Lawmakers visit ‘Alligator Alcatraz' after being blocked
The tour came after some Democrats were blocked earlier from viewing the 3,000-bed detention center that the state rapidly built on an isolated airstrip surrounded by swampland. So many state legislators and members of Congress turned up Saturday that they were split into multiple groups to view the facility.
'There are really disturbing, vile conditions and this place needs to be shut the hell down,' Rep. U.S. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a Democrat from Florida, told reporters after visiting. 'This place is a stunt, and they're abusing human beings here.'
Cage-style units of 32 men share three combination toilet-sink devices, the visitors measured the temperature at 83 degrees in one area that was billed as air-conditioned and grasshoppers and other insects abound, she and other Democrats said.
Although the visitors said they weren't able to speak with the detainees, Rep. Maxwell Alejandro Frost, a Democrat from Florida, said one called out 'I'm an American!' and others chanting, 'Libertad!,' a Spanish word for 'freedom.'
State Sen. Blaise Ingoglia, a Republican from Florida, countered that he had seen a well-run, safe facility where the living quarters were clean and the air conditioning worked well. He recalled that a handful of detainees became 'a little raucous' when the visitors appeared but said he didn't make out what they were saying.
'The rhetoric coming out of the Democrats does not match the reality,' he said by phone. 'It's a detention center, not the Four Seasons.'
Journalists weren't allowed on the tour, and lawmakers were instructed not to bring phones or cameras inside.
Messages seeking comment were sent to the state Division of Emergency Management, which built the facility, and to representatives for Gov. Ron DeSantis. DeSantis spokesperson Molly Best highlighted one of Ingoglia's upbeat readouts on social media.
DeSantis and fellow Republicans have touted the makeshift detention center — an agglomeration of tents, trailers and temporary buildings constructed in a matter of days — as an efficient and get-tough response to President Donald Trump's call for mass deportations. The first detainees arrived July 3, after Trump toured and praised the facility.
Described as temporary, the detention center is meant to help the Republican president's administration reach its goal of boosting the United States' migrant detention capacity from 41,000 people to at least 100,000. The Florida facility's remote location and its name — a nod to the notorious Alcatraz prison that once housed federal inmates in California — are meant to underscore a message of deterring illegal immigration.
Ahead of the facility's opening, state officials said detainees would have access to medical care, consistent air conditioning, a recreation yard, attorneys and clergy members.
But detainees and their relatives and advocates have told The Associated Press that conditions are awful, with worm-infested food, toilets overflowing onto floors, mosquitoes buzzing around the fenced bunks, and air conditioners that sometimes shut off in the oppressive South Florida summer heat. One man told his wife that detainees go days without getting showers.
Florida Division of Emergency Management spokesperson Stephanie Hartman called those descriptions 'completely false,' saying detainees always get three meals a day, unlimited drinking water, showers and other necessities.
'The facility meets all required standards and is in good working order,' she said.
Five Democratic state lawmakers tried to visit the site when it opened July 3 but said they were denied access. The state subsequently arranged Saturday's tour.
The lawmakers have sued over the denial, saying that DeSantis' administration is impeding lawmakers' oversight authority. A DeSantis spokesperson has called the lawsuit 'dumb.'
As Democratic officials headed into the facility, they said they expected to be given a sanitized and limited view.
Wasserman Schultz told reporters the lawmakers came anyway because they wanted to ask questions and get a sense of the structure and conditions.
Peltz and Rodriguez write for the Associated Press. Peltz reported from New York, and Rodriguez reported from Ochopee.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Paul believes Senate vote for NPR, PBS cuts will be ‘very close'
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said Sunday that President Trump's request to cut billions in funding to public broadcasters NPR and PBS would face a 'very close' vote in the Senate. 'I suspect it's going to be very close. I don't know if it will be modified in advance, but I can't really honestly look Americans in the face and say that I'm going to be doing something about the deficit if I can't cut $9 billion,' Paul told CBS's Margaret Brennan on 'Face the Nation.' Republicans including Sens. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) have expressed reservations about making deep cuts to NPR and PBS. Some in the GOP are also wary of pulling funding for PEPFAR, the global HIV/AIDS program started under President George W. Bush. Senators will work out the details of the recissions package this week, facing a Friday deadline to approve the cuts. 'Even though there are people who make arguments for it, and I can make an argument for a different way to cut it, we're going to be presented with a $9 billion cut and a $2.2 trillion deficit,' Paul said. 'So we have to cut spending. Absolutely have to cut spending.' On Thursday, President Trump threatened to withhold his backing for any Republican who goes against a recissions package, which includes sweeping cuts to foreign aid and public media. 'It is very important that all Republicans adhere to my Recissions Bill and, in particular, DEFUND THE CORPORATION FOR PUBLIC BROADCASTING (PBS and NPR), which is worse than CNN & MSDNC put together,' a Truth Social post from the president said. 'Any Republican that votes to allow this monstrosity to continue broadcasting will not have my support or Endorsement,' he added. Rounds and other senators have raised fears about the impact of public broadcasting cuts on rural areas that rely on local, government-funded stations for information. Rounds told reporters he planned to negotiate with the White House Office of Management and Budget to tweak the cuts. 'It's not our goal to come back in and totally eliminate a number of the rescissions, but specifically to take care of those that were in some of these rural areas,' Rounds said, according to Deseret News. 'This is their way of getting emergency messages out to people. That's the way in which they communicate in a very rural area.'
