logo
I know speech is protected at Davidson College. I see it all the time.

I know speech is protected at Davidson College. I see it all the time.

Yahoo06-04-2025
Conservative writer Andrew Dunn recently questioned whether Davidson College protects 'controversial' speech, particularly pro-Israel views.
I've spent the past few years at Davidson looking into, reporting on and teaching about the importance of free expression. Every issue of importance is being discussed on campus. But every false claim of censorship, as YAF alleged here, further roots in the public consciousness a distorted perception of colleges, who are stuck having to play Whack-a-Mole to correct the record.
A conservative student group, a chapter of Young Americans for Freedom (YAF), handed out an anti-Muslim pamphlet made available to them by national YAF to counter what they believed was an anti-Israel campus atmosphere. The group also retweeted what some considered transphobic. They then faced the usual student disciplinarian process and could choose between a hearing, where they could be found guilty or not guilty for harassment, or accept an accountability plan. They chose neither, convinced they were targeted for their beliefs.
But they weren't. The college was responding to complaints from other students, some of whom said they felt unsafe because of the pamphlet's contents, which was handed out near the student union's entrance. Davidson is required to take seriously every student concern for legal, practical and ethical reasons.
That's what triggered the potential hearing – not the group's stance on the Gaza war.
I know this because I know pro-Palestinian students and others have faced the same process disciplinarian, which is necessarily opaque because of privacy laws.
I know pro-Israel views are welcome because professors, students and staff shared them before the Oct. 7 Hamas terror attack on that country, and since.
I know because those voices can be so loud and persistent that they can pressure the college to cancel a Jewish speaker critical of Israel, as happened just weeks ago. (The college didn't cave.)
I know because I have colleagues holding pro-Palestinian views who've rethought public presentations for fear of being falsely labeled antisemitic.
I know because colleagues expert on the long-complex history of the Israel-Palestine conflict led well-attended teach-ins on the subject. They explained every side of the issue from an educational rather than ideological perspective.
I know because students have shared those views in my classes during deliberative discussions and debates infused with passion.
Here's what's also true:
Students, faculty and staff often disagree about this subject, and many others.
Many often feel reluctant to speak openly about this Israel-Gaza, and many other subjects. They fear the judgment of peers – a human instinct not unique to college campuses.
Many of us even disagree about the nature of the student disciplinary process. Should speech of any sort short of flagrant-obvious harassment – like the hurling of epithets or stalking – be subject to that process? Or maybe it would be better to allow students to resolve uncomfortable disputes among themselves.
Many Davidson students, faculty and staff disagree about when free expression advances or hampers the college's mission. When a student spreads misinformation on an important topic, should the college remain neutral to honor that student's right to speak freely? Or point out the falsehoods and correct them? If so, how can that be done in a way that doesn't feel punitive?
What if a professor's expression of personal beliefs makes it less likely students will engage in class, even if inadvertently. Should the college step in?
Colleges aren't gloried debate clubs who don't care about facts or the context in which they need to be grounded, the kinds of exchanges regularly on display in prime time on cable news.
Free expression is a right. But it comes with responsibilities, particularly for institutions of higher education whose objective is greater than simply gathering together people to exchange words no matter if truth is cultivated or undermined.
It's hard to determine where to draw the line between protected speech on a college campus, and that which should be shunned. But trying to get it right becomes more difficult each time an underinformed argument misleads the public about what we do and who we are.
Issac Bailey is a McClatchy opinion writer in North Carolina and South Carolina.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump administration to release billions in frozen education funds
Trump administration to release billions in frozen education funds

Axios

time24 minutes ago

  • Axios

Trump administration to release billions in frozen education funds

The Trump administration will release more than $5 billion in frozen funds for schools, the Department of Education announced Friday. The big picture: The administration has been facing bipartisan pressure to release the funds, with GOP senators issuing a public plea. Driving the news: The White House Office of Management and Budget completed a review of Title I-C, Title II-A, Title III-A, and Title IV-A ESEA funds and Title II WIOA funds and directed the Education Department to release them, department spokesperson Madi Biedermann said in an emailed statement. The agency will begin dispersing funds to states next week, she added. What they're saying: Sen. Shelley Moore Capito ( who was among the Republican lawmakers who signed onto a letter urging the administration to release the funding, said Friday that the funding supports critical programs people rely on. "The programs are ones that enjoy longstanding, bipartisan support like after-school and summer programs that provide learning and enrichment opportunities for school aged children, which also enables their parents to work and contribute to local economies, and programs to support adult learners working to gain employment skills, earn workforce certifications, or transition into postsecondary education, Capito said.

