Donald Trump teases third term: Would that be possible?
Despite the clear restrictions of the 22nd Amendment, which caps presidents to two terms, Trump insists there are 'methods' and 'loopholes'.
Speaking to TIME magazine on 25 April, Trump revealed that these loopholes are 'well known,' though he claims he does not believe in using them.
The president has been candid about the interest he's receiving. 'I have more people begging me to run again' he told TIME, according to People .
'But the only thing that's changed is they think I'm doing a great job, and they like the way I'm running the country'.
One of the most talked-about loopholes involves Vice President J.D. Vance running in the 2028 election on a Vance-Trump ticket.
The plan would see Vance resign after winning, allowing Donald Trump to step in.
When asked directly if he would pursue this strategy, Trump dodged the question and instead boasted about his cognitive test results.
He claimed he 'aced it 100%' and challenging interviewers to match his score.
The 22nd Amendment, ratified in 1951 after Franklin D. Roosevelt's four terms, explicitly forbids anyone from being elected president more than twice.
Amending this would require a two-thirds majority in both houses of Congress and ratification by three-quarters of the states-a Herculean task, especially given the political climate.
South Africans watching this political drama unfold might find echoes in their own constitutional debates. The idea of bending or bypassing constitutional limits resonates globally.
It reminds us of the importance of strong democratic institutions and the rule of law. Trump's claims also highlight how political figures can challenge norms and stir controversy, even from afar.
Trump's supporters remain enthusiastic. Steve Bannon, a former adviser, said in March, 'A figure like this appears once every century, if we're fortunate. We've got him now'.
Meanwhile, Republican leaders have cautiously acknowledged the constitutional hurdles. House Speaker Mike Johnson remarked, 'There are constitutional ways to amend the rules, but it's a high bar'.
As Trump continues to tantalise with the possibility of a third term, the world watches closely. Will he attempt to rewrite the rulebook, or will constitutional limits hold firm?
For now, Donald Trump's hints and boasts keep the political theatre alive-and South Africans, like the rest of the world, remain intrigued by this unfolding saga.
In the words of Trump himself: 'I'm doing a good job… and unlike every other president, I took the cognitive test and I aced it 100%'.
Time will tell if that confidence translates into a third term.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1.
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
an hour ago
- The South African
'A great pity': Ramaphosa slams DA's national dialogue withdrawal
President Cyril Ramaphosa said the national dialogue will continue without the input of the Democratic Alliance (DA). He was speaking at a joint media briefing with the President of Austria, Alexander van der Bellen, on Friday, 4 July. Ramaphosa described the DA's decision to withdraw from the national dialogue as 'hypocrisy'. He said it demonstrated a lack of principle. He said South Africans had called for a national conversation about the state of the country after 30 years of democracy. The head of the nation stressed that the dialogue is not a political platform but a collective discussion. Ramaphosa criticised the DA's withdrawal, saying it made no sense and was contradictory. He added that many South Africans were appalled by the party's behaviour. He expressed regret that the DA would deprive the people it represents of the opportunity to contribute to shaping the country's future. The president said the national dialogue will look at the country's governance and economic growth. As well as other aspects such as cultural, sports, and science-related matters. 'And I can name them all so that I can wet their [The DA] appetite. So that their tongues hang out and see that they are going to miss the biggest show in South Africa by defining themselves outside of the national dialogue. What a great pity,' Ramaphosa said. Ramaphosa added that he had anticipated the DA's withdrawal from the Government of National Unity (GNU) before the party pulled out of the national dialogue. This followed its member, Andrew Whitfield's axing from his position as deputy minister of trade and industry. At a media briefing on Friday, 27 June, DA leader John Steenhuisen also accused the African National Congress (ANC) of abusing its power. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 11. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Can Trump's unpredictable diplomacy lead to lasting peace?
