Is this the No. 1 401(k) move for 2025?
The headlines scream uncertainty, portfolios are flashing red, and it's natural to wonder if now is the time to retreat or lean in and make a bold move.
But, what if this dip presents a golden opportunity? Specifically, could frontloading your 401(k) right now be one of the smartest financial moves you make this year?
Frontloading means contributing a significant portion – or even the entirety – of your annual 401(k) limit early in the year, rather than spreading it out evenly over each paycheck. For 2025, the IRS allows up to $23,000 in contributions (or $30,500 if you're 50 or older).
Here's What Trump Is Really Up To With High-stakes Tariff Gambit
Instead of monthly contributions, you might hit the cap by spring – locking in more shares while the market is still down. If you have money in the bank to pay your bills, there could be a brilliant time to rob Peter to pay Paul and put more in your 401(k) while prices are cheaper.
Read On The Fox Business App
1. You're Buying While It's On SaleWith markets down thanks to tariff-fueled volatility, prices on stocks and index funds are lower than they've been in months. Especially in technology. Frontloading lets you scoop up more shares for the same dollar, positioning you to benefit when the market eventually rebounds.
2. Time in the Market Beats Timing the MarketBy getting your money in earlier, you give those dollars more time to grow. Compounding works best with time on your side, and historically, markets bounce back – often when investors least expect it. This is what helps the "snowball" effect.
3. It Takes the Emotion OutIt's hard not to let emotions cloud your decisions during turbulent times. Frontloading is a way to make a strategic move and then let the market do its thing, without constantly second-guessing yourself throughout the year.
1. You Could Miss the Employer MatchSome companies only match contributions per pay period. If you max out early, you might leave employer dollars on the table for the rest of the year. It's important to read the company Summary Plan Description (SPD) to see how your plan handles matches before frontloading.
2. You Might Not Be Catching the BottomMarkets can always fall further. Frontloading doesn't guarantee you're buying at the lowest point, and there's a chance your investments dip more before they rise. If the tariff war continues, this could send markets further down this year before they rebound.
3. Cash Flow Can Get TightFrontloading requires having the flexibility to take a hit to your take-home pay early in the year. If that's going to put stress on your budget or force you to dip into savings, it might not be worth it.
Click Here To Read More On Fox Business
If going all-in feels too aggressive, consider a partial frontload. Increase your contributions for the next few months while prices are still down, then return to your regular pace. This gives you some upside potential while keeping cash flow manageable.
It's easy to get spooked when the market drops. But often, the best financial moves are made when things feel uncertain. If your budget allows and your plan supports it, frontloading your 401(k) in a down market – especially one driven by temporary shocks like tariffs – might just be the best financial move you make in 2025.
Click Here To Read More From Ted JenkinOriginal article source: Is this the No. 1 401(k) move for 2025?
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Alabama farmer sees new interest within days of Trump's tomato tariff — and says former trade deal ‘never worked' for US
With President Trump's latest tariff announcement, the price of tomatoes could soon be going up in the U.S. On July 14, the Trump Administration announced a 17% tariff on tomatoes imported from Mexico, ending a decades-long trade deal that kept the price of importing tomatoes down in the U.S. Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it 'Mexico remains one of our greatest allies, but for far too long our farmers have been crushed by unfair trade practices that undercut pricing on produce like tomatoes,' said U.S. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick in the press release. 'That ends today.' And while some Americans may not be in support of additional tariffs levied against America's international trade partners, several U.S. farmers stand in strong support of Trump's latest trade move. 'Been two days now and we've actually had a lot more calls' For decades, U.S. and Mexican tomato operations worked under a trade agreement that allowed for relatively easy importation of Mexican tomatoes into U.S. markets. The deal was meant to protect American tomato farmers, but many believe the old trade agreement didn't do enough. 'There's been loopholes that the Mexican tomato producers have taken advantage of and continue to price dump, or lower the prices below the cost of production here in the United States and in Alabama," Blake Thaxton, executive director of the Alabama Fruit and Vegetable Growers Association, told WVTM 13 News. Chad Smith of Smith Tomato Farms in St. Clair County, Alabama echoed Thaxton's concerns with the old trade deal with Mexico. 'If they send the tomatoes over and it's supposed to be a set price and they need to move tomatoes, well, they may just give a load of bell peppers for free for them to take the tomatoes. So, it's never really worked,' said Smith. American tomato farmers had long felt as if they were hard-pressed to compete with the imports from Mexico, but several of them now see better times ahead with Trump's latest tariff news. 'It's only been two days now and we've actually had a lot more calls from people who have an interest in doing business," said Smith. 'And the price hasn't even changed.' As for Thaxton, he believes the potential of a sustainable future for U.S. tomato farmers is important. 