Moderate Dems get tougher on Netanyahu
Moderate Dems get tougher on Netanyahu

Politico

timean hour ago

  • Politico

Moderate Dems get tougher on Netanyahu

With help from Joe Gould, Phelim Kine and Daniel Lippman Subscribe here | Email Eric The rapidly deteriorating humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip is causing even some of Israel's staunchest defenders in the Democratic party to pile some harsh criticism on the U.S. ally. The top Democrats on the Senate Armed Services, Intelligence, Foreign Relations and Judiciary Committees and relevant foreign policy and defense Appropriations subcommittees issued a joint statement today calling on President DONALD TRUMP to apply more pressure on Israeli Prime Minister BENJAMIN NETANYAHU to end the war in the Gaza Strip and restore the distribution of food and other humanitarian aid into the territory. None of these Democrats — Sens. JEANNE SHAHEEN of New Hampshire, JACK REED of Rhode Island, MARK WARNER of Virginia, DICK DURBIN of Illinois, CHRIS COONS of Delaware and BRIAN SCHATZ of Hawaii — are avowed critics of Israel. Most have only rebuked Israel periodically since the Gaza war broke out and have supported aid to Israel throughout their careers. And they join a whole host of pro-Israel Democrats who have voiced their discomfort with Israel's actions over the course of this week. That includes Sen. MARK KELLY (D-Ariz.), who on Tuesday became one of the first prominent Democratic moderates to do so, and Sen. AMY KLOBUCHAR (D-Minn.), the third-highest ranking Democratic leader in the Senate. Klobuchar issued a sharp rebuke to Israel in a floor speech Thursday. On the House side, Rep. RITCHIE TORRES (D-N.Y.) got into a spat Thursday on X with Rep. RANDY FINE (R-Fla.) after Fine said that Palestinians should 'starve away' in the Gaza Strip until Hamas released the remaining Israeli hostages in its captivity. Torres has previously come under fire from critics of Israel for at times being too dismissive about the plight of Palestinians in the enclave. The moderates are sounding more and more like progressives, who have been lashing out at Israel for its approach to the Gaza war and calling on the White House across two administrations to use every tool possible to push Netanyahu to alleviate human suffering in the enclave. It's a critical moment in the conflict. The Israel-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has struggled to distribute aid to Palestinians in the enclave, exacerbating widespread starvation in the territory. Israeli troops are accused of firing on Palestinians seeking aid, killing hundreds of Palestinian civilians in recent weeks. Israel has downplayed concerns about the inadequacy of humanitarian aid, blaming Hamas for the violence associated with aid not getting to people and arguing it's a question of inadequate distribution, not volume, of aid entering the territory. The Trump administration has repeatedly pointed the finger at Hamas for the plight of Palestinians in the enclave. Some Democrats have acknowledged in recent weeks that they're facing considerably more pressure to call out Israeli actions in the Gaza Strip from the base. But don't expect the Democratic Party to abandon Israel anytime soon. The pro-Israel group Democratic Majority for Israel, a major player in Democratic primaries, put out a statement today that principally singled out Hamas for the issues with aid. A number of Senate Democratic defenders of Israel, including Minority Leader CHUCK SCHUMER and Sen. JOHN FETTERMAN (D-Penn.), have also not spoken out. Most Republicans, meanwhile, are keeping mum, making it deeply unlikely the worsening crisis in Gaza moves the White House to use its leverage on Netanyahu. The Inbox MUSK'S OTHER SHUTDOWN: ELON MUSK ordered the shutdown of vital Starlink communications satellite services for Ukraine along the frontline in September 2022, according to a Reuters report. The cut affected service around Kherson, which Ukraine was attempting to reclaim from Russia, and areas in eastern Ukraine. The Starlink shutdown led to the failure of a Ukrainian operation to retake the town of Beryslav, a Ukrainian military official told Reuters. Starlink terminals are vital to Ukraine's military operations, serving as the communications linchpin between command, drone and artillery units. The U.S. military is also increasingly using Starlinks for its own forces. It's not