Man charged with terror offences after protesting outside Scots court
A founding member of a pro-Palestine group has appeared at court charged with two terror offences.
Michael Napier, 78, appeared on petition at Edinburgh Sheriff Court on Tuesday, July 22, charged with two counts of inviting support to a proscribed terror organisation.
The West Lothian pensioner made no plea. He was committed for further examination and granted bail.
His next appearance at court is yet to be confirmed.
Supporters of Napier held a protest outside the court, many waving Palestinian flags or holding placards with pro-Palestinian slogans.
Mr Napier, who is a founding member of the Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign, was arrested on Monday July 21 while he was protesting the arrest of three women outside of the same Court in the capital.
Naomi Stubbs-Gorman, 31, Susan Riddell, 42, and Allegra Fitzherbert, 34, appeared on petition at the court charged with malicious mischief after a van was allegedly driven into a fence at an Edinburgh arms factory.
The trio made no plea on charges of malicious mischief, aggravated by having a "terrorist connection", after a van was allegedly driven into the fence of the Leonardo factory in the Crewe Road North area of the capital on July 15.
Riddell was also charged under the Road Traffic Act 1988, aggravated by having a "terrorist connection".
During a short private hearing the Sheriff granted Fitzherbert, of London, and Riddell, of Glasgow, bail. Their next appearance at court is to be confirmed.
Stubbs-Gorman, of Glasgow, had her application for bail continued one day and will appear before the court on Tuesday.
Protestors supporting the three women held a demonstration outside the court before their appearance.
Jessie Normaschild, 67, who was at the demonstration holding a Campaign Against Arms Trade banner, said she was attending to show support for the three women, and to protest about government support for arms manufacturers.
"Leonardo is a big arms factory in Edinburgh, and it makes the F-35 (fighter jet) targeting system," she said.
"The F-35s are being used to bomb Gaza. And we don't want Leonardo in Edinburgh. We don't want Scottish Government money, taxpayers' money, to fund Scottish Enterprise to give the money to Leonardo and Raytheon and BAE."
Leonardo previously said it does not supply equipment directly to Israel and that its main customer is the UK Armed Forces.
On Sunday Police Scotland said its counter-terrorism unit is leading the investigation into the incident, and that inquiries are ongoing. The force also issued an appeal for information to trace the movements of two vehicles.
One is a blue Ford Transit van which was seen around Gorgie Road on Monday and Tuesday prior to the incident.
The other is a white Honda CR-Z which was found in a car park on Gorgie Road after the incident.
Police have asked anyone with information to get in touch by calling 101, quoting reference number 0416 of July 15.
Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community!
Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today.
You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland.
No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team.
All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in!
If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'.
We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like.
To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Statesman
an hour ago
- New Statesman
Keir Starmer must use goodwill with Trump to expedite Palestinian statehood
Photo by Jane Barlow-Keir Starmer's decision to recognise a Palestinian state alongside France will be remembered as one of modern Britain's great foreign policy transformations. It marks a different approach from a new generation. And it has been a long time coming. As long ago as 2014, a majority of MPs – including me – voted to recognise Palestinian statehood. Recognition has been Labour Party policy for at least the last three general elections. The Foreign Secretary, David Lammy, has repeatedly said that he is working closely with the French, who announced their intention last week. It is no secret that pressure has ramped up in recent weeks, as the spectre of famine in Gaza has once again led the international community to look for new ways to demonstrate its commitment to a lasting peace. I have been saying to anyone who will listen for the better part of a year that it is time for the UK to fulfil its long-term commitment to recognition. Last week, I was one of 200 MPs of all parties to sign a letter calling on the government to do just that. On the same day, the Foreign Affairs Committee, which I chair, published a report into the Israeli-Palestinian conflict – the product of nine months' intensive work. In that report, by majority vote, we called for the UK government to 'recognise the state of Palestine while there is still a state to recognise'. We all called on the government to kick-start the political process for a two-state solution, and to demand a ceasefire and for aid to flood in. Much of the coverage of the decision has seemed to reflect the Westminster bubble's Vicky Pollard-like attitude to any major policy change: 'Yeah-but, no-but.' When was the last time good news was simply welcomed? A lot has been made of the so-called conditional nature of the announcement. But let's face it: such speculation had already been killed off within 24 hours, when Benjamin Netanyahu by return of post said 'no' to our demands. And so it's likely that the UK will recognise Palestine in the autumn. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe What, then, does recognition mean – both for the suffering populations of Gaza and the West Bank, and for the UK's international standing? The move to recognise a Palestinian state shows Netanyahu's far-right government that the international community will not tolerate the continued bombardment of Gaza. It will not tolerate the cutting off of aid. It will not allow Gaza and the West Bank to be annexed. As well as insisting that aid is allowed in, it will take concrete steps to support the self-determination of the Palestinian people. In my view, it is also an attempt to reach over the heads of the far-right Israeli government and speak directly to the Israeli public, a majority of which polls consistently show want peace. It tells them there are nations out there that are willing to do the hard work to secure peace. But above all, it shows that the UK is serious about getting back into the room and building the two-state solution that both Palestinians and Israelis desperately need. That is especially powerful coming as it does alongside our allies. Both France, with whom Britain carved up the Middle East under the Sykes-Picot treaty more than a century ago. And our allies in the Arab world, including Jordan, Egypt and Saudi Arabia, who for their part issued a statement on Tuesday night calling for Hamas to disarm and