'Food security is national security, and we need to be able to produce our own food here in the United States,' said Thaxton. Read more: Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can How the new tariff may affect your wallet While some American farmers are hopeful that the tomato tariff will impact their bottom line in a positive way, there's a concern that the changing policy will lead to higher prices at the grocery store. After all, the costs of producing tomatoes are higher in the U.S., thanks in part to American farms paying their workers up to 10 times more per hour than farm workers in Mexico. Thaxton believes the rising tomato costs won't be too dramatic, but other experts appear to be more concerned. In fact, some predict the new tomato tariff could push prices up by 10%. Since American farms face significantly higher production costs than Mexican growers — this includes wages, land, regulation, insurance, property taxes and equipment — these costs may be passed along to American consumers at the grocery store. At this moment, it's tough to predict the exact outcome that the tariff will have on the U.S. tomato market. While it looks like the tariff could help American farmers, it's unclear whether or not it will help American wallets. What to read next Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Here are 5 simple ways to grow rich with real estate if you don't want to play landlord. And you can even start with as little as $10 Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Until Trump Fired Her, She Was an Economist With Bipartisan Support
Nearly the entire Senate supported Erika McEntarfer in 2024 when she was nominated to lead the agency that produces key data on jobs and inflation. The widely respected economist was confirmed on a bipartisan 86-8 Senate vote, with support from Vice President JD Vance, who was then an Ohio senator, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, then a Florida senator. But Dr. McEntarfer was suddenly caught in the political crossfire on Friday when President Trump lashed out over the agency's most recent jobs report and fired her for releasing monthly jobs data showing surprisingly weak hiring. He called the data 'rigged' without offering any evidence, and he accused Dr. McEntarfer of manipulating the job numbers 'for political purposes.' Dr. McEntarfer was appointed to her most recent post by President Joseph R. Biden Jr. in 2023. Before that, she earned her stripes at the Census Bureau, where she worked for over two decades under both Republican and Democratic presidents. She graduated from Bard College with a bachelor's degree in social sciences, and she obtained a Ph.D. in economics at the Virginia Tech. She began her career as an economist at the Census Bureau, where she worked for six years, according to her LinkedIn profile. In 2008, she joined the Treasury Department, where she analyzed the president's budget as well as the effect of tax policy proposals on revenue. Dr. McEntarfer returned to the Census Bureau in 2010, assuming more of a leadership role. She became the head of research for the Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics program, which is responsible for developing new statistics on postsecondary employment outcomes and quarterly work force indicators. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
India responds to U.S. penalty over Russia oil
Aug. 2 (UPI) -- Indian officials confirmed Saturday the country is not altering policy and will continue buying oil from Russia, despite threats of a financial "penalty" from U.S. President Donald Trump. India's government has not given any directive to the country's oil refiners to stop or reduce the amount of Russian crude oil, the New York Times reported, citing two senior Indian officials. Trump earlier this week said he would impose a financial "penalty" on the South Asian country if it did not cut back on its reliance on Russian oil. The sanction would be in addition to a 25% American tariff on Indian goods. The president did not elaborate on the extent of the additional financial "penalty." "Remember, while India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their Tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the World, and they have the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary Trade Barriers of any Country, " Trump said in a Truth Social post. "Also, they have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of ENERGY, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to STOP THE KILLING IN UKRAINE." Trump on Friday said it was his understanding "that India is no longer going to be buying oil from Russia. That's what I heard. I don't know if that's right or not. That is a good step. We will see what happens." Indian officials told the New York Times the country has "not given any direction to oil companies" to change direction. Publicly, Indian officials said they are considering options without confirming or denying the Times report. "We have taken note of the sanctions, and we are looking into it," Ministry of External Affairs of India spokesman Shri Randhir Jaiswal said during a news conference Friday in New Delhi. "On the other question about proposed oil sale, I would say that I have no comments to offer in this particular matter. As far as sourcing our energy requirements is concerned, you are well aware of our broad approach, meaning our overall approach and stance. We take decisions based on the price at which oil is available in the international market and depending on the global situation at that time. As for the specifics of your particular question, I am not aware of it. I don't have details of these specifics." Jaiswal also attempted to avoid further escalating the situation. "I would also like to underline this particular point that this is a sensitive and complex case and therefore, I would urge all to be mindful that media reports based on speculation and misinformation are not helpful at all," he told reporters. "In so far as the reports claiming that there has been certain developments etc., such reports are incorrect. Please wait for an update from us, this is a sensitive matter, and we urge all sides to stay away from misinformation." Solve the daily Crossword