clear why Musk ordered the shutdown. However, the cut-off happened around the time when U.S. officials believed Russia might use a nuclear weapon to attack Ukraine. Reuters also reveals other findings that Musk ordered the shutdown of Starlink services in Russian-occupied Crimea in September 2022 to prevent a Ukrainian attack on Russian ships there. Musk later said he had not shut down services but rather never activated them in Crimea. WORSENING FIREFIGHT IN ASIA: Fighting between Thailand and Cambodia along their border continued into today, forcing thousands of civilians on both sides to flee the area. The two countries have been in talks for a ceasefire. But with them trading fire from powerful rocket launchers and artillery, that's looking increasingly unlikely. Acting Thai Prime Minister PHUMTHAM WECHAYACHAI said the conflict could become a war, threatening yet greater violence between the two historic adversaries. Thailand has accused Cambodia of intentionally targeting civilians. The brewing conflict could complicate efforts for the U.S. to counter China in the Indo-Pacific. Thailand, the militarily more powerful nation, is a close U.S. ally. Cambodia is more aligned with China, Vietnam and Russia, from whom it has received military supplies. NUDGING A NUKE DEAL: With the New START Treaty set to expire in 195 days, arms control advocates are urging Trump and Russian President VLADIMIR PUTIN to strike an interim deal to avoid a surge in nuclear weapons. 'Unless Trump and Putin reach an interim deal to maintain existing limits, we could soon see each side increasing the size of their deployed nuclear arsenals for the first time in more than 35 years by uploading warheads on existing missiles, which is no one's interests,' DARYL KIMBALL, executive director of the Arms Control Association, said in a statement. The comments came after Trump signaled support for renewed talks, telling Russia's TASS, 'We are starting to work on that. That is a big problem for the world, when you take off nuclear restrictions, that's a big problem.' SOME NEWS ON THE HOME FRONT: Are you a NatSec Daily reader who also cares deeply about the economic changes the Trump administration is ushering in? We have good news for you. POLITICO's flagship financial newsletter has a new Friday edition built for the economic era we're living in: one shaped by political volatility, disruption and a wave of policy decisions with sector-wide consequences. Each week, Morning Money: Capital Risk brings sharp reporting and analysis on how political risk is moving markets and how investors are to know how health care regulation, tariffs or court rulings could ripple through the economy? Start here. The first issue dropped today. Read it here. IT'S FRIDAY! WELCOME TO THE WEEKEND: Thanks for tuning in to NatSec Daily! This space is reserved for the top U.S. and foreign officials, the lawmakers, the lobbyists, the experts and the people like you who care about how the natsec sausage gets made. Aim your tips and comments at ebazail@ and follow Eric on X @ebazaileimil. While you're at it, follow the rest of POLITICO's global security team on social media: @dave_brown24, @HeidiVogt, @jessicameyers, @RosiePerper, @ @PhelimKine, @felschwartz, @connorobrienNH, @paulmcleary, @reporterjoe, @JackDetsch, @samuelskove, @magmill95, @johnnysaks130 and @delizanickel Keystrokes LIE TO ME: The five leading Chinese artificial intelligence chatbots provided false or unhelpful information more than half the time in a test run by analytics company NewsGuard, the company said today. In the test, the company presented chatbots with 10 false narratives spread by Chinese official media and pro-Chinese media. The narratives included that the U.S. had severed relations with China and that Taiwan was calling up draftees in preparation for war with China. In 40 percent of cases, the chatbots — Ernie, DeepSeek, MiniMax, Qwen and Yuanbao — presented false information. In 20 percent of cases, the chatbots did not debunk the false narratives. In one case, a chatbot presented Chinese government policy on Taiwan without being explicitly asked to do so. The failure rates were similar in Mandarin and English. It's a troubling finding for users in China, but also elsewhere as Chinese chatbots are increasingly popular across the world. The Complex NASA EXODUS: NASA will lose 20 percent or more of its staff, including thousands of senior