end its rule of Gaza. No, recognition is not a stand-alone solution. But nor is it merely symbolic. It is a gigantic first step. Next, the UK must get together with those same allies and build a peace plan. I've seen indications that the government is beginning to do this. It is true that Netanyahu only listens to Donald Trump. So we must leverage the strong relationship that Keir Starmer has built and present that plan to the president, who, let's be honest, is hardly going to do the detailed work himself. We should say, 'President Trump, you have the strength of ten presidents. Show Netanyahu that peace and two states is the only solution, and there might even be a Nobel Peace Prize in it for you.' I am not saying it will work – but it might. And, in the face of the very real threat that the Palestinian land will be annexed out of existence, surely we must try. While we must prioritise alleviating immediate suffering, it is our duty to work to secure peace and a future for the Palestinian people. For that, there is no solution other than the two-state one. For years, the government has held out for the point of maximum impact. That moment is now. [See also: Emily Thornberry interview: 'I want to rebuild good vibes about the UK'] Related
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Mark Carney was asking for Trump to impose tariffs
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announced on Wednesday that his Liberal government will recognise the state of Palestine at the United Nations in September, following the recent trend set by France and the UK. The decision to recognise Palestine at a time when the bloodthirsty terrorist organisation Hamas is firmly in control is abhorrent, especially when the Hamas-led October 7 attack on Israel is still so fresh in many people's minds. Democratic countries like Canada shouldn't be enhancing the status of a murderous outfit that's the equivalent of pure evil in our world. The Canadian government argues that they have put restrictions in place that must occur before recognition is approved. Carney said the Palestinian Authority must hold an election in 2026 and Hamas cannot be involved. He also insisted that Hamas releases the remaining Israeli hostages, and there must be a demilitarised Palestine. 'Preserving a two-state solution means standing with all people who choose peace over violence or terrorism,' the PM said at Wednesday's press conference, 'and honouring their innate desire for the peaceful co-existence of Israeli and Palestinian states as the only roadmap for a secure and prosperous future.' Let's put aside the obvious fact that terrorist groups like Hamas can't be trusted when it comes to negotiating terms and conditions for just about anything. Does anyone truly believe Hamas's leadership gives a tinker's dam about Carney's demands? Canada is a middle power with virtually no influence or cachet on the international stage since the path of destruction that former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau left in his wake. If Hamas barely pays attention to larger, more influential countries who have come around to their way of thinking, their perception of Canada won't change. There isn't a chance in hell that Hamas will drop its political and military influence in Palestine. They'll be pleased with the UN's recognition of Palestinian statehood, but their end game hasn't changed. That is: to destroy democracy, liberty and freedom in the West and beyond. Their enemies, including Israel, the US, France, the UK and yes, Canada, won't suddenly become bosom buddies and lifelong chums. In fairness, Carney's announcement could be for purely selfish reasons. He may believe it will solidify his political support among Canadian progressives. There's some validity to this argument. Since he has a minority government, much like Trudeau did on two previous occasions, it could be the best solution to achieving long-term Liberal electoral support. While Carney's decision will frustrate Canadian Jews, he knows there are many more voters in Canada's Arab and Muslim community – including young ones. Yet Canada's relations with the US is another piece of this puzzle. Carney's timing with this announcement couldn't have been much worse, unless it was planned in advance to infuriate US President Donald Trump. Canada and the US have been in the midst of a tariff battle. It started during the latter stages of Trudeau's leadership last year, complete with Trump's comments about Canada becoming the '51st US state'. A sizeable number of left-leaning Canadians foolishly believed Carney was the best leadership choice to take on Trump. That's why his Liberals won the April 28 federal election. The working relationship between these two leaders seemed more positive at first blush, which wasn't difficult to achieve with the bumbling Trudeau out of the picture. Some believed there was faint hope for a resolution before the 1 August deadline. Alas, Carney's con job with the Canadian electorate has been fully exposed. Early this morning, Trump announced that he was increasing the tariff rate on Canadian products from 25 to 35 per cent. Even before Canada's Palestinian recognition statement, it was clear the tariff negotiations weren't going particularly well. Canada had briefly threatened to double its counter-tariffs on US metals from 25 to 50 per cent and Carney's own tone changed dramatically this month. He went from telling the press that Canada was in 'intensive negotiations with the Americans' to resolve the tariff battle to making this eye-raising statement: 'we're working hard to get a deal, but we'll only accept the right deal with the United States. The right deal is possible, but nothing's assured.' It also didn't help matters that Carney began to focus more heavily on a trade and security partnership with the European Union at the same time, even suggesting Canada was the 'most European of non-European countries.' Carney's announcement about Palestine was a slap in the face to Trump, who strongly supports Israel and regards Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as a political ally. 'Wow! Canada has just announced that it is backing statehood for Palestine,' Trump wrote on his Truth Social account. 'That will make it very hard for us to make a Trade Deal with them. Oh Canada!!!' A trade deal between the two countries to reduce the 35 per cent tariffs now seems highly unlikely. Carney has suggested that the talks may not end today, but he appears to be focusing on 'broader discussions' like defence spending and investments. In other words, the tariffs will remain in place and the faith placed in him by far too many Canadian voters will be for naught. Is Carney bothered by the mess he's caused? It sure doesn't seem like it.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Business news live: New Nationwide house price data and latest FTSE 100 updates as stock rally stumbles
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.
