Renters hope ‘good cause eviction' bill will overcome Senate committee hurdle
Renter advocates are hopeful that this will b the year 'good cause' evictions finally become law in Maryland — but first it has to get past the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee, where it died last year after passing the House.
'We're seeing progress … Now, all eyes are on the Senate to do the right thing for the state of Maryland,' said Matt Losak at a midday rally of more than two dozen advocacy groups Tuesday outside the State House. 'We've been fighting for just cause or good cause eviction for more than a decade.
'Good cause eviction' refers to legislation that would let counties and the city of Baltimore adopt policies that require a landlord to cite a specific reason before ending a lease agreement with a tenant.
'In our view, this is the most important piece of legislation facing the Maryland General Assembly this year, short of the budget,' said Losak, the co-founder of Montgomery County Renters Alliance. 'We are seeing countless tenants losing their homes for no other reason other than forming tenants' associations, seeking promised or required services or trying to negotiate a fairer rent.'
The House and Senate both held hearings on the proposal Tuesday. The House Environment and Transportation Committee took up Del. Jheanelle K. Wilkins' (D-Montgomery) House Bill 709 and the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee heard Senate Bill 651, co-sponsored by Sen. C. Anthony Muse (D-Prince George's) and Sen. Clarence Lam (D-Anne Arundel and Howard).
'If your landlord can't give a good reason for the eviction, then your family shouldn't be evicted,' Muse said at the rally. 'When families can stay in their homes, they can stay near their jobs, near their schools, near their family and their friends.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
But with Maryland facing a 96,000-unit housing shortage, officials are trying to encourage new development to increase housing supply. They worry that developers may veer away from the state if there are too many regulatory hoops to consider.
For that and other reasons, good cause legislation may still face a difficult path this session.
The bills outline 10 broad circumstances that a landlord could cite when not renewing a lease, including substantial breach of lease or damage to the premises, a series of minor lease violations that negatively affect the property, or routine disorderly conduct that disturbs other tenants. Other 'good causes' include situations when residents habitually pay rent late, engage in illegal activities on the premises, or refuse to let the landlord access the property.
A landlord would also be able to take back property for their own use or a family member's, take it back for significant renovations, or just because they want to take it off the rental market. All of those are 'good cause' for lease non-renewal under the bill.
But Robert Enten, representing the Maryland Multi-Housing Association, told the Senate committee the bill has too many undefined terms that need clarification.
'Tenant engaging in 'routine disorderly conduct' – what does that mean?,' Enten asked. 'A tenant 'repeatedly' committing 'minor violations' — what does 'repeatedly' mean? Once? Twice? Three times? … If you want to pass a bill to deal with this, this bill needs a ton of work.'
A final out would be if the tenant refuses an offer of a new lease. Sen. Mike McKay (R-Western Maryland) asked if that could 'create a new loophole that will just automatically increase rent?'
'If I just don't want to rent to somebody for whatever reason, to get around it all, I just say, 'It'll be another $500,'' McKay said.
His question hung in the air for a moment, as bill supporters reached for an answer before Committee Chair Will Smith (D-Montgomery) jumped in.
'I think this question is very important, because it speaks to the interconnectivity of all these regulations across the state,' Smith said. 'He is absolutely right to ask this question, which shows you that nothing happens in isolation.'
Smith said that if counties do not have protections such as rent stabilization, then McKay's hypothetical could be real.
'But if you have rent stabilization in your jurisdiction, then you would not be able to raise the rent,' he said, referencing Montgomery County, which has created some rent stabilization policy.
'These are things that you have to kick around in your head when you're thinking about this,' Smith said. 'I like the notion of good cause, but we have a responsibility as a committee to be intellectually honest in how those things fit into the issues of other jurisdictions.'
Sen. Chris West (R-Baltimore and Carroll counties) asked would the bill 'advance the state's goals of creating more rental housing?'
Bill Castelli, representing Maryland Realtors, said the bill could be a deterrent for developers and landlords.
'I think the more control property owners lose in terms of that property – the less control they have of tenants in the property, the less control they have on the property itself in terms of what they charge – that provides less incentive for people to invest in,' Castelli said.
Despite the committee's questions, Losak said he is still 'a bit optimistic' about the bill's chances this year. He said that passing the bill 'changes the dynamic' between tenants and landlords by providing tenants with tools to fight back against unfair landlords.
'The bill itself is fair, just, sensible,' Losak said, 'and it's common sense.'
Later Tuesday, the House Environment and Transportation committee brought up HB 709 as one of last bills of the day.
Last year, the good cause legislation passed the House on a 96-37 vote, but without the Senate counterpart, the bill died. The bill is widely expected to pass the House again this session.
