logo
Family of Israeli hostage held in Gaza accuses Hamas of starving him

Family of Israeli hostage held in Gaza accuses Hamas of starving him

The Guardian2 days ago
The family of an Israeli hostage held in Gaza said that Hamas is starving him after the release of a video in which he appeared emaciated and weak.
The footage, released on Saturday, shows Evyatar David speaking in what appeared to be a Hamas tunnel in Gaza. In scenes that have caused outrage and dismay in Israel, he is shown digging what he says could be his own grave. In comments made under duress, he urges the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, to agree to a ceasefire.
'Today is 27 July, at 12:00 pm, I don't know what I'm going to eat. I haven't eaten for a few days in a row,' David says in a weak, slurred voice. He walks away from the camera, revealing his emaciated body.
'Time is running out. You are the only ones who can end this,' he says, in what appear to be comments directed at Israel's leadership.
Hamas captured David at the Nova music festival in southern Israel on 7 October 2023, the day Hamas-led militants killed around 1,200 people and captured around 250 hostages. He is one of 49 hostages still held by Hamas, 22 of whom are thought to still be alive.
The family of David released a statement responding to the video, accusing Hamas of starving David for propaganda.
'We are forced to witness our dear son and brother Evyatar being deliberately and cynically starved in Hamas's tunnels in Gaza – a living skeleton buried alive. Our son has only a few days left to live in his current condition,' the family said.
They called for humanitarian aid that enters Gaza to be allowed to reach David and urged the US and Israeli governments to do everything possible to secure his release.
Gaza is in the throes of famine, with mass starvation on the rise. Israeli officials have said Hamas is deliberately starving its captives.
The video was released as the US envoy, Steve Witkoff, visited Israel to discuss a ceasefire in Gaza. He met the families of some hostages on Saturday, and told them Washington was pushing for a comprehensive end to the war that would include the release of all hostages.
'We now need to bring all of them home. We are very close to ending the war,' he said, according to a statement released by the Hostages and Missing Families Forum.
Netanyahu' office said on Saturday that he had spoken to the families of David and another hostage, Ron Braslavski, who was pictured in a video released on Friday.
Thousands of people rallied in Tel Aviv on Saturday night to call for the release of the hostages. Relatives of some of the hostages erected a protest camp surrounded by razor wire and displayed pictures of those still held captive.
They sat in the middle of the encampment, which they said symbolised the imprisonment of their loved ones. They called for an end to the war in Gaza, with some accusing Netanyahu of prolonging the war to save his governing coalition.
'This is the time for a comprehensive deal and an end to the war. No more delays. No more leaving them behind. Stop this nightmare and bring them out of the tunnels and home,' the families said in their statement.
Ceasefire negotiations collapsed two weeks ago, when the US and Israel accused Hamas of not negotiating in good faith. Hamas has denied the accusation and countered that Israel was stalling.
Pressure on Israel to agree to a ceasefire is mounting, as the international community reacts in horror at the growing famine in Gaza, which has killed 175 people, including 93 children. The aid community blames Israel's blockade on aid into Gaza for their starvation, a claim Israel has denied.
In response to the stalling ceasefire efforts, Netanyhu had suggested alternatives to his cabinet, including a renewed offensive on Gaza in a redoubled effort to defeat Hamas.
Witkoff denied there was any plan for a further offensive, telling the families of hostages on Saturday that Hamas said that it was ready to disarm. In a statement, Hamas later vowed not to demilitarise 'as long as the occupation exists.'
Some 60,500 people have been killed in Gaza during Israel's military campaign there over the last 21 months, according to Gaza's health ministry.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How did John Oliver become the moral compass of the US?
How did John Oliver become the moral compass of the US?

The Guardian

time21 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

How did John Oliver become the moral compass of the US?

