
The Socialist Mayor Who Came 100 Years Before Zohran Mamdani
That might sound like what has played out in New York City over the last month, as Zohran Mamdani has become a political sensation since winning the Democratic mayoral primary. But it's actually the story of what happened in Schenectady in 1911, when voters elected George Lunn mayor, a post he'd go on to hold for four terms.
Over a century divides these two political stories. Yet, the history of Lunn's career offers pointers for how Democratic Socialist Mamdani can harness his political skills and newfound celebrity to make sustainable change, overcome attacks from the political opposition, and have a long, successful career.
In 1911, Schenectady was one of the fastest growing cities in the U.S.; from 1900 to 1910, its population had increased nearly 130%, from 31,682 to 72,826. Like so many cities across the northeast and Midwest, this boom stemmed from rapid industrialization, most especially the growth of General Electric. G.E.'s hunger for labor, along with the needs of the American Locomotive Company, the city's other main employer, drew thousands to Schenectady, most notably and visibly working-class immigrants from Italy and Poland.
Schenectady was a bustling, vibrant small city, but it was also bursting at the seams—the city's growth had outpaced its housing stock, its school system, its streets and sewers, and its 19th century administrative structure. The city's working-class residents found it difficult to afford transportation on streetcars and lived in crowded and unhealthy neighborhoods with no access to parks or playgrounds. Amid the rapid growth, politically connected businessmen couldn't resist the temptation to line the pockets of local politicians to ensure that they would profit from public contracts for building roads and schools.
Read More: Zohran Mamdani's Upset Is a Seismic Moment for the Left
Enter Lunn, a young Protestant minister who grew up in Iowa and Nebraska where he was imbued with a sympathy for the common people from the populist teachings of William Jennings Bryan. Lunn traveled east to do graduate work in economics and theology and was called to the elite First Reformed Church in Schenectady in 1904. The dynamic and popular preacher discomfited many in his parish with his increasingly pointed critiques of inequities and corruption in the city. In 1909, he resigned, and started his own working-class congregation and weekly newspaper—and increasingly found an affinity with the city's small but vocal Socialist Party.
Socialism was on the march, it seemed. Hundreds of party members had been elected to city and state offices across the country, and a Socialist administration had just started running Milwaukee. While a critique of the capitalist system infused their messaging, these Socialists also aimed to provide public services and reduce the cost of living for working-class urban Americans.
Their success inspired Lunn. In 1911, he declared himself the Socialist candidate for Mayor, with an ambitious platform. Lunn promised to provide low-cost necessities—groceries, coal, and ice for the pre-electric era iceboxes—by starting city-run businesses to compete with private merchants who exploited their poor customers. Additionally, he pledged to run an efficient, professional, and honest government in contrast to the corruption rife in both the Democratic and Republican parties in Schenectady City and County.
In a four-way race (Democratic, Republican, Progressive, and Socialist), Lunn prevailed, bringing with him a Socialist majority on the City Council. One of his working-class supporters told a reporter, 'People got mighty sick of voting for Republicans and Democrats when it was a heads I win, tails you lose proposition.' This voter remarked that people wondered why the gap 'between the pay envelope and the grocer's and butcher's bills' was getting so tight. Lunn's message was attractive because he 'had a way of kind of harnessing words to ideas that had been running around loose in a lot of folks' minds.'
Lunn, in his campaign, promised to 'go on, step by step… and demonstrate that we are fit to rule.' And so he did.
The most 'socialist' parts of the new mayor's agenda never came to full fruition; local businesses challenged the city-run ice and grocery stores he launched and courts found them to be illegal. The city-run ice store shut down, while the grocery store became a co-op and then collapsed.
Yet, undaunted, Lunn's 'sewer socialism' succeeded in other ways. After a court fight, the city-run coal dealership he created was reorganized as a quasi-private enterprise. It sold coal below the cost charged by local dealers and, in doing so, may have forced them to lower their prices.
Among Lunn's other achievements, the city built a more robust public health system that led to a decrease in infant mortality, expanded the school system and provided free textbooks for students, created a Municipal Employment Bureau to undercut the exploitation of recent immigrants by private employment agents, and constructed a network of city parks that persists to this day. Lunn also rid the city of the 850 privies still fouling its soil and the Mohawk River by completing a long-stalled sewer system. Residents who opposed the extension had obtained an injunction to prevent the city from cutting down a tree in the way of excavation. Lunn went out with an axe, cut it down himself, paid a fine, and the pipe went in.
Despite his socialist ideology, Lunn also won praise from business interests, including the management of G.E., for his emphasis on administrative efficiency. He reorganized city government, implemented a transparent bidding process for city contracts, and appointed a number of non-Socialists to important administrative posts.
Even though economics were his focus, Lunn didn't shy away from the culture war issues of the day. He fervently supported women's suffrage, which at the time had had a losing track record in New York State.
