UK court convicts three of arson organised by Russia's Wagner group
Prosecutors said the 20 March 2024 attack was planned by agents of Russia's Wagner mercenary group, acting on behalf of Russian military intelligence.
The British government has proscribed Wagner as a terrorist organisation.
The prosecution said Wagner used British intermediaries to recruit the men to target an industrial unit in Leyton where generators and StarLink satellite equipment bound for Ukraine were being stored.
The StarLink is frequently used by Ukraine's military in fending off Russia's full-scale invasion.
Authorities said the arson was part of a campaign of disruption across Europe that Western officials blame on Moscow and its proxies.
A jury at London's Central Criminal Court found Jakeem Rose, 23, Ugnius Asmena, 20, and Nii Mensah, 23, guilty of aggravated arson.
A fourth man, 61-year-old Paul English, was acquitted.
The fire caused around £1 million (€1.16 million) worth of damage.
Prosecutors said the attack was orchestrated by Dylan Earl, 21, and 23-year-old Jake Reeves, who pleaded guilty to aggravated arson on behalf of the Wagner Group before the trial started.
They also pleaded guilty to offences under the UK's National Security Act 2023.
Two other men were on trial over the arson and related plots. One was found guilty on Tuesday of failing to disclose information about terrorist acts, while the other was cleared.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
9 hours ago
- Euronews
Taliban tortured Afghans expelled from Pakistan and Iran, UN says
The Taliban have tortured and threatened Afghan nationals who were forcibly returned from Iran and Pakistan because of their identity or personal history, a UN report said on Thursday. Pakistan and Iran are expelling millions of Afghans who they say are living in their countries illegally. Afghan authorities have urged nationals to return, pledging amnesty for anyone who left after the Taliban returned to power in 2021. But rights groups and the UN have repeatedly warned that some of those returning are at risk of persecution because of their gender, profession or links to the former Western-backed administration. Thursday's report from the UN mission in Afghanistan said some people have experienced serious human rights violations, while others have gone into hiding or relocated for fear of Taliban reprisal. The violations include torture, ill-treatment, arbitrary arrest and threats to personal security at the hands of the Taliban, according to the report. A former government official told the UN mission that, after his return to Afghanistan in 2023, he was detained and severely tortured with sticks and cables. He was waterboarded and subjected to a mock execution. A non-binary person said they were beaten severely, including with the back of a gun. Volker Türk, the UN high commissioner for human rights, said nobody should be sent back to a country where they face the risk of persecution on account of their identity or personal history. This was even more pronounced for Afghan women and girls, who were subjected to a range of measures "amounting to persecution based on their gender alone," he added. The Taliban have imposed severe restrictions on Afghan girls and women, cutting off access to education beyond the age of 12, most employment and access to many public spaces. Responding to the report, Taliban authorities denied mistreating Afghan returnees and rejected allegations of arrest, violence, intimidation or retaliation against people because of their identity or personal history. Afghans returning from neighbouring countries were provided with facilities related to documentation, transportation, resettlement, and other legal support, they said, while the Interior Ministry provides a "warm welcome." They called on the UN mission to prevent forced deportations, adding the United Nations as a whole 'should not hesitate' in providing basic needs to refugees, such as food, medicine, shelter and education. An uncertain future Afghans who left their homeland in the millions over the decades are either being pushed out in expulsion campaigns, like those in Iran and Pakistan, or face an uncertain future because of reduced support for refugees. On Monday, thousands of Afghans in the US lost protection from deportation after a federal appeals court refused to postpone US President Donald Trump administration's decision to end their legal status. US Homeland Security officials said in their decision to end the Temporary Protected Status for Afghans that the situation in their home country was getting better. But groups helping Afghans with this status say the country is still extremely dangerous. The Trump administration's suspension of a refugee programme in January has left thousands of Afghans stranded, particularly in Pakistan, and a travel ban on Afghans has further diminished their hopes of resettlement in the US.
