Race for the Áras: Joe Duffy and Bertie Ahern among names circulating but parties wary of ‘knee-jerk' selection
Fianna Fáil
had come out of the party's worst election in its long history and had no appetite to run its own candidate in the
presidential election
that year.
Somebody who knew
Gay Byrne
took it upon themselves to approach the former Late Late Show host (then 77 years old) to see if he might be interested in a tilt at the Áras. It led to serious discussions, including a conversation with party leader Micheál Martin. If Byrne agreed to stand, it would be a considerable coup for the party. Here was a bona fide celebrity candidate who could command widespread support.
When word of the talks got out, Byrne was immediately installed as odds-on favourite, even though he had not fully made his mind up. Then, in comments he made at a public event, he said Ireland was being 'run by mad people in Brussels'.
Unsurprisingly, that caused a big stir. Now, Byrne was facing intense scrutiny by the media on all kinds of issues and views. Within 48 hours he was out of the race, saying it was more trouble than it was worth.
READ MORE
Fourteen years – and two presidential terms – later, Byrne's protegee, Joe Duffy, is being mentioned in the same breath at the same period of the electoral cycle. When he retired from Liveline last month, after 26 years at the helm, Duffy gave a tongue-in-cheek response when asked if he would be a candidate.
'I was president of Trinity students' union; I still have the posters. But my face has changed a lot. Maybe my intellect isn't as strong as it used to be,' he said.
There was little that could be taken from his comments to suggest a definite interest on Duffy's part. Nonetheless, he did not categorically rule himself out. That was enough to make him something of a talking point in Leinster House this week, with the broadcaster's name being linked with Fianna Fáil, and also with Labour. 'If he stood tomorrow, he'd win,' said a Fianna Fáil TD, one of about half a dozen who mentioned his name to me as a possible contender.
Attempts to reach Mr Duffy this week were not successful. With no further comment from him, or from any party, and no confirmation of any contacts, his status at the moment is that of yet another name being thrown into the mix of 'maybes', along with former WHO deputy director Dr Mike Ryan, Ireland's Ambassador to the USA Geraldine Byrne-Nason, and Irish Times columnist Fintan O'Toole.
The big three political parties all insist, when asked, it is too early to predict the composition of the field. A senior figure in Fianna Fáil points out that the last time it contested a presidential election, in 1997, its candidate Mary McAleese was not selected until September 19th, just six weeks before polling day.
'Mary McAleese was certainly not a household name back then. Her success depended entirely on how successful that short campaign would be in elevating her standing among the public,' said the source.
'It's too early in July. Our approach will be measured and not knee-jerk.'
Forward momentum in this campaign has hit the doldrums in recent weeks. The Opposition party leaders (all representing left and left-of-centre parties) held informal talks earlier this year with a view to finding an agreed candidate. Nothing has come of them as yet and all that urgency has faded.
There have been no meetings lately, though the parties plan to reconvene before the summer recess to continue the search.
With all becalmed, there has been inertia. Last week, one of the people who might be seen as an agreed candidate of the left, Senator Frances Black, said she was ruling herself out '99.5 per cent'. No party has approached her to date, she confirmed. The subliminal message was that her patience had run out.
[
Opposition parties cooling on possibility of joint left candidate for presidential race
Opens in new window
]
There is another undercurrent that might explain the dearth of people coming forward. That is the view that presidential campaigns have become personalised and brutal, which has a chilling effect on prospective candidates.
Labour TD Alan Kelly certainly thinks so. 'There are people who would make a very good president of Ireland, very rounded people, with huge capacity and integrity. It's become clear to me that very few of them would ever put themselves through this campaign, as they've seen what has happened in the past. This is a real issue for society,' he says.
He recalls the bruising experience of Labour candidate Adi Roche in 1997, in which she and her family were the subject of a smear campaign. Dana Rosemary Scallon has talked in recent weeks to Oliver Callan on RTÉ of how traumatic the 2011 campaign was for her.
Gavin Duffy was a candidate in 2018 and found himself under similar unyielding scrutiny. In his case, it was in connection with his involvement in a crash 40 years earlier in which a young woman was seriously injured. Then 18, he was convicted for careless driving and for being uninsured.
Duffy says he was realistic enough to know before then that he was not a contender. The incident being brought up, however, was difficult to respond to from both a personal and a campaign perspective.