Read More: How Zohran Mamdani Plans to Fix New York City's Housing Crisis
Despite his robust platform, however, Lunn's flavor of socialism disappointed his more radical colleagues, including a young Walter Lippmann. Before becoming one of the preeminent political commentators of the mid-20th century, Lippmann was a hair-on-fire Socialist, who came as a young Harvard grad to work as Lunn's personal secretary. He left after four months, disappointed with the decidedly non-radical flavor of the mayor's socialism: 'I have often thought of the slashing articles the Socialists in Schenectady would write about the present administration if they weren't responsible for the administration,' he griped.
Lunn's moderation wasn't enough to placate Schenectady's more conservative political powers either. The other three parties formed a fusion ticket in 1913 to try to beat Lunn. They succeeded, in part because the mayor was distracted by affairs beyond Schenectady—most especially his arrest at a rally for strikers affiliated with the radical International Workers of the World union in nearby Little Falls.
But the opposition couldn't wipe out Lunn's charisma or his accomplishments in improving the quality of life in the city through 'good' government. That enabled Lunn to return to the mayor's office again in 1915. But he was soon ejected from the local Socialist Party for refusing to allow the Party to dictate appointments to city jobs. Lunn then rebranded himself as a progressive Democrat. He went on to serve a term in Congress, two more terms as Mayor, a stint as Lieutenant Governor under Al Smith, and then, finally, 17 years as the head of New York State's Public Service Commission. He retired in 1942.
What lessons can Mamdani learn from Lunn's successes and failures should he win the general election campaign in New York City? He's hoping to run a vastly larger and more complex political, economic, and social entity than the Schenectady that Lunn led.
Even so, Lunn's career makes clear the importance of making a tangible difference in residents' lives. Lunn's brand of reform disrupted the corrupt and complacent, empowered talent without regard to political allegiance, and relentlessly focused on the common good of his constituents. His track record in Schenectady produced visible, tangible achievements, and even his failures, such as the city-run ice business, nonetheless signaled where Lunn's values lay in ways that resonated with working class voters.
Like Lunn, Mamdani will undoubtedly come under attack from the opposition, but if he can harness his considerable charisma and communication skills to make people's lives better, he too can overcome them and leave a lasting mark.
Andrew Morris is professor and chair of the Department of History at Union College in Schenectady, N.Y.
Made by History takes readers beyond the headlines with articles written and edited by professional historians. Learn more about Made by History at TIME here. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of TIME editors.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
22 minutes ago
- Politico
Inside the House GOP rebellion over Epstein
One option, of which Johnson appeared to be most supportive, was to forgo moving legislation through the Rules Committee for the rest of the week – effectively a legislative surrender but it would give the White House time over August recess to work on releasing Epstein-related information. Another route was to vote on a rule that included some of the Epstein language from the GOP-authored, non-binding resolution from the previous week, which would call for the release of a limited scope of Epstein documents. But GOP leaders believed that would likely fail on the chamber floor. Then there was the alternative that some House Republicans bristled at the most: to forge ahead in the Rules Committee and to vote 'no' on Democratic-led Epstein amendments. But that also wouldn't have satisfied Republicans who wanted leaders to come up with a palatable alternative to support like the non-binding resolution. 'The rule was going down anyway,' said another person with knowledge of the matter. 'So the choice was clear.' So Republicans picked door No. 1, a choice that has opened Johnson up to mockery on the Democratic side of the aisle and incredulity inside his conference. 'People want the information. They don't want things covered up,' GOP Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, one of Trump's biggest cheerleaders in the House, told reporters this week. Majority Leader Steve Scalise in an interview Wednesday played off the crisis, saying that the fallout wasn't a 'rebellion' but rather Democrats trying to 'turn the Rules Committee into a circus' and Republicans 'weren't going to let that happen.' But Senior House Republicans have also been irritated that the White House hadn't offered much in terms of backup, according to two other Republicans with knowledge of the conversations. When there is a problem in the House GOP conference, leaders often call in Trump to mediate. Trump did speak to Rules Committee Republicans — who were at the center of the protest over Epstein this week — in the Oval Office Tuesday night, according to three people with direct knowledge of the meeting. Foxx, the Rules chair, said the meeting was to thank panel Republicans for their work to pass Trump's megabill ahead of a White House celebration around the legislative achievement. But Rules Committee Rep. Ralph Norman — who this week accused House GOP leaders this week of 'stalling' on Epstein matters — said he believes Trump now 'is gonna release everything.' 'We were with him last night,' Norman added. Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) have been pushing for a vote on a binding Epstein file-release measure that could have the support to pass the house in September, when the bipartisan duo will be able to use procedural maneuvers to force the issue. GOP leaders privately argue their best chance to defeat it is for the administration to make progress in August – an outcome Norman and others are rooting for, too. In the meantime, the firestorm doesn't appear to be dying down, especially following a Wall Street Journal report that the Justice Department informed Trump in May his name was in documents related to the Epstein case. 'That is our best, and only, option now,' one senior House Republican said. 'Otherwise, we'll be right back here in September.' Nicholas Wu and Mia McCarthy contributed to this report.