Euronews
11 hours ago
- Euronews
Russian strike damages UNESCO-protected sites in Ukraine's Odesa
The city of Odesa in southern Ukraine was the target of a major Russian drone attack on Wednesday night, destroying a nine-storey building and damaging several historic monuments in the old town. The Russian drone attack damaged UNESCO-protected landmarks, such as Prymorskyi Boulevard and the Pryvoz Market, both part of the historic centre of the Black Sea port city, Oleh Kiper, head of the Odesa regional military administration, said on Telegram. Various fires broke out in the region as a result of the strikes, including at a nine-storey residential building. At least four people were injured, spokesperson for the State Emergency Service of Odesa, Marina Averina, reported. Apartments from the fifth to the eighth floors were destroyed, and fires broke out on the fifth and sixth floors. Emergency crews rescued five people trapped in their apartments and evacuated another 33 residents. Russia also launched attacks in the Cherkasy, Kharkiv, Zaporizhzhia, Donetsk, Sumy and Mykolaiv regions, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy wrote on X. "Yesterday, at the meeting in Istanbul, the proposal for an immediate and full ceasefire was reiterated to the Russian side," Zelenskyy wrote, adding that in response, Russia had launched numerous attacks at Ukraine. In Kharkiv, three people were killed and at least five injured, Governor Oleh Syniehubov said. And overnight attacks at Cherkasy, south-east of Kyiv, sparked several fires and injured at least seven people, including a child, according to local media. Local authorities reported that two powerful explosions went off in the city, resulting in power cuts and interruptions to Internet connections. Ivan Fedorov, head of the Zaporizhzhia Regional Military Administration, reported that the region was targeted by nine Shahed drones during the night, resulting in multiple fires. The town of Mykolaiv, in the south of the country, also became the target of a drone attack. The head of the Regional Military Administration, Vitalii Kim, said Russia attacked the town with Shahed drones overnight. No casualties have yet been reported. Ukrainian army targets Russian oil depot Meanwhile, a Ukrainian drone struck an oil depot in Sirius, near the Russian city of Sochi, in the Krasnodar region. The local governor, Veniamin Kondratyev, reported that two people were killed by fallen debris from a drone that had been shot down in Sochi. "Debris from the drone also fell on the territory of an oil depot. As a result of the attack, 11 people were injured, four were hospitalised," he wrote on Telegram. These claims could not be independently verified. The Russian Defence Ministry claimed that 42 Ukrainian drones were intercepted by Russian defence systems on Wednesday night, including seven in the Krasnodar region.
Euronews
15 hours ago
- Euronews
Why Ukraine's new anti-corruption law spells trouble for its EU hopes
For the past three years, the European Union has invoked the mantra of "as long as it takes" to reaffirm, time and time again, its unyielding, all-encompassing support for Ukraine as it fights against Russia's brutal full-scale invasion. That pledge was not merely rhetorical. It translated into financial assistance, weapons and ammunition, energy security, roaming services, a free-trade deal and temporary protection for refugees. The bloc's proposed seven-year budget features a separate, tailor-made fund worth €100 billion to help the country's long-term reconstruction. But this week, that unbroken front cracked for the first time when the European Commission slammed, in no uncertain terms, a new law in Ukraine. The law, passed through parliament at a speed that appeared to catch Brussels off guard, is designed to bring two anti-corruption bodies – the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) and the Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO) – under the direct oversight of the prosecutor general, a political appointee. The prosecutor general will now be allowed to select cases handled by NABU and SAPO and reassign them to other state entities, which critics say risks empowering the executive branch to sway and possibly derail high-profile investigations. The prosecutor general will also be able to give written instructions to the agencies. The fact that the vote in parliament took place a day after the security services raided the NABU offices over allegations of Russian espionage added to the outrage. Marta Kos, the European Commissioner for Enlargement, who is tasked with assessing the progress made by candidate countries, was the first to express her disapproval. "Seriously concerned over today's vote in the Rada. The dismantling of key safeguards protecting NABU's independence is a serious step back," Kos said on social media. The warning was stark, but futile. A few hours later, amid growing uproar from protesters across Ukraine, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy signed the bill into law. "The anti-corruption infrastructure will work, only without Russian influence – it needs to be cleared of that. And there should be more justice," Zelenskyy said in his evening address, referring to the recent raids into the NABU offices. "It is important that the Prosecutor General is determined to ensure that in Ukraine, the inevitability of punishment for those who go against the law is actually ensured. This is what Ukraine really needs." The following day, the extraordinary clash escalated when Ursula von der Leyen called Zelenskyy and demanded explanations about the contentious legislation. "President von der Leyen conveyed her strong concerns about the consequences of the amendments," a spokesperson said. "The respect for the rule of law and the fight against corruption are core elements of the European