logo
Cowboy builder charged families £100k for their dream kitchens and then never installed them

Cowboy builder charged families £100k for their dream kitchens and then never installed them

Daily Mail​a day ago

A rogue kitchen fitter who took £100,000 from families, ripped out their kitchens and fled with their money has been jailed.
Jamie Brown, 56, left 19 families in utter despair when he turned their homes upside down, ignored their messages and then finally admitted he would not be returning to finish the job or hand back their cash.
In one particularly cruel betrayal, he ripped out the kitchen of a couple who were weeks away from having a baby, but never returned to fit a new one, leaving them with a home in tatters as they juggled the first few months of their newborn's life.
The dodgy builder, who lives in a detached newbuild house in Bristol, ran his company Brown and Son Interiors, which flaunts a string of fully completed kitchen installations on its Instagram page.
Meanwhile, his LinkedIn profile boasts 'over 25 years of experience' carrying out 'quality, fully guaranteed kitchen installations in and around the South West and Wales'.
However, the reality could not be more different as families were conned out of their life savings and left with a hollow shell where their kitchen once stood.
In what seemed like a cruel joke, the father continued to go on holidays, with his wife Nina posting pictures of their travels on Facebook for his victims to see.
Was your home ruined by this man? Email: katherine.lawton@mailonline.co.uk
Brown appeared at Bristol Crown Court to be sentenced on 19 counts of theft in a prosecution brought by South Gloucestershire Council's Trading Standards department.
Nine of his victims also attended court to see his sentencing, and hear the circumstances around how he stole from them over the spring and summer of 2023.
Prosecuting, Lee Reynolds told the court how Brown was very keen to be hired to undertake work, most of which was to fit new kitchens.
He said a pattern emerged, which saw him warn prospective customers they needed to agree to the job and pay up front quickly or prices would go up. However, once money had changed hands, he would be evasive and elusive.
Brown would arrive to start the job, ripping out kitchens and often leaving them there, but disappear again and give a variety of excuses about why he was not returning to begin work to fit a new one, the court heard.
Many of his victims eventually discovered they had ordered and paid for new kitchens through him, but he had not even purchased the kitchens from the retail suppliers, such as Howdens and Magnet.
This continued until September 2023, when customers received texts, the first informing them that Brown had 'had a mental breakdown', and a second informing them that his company had gone into liquidation and they would not be receiving any money back or any new kitchens.
Mr Reynolds said: 'One victim says that she was totally devastated by what had happened. This wiped out her savings. Another said it had taken him three years to save the money for a new kitchen and had been left without a kitchen at all.
'He had to take out a loan of £7,000 for another kitchen, which will take him six years to repay.
'Another victim had been told by Mr Brown that he had until 5pm that day to lock in the price for a new kitchen, and paid the money the next day, and the existing kitchen was removed in the August.
'This was a cause of high emotional stress and anxiety at a time when his wife was nine months pregnant, and they were left without basic facilities for their newborn baby, as well as losing £12,500,' Mr Reynolds added.
One victim said the scale of Brown's serial offending only came to light when staff at kitchen suppliers Howdens told her she was not the only one - when they broke the news to her that the father never paid for the kitchen she'd ordered.
South Gloucestershire Council's Trading Standards were notified after the September liquidation of his company, Brown and Son Interiors. They began an investigation, finding he had done the same thing before, with a previous company called JR Brown Interior Installations Ltd.
In fact, the investigation discovered that on the same day he was telling customers of the first company that he couldn't do the work and they'd lost their money, he was cunningly setting up the second company to continue his conmanship.
'We were moving into a new house in Keynsham and it needed a whole new kitchen,' said one victim, who was in court to see Brown jailed.
'We paid £14,000 up front of £27,000 in total so he could order the kitchen, and he sent a plasterer and then an electrician to prepare the kitchen, but then told us we'd have to pay them too, and he'd take it off the final bill.
'He ripped out our kitchen and then left us. We didn't have running water, no way of cooking, no washing machine. We rigged up a temporary thing in the garage, but he left it and that went on for ten weeks, with different excuses.
'In the end I rang Howdens and they said they could deliver the kitchen, but it would have to be paid for. That's when I realised for sure what was going on, it was devastating,' she added.
In the almost two years since, the victim said the Trading Standards department at South Gloucestershire Council had been 'incredible' in supporting the victims and putting the case together.
'What made it worse was that he continued to go on all these lovely holidays. His wife would post pictures of them going on holidays, one after another, all the time. I stopped looking because she blocked me on Facebook, but friends would send me screenshots. I was left thinking ''these are holidays we should be going on, not him''.
'I gathered all the evidence of that in the period since, and submitted it to the Trading Standards prosecutors and it added to the exacerbating factors of the offending,' she added.
Brown was eventually charged with 19 counts of theft, alongside his wife Nina, who was listed as a company director at the time. The case against Nina was formally discontinued in court last week.
Brown initially pleaded 'not guilty' to the charges at a series of court hearings last winter and a trial date was set for April 2026. But in April he changed his plea to 'guilty', admitting 19 counts of theft.
There was some dispute in court about the total amount of money he had stolen. The prosecution opened their case and put the amount at £101,602.91, but Brown's defence counsel David Sapiecha said the true figure was £84,817.
In mitigation, Mr Sapiecha told Bristol Crown Court that Brown had been a man of previous good character who hadn't set up the companies with the intention of stealing from people, but 'things had become too much for him'.
'He is not ingrained dishonest, he's someone who acted dishonestly for a period,' Mr Sapiecha said. 'He believed one day things could be put right.'
He told the court that the couple are now in the process of selling their home and the proceeds would be used to pay back every penny to people who lost money.
Judge James Patrick said the benchmark sentence for such an offence was three years, but with his age, good character and other mitigation, he would bring this down to 18 months.
He told Brown he was close to accepting Mr Sapiecha's submission that he could be dealt with through a suspended sentence, but decided the level of offending, the number of victims and the devastation they had gone through were such that only a prison sentence would do.
'You lied and lied consistently,' said Judge Patrick. 'This is not even a case where you were robbing Peter to pay Paul. You were going in, ripping up kitchens and spinning the lie that there was going to be jam tomorrow, but there never was.
'That left a huge inconvenience to people. It is to your credit that you've put your house up for sale, but these people are still to be compensated and it's June 2025 now, and they've also suffered huge emotional distress.
'I bear in mind the effect this will have on your life, but I've concluded it's not possible to avoid a custodial sentence,' he said, telling Brown he will serve at least 40 per cent of the 18 months in prison before he can be released on licence.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dartmoor dairy farm 10-year ban for chronic neglect of cattle
Dartmoor dairy farm 10-year ban for chronic neglect of cattle

