
Calls to cancel B.C. Ferries contract with China misguided, say mayors in ferry-reliant communities
B.C. Ferries' announcement that its four new vessels will be built in China has made waves, with the ripple effects reaching all the way to Ottawa.
Canada's transport minister, Chrystia Freeland, has said she's disappointed with the decision and the Conservatives, both federally and in B.C., have gone further, saying the deal should be scrapped entirely.
But no Canadian companies bid on the contract, and B.C. Ferries says it would have cost at least $1 billion more to have the ferries built in Europe.
Some mayors in ferry-dependent communities say residents don't care where the new ships are built, as long as it results in more reliable service and affordable fares.
Marine industry association weighs in on shipbuilding growth in B.C.
3 days ago
Duration 7:04
Sechelt Mayor John Henderson says the political rhetoric ignores the needs of people in his community who rely on the ferries as their highway system.
"We need these built, we need them built yesterday," Henderson said. "As ferry-dependent users, we don't really care [where they're built], because we need them."
Henderson acknowledges the new vessels will service the larger routes, and not smaller communities like his, but they will help improve the overall reliability of B.C. Ferries' aging fleet.
"To stop this process and start it again in a new fashion, we're not talking months, we're talking years, and we don't have years."
Andrew Leonard, the mayor of Bowen Island, says his residents are affected when B.C. Ferries ships that are well past their lifespan break down and are out of service.
"The trickle-down effect is that does cause chaos in the Horseshoe Bay terminal," said Leonard, which can in turn disrupt the smaller ferries heading to Bowen Island.
That's why, he says, the political debate about where the ferries will be made is "disconnected" from the needs of local residents.
"I'm not sure how big of a deal it is if there's not Canadian capacity to build those vessels," Leonard said.
North Vancouver's Seaspan, B.C.'s largest shipyard, did not bid on the contract because it's busy building ships for the Royal Canadian Navy.
"I think going forward, there's a huge opportunity to work with the federal government to ensure our shipbuilding industry has the opportunity to build these ferries right here in Canada," said Premier David Eby.
Eby also points out that B.C. Ferries is getting short shrift when it comes to federal cash for ferries, compared to ferries in Atlantic Canada.
B.C. Ferries received $35.6 million from Ottawa last year. Based on 22.7 million passengers that year, that amounts to $1.50 per passenger.
Compare that to Marine Atlantic, which received $192 million from the federal government while servicing 367,786 passengers. That breaks down to $522 per passenger.
Transport committee launching study of B.C. Ferries' $1B loan for Chinese ships
6 days ago
Duration 2:28
The controversial decision to buy a new B.C. Ferries vessel from China has caught the attention of the federal government. The Transport Committee in Ottawa is promising to investigate a loan the Canada Infrastructure Bank gave B.C. Ferries for the purchase. Michelle Morton has more on the concerns being raised about how taxpayer dollars are being invested while Canada faces a trade war.
Trevor Heaver, a UBC professor emeritus who specializes in transport economics, says the federal government's relationship with Marine Atlantic — a federal Crown corporation that operates ferries between Newfoundland and Nova Scotia — is different than that with B.C. Ferries, a private company owned by the B.C. government.
"[Marine Atlantic's] relationship with the federal government is completely different than B.C. Ferries because Canada has an obligation under Confederation to support those ferries," Heaver said.
The federal government agreed to provide subsidies for ferries when Atlantic provinces joined Confederation in 1867, whereas Ottawa's funding for B.C. Ferries was negotiated by former premier Bill Bennett in 1977.
Nonetheless, Eby is using that disparity to bolster his argument that B.C. is consistently forgotten by Ottawa, while central and Atlantic Canada reap the rewards.
The premier also points out that one of Marine Atlantic's newest ships was built in the same Chinese state-owned company, CMI Weihei Shipyards, without a similar backlash.
"In fact, a [Marine Atlantic] ferry was built at the exact same Chinese shipyard as the B.C. Ferries [ships] are going to be built and their ferry[is] paid for in its entirety, whereas the West Coast only qualifies for a loan."
It follows criticism from provincial and federal Conservatives, who say the loan contradicts statements from Freeland that no federal money would subsidize the contract with China.
Kiel Giddens, the B.C. Conservative labour critic, says a key piece of legislation passed to respond to tariff threats — Bill 7 — gives the power to overturn procurement decisions to prioritize a made-in-Canada approach.
"We think [the NDP] government should actually be cancelling this contract and bringing some of these jobs back home," Giddens said. "If not full capacity here, design your procurement in a way that it will be possible for some Canadian jobs and the rest with Canada's allies."