Union. As a candidate country, Ukraine is expected to uphold these standards fully. There cannot be a compromise." A few hours after the phone call, Zelenskyy promised to submit a new bill to "ensure the strength of the rule of law system", without giving further details. Separation of powers The hands-on interventions signal the high-risk gamble that Kyiv is taking. The fight against corruption has been central to Ukraine's ambition to join the bloc. It was among the first issues raised by reporters and analysts when Zelenskyy, in the first days of Russia's war, submitted the membership application and remained a prominent subject as the debate among capitals gained traction. Corruption has been a notoriously persistent problem in Ukraine since the collapse of the Soviet Union, when oligarchs and organised crime rushed to exploit the chaos of the political transition and pillaged the up-for-grabs sectors of the economy. Corruption has been detected in elections, the judiciary, the public administration, the education system and the business sector, creating an impression of widespread penetration. Transparency International has consistently ranked Ukraine among Europe's worst performers on corruption. Although the country's score has moderately grown over the last decade, it remains outside the top 100. Mindful of the formidable challenge, the Commission made strengthening the fight against corruption one of the seven prerequisites that Ukraine had to fulfil before formally starting accession negotiations. Leaders agreed to launch talks in December 2023, despite Kyiv having made only partial progress on anti-corruption, de-oligarchisation and the rights of minorities. Since then, Brussels has encouraged Ukraine to continue its efforts, which are essential to convince international donors and investors to bring capital into the nation. The latest edition of the enlargement report, released in October 2024, found that Ukraine had "further improved" the credibility of its anti-corruption framework and had "strengthened the independence and the institutional capacity" of NABU and SAPO, which were created in response to the 2014 revolution. NABU investigates top-level corruption, and its cases are overseen and prosecuted by SAPO. The cases are then tried by the High Anti-Corruption Court. "NABU and SAPO have maintained their operational effectiveness and remain important institutional pillars in the anti-corruption infrastructure," the Commission said. The report highlighted the fact that SAPO had become a "separate legal entity" from the prosecutor general's office and recommended that the head of SAPO be allowed to open investigations into members of the parliament "independently" from the prosecutor. These elements are rendered null by the new law, which places the prosecutor general at the top of both agencies as the ultimate arbiter. Conscious uncoupling? The apparent backsliding threatens to worsen the already precarious state of Ukraine's European integration. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has imposed an unassailable veto that prevents the country from opening the first cluster of accession negotiations, known as Fundamentals. That cluster also covers the fight against corruption. Orbán has focused his opposition on the fact that Ukraine is a country at war and, in his view, fails to respect the rights of its Hungarian minority. The prime minister has branded the results of a national consultation as a "strong mandate" to freeze the bid. In response to Orbán's actions, the Commission came forcefully to Kyiv's defence, arguing there were "no objective reasons" to block the first cluster. "Things are really clear: as we speak, Ukraine is delivering on reforms in the most difficult circumstances that one can imagine," a spokesperson said earlier this month. The row over the anti-corruption reform provides Orbán and other sceptics with a fresh argument to derail the accession process and, perhaps inevitably, fuels speculation about a potential decoupling of Ukraine's and Moldova's bids. The two Eastern countries applied for EU membership shortly after Russia launched the full-scale invasion and were declared candidates on the same day in June 2022. Since then, they have moved together as a "couple". The Commission considers both equally ready to open the first cluster and is waiting for member states to give their unanimous go-ahead. Notably, Orbán has not voiced any reservations about Moldova's ambitions, which means Chișinău could unlock the next stage of negotiations while Kyiv waits for the veto to be lifted. Until now, member states have been reluctant to decouple the bids, fearing that doing so would amount to a big victory for Orbán and a stinging defeat for Ukraine. The dispute over the anti-corruption legislation could now prompt a change of mindset. "Events in Ukraine are extremely worrying and risk undermining Ukraine's EU accession process, which is already stalled due to Hungary's veto on opening the fundamentals cluster," said Amanda Paula, a senior policy analyst at the European Policy Centre (EPC). "I believe it will give momentum to discussions about uncoupling Moldova from Ukraine. It would be unfair to hold back Moldova because of developments in Ukraine." The fight against corruption is pivotal not only to Ukraine's accession – it is also ingrained in the commitments the country made to the European Commission as a condition for receiving gradual payments under a dedicated €50 billion fund. These payments, crucial to sustaining public services and paying for salaries, represent a powerful leverage should Brussels decide to escalate the showdown until Kyiv reverses the legal changes and restores the independence of NABU and SAPO. A Commission spokesperson said it was premature to speculate about a possible freezing of funds at this stage.
