
Banke Bihari temple corridor protest temporarily suspended after MP Hema Malini's assurance
The decision came after Mathura MP Hema Malini assured them that their concerns would be conveyed to the chief minister.
The women, belonging to the families of temple sevayats and local traders, met Hema Malini at her residence in Vrindavan and in the meeting elaborated on the reasons behind their protest and sought redressal of their apprehensions regarding the project.
They expressed fears that if displaced from their current location, they would not be able to perform the seva-puja of Thakurji as smoothly as before.
They also voiced concern that the traditions of the temple and the heritage of the narrow lanes would be adversely affected.
Submitting a memorandum to the MP, the women requested that their plea be placed before the chief minister. "We are confident that if our views are presented to the chief minister with empathy, he will understand our sentiments and find a middle path between the government's plan and our demands," one of the protesters said.
Talking to reporters, Hema Malini acknowledged that there might have been some gaps in communication with the protesting families regarding the project.
"But the government is working for the public's convenience. I will certainly raise this issue before the chief minister," she assured.
She added that the families feared that the corridor would push them farther from the temple, causing practical difficulties in performing rituals.
"They have been assured that no one will be forced to move outside Vrindavan. The administration is making arrangements for them within Vrindavan's limits," she said.
Hema Malini also emphasised the necessity of the corridor and said, "Some among them do not want the corridor at all, but with the increasing number of pilgrims, it is our duty to provide the necessary facilities. If the corridor is not built now, it will become even more difficult later," she noted.
She further stated that while the corridor is essential, she would ensure that all stakeholders' sentiments are respected and conveyed to the government.
The women also demanded that the ordinance for forming a trust to manage the temple be withdrawn entirely.
Among those who submitted the memorandum included Neelam Goswami, Sunita Goswami, Suman Goswami and others.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Print
4 days ago
- The Print
‘Very, very big news…massive, massive development'—How TV covered Jagdeep Dhankhar resignation
Like a sudden monsoon downpour, he came and went, leaving behind a cloudy sky of confusion and speculation in the news media—and a 'juicy scandal' for the Opposition ( India Today ). He went from being the news of the day and the subject of all evening discussions across news channels on Tuesday, to literally being yesterday's headline. By Wednesday morning, Jagdeep Dhankhar was history. SIR in the Bihar Assembly had taken over the television news space. Why had Dhankhar suddenly resigned as the Vice President of India—'Dhexit' as NDTV 24×7 called it—on the night of 21 July? And why did he cite ill health for his hasty departure, when he had appeared in good shape just three hours earlier? To begin with, nobody knew—and they didn't get time to ring up their 'sources' in the government. Television news anchors were caught smack in the middle of their 9 pm debates when Dhankhar publicly announced his resignation, so they went with his explanation and gave it the 'breaking news' treatment on Monday night. A somewhat distracted Rajdeep Sardesai called it 'Big news' on India Today; CNN News 18's Rahul Shivshankar, who repeats words for maximum effect, said it was 'Very, very big news… a massive, massive development'. Republic's Arnab Goswami described it in a four-letter word: 'Huge'. 'There's no other angle to this, clearly,' Goswami added with finality and went back to his earlier debate. Also read: Crime stories dominated Indian TV news headlines—murder, suicide to execution 'Something is wrong' By Tuesday evening, Goswami found more angles to the 'shock exit' than there are in a hexagon. Did Dhankhar 'go overboard… try to shock the government, grab a headline…', and did he call a senior Congress leader at 7:30 pm—'why on earth, earth, earth…' would he do that? Obviously, Goswami detected the Congress hand behind Dhankhar's actions. Other 9 pm TV news anchors also played 'Question Hour' throughout the day with endless rhetorical questions. It allowed them to freely speculate on the former vice president's resignation. 'Did he overplay his hand?' asked NDTV 24×7. 'Why did he do it?' asked India TV's Rajat Sharma. Why did he keep the government in the dark over the Opposition's impeachment motion? Why did he meet the President in secrecy to hand over his resignation? The often sarcastic Sandeep Chaudhary of ABP News wondered if he had left or was made to leave. How come Dhankhar remembered his serious health issue only at 9:25 pm on Monday? Why had no minister visited him if he was seriously ill? What happened in the two and a half hours after his last official meeting? 'Something is wrong…' he concluded like ACP Pradyuman from the popular TV series C.I.D. Round and round, television news circled around the possible reasons for the 'shocking' and 'inexplicable' quitting of Jagdeep Dhankhar (India Today)—all of them arrived at the same conclusion as Republic TV's reporter: 'Obviously something has happened.' Gee, thanks. A love affair Now, if only everyone had read this Times Now story early in the morning, it would have been clear that 'The acceptance of an Opposition-sponsored motion for the removal of high court judge Yashwant Varma… followed by a decision to announce two business advisory committee meetings without consulting…'' the government led to Dhankhar's resignation This theory hit the headlines across news channels Tuesday and gained validity with each telling. Prime Minister Narendra Modi all but confirmed that all was not well between the VP and PM with his terse tweet of farewell at midday. Also, as TV anchors and Opposition leaders who were