BBC News

time34 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Dartmoor dairy farm 10-year ban for chronic neglect of cattle

A family who ran a Dartmoor dairy farm have been banned from keeping animals for ten years due to chronic neglect of their Dunn, 50, of East Barton Farm, Exbourne, Devon, admitted 22 food hygiene offences and 24 animal welfare charges at Exeter Magistrates' parents Rosamund Dunn, 76, and Edmund Dunn, 79, admitted ten animal welfare judge Stuart Smith said the hygiene concerns at their milk parlour risked the health of the public who bought their milk products. He added that animal carcasses were found around the farms, lame and emaciated cows had to be euthanised by vets, animals were never treated for their ailments and they were living in hazardous conditions on the farm. 'Buried in mud' The judge said animals were surrounded by rubbish, including pipes, gas canisters, cables, metal sheets and old tyres as they tried to get to water and said one carcass was buried in mud and had been there for days or weeks. Another dead cow was lying in a slurry channel risking contamination of the water Herc Ashworth said William Dunn was 'overwhelmed' by the task and despite getting plenty of advice and support, things just got defence lawyer said these were 'distressing and serious offences' and claimed the family were struggling to recover from Covid when staff were laid off and costs increased by £25,000 a month. Three months to sell The lawyer said: "William Dunn was a one man band. It was a large farm operation with one person to manage the whole thing."The Dunns admitted a number of offences in the prosecutions brought by Trading Standards and the Food Standards have been given three months to sell their 170 strong herd owned by the Dunn parents, with William Dunn running the parents were also fined £3,053 each and William Dunn was fined a total of £27,000.