Heaver says demanding that the ships be made in Canada — even at a higher cost — ignores the principles of global free trade.
"The notion that ships to be operated by BC Ferries should be constructed in Canada is acting rather like Mr. Trump," said Heaver, pointing to the U.S. president's protectionist policies such as tariffs.
B.C. shipyard contracted to build federal vessels but not local ferries
18 days ago
Duration 2:07
There have been questions over why a B.C. Ferries' contract went to a Chinese shipyard instead of North Vancouver's Seaspan. As Leanne Yu reports, B.C.'s largest shipyard is already busy with federal projects.
"We have fundamentally to accept that we can't do all things," Heaver said. "And that we rely on a competitive process to use resources most efficiently for the benefit of consumers."
Some ferry users who spoke to CBC News at the Swartz Bay terminal in North Saanich say the upgraded vessels can't come fast enough.
"I'm always concerned about value for dollars," says Erroll Winter, who lives on the Lower Mainland. "Certainly I'd like [the contract] to go toward Canadian builders if it's possible, but I'm also torn between the costs of the ferries. They're already very expensive."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Vancouver Sun
3 minutes ago
- Vancouver Sun
Conversations Live: One-on-one with the U.S. ambassador to Canada
With trade tensions at an all-time high, citizens on both sides of the border have been anxiously waiting for the next move in U.S. President Donald Trump's chess game. Join us this Thursday at 5 p.m. as Conversations Live host Stuart McNish sits down with the U.S. ambassador to Canada, Pete Hoekstra, for a special one-on-one discussion about the current state of Canada-U. S. relations. You can watch the livestream here starting at 5 p.m. and submit questions below.


Globe and Mail
3 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
DOW Gears Up for Q2 Earnings: What's in the Cards for the Stock?
Dow Inc. DOW is scheduled to come up with second-quarter 2025 results before the opening bell on July 24. DOW surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate in two of the trailing four quarters and missed twice. It has a trailing four-quarter earnings surprise of 24.2% on average. Dow posted an earnings surprise of 200% in the last reported quarter. While DOW is expected to have benefited from its productivity initiatives, soft demand due to weak global economic activities and pricing pressures are likely to have affected its second-quarter performance. Dow's shares are down 44.4% over a year compared with the Zacks Chemicals Diversified industry's 18.4% decline. Let's see how things are shaping up for this announcement. What Do DOW's Revenue Estimates Say? The Zacks Consensus Estimate for revenues for DOW for the to-be-reported quarter is pinned at $10,445.6 million, suggesting a year-over-year decline of 4.6%. Our estimate for revenues for the Packaging & Specialty Plastics segment is currently pegged at $5,197.9 million, calling for a decline of 5.8% year over year. The same for the Industrial Intermediates & Infrastructure segment stands at $2,884.6 million, indicating a 2.3% year-over-year decline. Our estimate for revenues for the Performance Materials & Coatings segment is pinned at $2,142.1 million, suggesting a fall of 4.5% year over year. Factors Shaping DOW's Q2 Results Dow is expected to have faced headwinds from demand softness in Europe and China in the quarter to be reported. Lower consumer spending amid inflationary pressures is affecting demand in Europe. Construction and manufacturing activities remain soft in the region. Demand in Asia has been affected by a weaker demand recovery in China. The property sector in China remains sluggish, with declining new home prices. Inflationary pressures are impacting consumer durables and building and construction demand. Demand in infrastructure, including residential construction, also remains weak. Dow sees softness in automotive in Europe due to low demand. Soft conditions across these markets are likely to have weighed on DOW's volumes in the second quarter. Weak macroeconomic conditions due to disruptions caused by tariffs are expected to have affected business and consumer sentiment. Dow is also being challenged by weak siloxane prices in its Performance Materials & Coatings unit. The segment continues to see siloxane pricing pressure partly due to supply additions in Asia. Siloxane prices remain under pressure due to competitive pricing pressure resulting from additional supply driven by capacity additions in China. While capacity additions have slowed, elevated industry supply is expected to continue to have impacted prices in the second quarter. Nevertheless, Dow is likely to have benefited from cost-saving and productivity actions. DOW is implementing targeted actions focused on reducing direct costs and labor costs. It is taking action to cut costs by $1 billion to drive margins. Dow sees around $300 million in benefits from these actions in 2025, with full benefits expected by 2026. The benefits of DOW's cost-saving actions are likely to be reflected in its bottom line in the to-be-reported quarter. Dow Inc. Price and EPS Surprise Dow Inc. price-eps-surprise | Dow Inc. Quote What Our Model Unveils for DOW Stock Our proven model does not conclusively predict an earnings beat for DOW this season. The combination of a positive Earnings ESP and a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy) or 3 (Hold) increases the chances of an earnings beat. But that's not the case here. Earnings ESP: Earnings ESP for DOW is -53.04%. