Alligator Alcatraz: American history from the dark side
I don't mean that we are trapped in an inflexible pattern of endlessly repeating historical cycles, as in the more esoteric propositions of Vico and Nietzsche. ('Time is a flat circle,' as some lowlife says in the first season of 'True Detective,' moments before getting murdered by cops.) But too many of us, including a large proportion of liberals who ought to know better, are indeed trapped in the delusional one-way narrative of progress known as American exceptionalism, leading us to announce in horrified tones, with every new outrage of the Trump administration, that this is 'not who we are.'
So it is with the Florida concentration camp for migrant detainees known as 'Alligator Alcatraz,' which was at first a gleeful MAGAsphere nickname and is now what this jury-rigged assemblage of cages under tents is actually called. To describe this evil little zone of exclusion as sadistic, despicable and insulting, or as a symptom of incipient or actual fascism, is accurate enough. But it's most definitely who 'we' are in 2025. If we claim that such a thing is 'un-American,' then we're the ones who haven't paid attention to history — and as profoundly ignorant about everything as Donald Trump and his supporters may be, they know that much.
Just as America's penchant for religious mania and moral panic goes clear back to the Puritan settlers and the small-town schism of the Salem witch trials, the punitive, paranoid spirit behind Alligator Alcatraz — the desire to divide those who 'belong' to the imagined national community from those who do not — has deep roots in this nation's history. At the same time, the concentration camp is a modern global phenomenon with its own ironic history, which long precedes the Nazi death camps. It was a product of the industrial age, colonialism and newly racialized ideas of citizenship. If anything, Alligator Alcatraz is a classic example of the form, right down to its ugliness and cheapness, not to mention its explicit aim as a showcase for humiliation, suffering and dehumanization, but not quite for deliberate murder.
The delusional narrative of progress mentioned above, in which democracy keeps on expanding, human rights gradually extend to everyone everywhere, and America draws ever closer to forging the 'more perfect union' promised by the Constitution, is understandably alluring, and almost irresistible. For many of us who grew up in the tumultuous decades between the civil rights movement and the Patriot Act, it served as a kind of civic religion: The 'arc of the moral universe' was bending in our direction, and all that.
But that was always a subjective perception of history, not a universal law. It was widely shared by educated middle-class people infused with Enlightenment values, although not by all of them. It was true, of course, that the dizzying historical and technological changes of the 20th century had brought dramatic social progress. But it was a grievous historical error to assume that the gains made through passionate and painful struggle by racial justice movements, feminism, LGBTQ+ Pride, environmental crusaders and so on were natural, inevitable and universally accepted, or that no one beyond a handful of left-behind troglodytes seriously wanted to reverse them.
Alligator Alcatraz, like nearly everything else about the second Trump regime, is a deliberate, overt mockery of the liberal narrative of progress. It's a manifestation of 'owning the libs' in physical, tangible and almost literal form. (So far, MAGA's secret police have not specifically targeted the regime's domestic opponents, but the threats get more explicit every day.) Terrorizing, incarcerating and deporting immigrants is an important regime goal in its own terms, of course, but the real target of terrorism — state terrorism included — is always the broader public. Liberal outrage, to some significant degree, is the point, as are a mounting sense of powerlessness and increasing anxiety about the rule of law and the constitutional order.
In that sense, Alligator Alcatraz is also a postmodern phenomenon — a hamfisted ironic commentary on the failure of liberal democracy, and on how easy it was to undermine — as well as a site for the actual torment of actual human beings. As Andrea Pitzer, the author of 'One Long Night: A Global History of Concentration Camps,' observes in an MSNBC commentary, American history offers many pre-echoes of the Trumpian anti-immigrant crusade: Centuries of genocide and forcible removal against Native people 'set the stage for abuse of those not counted as citizens,' and slavery laws enabled human trafficking and created categories of human beings with no legal rights.