Indianapolis Star
an hour ago
- Indianapolis Star
Musk can spend a fortune on the 'America Party,' but it likely won't succeed
Set aside for a moment the raging egos and MAGA personalities at the heart of the renewed argument about whether America needs a new political party to compete with the Republican and Democratic parties. One thing we can say for sure: There's an appetite for just that among Americans. A Gallup poll released Oct. 1, just 35 days before the 2024 presidential election, in a time of extremely heightened political tension and public awareness, found that 58% of American adults said a third party was needed. Americans had Donald Trump or Kamala Harris to choose from at that moment, and a majority wanted more options. That polling number has fluctuated over the years, but Gallup has found majority support for the issue in polls going back two decades. But that's theory. What about practice? What if the third-party movement at the center of attention now was being spearheaded by one of the most politically toxic people in America? Is Elon Musk, currently viewed unfavorably by 55% of Americans, the best face for the "America Party" he announced on July 5? Musk, the world's wealthiest person, spent about $290 million to help Trump win a second term as president. Now they're spitting social media venom at each other after Musk was ousted from Trump's administration and then became infuriated by the deficit-busting spending in the president's new budget bill. Musk casts his new political party as an attack on the "uniparty," a common shorthand to suggest that the Republican and Democratic parties are more alike than different, especially when it comes to spending our taxes. Opinion: Trump's tax bill will crush the rural voters who chose him There's a glaring flaw in that claim ‒ Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act was crafted exclusively by his administration and Republican leaders in Congress. Democrats were locked out of the process and did not vote for the bill, which passed with thin Republican majorities. But Musk, like Trump, is not the kind of politician who will let reality govern his rhetoric. So, in his framing, they're all bad guys in Washington, DC, and he's going to be the new sheriff who cleans up the town. That's one way this might go. Another could be that political consultants squeeze Musk's fortune for as much juice as the America Party can produce, while not having much of an impact. Or, with Musk's businesses taking serious economic hits from his political combat, he might just talk a big game and then walk away. Trump, in a long social media post on Sunday, July 6, said Musk was "off the rails" while noting that third parties "have never succeeded in the United States." Then why did Trump need a 336-word post at all? He showed us his fear by adding that third parties are effective at causing "Total DISRUPTION & CHAOS" in American politics. Here's what disruption and chaos probably looks like to Trump ‒ Musk's America Party impacts the thin congressional margins, tipping the House and Senate to Democrats, giving them the power of oversight or even impeachment (for a third time) to hold Trump to account. Ryan Clancy, chief strategist for No Labels, told me that the "initial reaction from the Republicans suggests that they think (Musk) is more of a threat to them." And he would know. No Labels, you might remember, was a significant concern for the Democratic Party and its allies in 2024 as the group tried, and eventually failed, to put on the presidential ballot a bipartisan centrist ticket. Will Musk's America Party be the threat to Republicans that No Labels was to Democrats? Clancy said it's too early to say, and that will depend on what kind of candidates Musk recruits. Musk has suggested that he might "laser-focus on just 2 or 3 Senate seats and 8 to 10 House districts" in the 2026 midterm elections because the House and Senate have "razor-thin legislative margins," and that it might "be enough to serve as the deciding vote on contentious laws." Opinion: Data centers are inevitable, but why should Indiana pay for their energy demand? Clancy told me No Labels has not spoken to Musk or anyone close to him about the America Party. But the strategist hopes the new political party would inject a little competition into elections, which could pull some Republicans and Democrats back to the center of the political spectrum. "I would encourage people to give it a chance, give it some runway, let it breathe a little," Clancy said. "Let's see what kind of candidates come around it." Rahna Epting, executive director of MoveOn, a progressive policy group, spent part of 2024 criticizing No Labels as a potential "spoiler" that could have helped Trump win a second term. She told me that "another party, paid for by billionaires like Elon Musk, is not the answer for this country's challenges." Where Clancy sees potential, Epting sees only vanity and self-interest as motivation for Musk. She noted that Republicans, from Trump on down the ballot, ran last year on making life more affordable for Americans. And she thinks Americans are still looking for solutions like that in the midterms. The MoveOn leader is just as opposed to the Big Beautiful Bill as Musk is. And she's just as opposed to his America Party as she was with No Labels. "No Labels was a tactic without a plausible strategy to win, and I think Elon Musk's effort is a tactic without a plausible way to win," Epting said. "And both were in it for themselves and not for the people of this country." Clancy estimates that a competitive Senate campaign next will cost "easily nine figures," while a House seat "can easily be low eight figures." And then there is the complicated and costly infrastructure of getting on ballots, state by state. Put another way: Musk might be about to spend some serious money again. But I'm not sure if he can repeat his 2024 success. And it's worth pointing out that Musk himself no longer sees 2024 as a success.