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for the second quarter is currently pegged at a loss of 8 cents. You can uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before they're reported with our Earnings ESP Filter. Zacks Rank: DOW currently carries a Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell). Basic Materials Stocks That Warrant a Look Here are some companies in the basic materials space you may want to consider as our model shows they have the right combination of elements to post an earnings beat this quarter: Agnico Eagle Mines Limited AEM, scheduled to release earnings on July 30, has an Earnings ESP of +8.77% and carries a Zacks Rank #1. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank stocks here. The consensus estimate for AEM's earnings for the second quarter is currently pegged at $1.66. Newmont Corporation NEM, slated to release earnings on July 24, has an Earnings ESP of +4.42% and carries a Zacks Rank #2 at present. The consensus mark for NEM's second-quarter earnings is currently pegged at $1.05. Kinross Gold Corporation KGC, scheduled to release earnings on July 30, has an Earnings ESP of +15.34%. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for KGC's earnings for the second quarter is currently pegged at 27 cents. KGC currently carries a Zacks Rank #1. 5 Stocks Set to Double Each was handpicked by a Zacks expert as the #1 favorite stock to gain +100% or more in the coming year. While not all picks can be winners, previous recommendations have soared +112%, +171%, +209% and +232%. Most of the stocks in this report are flying under Wall Street radar, which provides a great opportunity to get in on the ground floor. Today, See These 5 Potential Home Runs >> Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Dow Inc. (DOW): Free Stock Analysis Report Newmont Corporation (NEM): Free Stock Analysis Report Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC): Free Stock Analysis Report Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM): Free Stock Analysis Report


CBC
4 minutes ago
- CBC
Toronto has 6 months to meet terms of housing agreement with Ottawa, minister says
Toronto has six months to meet the terms of a housing agreement with Ottawa, the federal housing minister said — a deadline that comes as the city risks losing $30 million in federal housing funds. Minister Gregor Robertson said it was "disappointing" that Toronto city council voted against allowing sixplexes citywide last month, which was a key condition of its deal with the federal government. "We need Toronto, as the biggest city in Canada, to be really leading the charge in solving the housing crisis we have," Robertson said in an interview with CBC Radio's Metro Morning on Wednesday. Robertson did not say whether Toronto risks losing some of the federal funding it was promised if it sticks to its sixplex plan, but he said the government will review its agreement with the city in January. He said he sent a letter to Toronto Mayor Olivia Chow this week that lays out these terms. "We've got six months ahead of us to sort this all out," he said. "Certainly, my expectation is that Toronto will respect the agreement and the commitments that they came up with, and we're going to see that delivered." CBC Toronto has reached out to the city for comment. Toronto on track to meet housing goal, Chow says Toronto city council voted in June to allow sixplexes in only nine wards and give other wards the chance to opt-in. In his letter to Chow, provided to CBC Toronto, Robertson wrote he was disappointed about the decision, which he wrote "goes against the level of ambition that was committed to in our Housing Accelerator Fund Agreement by the City of Toronto." "I will underscore the possibility of reduced funding if the City of Toronto does not present solutions that ensures the spirit of the agreement is met," reads the letter from Monday. In March, then-federal housing minister Nate Erskine-Smith warned Chow that any deviation from a citywide policy permitting sixplexes would result in 25 per cent less federal funding. That amounts to almost $30 million of the total $118 million that Ottawa has pledged annually to Toronto from its Housing Accelerator Fund, a program that provides incentive funding for cities to build more homes. Chow responded to Robertson's letter on Wednesday, writing the city is on track to exceed its target of building 60,980 homes over the course of the three-year agreement with Ottawa. "We are making progress on multiple fronts: zoning, building, cutting red tape, and protecting existing homes," she wrote in the letter, obtained by CBC Toronto. Chow wrote she has added a motion to city council's meeting on Wednesday to waive development charges for sixplexes "to make these projects more financially viable and easier to build." Some residents had opposed building sixplexes in Toronto at a city planning and housing committee meeting held in June before the council vote. One resident said multiplexes have caused many issues, including problems related to parking and privacy. Robertson told Metro Morning there is "a lot of misinformation" about sixplexes, which he called relatively gentle density.