Those historical crimes paved the way for a more recent example, the infamous concentration camps of the 1940s in which 120,000 Japanese Americans, most of them native-born U.S. citizens, were interned for years after being dispossessed of their homes, their livelihoods and most of their property. I grew up in the San Francisco Bay Area, among many neighbors and classmates whose parents and grandparents had survived those camps, and I don't remember the subject ever being mentioned. I'm not sure I knew internment had happened, or understood its scale, before I reached adulthood.
The overt racism and grotesque unfairness of Japanese-American internment eventually provoked some degree of societal reckoning, if only years later. Historians have recently begun to pay attention to the less well-known internment of German Americans a few decades earlier, during World War I. Conditions in those camps were not especially harsh, and only a few thousand U.S. citizens were incarcerated. But anti-German propaganda campaigns, along with outlandish claims that hundreds of thousands of disloyal German Americans might rise up in revolt, left a lasting impact.
German culture and the German language were virtually erased from American society almost overnight — sauerkraut was rebranded as 'Liberty cabbage,' seriously — and as historian Matthew Stibbe writes, the 'enemy alien hysteria' of the war years fed right into the Red Scare immediately afterward:
[Q]uestioning the loyalty of individual citizens and non-citizens from particular ethnic backgrounds became standard practice for American agencies involved in domestic security after 1918 and the association of German- as well as Russian-born émigrés with left-wing subversion continued through to the late 1940s and beyond.
There's no mistaking the bizarre historical irony at work here: German immigrants and their children faced systematic persecution and discrimination in the U.S. barely 15 years before Hitler took power in the Fatherland — and the long-tail effects included a decades-long crusade against socialists, anarchists and labor activists. If you want to go even deeper into WTF, consider this: Historian Caroline Elkins argues that the first systematic use of concentration camps against a civilian population came during the Boer War around 1900, when British authorities rounded up and interned thousands of Dutch-speaking settlers in South Africa — in other words, the people known to us today as Afrikaners.
written by Amanda Marcotte, now also a weekly show on YouTube or wherever you get your podcasts.
Exactly how those events rebounded in later history is a complicated question, not a straightforward equation of cause and effect. Every self-defined human community winds up with a sense of historical grievance along the way, whether or not it makes sense to outsiders. That's one way of understanding where we are today, with a startlingly high proportion of white Americans — most of them descended from immigrants who faced hardship or persecution at some point — having forged a group identity of permanent resentment, pursuing an incoherent campaign of retribution against those they believe have cheated them, lied to them or tried to replace them.
Alligator Alcatraz is the symbol of their crusade, and it could hardly be more American. It channels this country's long history of paranoia, xenophobia and systematic exclusion through the grotesque 20th-century innovation of the concentration camp, all of that repackaged as an aggressively stupid meme complete with AI-slop images, Etsy insta-merch and an almost lifelike salesbot in Kristi Noem.
Most important of all, it inverts the liberal narrative of history, in which the misdeeds of the past offer us important lessons, mistakes to be confronted, repented and transcended on the path to something better. The intended lesson of Alligator Alcatraz is that there are no lessons in the past: There are no mistakes to correct, nothing to apologize for and nothing better to reach toward. There is only power and domination, and they should be celebrated. Plenty of Americans have believed that all along.