'I'll be happy when the Senate passes it,' said Del. Marc Korman (D-Montgomery), chair of the Environment and Transportation Committee, 'because that's what has to happen for us to get something to the governor.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
4 minutes ago
- New York Times
Why Cortez Masto Tangled With Cory Booker on the Senate Floor
Senator Catherine Cortez Masto, Democrat of Nevada, is one of the least flashy lawmakers on Capitol Hill. So it was a surprise when Ms. Cortez Masto, a no-nonsense former attorney general and federal prosecutor who has won her swing state repeatedly, emerged this past week at the center of a dramatic showdown on the Senate floor with Senator Cory Booker, the progressive New Jersey Democrat with presidential ambitions. The dispute started over a package of bipartisan policing bills that Ms. Cortez Masto was seeking to quickly pass. But the debate that unfolded instead was about how to be an effective Democrat during the second Trump presidency. Mr. Booker accused Ms. Cortez Masto of being 'complicit' with an authoritarian president by trying to push through the policing bills at a time when the Justice Department was 'weaponizing' public safety grants against states and cities that 'resist the Trump policy agenda.' Ms. Cortez Masto's retort: 'Two wrongs don't make a right.' In an interview on Friday afternoon, Ms. Cortez Masto spoke about the altercation and why she thinks Democrats must try to find common ground with Republicans in a polarized era. The interview has been lightly edited and condensed for clarity. What was it like to be called 'complicit' with President Trump by a fellow Democrat? Want all of The Times? Subscribe.


New York Times
4 minutes ago
- New York Times
How the New Texas Map Changes the Outlook for Control of the House
So far this election cycle, most analysts have assumed that Democrats will win the House next November. No, it's not a guarantee. But the party out of the White House usually does well in midterms, and Democrats need a mere three seats to retake the chamber. Over the last few weeks, this reasonable assumption has started to get more complicated. It turns out that Democrats might need to flip more than three seats, as President Trump is pushing red states to undertake a rare mid-decade redistricting effort to shore up the slender Republican House majority. On Wednesday, Republicans in Texas unveiled the first of these efforts: a new map that could flip as many as five seats from blue to red. It's still too early to say what might happen beyond Texas. Maybe other Republican states will join; maybe Democrats will retaliate. Obviously, a wider redistricting war could have far greater implications, to say nothing of whether it is healthy for the country. But on its own, while the Texas map makes the Democrats' path to the House harder, it doesn't necessarily make it hard. They would still be favored to win the House if the election were held today on the new map, even though they don't hold a very large lead in the polls. The current national congressional map remains more or less balanced by the usual measures of partisan fairness. Proposed House Map Is More Republican, but Still Less Than in Past Even with Texas' changes, Republicans have just a small advantage in the way House districts lean, measured by whether each district supported the Republican presidential candidate by a larger margin than the national popular vote in the prior election. Republican advantage in how districts lean +23 districts +23 +20 +20 +18 +11 +13 +13 +10 +7 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 2020 2024 2026 Republican advantage in how districts lean +23 districts +23 +20 +20 +18 +11 +13 +13 +10 +7 1992 2000 2008 2016 2026 Sources: POLIDATA; Daily Kos Elections; Voting and Election Science Team; PlanScore; The Downballot By The New York Times Want all of The Times? Subscribe.


USA Today
7 hours ago
- USA Today
Senate confirms Trump's pick to oversee higher ed, a man tied to for-profit colleges
The Senate confirmed President Donald Trump's pick to oversee higher education policy, a man with deep ties to the for-profit college industry, by a 50-to-45 vote on August 1. Senate Majority John Thune filed cloture on Kent's nomination earlier in the week. And the education committee had already advanced Kent on a 12-11 vote without a hearing in late May. The undersecretary at the Department of Education oversees billions in federal financial aid and is charged with ensuring America's colleges provide a quality education. Education Secretary Linda McMahon had previously told USA TODAY that Kent is a 'natural leader' whose experience and concern for students 'make him the ideal selection for under secretary of education." He had won the support of several prominent university trade groups who are opposed to Trump's attacks on universities, but said they supported Kent's nomination. His confirmation comes as the Trump administration seeks to reshape higher education and has launched numerous investigations into high profile universities. Kent had already been working at the agency on the administration's initiatives like K-12 school choice. But prior to working in the government, Kent had a long history working for or close to for-profit colleges. From 2008 to the end of 2015, Kent worked for Education Affiliates, a for-profit college company. When he left, he was a vice president of legislative and regulatory affairs. In 2015, the Department of Justice announced the company had agreed to a $13 million settlement to settle accusations it had gamed the federal financial aid system. The company told USA TODAY Kent was not involved in the settlement or the allegations of fraud. Critics, including student advocacy groups and teacher unions, had called on the Senate education committee to put Kent through a public hearing to answer questions about his time working for the company. And one of the original whistleblowers tied to that case, Dorothy Thomas, expressed concern about someone from the company's leadership holding the under secretary position. Kent had also worked for Career Education Colleges and Universities, a for-profit college trade group. He developed a reputation for deep policy knowledge while speaking against regulations geared toward the for-profit college industry. That group's CEO, Jason Altmire, said Kent was not driven by partisan politics and would bring an unbiased view to the under secretary position. He then went to work for Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin's administration as a deputy secretary of education. Youngkin, in a prepared statement, said Kent improved how Virginia manages colleges and made them more accountable to students and families through increased transparency. Chair of the Virginia Senate's education committee, Democrat Ghazala Hashmi, told USA TODAY Kent had tried to destabilize accreditation in the state and he was aligned with efforts to dismantle consumer protections. In a departing message to the commonwealth, Kent said he was proud of reducing costs while pushing for free speech and accountability at Virginia's colleges. Chris Quintana is an investigative reporter at USA TODAY. He can be reached at cquintana@ or via Signal at 202-308-9021. He is on X at @CQuintanaDC