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Secret Service failed to stop Trump assassination attempt, Senate report says
Advertisement In an interview on CBS's 'Face the Nation' on Sunday, Paul accused former Secret Service director Kim Cheatle of lying to Congress when she testified that the agency had not received requests to beef up Trump's security detail in advance of the Butler shooting. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Paul said investigators found that the agency had received at least four requests for countersnipers and other security enhancements from Trump's Secret Service detail, as well as from his campaign. 'There was a cascade of errors,' he said. 'When we talked to the people in charge of security, everybody pointed a finger at someone else.' In a statement Sunday, Cheatle pushed back on the assertion that she lied to Congress, saying that when she testified, 'the information provided to me by personnel from Headquarters and the Trump detail, to include the current agency Director, confirmed my statement that no requests for additional support had been denied to our agents at Butler.' Advertisement 'Any assertion or implication that I provided misleading testimony is patently false and does a disservice to those men and women on the front lines who have been unfairly disciplined for a team, rather than individual, failure,' she added. The current Secret Service director, Sean Curran, said in a separate statement Sunday that the agency would continue to cooperate with the Senate committee and that following last year's shooting, 'the Secret Service took a serious look at our operations and implemented substantive reforms to address the failures that occurred that day.' On July 13, 2024, Thomas Matthew Crooks, a 20-year-old nursing home worker from Pennsylvania, scaled a building outside the security perimeter of Trump's campaign rally in Butler and opened fire using an AR-style rifle, killing one person and critically injuring two others. He attempted to assassinate Trump, grazing him near the top of his right ear, and was killed by law enforcement officers at the scene. The report shed no new light about the assailant's motives, which remain a mystery to investigators one year on. But it painted a picture of an expansive security detail that was erroneously left in the dark as an assassination attempt unfolded. The committee identified several Secret Service failures to properly disseminate information about a suspicious person — later determined to be Crooks — and his whereabouts. Its investigation also uncovered conflicting reports about who knew what, and when. 'The lack of structured communication was likely the greatest contributor to the failures of the USSS,' the report stated. Advertisement According to the report, Secret Service failures allowed Crooks to evade detection for nearly 45 minutes. In particular, the report singled out the Secret Service's security room agent, whose job is to manage communications between all parties involved in securing an event 'to ensure situational awareness.' The committee accused the security room agent, who was not named, of failing to properly relay that a local tactical team was looking for a person equipped with a rangefinder outside the security perimeter, despite hearing of it at roughly 5:45 p.m., about 25 minutes before the shooting. A Pennsylvania State Police officer who was in the Secret Service security room testified that he told the security room agent in person that there was an active search for a person with a rangefinder outside of the security perimeter. When asked, he said he did not know if the security room agent relayed that information to others over the radio. 'I got a distinct impression that there's, like, a lack of urgency,' he recalled. The Pennsylvania State Police officer said he later updated the security room agent that the suspect was seen on top of a roof, but that he did not know if the agent further disseminated that information. Meanwhile, the security room agent gave a conflicting story, saying he was not aware of a person on a roof, but only heard via radio communications that local police 'were working [a] problem at 3 o'clock.' No one stopped Trump from walking onstage, where he was shot at about 6:15 p.m. In an interview with investigators, the security room agent acknowledged that he had no other contact with local law enforcement that day, and that he had not seen operations plans put together by the Pennsylvania State Police or the Butler Emergency Services Unit before the rally. Advertisement The Senate committee called into question why the agent was found to not have violated Secret Service policy and why he never faced any disciplinary action. He retired this June. The Secret Service has since adopted some changes to its internal policy to address the communication failures, the report said. Before the shooting, security officials were concerned about Trump's safety, uncovering an alleged Iran-linked plot to assassinate him and other US targets. During the first week of July 2024, several top security officials met to discuss intelligence involving Trump's safety and agreed to allow countersnipers at all of his rallies. This bucked tradition: The Butler rally was the first time a former president and candidate had received countersnipers from the Secret Service, the report said. The report denounced the Secret Service for what it called 'insufficient accountability' for the shooting. Six Secret Service agents were placed on unpaid leave, with the suspensions ranging from 10 to 42 days. The Secret Service this month said it made several changes since the Butler shooting, including boosting communication with state and local authorities and beefing up intelligence sharing before and during events requiring protection.