The post Alligator Alcatraz: American history from the dark side appeared first on Salon.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Treasury Secretary Disses Elon Musk After He Announces Rival Political Party
President Donald Trump's treasury secretary just told Elon Musk to stay out of politics. Cabinet member Scott Bessent took a shot at the Tesla CEO and former White House advisor after he revealed he was forming his own political party over the weekend. Speaking about Musk's time behind the federal budget slashing initiative known as the Department of Government Efficiency during Sunday's episode of CNN's 'State of the Union,' he said, 'The principles of DOGE were very popular. I think if you looked at the polling, Elon was not.' Bessent, who reportedly clashed with Musk during his time in the White House, then told the world's richest man he'd be better off concentrating on his businesses, which reportedly took a slump during his time in politics. Bessent takes a shot at Musk: "The principles of DOGE were very popular. I think if you looked at the polling, Elon was not." — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) July 6, 2025 'I believe that the boards of directors at his various companies wanted him to come back and run those companies,' he said. 'I imagine that those boards of directors did not like this announcement yesterday, and will be encouraging him to focus on his business activities, not his political activities.' After publicly falling out with Trump over the cost of his signature spending and tax cut bill, Musk announced the launch of the 'America Party' in a Saturday post on X. Calling out the so-called 'Big, Beautiful Bill's' projected $3.3 billion price tag, he wrote, 'When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy.' 'Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom,' Musk went on. The tech mogul's nascent third-party already seems to have sparked the interest of several Trump critics. Billionaire and 'Shark Tank' personality Mark Cubanreposted the announcement with a series of fireworks and fire emojis before pledging to help get the America Party on ballots. Former White House communications director Anthony Scaramucci also chimed in online, writing, 'I would like to meet to discuss. My DMs are open.' Elon Musk Says He's Formed A New Political Party: The 'America Party' Elon Musk Predicts Prison 'For A Long Time' For Key Trump Insider White House Praises 'Healthy Debate' After Reports Of Elon Musk, Scott Bessent Screaming Match
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Where do trade talks stand in the rush to avert higher US tariffs?
US President Donald Trump has said he will send letters to select trade partners facing tariff hikes as early as Monday, piling pressure on countries to strike a deal with Washington before a new August 1 deadline. The White House announced sharp levies on dozens of economies in April, citing a lack of "reciprocity" in trade relations, which were set to kick in on Wednesday, July 9. Trump announced on Friday the levies' imposition would be pushed to August 1 to allow time for talks to wrap up, but said he signed 12 letters to inform some countries of rate hikes, which will likely be sent on Monday. With Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent saying the administration was "close to several deals," where do things stand for economies from Taiwan to the European Union? - EU: 'Ready' for deal - The European Union said it is "ready for a deal" with Washington, with the bloc's trade chief meeting his US counterparts Thursday. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said the EU was targeting an "agreement in principle" when it came to the initial July 9 cutoff. Bessent said the European Union is "making very good progress" after a slow start. With no deal, the US tariff on EU goods doubles from the "baseline" of 10 percent to 20 percent -- with Trump previously threatening a 50 percent level. - Vietnam: A pact with uncertainties - Washington and Hanoi unveiled a trade pact Wednesday with much fanfare and few details, but it allowed Vietnam to avoid Trump's initial 46 percent tariff. Under the agreement, Vietnamese goods face a minimum 20 percent tariff while products made elsewhere face a 40 percent levy -- a clause to restrict "transshipping" by Chinese groups. But there remain questions on how the higher levy would apply to products using foreign parts. There is also a risk that Beijing will adopt retaliatory measures, analysts warned. - Japan: Rice, autos at stake - Despite being a close US ally and major source of foreign investment, Japan might not escape Trump's tariff hike. Tokyo's trade envoy Ryosei Akazawa has made numerous trips to Washington through the end of June. But Trump recently criticized what he described as Japan's reluctance to open up further to US rice and auto exports. "I'm not sure we're going to make a deal," Trump said, adding that the country could pay a tariff of "30 percent, 35 percent, or whatever the number is that we determine." - India: A good position - Indian manufacturers and exporters want to believe they can avoid a 26 percent tariff. Negotiations between both countries have been going well for weeks, and Trump himself suggested at the end of June that a "very big" agreement was imminent. Ajay Sahai, director general of the Federation of Indian Export Organizations, said the feedback he received "suggests positive developments." But he maintained that the situation was fluid. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has stressed that agriculture and dairy products remain "very big red lines." - South Korea: Muted optimism - Seoul, which is already reeling from US tariffs on steel and autos, wants to avert a sweeping 25 percent levy on its other exports. Cooperation in shipbuilding could be a bargaining chip, but "at this stage, both sides still haven't clearly defined what exactly they want," said new President Lee Jae Myung on Thursday. "I can't say with confidence that we'll be able to wrap everything up by July 8," he added. - Indonesia, Thailand, Taiwan in the wings - Other Asian economies including Indonesia, Thailand and Cambodia, which faces a 49 percent tariff, wait with bated breath. Indonesia has indicated willingness to boost energy, agriculture and merchandise imports from the United States. Bangladesh is proposing to buy Boeing planes and step up imports of US agriculture products. Taiwan, for whom Washington is a vital security partner, faces a 32 percent duty without a pact. Although both sides have faced bumps along the way, Taiwanese Vice President Hsiao Bi-khim said "negotiators from both sides are working diligently" to find a path forward. - Switzerland: Hope for delay - Switzerland's government said Washington has acknowledged it was acting in good faith, and assumes its tariff level will remain at 10 percent on July 9 while negotiations continue. But without a decision by the president as of the end of June, Switzerland did not rule out that levies could still rise to a promised 31 percent. burs-jug-bys/jgc/aks/aha
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Oil Drops as Larger OPEC+ Supply Increase Raises Glut Concerns
(Bloomberg) -- Oil extended declines after OPEC+ agreed to a bigger-than-expected production increase next month, raising concerns about oversupply just as US tariffs fan fears about the demand outlook. Foreign Buyers Swoop on Cape Town Homes, Pricing Out Locals Trump's Gilded Design Style May Be Gaudy. But Don't Call it 'Rococo.' Massachusetts to Follow NYC in Making Landlords Pay Broker Fees NYC Commutes Resume After Midtown Bus Terminal Crash Chaos What Gothenburg Got Out of Congestion Pricing Brent slid as much as 1.6% toward $67 a barrel after falling 0.7% on Friday, and West Texas Intermediate was below $66. The group led by Saudi Arabia decided on Saturday to increase supply by 548,000 barrels a day, putting OPEC+ on track to unwind its most recent output cuts a year earlier than planned. Alliance officials cited summer demand as one reason for their optimism that the extra barrels could be absorbed by the market, with the move answering President Donald Trump's calls for lower fuel costs. The oil market has been volatile in recent weeks following the conflict between Israel and Iran, with a fragile truce now in place and focus shifting to OPEC+ supply and US trade policy. Trump's country-by-country tariffs will take effect Aug. 1, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said, signaling some breathing room for trading partners ahead of a previous deadline of July 9. OPEC+ previously announced hikes of 411,000 barrels a day for May, June and July — already three times faster than scheduled — and traders had expected the same amount for August. The increase amplifies a dramatic strategy pivot, from years of output restraint to reopening the taps to reclaim market share. The group is 'clearly taking advantage of a period of tightness in global energy markets,' said Robert Rennie, the head of commodity and carbon research at Westpac Banking Corp. However, there are 'downside risks' to oil prices as seasonal demand wanes after summer, he added. 'Healthy Market' The boost was based on 'a steady global economic outlook and current healthy market fundamentals,' the group said in a statement on Saturday. Saudi Arabia followed with a price increase to its main crude grade for Asia next month, signaling confidence the market can withstand the extra OPEC+ supplies. The alliance will consider adding another 548,000 barrels a day in September at its next meeting on Aug. 3, according to delegates, which would complete the revival of 2.2 million barrels a day of cuts made in 2023. For Brazil's Criminals, Coffee Beans Are the Target SNAP Cuts in Big Tax Bill Will Hit a Lot of Trump Voters Too Sperm Freezing Is a New Hot Market for Startups Pistachios Are Everywhere Right Now, Not Just in Dubai Chocolate China's Homegrown Jewelry Superstar ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data