Speaking not of his own candidacy but in general terms, he says: 'It's not an election, it's a process of elimination.
'Something is spun in a way to appear like a serious character flaw, and therefore confidence is undermined. The candidate drops in the polls, and eventually the last man or woman standing is elected.'
Comparing 2018 and 2025 is not a like-for-like exercise, Duffy says. Back then, President Michael D Higgins was seeking reelection. Sinn Féin was the only party that fielded a candidate. The rest were independents.
'This election is very different. We are going to get a higher calibre of proven, established politicians running with the backing of their political parties.'
In other words, it will be a more serious, less visceral contest. Right now, there are signs that bigger parties are finally beginning to swing into action.
Fine Gael will open its nominations on Monday and close on July 15th. If there is more than one candidate, the party will hold hustings in late July and conduct a postal ballot in August, using its electoral college system. It is widely expected that former EU commissioner Mairéad McGuinness and sitting MEP Seán Kelly will seek nominations.
[
Fine Gael's Seán Kelly 'could do a lot' as president but stops short of declaring run
Opens in new window
]
In a letter to members, Fine Gael general secretary John Carroll set out the timeline if there is a bout: 'The result will be announced, and the candidate ratified, at an event in early September.'
By that time, Sinn Féin and Fianna Fáil will be close to reaching their decisions. Sinn Féin consulted widely with its membership last month on its best approach.
A spokesman said this week the process will conclude in early autumn and added that a no-candidate scenario was not envisaged. Essentially that means it will have its own candidate, or support someone whose political space is contiguous to Sinn Féin's. Finding the ideal candidate might prove a challenge, though.
The same questions face Fianna Fáil. Talking to its TDs and Senators in Leinster House on Wednesday and Thursday, most were strongly of the view that the party should field a candidate.
The last Fianna Fáil candidate was McAleese 28 years ago. 'We are the biggest party. We can't exclude ourselves in this election for three decades,' said a veteran TD on Thursday.
A few names have been mentioned, including Bertie Ahern, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú and Mary Hanafin.
On Thursday, former minister of State, and head of Unicef Ireland, Peter Power, was on manoeuvres around Leinster House, gauging the support levels of colleagues. He is said to be interested in running.
The party's nomination process is a straight vote of its TDs and Senators. All who spoke to The Irish Times said that – in realpolitik – Taoiseach Micheál Martin would effectively make the final decision on running a candidate, and probably on the identity of the candidate.
[
Fianna Fáil is in desperate need of a candidate for the presidential election. Applications are invited
Opens in new window
]
In the past, those seeking nominations were often serving TDs. No such figure has emerged this time.
The feedback from senior party figures is that for it to contest the election, it will need a candidate of status who is capable of winning. There is a sense that such a candidate has yet to be identified.
Could there be a dark horse? Some independents will succeed in getting a nomination and Duffy can see a serious contender among them.
'Somebody could emerge from left field who can appeal to people under 35 who don't vote [along party lines],' he said.
'I think there is a lot of angst about housing. If somebody can play into that stream, they could do very well.'