personnel, under a Trump administration push to slim the federal government, Sam reports in POLITICO's Space newsletter. The voluntary departures include 2,892 civil servants in the agency's GS-13 through GS-15 pay levels — senior positions reserved for those with significant technical or managerial responsibilities, like planning Mars missions or leading work on space telescopes. The losses could affect U.S. plans to land astronauts on the moon by 2027, a key goal as the U.S. races to beat China back to the lunar surface. In an open letter to interim NASA Administrator Sean Duffy, a group of current and former NASA employees protested this week that the departures would eliminate 'highly specialized, irreplaceable knowledge crucial to carrying out NASA's mission.' Still, the departures, which the administration has incentivized through a range of offerings to employees, may not be enough for the Trump administration. The White House wants to cut over 5,000 staff from NASA from its 2024 staffing level, meaning that NASA may have to fire more than 1,000 additional staff. POLISH ARMS: The United States on Friday announced a $4 billion loan guarantee to Poland under the Foreign Military Financing program, a big boon for one of the NATO allies most in the Trump administration's good graces. The announcement did not name any specific acquisition programs that the loan guarantee might support. Poland has gone on a buying spree of U.S. arms in recent years, a binge that has included 96 Apache helicopters and over 400 High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems. 'Poland remains one of America's strongest and most dependable allies in Europe,' State Department spokesperson TAMMY BRUCE said in a statement. Poland's spending of more than 4 percent of its gross domestic product on its military places it favorably among European nations for the Trump administration, which has pressed for NATO members to spend five percent of GDP on defense. NATO members agreed to hit this goal by 2035 at the most recent summit. Poland aims to hit that number by 2026, officials have previously said. Broadsides CHINA CRIES COLONIALISM: The Chinese government's hands-off approach to the worsening cross-border military skirmishes between U.S. treaty ally Thailand and China-aligned Cambodia isn't curbing Beijing from blaming Western countries for the dispute. 'The root cause of this issue stems from the legacy of Western colonialism from years past, and now requires a calm and prudent approach to resolution,' Chinese Foreign Minister WANG YI told ASEAN Secretary-General KAO KIM HOURN in Beijing today, per a Chinese Foreign Ministry statement. Wang made clear Beijing is leaving it to ASEAN — of which Cambodia and Thailand are both members — to undertake 'mediation efforts' between Bangkok and Phnom Penh to end the fighting. As in Ukraine, the conflict provides Beijing a real-time opportunity to observe and analyze military tactics and the relative performance of U.S. and Chinese-supplied weaponry. Transitions — DILLON McGREGOR is now acting assistant secretary for legislative affairs at the Department of Homeland Security. He most recently was a senior adviser at DHS. — BRIAN SATTLER is now strategic planner for the senior adviser to the secretary for the Coast Guard. He most recently was director for maritime and industrial capacity at the National Security Council. — PALOMA CHACON has been promoted to press secretary for the Department of Homeland Security. — RAVI SINGH has been promoted to be senior vice president and CFO of the Export-Import Bank of the United States. — JOEL VALDEZ is now acting deputy press secretary for the Pentagon. He most recently was communications director and senior adviser for Rep. LAUREN BOEBERT (R-Colo.) and has previously worked for MATT GAETZ. What to Read — Glenn Gerstell, The New York Times: Remember the TikTok Ban? Does Anyone? — Marton Dunai, The Financial Times: Could Hungary's faltering economy topple Orbán? — Katharine Houreld, The Washington Post: As Kenya's protests intensified, two friends bled on opposite sides Monday Today — Washington Institute for Near East Policy, 11 a.m.: Violence in Suwayda: No 'Plan B' for Syria? — Hudson Institute, 4:30 p.m.: What Taiwan Can Learn from Ukraine's Battlefield Experience. Thanks to our editors, Heidi Vogt and Emily Lussier, who provide us with false or unhelpful information more than half the time.