Some time ago, an acquaintance sent me a cryptic text message. 'Thought of you after I saw one of your recent articles,' they said. 'Thank you for saying it.' I write columns regularly. Some are about vaginas; some are about the genocide in Gaza. Was this person thanking me for drawing attention to the desperate plight of people on eBay who are prepared to pay five times the original sales price for Gwyneth Paltrow's delisted This Smells Like My Vagina candle? Or were they referencing Gaza? I suspected the latter, but there was no way of immediately knowing – which often feels par for the course when it comes to the conversation around Gaza. The Trump administration has cracked down on pro-Palestinian speech to such a draconian degree that even within a private text message, some people are too terrified about jeopardising their career or immigration status to speak up. Many lawmakers and parts of the media seem to have lost the ability to communicate in plain English when it comes to Palestine. I have seen long articles handwringing about the desperately complicated situation of starving kids which don't mention the word 'Israel' once. I have lost count of the number of articles talking about 'starvation stalking Gaza' that circle endlessly around exactly how this starvation has come about. Gaza is almost completely destroyed. There is now a growing consensus that a genocide is under way, and since a plan for the mass displacement of Palestinians to make space for a 'Gaza riviera' was discussed in the Knesset, more people are beginning to speak up. Nevertheless, Gaza-related atrocity denial is so widespread in the US, and the climate of fear around speaking about Palestine so pervasive, that an influential person voicing an unequivocal criticism of Israel's conduct will still make the news. See, for example, John Oliver. The Last Week Tonight host made headlines this week after he opened his most recent show with a clear-eyed analysis of the human-made famine in Gaza. 'Look, 'Gaza is starving' is a sentence that's objectively true, but it's also slightly misleading because it's too passive,' Oliver said. 'Gaza is being starved by Israel.' I'm glad to see Oliver spelling this out. But it is enraging that it is a late-night host speaking with clarity rather than editorial boards, cable news anchors or politicians – many of whom seem to treat mass starvation as an unfortunate and unintentional consequence of war rather than a deliberate act. One CBS video from last December, for example, is headlined: 'Hunger spreads virtually everywhere in Gaza amid Israel-Hamas war.' As the Al Jazeera Journalism Review argues, many headlines in major US outlets have similarly described the situation as a 'food crisis' rather than an intentional blockade. Meanwhile, the rightwing Free Press – which CBS is reportedly mulling buying for up to $250m partly because of its 'pro-Israel stance', according to the FT – described media reporting around starvation in Gaza as part of 'a highly effective campaign of information warfare' against Israel perpetrated by Hamas. And while experts have been warning about famine risks in Gaza since December 2023, an analysis of US media coverage by the watchdog Fair shows most outlets barely covered the situation until it became undeniably grim. 'The conditions of famine have been out in the open for well over a year, and yet it was considered barely newsworthy in US news media,' it says. Oliver isn't the only late-night host speaking up. Indeed, from the shenanigans of the Trump administration to the starvation of Gaza, late-night hosts (and children's entertainer Ms Rachel) seem to have become the moral voice of the US. The Daily Show's Jon Stewart has also been outspoken about Gaza. 'I have a moral clarity about what I'm seeing,' said Stewart, who is Jewish, in an episode last week where he was speaking to the Jewish Currents editor-at-large, Peter Beinart. 'I feel like a crazy person. I feel as if I'm watching something that is so self-evidently inhumane and horrific. And to be told that I have to shut up because I risk the Jewish state by speaking out? I would say the opposite. I think they're putting the likelihood of a surviving Jewish state much more at risk with this type of action.' And then there's Stephen Colbert's The Late Show on CBS. Colbert hasn't spoken about Gaza a huge amount, although he did criticise the crackdown on student protests, saying: 'Even if you don't agree with the subject of their protests, as long as they are peaceful, students should be allowed to protest. It's their first amendment right.' He has, however, been very outspoken about Trump. Last month, he said Paramount Global (which owns CBS) deciding to pay a large settlement to Trump over content in a CBS show, 60 Minutes, amounted to a 'big fat bribe'. Three days later, his show was cancelled – many suspect because Paramount higher-ups wanted to stay in Trump's good books to get a merger approved. This seems to have worked. Trump has said: 'I absolutely love that Colbert was fired.' I bet he does. Late-night hosts seem to be doing far more than certain other influential voices when it comes to speaking truth to power. None of this is funny – but when comedians become the most vocal truth-tellers, it's possible your country has become a joke. Arwa Mahdawi is a Guardian US columnist Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.