interviewed pointed out, no minister or BJP MP had messaged well wishes to Dhankhar. Once it was an open secret, reporters spoke freely on Dhankhar v/s Government over his remarks concerning the judiciary, farmers and his apparent cosy-cosy with Congress leaders. India TV came up with another possible reason: A day earlier, Dhankhar had a party where Opposition politicians were invited—including former Delhi chief minister, Arvind Kejriwal. Ispo facto, the ex-VP and the Opposition had developed feelings for each other. Also read: Hindi TV news channels' favourite villain the Muslim is back—Mitthoo Mian to Muharram Radio silence Who would be the next Vice President? That question made the rounds on news channels and just like we never know Kaun Banega Crorepati, the TV anchors and reporters were clueless. That didn't stop the speculation: CNN News 18 had a list ready—Nitish Kumar, Rajnath Singh, Shashi Tharoor, JP Nadda, Manoj Sinha. No chance it's going to Nitish Kumar, said an 'expert' on India TV who went on to suggest it could be someone from Punjab, where the BJP wants to gain a strong foothold. The channel also suggested there were 'big changes' in the offing. Well, can't wait, right? Taking a cue from the government, news channels did not carry any major profiles of the former Vice President. Nor did they try to interview anyone who was close to him. They didn't stand outside the gate of his official residence, either, waiting to see who went in or came out and grab a soundbyte—as they usually do. Finally, there were no BJP participants in the TV debates on Dhankhar's departure and only a very few interviews with BJP or NDA MPs. There was only radio silence The official info-vacuum was filled with 'sourced information' (NDTV 24×7)—a euphemism for the government. That Dhankhar stepped out of line became the accepted version of events for television news. The truth? Hmmm. Between the government's silence and the habit of television news to follow the official account of events, there's no knowing. The author tweets @shailajabajpai. Views are personal. (Edited by Theres Sudeep)


News18
4 days ago
- News18
Can govt appoint trustee of Banke Bihari temple, HC asks UP govt
Prayagraj (UP), Jul 23 (PTI) The Allahabad High Court has sought a reply from the Uttar Pradesh government on whether it can appoint its officials as trustees of the Banke Bihari temple in Mathura, a private temple, by the issuance of the Uttar Pradesh Shri Bankey Bihari Ji Temple Trust Ordinance, 2025. Justice Rohit Ranjan Agarwal, after hearing amicus curiae Sanjeev Goswami, fixed July 30 as the next date of hearing on a petition filed by Pranav Goswami and another. According to the amicus curiae, 'The temple is a private temple and the religious practice is being carried out by the heirs of the late Swami Hari Dasji. By the issuance of the ordinance, the government is trying to take control over the temple through the back door." The amicus curiae apprised the court that according to the ordinance, there would be two kinds of trustees of the board — nominated trustees and ex-officio trustees. The nominated trustees will be the seers, gurus, scholars, mathadhish and mahants etc. from the Vaishnav tradition as well as followers of the Sanatan Dharma. However, he raised strong objections as to the seven ex-officio trustees, who are officials like the district magistrate, the special superintendent of police and the municipal commissioner of Mathura, which he said would amount to a back-door entry by the state government in the private temple. 'The creation of such a trust amounts to intruding into the Hindu religion by the state government. The Constitution does not provide for the State to practise any religion and take control of any temple," the amicus curiae said. The court, in its order dated July 21, sought the state government's reply and observed, 'The matter requires consideration. Hearing to continue. Put up this case as fresh on July 30, 2025. By that time, the state government would respond to the argument which has been raised by the amicus curiae. PTI COR RAJ RC (This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed - PTI) view comments First Published: July 24, 2025, 01:15 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


Hindustan Times
6 days ago
- Hindustan Times
Uttar Pradesh Congress to protest over power, fertiliser issues
The Uttar Pradesh Congress will on Tuesday stage protests across 75 districts against alleged poor electricity and fertiliser supply in the state. UP Congress chief Ajay Rai gave this information at a press conference that he along with party UP in charge Avinash Pande addressed here on Monday. UP Congress chief Ajay Rai, party's UP in charge Avinash Pande and senior leader PL Punia at a party workshop in Lucknow. (HT photo) 'Fertiliser from Uttar Pradesh is being smuggled to Nepal while farmers here are getting cane when they ask for fertiliser,' Rai alleged. The partymen will submit memorandums to the office of district magistrates across the state, he said. Party's UP in charge Avinash Pande, who has been chairing zonal review meetings for the past one week under organisation strengthening process, said, 'The Sangathan Srijan workshops have given new strength to the party that is targeting upcoming panchayat elections and the 2027 assembly elections (in UP).' He along with Rai chaired the party's Awadh zone meeting during the day after Braj, Prayagraj and Poorvanchal zones. 'What happened with the energy minister in Vrindavan is an example of what people think for this government. The minister was stopped from worshipping at Vrindavan temple by Goswami community people as they protested the projects being forced upon the people there,' Rai claimed. 'An FIR was lodged against me in Varanasi when I tried to expose the government for poor services for the Kanwariyas. But as our leader Rahul Gandhi says these FIRs are medals for me from the BJP government,' he said. Senior Congress leaders, including PL Punia, Virendra Chaudhary, Naseemuddin Siddiqui, Dinesh Kumar Singh and Anil Yadav, were present in the meeting.