He and others believe there will be four to six candidates - one each from Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael and Sinn Féin, a candidate representing smaller left parties, and one or two independents, who have secured their nominations by getting the backing of four local authorities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Irish Army Rangers board the MV Matthew in largest-ever drugs haul
Mr Starmer told Virgin Radio he had spoken to the chancellor and she was 'fine', and her tears were as a result of a 'purely personal' matter. (Reuters)
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Expect plenty of cribbin' and moanin' as the budget games begin
The budget games are under way, right enough. Impending decisions about spending priorities for next year and into the future are now the unavoidable context of every political exchange – especially those within Government , some of which you'll see, most of which you won't. They are the subtext of every interview, news story and speech between now and October. As ever, the management of expectations at the centre is essential at this stage. At the recent National Economic Dialogue Paschal Donohoe solemnly warned of deep uncertainty about the future and that (inconveniently) positive headline economic figures so far this year mask 'considerable vulnerabilities'. 'The mood music is changing,' Donohoe warned. His party leader saw 'dark clouds on the horizon'. For the Taoiseach , 'challenging,' was the mot juste. In the Dáil this week, Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers returned to the theme. READ MORE 'We face significant economic uncertainty,' he said. 'Everyone in this House needs to realise the level and degree of ... corporate risks that exists right now.' As the Bert used to say during the late stage hubris of the Celtic Tiger, sure this is all cribbin' and moanin' and talkin' down the country. Still, you can see what they're at. The country and its political system have become accustomed to massive giveaway budgets, and cannot contemplate restraint. Well, let me qualify that thought: everyone can contemplate restraint, just not for themselves. Everyone has a demand for extra spending, sourced from the public purse. Some have a good case; all believe they deserve priority. Much of our media – especially RTÉ – is in the habit of promoting the causes of all comers relentlessly and uncritically. Of course, RTÉ might feel a special affinity with bodies looking for money from the Government. But still. Some context would not go amiss – how much would this cost? What is the existing budget? Where might the money come from? What should not be done in order to pay for this? What taxes should be increased? The list of supplicants for greater public funding is literally unending. A casual glance at a political correspondent's inbox gives a flavour of the requests bombarding the budget ministers: extra provision for education for people with disabilities; extra funding for school capitation; VAT cuts for the embattled hospitality industry; a €25 per week increase in welfare rates; this week's cause celebre – retaining the €1,000 discount on fees for third level students; and so on, and so on. [ The Irish Times view on college fees: Government has a choice to make Opens in new window ] Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan played a more subtle hand. Speaking at the Free Legal Advice Centre in Dublin, he said it was clear that Ireland has 'a big problem' with domestic violence. He would like to provide more resources for Flac and for civil legal aid – but 'I'm limited in terms of budget'. He is getting to the heart of the entire question of budgeting: it's all a question of priorities. Few people would quibble with increasing the budget for legal aid to ensure that people can have access to justice and to the protection of the law, when that question is taken in isolation. But governments cannot take any of these questions in isolation – they must weigh it all up as part of a coherent and credible whole of Government budgetary plan. Within the justice budget, for example, how does that measure up as a priority against recruiting more gardaí? Or fixing the problem of prison overcrowding? Or supporting the victims of crime? Or rehabilitating young people who have fallen into criminality? And how should the justice allocation be compared to the other budgets within Government? Should justice be constrained so that we can spend more money on health? On disabilities? On child poverty? Not so simple now, is it? And, yes, you might want to do all these things. But you can't. Anyone who pretends you can isn't being straight. You have to choose. Now let's not feel too bad for Messers Donohoe and Chambers. It may be hard being in charge of budgets during a time of plenty, but it's better than being Rachel Reeves . As the tears rolled down Reeves' cheeks in the House of Commons on Wednesday, both sterling and the UK's standing in the bond markets were headed in the same direction. Whatever the problems of prosperity that Jack and Paschal have to manage, they are far, far preferable to the other kind of problem, now facing Reeves and her prime minister. Better to have surpluses than deficits. So you might think that an overriding national priority would be to maintain steady and stable public finances. To do that, the budget ministers and the leaders of the Government parties have decided, they must eliminate the once-off giveaways of the last three budgets. 'We can't and we won't' continue with them, Donohoe told Ivan Yates on Newstalk on Thursday. But how firm is that determination? My sense is that Donohoe's is rock solid. He is not, however, in charge of the Government. Both Simon Harris and Micheál Martin, while ruling out another goody basket of one-off giveaways, have insisted that they will also seek to help people with rising costs in the budget. Does this signal a middle ground will be found? This week's controversy over student fees shows just how hard it is to withdraw benefits to which voters have become accustomed. Does the Government have the political will and the capacity to restrain itself and take politically difficult but necessary decisions to position the country for future growth and to protect it against future adversity – or will we cross our fingers, plough on and hope for the best? We'll see. But I know one thing: the politics of no hard choices never, ever ends well.