Trump tells Israel to ‘finish the job' against Hamas weeks after suggesting ceasefire deal in sight
Trump tells Israel to ‘finish the job' against Hamas weeks after suggesting ceasefire deal in sight

CNN

timean hour ago

  • CNN

Trump tells Israel to ‘finish the job' against Hamas weeks after suggesting ceasefire deal in sight

Donald Trump The Middle East Israel-Hamas warFacebookTweetLink Follow Only a few weeks ago, President Donald Trump seemed confident a deal was days away that would end the fighting in Gaza, secure the release of hostages and allow aid to flow into an enclave where people are starving to death. Now, Trump's optimism seems to have vanished. The president pulled back his negotiators from ceasefire talks this week after the US deemed Hamas neither 'coordinated' nor 'acting in good faith.' Steve Witkoff, Trump's Middle East envoy, said he was looking into 'alternative options' for getting the hostages out. And Trump, rather than urging an immediate return to the negotiating table, signaled Friday it was time for Israel to escalate its military campaign, even as images of starving children in Gaza lead to mounting global outrage. 'I think they want to die, and it's very, very bad,' Trump said of Hamas before leaving for a weekend trip to Scotland. 'It got to be to a point where you're gonna have to finish the job.' Whether Trump's shift in posture is a true reflection of the talks breaking down — or, as some Western officials suggested, a tactical step meant to jolt Hamas and break a deadlock — wasn't clear. But his words suggested he would do little to pressure Israel to pull back on its 21-month-long military campaign in Gaza, despite a growing humanitarian crisis that led one UN official this week to label Gazans 'walking corpses.' Trump declined to describe his recent conversations with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu — whose actions in Gaza and Syria this month have surprised and frustrated him — beyond calling them 'sort of disappointing.' 'They're gonna have to fight and they're gonna have to clean it up. You're gonna have to get rid of 'em,' Trump said of Israel going after Hamas. It was a stark acknowledgement from the president that his attempts to broker a new ceasefire — which seemed earlier this month in its final stages — had fallen off course. A failure to end the Gaza conflict, along with his parallel struggles to end Russia's war in Ukraine, have proven frustrating for Trump as he jockeys for a Nobel Peace Prize. His pessimism did not entirely match other signals emerging from the region. Egypt and Qatar said they would move forward in mediating for a lasting ceasefire in Gaza, calling the latest suspension in talks 'normal in the context of these complex negotiations,' according to a joint statement posted by the Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. A senior Israeli official told CNN that the talks have 'not at all' collapsed, and said there is still an opportunity for the negotiations to resume. And some US officials said they hoped both the president's comments Friday, paired with the decision by Witkoff on Thursday to pull back from the ceasefire talks, would push Hamas into a more conciliatory negotiating stance. Still, the United States' sudden pull back sent shockwaves Thursday night through Doha, the Qatari capital where the negotiations have been taking place. 'This is an earthquake,' said one source with direct knowledge of the talks. 'We're dealing with the aftershock.' As has been the case for months, the sticking points in the talks include how and when the war will end permanently, the number of Palestinian prisoners who will be released and where the Israeli military will redeploy in Gaza, according to people familiar with the negotiations. Speaking to reporters Friday on the South Lawn as his helicopter awaited, Trump blamed the breakdown in talks squarely on Hamas, which he said had seen its leverage diminished after dozens of its hostages were either released or died in custody. 'Now we're down to the final hostages, and they know what happens after you get the final hostages, and basically, because of that, they really didn't want to make a deal,' Trump said, echoing a sentiment that one US official said Netanyahu conveyed when he met with Trump for dinner at the White House earlier this month. Whether Trump's comments will actually pressure Hamas into agreeing to the existing proposal to end the war remains to be seen, but they did appear designed in part to try to jog Hamas back to the realm of what is achievable. In the wake of Witkoff's Thursday statement, the senior Israeli official said Israel hopes Hamas will 'reconnect itself to reality' so the remaining gaps can be bridged. Speaking to CNN on Friday, State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce predicted Trump and Witkoff's efforts would eventually yield results, though she declined to indicate what direction the talks would head next. 'We've tried. The world has watched this. What the options are — clearly there are many tools in President Trump's tool chest, many options that Special Envoy Witkoff has,' Bruce told Kate Bolduan. 'So, they are very smart, adept individuals who know the players. And I expect that we'll have some success.' Neither Bruce, nor Trump, nor any other administration official seemed willing to place a timeline on when that success might come, perhaps wary after Trump predicted in early July that a deal would be struck within a week. But as the starvation crisis in Gaza spirals into a humanitarian catastrophe, urgency is growing to complete a deal. During a meeting in Tunis on Friday, Tunisian President Kais Saied presented Trump's senior Africa adviser Massad Boulos — who is also the father-in-law of Trump's daughter Tiffany — with photos of malnourished children, desperate for food and eating sand. 'It is absolutely unacceptable,' Saied could be heard saying, according to AFP. 'It is a crime against all of humanity.' At the White House, Trump said it was Hamas that was preventing aid from being distributed. And he said the US hadn't received enough credit for the help it had already provided. 'People don't know this, and we didn't certainly get any acknowledgement or thank you, but we contributed $60 million to food and supplies and everything else,' he said. 'We hope the money gets there, because you know, that money gets taken. The food gets taken. We're going to do more, but we gave a lot of money.' An internal US government review found no evidence of widespread theft by Hamas of US-funded humanitarian aid in Gaza. Meanwhile, top US allies have adopted a tougher stance on Israel's military campaign. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, whom Trump will meet in Scotland this weekend, on Friday said 'Israel's disproportionate military escalation in Gaza' was 'indefensible.' And French President Emmanuel Macron, in a surprise late night social media post, said France would move to recognize a Palestinian state at September's United Nations General Assembly, a step that angered Israel and that US Secretary of State Marco Rubio called 'a slap in the face to the victims of October 7th.' Trump sounded less troubled by the move, which he instead dismissed as pointless. 'The statement doesn't carry any weight,' he said. 'He's a very good guy. I like him. But that statement doesn't carry weight.' CNN's Jeremy Diamond and Jennifer Hansler contributed to this story.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store