
SC notifies guidelines for retention, disposal of records
New Delhi [India], June 26 (ANI): The Supreme Court on Thursday highlighted a lacuna over the management of administrative records and issued guidelines for retention and disposal of documents to create accountability and efficiency across all registry wings.
Chief Justice of India BR Gavai, in a message, said that over the years, the registry of the Supreme Court has witnessed a significant increase in the volume and diversity of administrative records generated across multiple branches.
CJI said, 'While judicial records pertaining to case proceedings are governed by explicit provisions contained in Order LVI of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013, and further elaborated in Chapter XXI of the Handbook on Practice and Office Procedure of the Supreme Court of India, 2017, a lacuna has persisted with respect to the management of administrative records.'
He further added, 'This disparity leads to inconsistent practices across branches, affecting archival clarity and efficiency. The 'Guidelines for Retention and Destruction of Records 2025' aim to remedy this by promoting coherence, accountability, and efficiency in managing administrative records, including institutional decisions, policy implementations, inter-departmental correspondences, audits, and engagements with external stakeholders.'
He underscored the importance of properly managing these records for transparency and accountability, and guidelines to establish a rational framework.
Operational efficiency is enhanced by the systematic elimination of obsolete documents, easing storage burdens and improving record retrieval speed, said the CJI.
'The Guidelines ensure compliance with audit and statutory obligations by defining appropriate retention periods based on fiscal, legal, and administrative relevance. They are aligned with national public record management standards,' he further continued.
The guidelines were stated to have been borne out of detailed consultations among Registrars and officials of the Registry.
As per the issued guidelines, original submission notes or paper books bearing signatures of the Chief Justice of India and judges of the Supreme Court are to be preserved permanently. Policy files, office orders and circular files were to be preserved permanently.
In case the records of one branch or wing were correlated with those of a different branch or records relating to the confidential branch, an intimation on 'the pendency of court case is to be sent to them as soon as the court case is received in the section', it said.
Destruction and retention of records by the relevant branches should be carried out after due approval from the registrar concerned, it further said. (ANI)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Against Ambedkar's ideology': CJI Gavai on Article 370; says need 'one Constitution to keep country united'
NEW DELHI: The Chief Justice of India BR Gavai on Saturday supported the abrogation of Article 370 and said that in order to keep the country united, "we need only one Constitution". Tired of too many ads? go ad free now He recalled when the case was brought before the Supreme Court, the five-judge bench unanimously upheld the Centre's decision to abrogate Article 370 citing it against BR Ambedkar's ideology. "When Article 370 was challenged, it came before us, and when the hearing was underway, I recalled Dr Babasaheb's words that one Constitution is suited for a country... If we want to keep the country united, we need only one Constitution," PTI quoted Gavai saying. On August 5, 2019, the Centre revoked 's special status and reorganised it into two Union territories. Justice Gavai noted that Ambedkar had faced criticism for including too much federalism in the Constitution, with concerns that it might weaken national unity during times of war. "See the situation in the neighbouring countries, be it Pakistan, Bangladesh or Sri Lanka. Whenever our country faces challenges, it has remained united," he added. Gavai was speaking at the inauguration of the Constitution Preamble Park in Nagpur.


Scroll.in
an hour ago
- Scroll.in
Supreme Court orders release of law student from preventive detention under NSA
The Supreme Court on Friday ordered the immediate release of a 24-year-old law student, who had been in preventive detention in Bhopal's Central Jail for nearly a year under the National Security Act. The student was detained after a disturbance at a university campus in Madhya Pradesh's Betul which reportedly occurred after he allegedly clashed with a professor on June 14, 2024, Live Law reported. The first information report filed in the case included charges pertaining to attempt to murder. The student surrendered on June 16 and was placed under judicial custody. When he was in jail, the authorities issued a preventive detention order under the National Security Act which kept getting extended every three months, the legal news outlet reported. The National Security Act allows the Central or state government to order the detention of a person 'with a view to preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the defence of India, the relations with foreign powers, or the security of India'. It may also order detention to prevent them from acting in any manner prejudicial 'to the security of the State', the 'maintenance of public order' or the 'maintenance of supplies and services essential to the community'. The police and district magistrates have the power to issue detention orders, subject to approval by the state government within 12 days. Rights bodies in India have criticised the National Security Act for vaguely worded charges, procedures that subvert the due processes of law, provisions that require courts to draw 'adverse inferences' against the accused, lack of mechanisms to prevent arbitrary or discriminatory detention, and sweeping immunities for government officials. During the hearing, a bench of Justices Ujjal Bhuyan and Vinod Chandran found the reasons for his detention insufficient to meet legal requirements, calling his confinement 'wholly untenable'. The Supreme Court found invoking the National Security Act unnecessary saying that there was no proper reason to keep him in preventive detention while he was already being held under regular legal charges, Live Law reported. 'At the most, these are all issues of law and order,' the court verbally observed. ''Public order' is something bigger.'


India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Face Of Democracy...: Police Detain BJPs Sukanta Majumdar During Protests Against Kolkata Law College Gangrape Case
Kolkata Gangrape Case: Police detained Union Minister and West Bengal Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) President Sukanta Majumdar on Saturday while he was protesting against the alleged horrific gangrape incident at South Calcutta Law College in Kolkata. The case came to light on Friday, and so far, four individuals have been arrested in connection with the case. "This is the face of democracy in West Bengal. Mamata Banerjee has ruined democracy in the state... The police have arrested me and other workers (of the BJP)," according to ANI, Majumdar said while being detained by the police. #WATCH | West Bengal | Police detain Union Minister and West Bengal BJP President Sukanta Majumdar while he was protesting against the alleged gangrape incident at South Calcutta Law College in Kolkata, on 25th June evening. He says, "This is the face of democracy in West… — ANI (@ANI) June 28, 2025 Kolkata Law College Rape Case A female student was allegedly gang-raped inside the South Calcutta Law College in Kolkata's Kasba on Wednesday. The National Commission for Women (NCW) on Friday took suo motu cognisance of the incident. NCW Chairperson Vijaya Rahatkar expressed deep concern and wrote to the Commissioner of Police, Kolkata, urging a time-bound investigation under relevant provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). In her letter, Rahatkar demanded full medical, psychological, and legal support for the survivor and requested that authorities ensure compensation is provided under Section 396 of the BNSS. Four Arrests Earlier, the police had arrested three accused within 24 hours; they are named as Monojit Mishra (31), Zaib Ahmed (19), and Pramit Mukhopadhyay (20), who were former students or staff members of the same law college. On Saturday, Kolkata Police also arrested the guard of the South Calcutta Law College. As per ANI, the police said, "Guard of the Law College, Pinaki Banerjee (55) has also been arrested in the case." Political Row The alleged gangrape has triggered a political row between the leaders of the ruling TMC and the opposition BJP. While, BJP MLA Shankar Ghosh demanded Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee's immediate resignation on Saturday, over the alleged Kolkata gang rape case. Speaking to ANI, Ghosh said, "This incident reveals the character of TMC, their thoughts towards women. I demand the immediate resignation of Mamata Banerjee as the CM of West Bengal. Under her rule, no one is safe." On the other hand, BJP leader Amit Malviya, in a post on X, alleged that one of the accused, Mishra, has ties with TMC.