Of all the accusations President Trump may face, he surely deserves credit for effort, at least, to end conflicts, particularly the Ukraine war. Image: AFP US President Donald Trump attracts an avalanche of international scrutiny for all the right reasons — he is, after all, the commander-in-chief of the world's most potent army and presides over an economy with significant global influence. Washington's penchant for a cantankerous foreign policy that is replete with unpredictability is also an added reason to the long list of why the US matters the most in international relations. However, of all the accusations President Trump may face, he surely deserves credit for effort, at least, to end conflicts, particularly the Ukraine war. His surprise telephone call to his Russian counterpart, President Vladimir Putin, this week, reveals the side of the US President that confirms his unpredictable human nature. The one minute, he is bombing Iran under the guise of thwarting Tehran's nuclear programme. The very next minute, he unilaterally announces the pending resumption of talks between the US and Iran aimed at ending the simmering tensions and military confrontation. Typically, Trump seems to revel in leaving his friends and foes alike wondering what his next move will be. Like a hurricane, he leaves everyone scrambling for cover in his wake. In East Central Africa, President Trump has recently succeeded, almost out of the blue, to bring about a peace treaty between long-term neighbouring adversaries in Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). According to the International Rescue Committee, from 1998-2007, an estimated 5.4 million people died as a result of conflict in the DRC, Africa's foremost producer of minerals and rare earths. Throughout many years until recently, Rwanda stood accused of providing military support to the notorious rebel group, the M23, that seeks to topple the DRC's democratically elected government. The African Union (AU) has been woefully unable to end the DRC conflict. The regional body, the Southern African Development Community (SADC), has attempted to halt the war through military intervention. However, the SADC army has been thoroughly overrun by the Rwanda-backed M23 rebel group, causing a major continental embarrassment as purported peace-keeping soldiers were forced to cut and run with tails between their legs. It has thus taken great effort from the Trump administration to intervene, and successfully so, in bringing the warring sides to Washington a fortnight ago to put pen to paper, thereby creating a rare sense of normalcy to Africa's territory that has so far known only terror. Granted, Trump's endorsement and material support for the Israeli genocide against Gaza leave too much to be desired. With naked impunity and US diplomatic cover, Israel continues to extinguish helpless Palestinians on whose plight the world, except South Africa, has deliberately turned a blind eye. So far, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu — aided by the US and EU — has killed nearly 60 000 Gazans since 2023. Nearly 20 000 of the victims are innocent children, including newborn babies in understaffed hospitals that the Western NGO's have elected to ignore. Methinks that if Trump never receives a Nobel Peace Prize, he so desperately aspires, Gaza will be the singular cause for that failure. But then again, nothing in life is ever 100% good or bad, at least in my book. Despite Trump's glaring litany of shortcomings, his unexpected nearly one-hour telephone call to President Putin, during which the elephant in the room was how to end the war in Ukraine, deserves merit. It happened during a time when some in Europe and Nato are desperately investing their time and resources in propaganda to peddle Russophobia, creating an atmosphere of foreboding fear about unsubstantiated claims of Moscow's dreaded secret intentions to conquer Europe one territory after the other. The Kremlin has consistently dismissed the war-mongering Western drums, dismissing the claims simply as ludicrous. During the Trump-Putin call, according to the Russian Presidential Aide, Yuri Ushakov, the discussions were cordial and meaningful and, above all, goal-oriented. Of greater importance, Trump raised 'the issue of an early end to hostilities in Ukraine'. In return, President Putin stressed that 'Russia continues to seek a negotiated solution to the Ukrainian conflict'. Although other issues were also discussed, the spirit of conviviality that characterised the discussion and their clear convergence of standpoints hint at the renewed path and hope that the road to a peace deal is getting clearer by the day. Finally, thanks to Trump, there is a thaw in bilateral relations between the two nuclear powers. Furthermore, the jovial discussions took place during a week in which Trump suspended the supply of US arms deliveries to Ukraine. This included a pause in the delivery of several critical munitions to Ukraine, including the patriot interceptors. Reports attributed the decision to Washington's concerns over dwindling US stockpiles. In my view, it matters less what the real reason could be. The move expedites the push toward the attainment of the much-needed truce in the Ukraine conflict. Too many lives have been lost, and unless there is a halt to the hostilities, and pretty soon, Ukraine could end up as one gigantic heap of rubble. The Trump administration's moves in global affairs, of course, affect every nation. But the greatest effects are inevitably felt across Europe, where Washington's traditional allies find themselves at the receiving end of devastating imposition of tariffs on various goods by the Trump administration. Additionally, at the level of Nato, the unity that until recently held the bloc together is rapidly disintegrating. Nato is no longer certain that, under Trump, the US still adheres to Article 5, which refers to 'an attack on one is an attack on all'. Instead, Trump has implored Europe to pull itself by the bootstraps and increase military expenditure to 5% of each country's GDP. This is a tall order. At the moment, many EU economies are reeling, and any expenditure on arms ahead of welfare, healthcare and social services is highly likely to trigger upheavals. This eventuality, the EU politicians are not prepared to face. Washington's push for peace in Ukraine has also forced Europe to rethink its aggressive propaganda against Russia, and instead, restart ways to seek a negotiated settlement. This week's out-of-the-blue call by the French President Emmanuel Macron to President Putin — the first in a long time — signalled Europe's acceptance that, without the US backing, the EU can no longer continue to threaten Russia with military force. Macron's call to his Russian counterpart follows the EU's years of demanding Russia's defeat, sending Scalp missiles, and spewing anti-Putin rhetoric. These latest moves, and a rare posture that cries out for peace talks, are a drastic change in the EU's foreign policy toward Moscow. The unprecedented barrage of economic sanctions that the EU had imposed on Moscow at the behest of the Biden administration has had a boomerang effect on Europe. It has caused EU economies to contract, such as Germany, and at the same time, the Russian economy flourished in spite of the sanctions. Europe's talk of going it alone if President Trump pushes for peace has dissipated very quickly. So has the talk of the so-called Coalition of the Willing led by the UK and France's Macron, aka 'Little Napoleon'. War talk, seemingly, has short legs. And now, as peace looms ever so large on the horizon, Moscow is insisting that the West address the fundamental causes of the Ukraine conflict, which is NATO's expansion eastward, especially to Russia's doorstep.