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Oliver Plunkett's story would make a great film – it's a shame modern, secular Ireland has forgotten him
Interest in Oliver Plunkett has fluctuated over the four centuries since he was found guilty of treason in a blatant miscarriage of justice in 1681, after which he was hanged, drawn and quartered at Tyburn . Interest may have peaked in the 1970s. In 1975, there was nearly a diplomatic incident because then taoiseach Liam Cosgrave and president Cearbhall Ó Dálaigh were vying to represent Ireland at the canonisation in Rome . Cosgrave won and even proclaimed the first reading at the canonisation Mass. Archbishop Karol Wojtyła of Kraków also attended, invited by Cardinal William Conway. Four years later, now Pope John Paul II, he prayed before the relics of St Oliver Plunkett at Drogheda before his famous plea for peace. Citing Oliver Plunkett as an exemplar of forgiveness, he begged 'in the language of passionate pleading ... on my knees ... turn away from the paths of violence and ... return to the ways of peace'. More than 50 years before, in 1920, when Terence McSwiney was Lord Mayor of Cork, Sinn Féin councillors successfully proposed that George's Street be renamed Oliver Plunkett Street in honour of his beatification. READ MORE This year marks the 400th anniversary of Oliver Plunkett's birth and the 50th since his canonisation. But in contrast, the national coverage has been scant and the response muted, aside from in places directly associated with the saint, such as Loughcrew in Co Meath, where he was born, Armagh, where he was primate, and Drogheda, the home of the national shrine in St Peter's Church. An extensive programme , concluding in November, has been held in these areas involving Masses and ecumenical services, walks, tours, exhibitions, concerts and competitions, thanks to a hard-working committee. It is not the first time that Oliver Plunkett has fallen from national attention. For example, in the 200 years after his death, only a loyal few kept his memory alive. Tommy Burns, writing in the Commemorative Book compiled by the St Oliver 400 Committee, includes in that small number the Siena Dominican Sisters in Drogheda. They preserved the executed archbishop's head for nearly 200 years, which sometimes involved great personal risk. While the relic may appear grisly to modern sensibilities, it is venerated not for ghoulish reasons but as evidence of his ultimate sacrifice for his faith. [ From the archive: Highlighting cruelty of St Oliver Plunkett's execution reaffirms our commitment to faith Opens in new window ] Oliver Plunkett's story would make a great film. He was connected to many of the Hiberno-Norman landed families. When he chose to be a priest, he also chose exile in Rome, as no seminary could operate in Ireland. He became a well-regarded professor of theology at the College for the Propagation of the Faith. When appointed as Archbishop of Armagh in 1670, the memory of Cromwell's slaughter of thousands in Drogheda and Wexford followed by deliberately induced famine that reduced the population by up to 25 per cent was still fresh. Plunkett managed to navigate a political situation where Catholics officially had no civil rights. It sometimes necessitated disguise as an English officer or hiding in caves. He worked tirelessly to be on good terms with Protestant bishops and included Protestant students in a newly established Jesuit school in Drogheda. The Irish Catholic Church was in chaos – religious orders fighting over property, alcohol-abusing priests leading scandalous lives, and the Rapparees – or partisans – launching raids. The Rapparees were viewed either as guerrilla defenders of fellow dispossessed Catholics or lawless criminals, and probably contained elements of both. Oliver Plunkett negotiated a settlement with the Rapparees in Tyrone, leading to an unprecedented peace. Some of the clerics he reprimanded or removed from office would eventually give false testimony against him, implicating him in Titus Oates' entirely fictitious Popish plot. Modern, secular Ireland does not have much space for a story like Oliver Plunkett's or, indeed, for contemporary examples of Christian persecution. But as Archbishop Eamon Martin said in a homily in Loughcrew last Sunday, 'sadly, even in 2025, martyrdom remains a reality for many of our Christian brothers and sisters around the world'. Archbishop Martin cited the recent murder of 200 Christians in western Nigeria. Fulani armed groups descended on a village full of displaced Christians and murdered them with machetes, before setting fire to their bodies. According to a UK Parliament research briefing , 4,476 Christians were killed for faith-related reasons in 2024. Seventy per cent of those killed were in Nigeria. The world mostly ignores it. The BBC recently provided a perfect example of this reluctance to ascribe religious motives in an explainer on the 200 deaths. It laid the blame on farmer versus herder conflicts and climate change before mentioning religion as an additional factor. According to the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom, Fulani armed groups in northwest Nigeria engage in 'kidnapping, rape, property and cattle theft, illegal possession of weapons, and murder'. While the motivation behind individual attacks can be difficult to verify, they 'significantly restrict freedom of religion or belief, particularly for the predominantly Christian communities that live there'. We care about the shocking conditions of Palestinian children in Gaza because we see them daily on our screens. The courage and faith of St Oliver might remind us that other persecuted communities, including Christians, deserve visibility and no less of our concern.