Israel's assault on humanitarian norms
Israel's assault on humanitarian norms

The Guardian

time21 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Israel's assault on humanitarian norms

We are Israeli historians teaching in Jerusalem who have been writing publicly about the war since early 2024. The processes that Jonathan Whittall describes, the result of a siege and an unprecedented assault on international humanitarian organisations, have been known to anyone willing to listen, in Israel and in the west, for a very long time (I saw many atrocities as a senior aid official in Gaza. Now Israeli authorities are trying to silence us, 3 August). Israel's siege, which has fluctuated in its totality since 7 October, limited the amounts of food, medication and essential supplies allowed into the Gaza Strip, culminating in a complete siege from March to May 2025. Israel's assault on international organisations started with a campaign against Unrwa, the UN agency dedicated to the care for Palestinian refugees, and developed into a set of regulations aimed at intimidating international non-governmental organisations (INGOs) and obstructing their ability to work in the occupied Palestinian territories. The effect has been the replacement of reputable humanitarian organisations by an Israeli-funded private enterprise (the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation), with no experience in humanitarian aid or commitment to human wellbeing. The result is the reported starvation to death of more than 100 Palestinians and the shooting of Palestinians who sought aid, killing and injuring many thousands. Human life in the Gaza Strip has become exceedingly cheap. For us, as Israeli citizens who believe in the sanctity of all human life, the current moment represents our own failure, alongside the failure of international law, the international community and most media outlets. During Whittall's term in office as head of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), it has been an unrelenting source of information regarding the systematic assault on human life in the occupied territories. We applaud Whittall for speaking out. OCHA and other INGOs need the backing of governments and the international community to restore a human-oriented humanitarian system and save those who can still be saved. Dr Lee MordechaiHistory department, Hebrew University of JerusalemProf Liat KozmaDepartment of Islamic and Middle Eastern studies, Hebrew University of Jerusalem Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

Hezbollah threatens to resume firing at Israel if it intensifies Lebanon action
Hezbollah threatens to resume firing at Israel if it intensifies Lebanon action

BreakingNews.ie

time21 minutes ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Hezbollah threatens to resume firing at Israel if it intensifies Lebanon action

The leader of Lebanon's Hezbollah warned on Tuesday that if Israel intensifies its military operations against his group, the Iran-backed armed faction will resume firing missiles toward Israel. Naim Kassem's comments came as Lebanon's Cabinet was meeting to discuss Hezbollah's disarmament. Advertisement Beirut is under US pressure to disarm the group that recently fought a 14-month war with Israel and was left gravely weakened, with many of its political and military leaders dead. Since the war ended in November with a US-brokered ceasefire, Hezbollah officials have said the group will not discuss its disarmament until Israel withdraws from five hills it controls inside Lebanon and stops almost daily airstrikes that have killed or wounded hundreds of people, most of them Hezbollah members. Israel has accused Hezbollah of trying to rebuild its military capabilities. Israel's military has said the five locations in Lebanon provide vantage points or are located across from communities in northern Israel, where about 60,000 Israelis were displaced during the war. Advertisement Since the ceasefire, Hezbollah has claimed responsibility for one attack on a disputed area along the border. In a televised speech on Tuesday, Kassem said Hezbollah rejects any timetable to hand over its weapons. 'Israel's interest is not to widen the aggression because if they expand, the resistance will defend, the army will defend and the people will defend,' he said. 'This defence will lead to the fall of missiles inside Israel.' Since the war ended, Hezbollah has withdrawn most of its fighters and weapons from the area along the border with Israel south of the Litani river. Advertisement Last week, Lebanese President Joseph Aoun reiterated calls for Hezbollah to give up its weapons, angering the group's leadership. The ceasefire agreement left vague how Hezbollah's weapons and military facilities north of the Litani river should be treated, saying Lebanese authorities should dismantle unauthorised facilities starting with the area south of the river. Hezbollah maintains the deal covers only the area south of the Litani, while Israel and the US say it mandates disarmament of the group throughout Lebanon. Kassem said Hezbollah rejects a government vote over its weapons, saying such a decision should be unanimously backed by all Lebanese. Advertisement 'No one can deprive Lebanon of its force to protect its sovereignty,' Kassem said. Hezbollah's weapons are a divisive issue among Lebanese, with some groups calling for its disarmament. The Israel-Hezbollah war started a day after the October 7 2023 Hamas-led attack against Israel from Gaza. It left more than 4,000 people dead and caused 11 billion dollars (£8.3 billion) of damage.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store