The Citizen
4 hours ago
- The Citizen
National dialogue: Ramaphosa slams DA ‘hypocrisy', says party will miss out on ‘biggest show in SA'
The president also questioned the DA's decision to remain in the GNU. President Cyril Ramaphosa has strongly criticised the Democratic Alliance (DA), accusing the party of hypocrisy after it pulled out of the much-anticipated national dialogue. The DA's decision followed Ramaphosa's removal of Andrew Whitfield as Deputy Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition. The party has opted to remain within the government of national unity (GNU) despite harsh criticism of the president's actions and threats to table a motion of no confidence. Ramaphosa on DA's withdrawal from national dialogue Addressing the matter at a press conference held at the Union Buildings in Pretoria alongside Austrian President Alexander Van der Bellen, Ramaphosa described the DA's withdrawal from the dialogue as both 'unfortunate' and a 'real shock to me'. He reminded the DA that all participating parties had agreed to the dialogue process when signing the GNU statement of intent. 'Every party signed to that, and it is rather surprising to hear a leader of the Democratic Alliance saying they never agreed to that in the first place.' 'That is the worst form of hypocrisy that I've ever heard,' the president said, in the presence of DA leader John Steenhuisen. ALSO READ: DA threats 'irresponsible': Ramaphosa 'amazed' at Steenhuisen's reaction over Whitfield dismissal Ramaphosa reiterated that the national dialogue was not a 'party political platform', but rather a collective initiative. He confirmed that the dialogue would proceed regardless of the DA's involvement. 'What is wrong with the dialogue? Nothing is wrong with the dialogue. It's about people getting together. 'So what I can say is that the national dialogue will continue without the participation of the Democratic Alliance, and we will probably have a very, very successful dialogue without diversionary inputs or interference from a party that does not have the interests of South Africans at heart.' 'The National Dialogue is a platform for all South Africans to craft a shared vision of the kind of a society we seek to build and agree on the actions we need to take to realise that vision. The dialogue will proceed as planned.' ~President @CyrilRamaphosa #AustriaInSA — The Presidency 🇿🇦 (@PresidencyZA) July 4, 2025 The president added that by refusing to participate, the DA was going to 'miss the biggest show in South Africa' that would discuss various issues. 'What a great pity,' Ramaphosa remarked. Ramaphosa insists national dialogue will proceed Former president Thabo Mbeki has also criticised the DA's stance in an open letter. Mbeki described the party's actions as both misguided and disrespectful to the South African public, dismissing the DA's claim that the dialogue was merely an ANC election campaign platform. Ramaphosa reacted to Mbeki's sentiments. 'He's also appalled, as many South Africans are appalled at the behaviour of the Democratic Alliance.' READ MORE: 'Bring all to dialogue': Experts insist national dialogue must be people-driven He further questioned the logic behind the DA's continued presence in the GNU while opposing the national dialogue. 'It's the strangest behaviour I've ever seen. And when they met, we thought that they were going to withdraw from the government of national unity. What did they come with? 'They come with saying no, no, no, no; we want to stay in the government of national unity, but we're boycotting the people of South Africa. 'What a contradiction. It makes no sense. So national dialogue will go on,' Ramaphosa concluded. Steenhuisen pushes back Meanwhile, Steenhuisen questioned the timing and setting of Ramaphosa's remarks. 'I don't think that intemperate attacks on a public platform when you have a visiting head of state next to you is the appropriate forum to do that,' he told the media. The DA leader said he intended to discuss with the president his appointment to the inter-ministerial committee (IMC) overseeing the national dialogue. 'I never asked to be on the IMC.' Responding to Mbeki's letter, Steenhuisen claimed the dialogue was 'an inside closed shop deal with the ANC.' 'Clearly, there's been a free flow of information, meetings, discussions around budgets and etc. that have not even taken place with members of the government of national unity. 'The first I found out that there was a R700 million price tag on this thing was when I read it in the media.' Steenhuisen maintained the dialogue was an ANC strategy to rebuild political support ahead of the 2026 local elections. He further contended that the matters set for discussion in the dialogue would not be effectively implemented by ministers linked to corruption scandals. 'A dialogue isn't going to feed anybody. It's not going to build a single house. 'It's not going to create a single other job and nothing we do or say is going to do that unless we get out there and vigorously implement the medium-term development plan, which is the adopted program of government,' Steenhuisen added. NOW READ: 'Hijacked' by the ANC? Maimane issues National Dialogue warning