Two arrested after man found seriously injured in Shirebrook
Two arrested after man found seriously injured in Shirebrook

BBC News

time34 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Two arrested after man found seriously injured in Shirebrook

Two people have been arrested on suspicion of wounding with intent after a man was found with serious injuries in Police said it was made aware a man had been admitted to hospital on Saturday 28 June after an incident in or around The Gate Inn pub on King Edward Street earlier in the force added it is still trying to establish how the man came to be injured and is aware of a video circulating on social media - but urged people not to share the video and send it directly to police. Two men aged 22 and 20-year-old have been arrested on suspicion of wounding with intent. The 22-year old has been released on bail while the 20-year-old remains in custody. Police are appealing for anyone with CCTV or dashcam footage from the Main Street area of Shirebrook to come forward.

British law firm coached universities on how to obtain sweeping protest bans
British law firm coached universities on how to obtain sweeping protest bans

The Guardian

time36 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

British law firm coached universities on how to obtain sweeping protest bans

A law firm that helped a UK university obtain a year-long ban on unauthorised protests, which could lead to students being jailed for up to two years, has quietly coached several others on how to take similar legal action, the Guardian can reveal. Shakespeare Martineau LLP, which represented Cardiff University during proceedings that led to it being granted a sweeping anti-protest injunction this month, promoted the controversial type of court order to universities at a webinar last October, according to documents obtained by the Guardian and Liberty Investigates under the Freedom of Information Act. Cardiff staff and students could now face prison and unlimited fines for holding protests on large stretches of their campus without permission, which must be sought three weeks in advance. It follows conflict between the university and students over a pro-Palestine encampment on campus. Lawyers who argued against the injunction said it was so broad that it potentially covered all unauthorised protest-related activity ranging from industrial action to bake sales – though Cardiff disputes this – while a UN watchdog for protests rights called the move a 'flagrant violation of international human rights law'. When approached for comment, a Shakespeare Martineau spokesperson said this interpretation was 'inaccurate', insisting the injunction related only to 'unlawful encampments'. They reiterated that the order did not not prohibit 'lawful' protest, where the university had given its permission. But two independent legal experts who examined the order's wording agreed that it could apply to other protest activities besides encampments. Other universities that registered for the webinar include Reading, Exeter, Northumbria, Hertfordshire, Birkbeck, Bath Spa and Liverpool John Moores. Spokespeople for these universities variously said their staff commonly attended webinars and attendance did not mean they had adopted or agreed with the measures discussed, while Exeter and Northumbria said their staff had not attended but received slides. Falmouth and Warwick, whose staff were also recorded as having attended, did not respond to requests for comment. Slides from the webinar show Shakespeare Martineau suggested the 'newcomer injunctions' – so called because they can be used 'against persons unknown' and those not involved in protests at the time it was made – like that taken out by Cardiff could represent 'the future' for universities. One attender asked whether the use of injunctions could 'be seen as attempting to curtail [freedom of speech] unlawfully', according to notes provided by a university. The presenter said: 'No I don't see any difficulty in principle with that […] You would of course need to show to the court that the restrictions imposed by an injunction do not interfere with freedom of speech and that you can demonstrate this is a proportionate response.' But the European Legal Support Centre, which has intervened in four university injunction cases, including Cardiff, said the tactic represented a 'chilling precedent for academic institutions', calling the injunctions 'legally complex and financially impractical for affected students to challenge in court'. Gina Romero, the UN special rapporteur for freedom of assembly, said 'profiting from the […] curtailing of human rights is despicable', in comments critical of the law firms' promotion of the tactic to universities. Last week England's Office for Students published guidance due to take effect in August, advising universities against making 'sweeping' protest restrictions. While the move has been welcomed by free speech lawyers, they have cautioned that it will not stop universities applying for injunctions and will need to be tested in court. Twelve-month temporary injunctions were this week month granted to two Cambridge colleges, as well as a temporary injunction at a third. Smita Jamdar, the head of education at Shakespeare Martineau, said it was working with universities to facilitate peaceful protests while dealing with unlawful encampments and trespass. She said: 'Universities are dealing with complex situations on campus every single day. Understandably, many institutions are seeking guidance on how to manage a whole host of situations effectively and safely, while upholding the law and balancing the rights and freedoms of the whole campus community.' A spokesperson for Cardiff University said it remained 'absolutely committed to free speech and to the right to peaceful protest' but had seen 'an escalation in practices that put protesters and the community at risk'. Cardiff's injunction is due to be reviewed in July 2026.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store