Politico
29 minutes ago
- Politico
Thune dishes on his midterm strategy
IN TODAY'S EDITION:— Thune may pull a McConnell in 2026— A short-term stopgap is coming, Thune says— Cooper expected to enter NC Senate race John Thune's approach to the midterms is a shaping up to be a mix of Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell. In an interview previewing his 2026 strategy, the South Dakota Republican told Jordain that he's already 'coordinating closely' with Trump, including giving recommendations on potential candidates. The majority leader's goal is to make sure that the Senate GOP campaign wing is 'rolling in the same direction' as Trump and Trump's political arm. But Thune said he's willing to intervene in contested GOP primaries where he thinks a candidate would be doomed in the general election – an old McConnell tactic that sometimes annoyed others in the party. 'We're all about preserving and protecting and expanding our majority,' Thune said. 'So we want the best candidates on the field.' Thune has three states so far where GOP senators are retiring: Alabama, Kentucky and North Carolina. Each is likely to have a competitive primary that pits factions of the party against each other. In North Carolina, Thune has spoken with Lara Trump about the seat being vacated by Sen. Thom Tillis. Thune said the president's daughter-in-law 'would be great' before dropping the caveat, 'if she were to decide to do it.' Thune hinted we could hear more soon. Four GOP senators granted anonymity to speak candidly told Jordain they don't expect her to jump in. Thune's potential primary problems aren't limited to seats where Republicans are retiring. They're facing a likely jam-packed primary field in Georgia, where Gov. Brian Kemp passed on challenging Democratic Sen. Jon Ossoff, whose own party is bullish about keeping his seat. Thune said he believes the state is a 'real pick-up opportunity' but that Republicans 'need a good candidate.' Thune also has work to do in Iowa, with some of his members concerned that Sen. Joni Ernst might retire. Thune believes she'll run, and in the meantime has 'encouraged her to, and told her we'll do everything we can to help her' if she does. Then there's Texas. Thune said it 'remains to be seen' if Trump will get behind Sen. John Cornyn, who is facing off against MAGA favorite Ken Paxton. Thune said Trump 'wants to see how the race plays out.' The majority leader said he believes Cornyn would be 'by far the best general election candidate.' Asked about Paxton's recently-announced divorce – with his wife citing 'biblical' reasons for the breakup – Thune said voters will realize 'there's a real contrast between these candidates, both in terms of experience and accomplishment, but also I think that those character issues are always a factor.' That's not all Thune told us. He made news on Mike Johnson and Jeffrey Epstein, his CR strategy and more that POLITICO Pro readers got in an exclusive Q&A. GOOD THURSDAY MORNING. Email us at jcarney@ crazor@ mmccarthy@ and bguggenheim@ Follow our live coverage at MORNING MONEY: CAPITAL RISK — POLITICO's flagship financial newsletter has a new Friday edition built for the economic era we're living in: one shaped by political volatility, disruption and a wave of policy decisions with sector-wide consequences. Each week, Morning Money: Capital Risk brings sharp reporting and analysis on how political risk is moving markets and how investors are adapting. Want to know how health care regulation, tariffs, or court rulings could ripple through the economy? Start here. WHAT WE'RE WATCHINGWith help from Jordan Williams The House is out of session. The Senate will vote to confirm Matthew Lohmeier as under secretary of the Air Force and to move forward on Richard Topping's nomination to be VA's chief financial officer at 11:30 a.m. A confirmation vote for Topping and a vote to end debate on Emil J. Bove's nomination to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals is expected at 1:45 p.m. — Senate Appropriations will mark up fiscal 2026 Interior-Environment and Transportation-HUD appropriations bills at 9:30 a.m. — Senate Judiciary will mark up the TRACE Act, Opioid Overdose Data Collection Enhancement Act and the CHILD Act of 2025, and vote on two U.S. attorney nominees at 10:15 a.m. The rest of the week: The House is out for August recess. The Senate will continue working through appropriations bills and Trump's nominations. Pro subscribers receive this newsletter with a full congressional schedule and can browse our comprehensive calendar of markups, hearings and other notable events around Washington. Sign up for a demo. THE LEADERSHIP SUITE Inside the House GOP Epstein rebellion Speaker Mike Johnson has been trying to put out fires behind the scenes of one of the most pronounced breaches between Trump and key House GOP allies since he took the gavel: the stalled release of the Jeffrey Epstein files. In a revealing account of the House breakdown that derailed legislative action until September, Meredith Lee Hill and Hailey Fuchs report on a level of anger within the Republican conference over Epstein that goes beyond what is on display publicly. Republicans have been bucking their own leadership, incensed about being all but forced to vote against Democratic efforts calling for the release of more information. In private meetings this week, Republicans — including committee chairs — have warned, and in some cases begged, leaders to act. Rules Committee Chair Virginia Foxx and panel member Erin Houchin told House leaders Republicans wouldn't advance any rule for the week without a better solution to the Epstein issue, prompting Johnson to shut down the committee altogether. And just as lawmakers left town Wednesday, an Oversight panel approved a Democratic motion to compel Chair James Comer to subpoena the Justice Department for all Epstein files. The revolt has stunned White House officials and GOP leaders — and it could continue the moment they return from August recess. 'I think the administration will put more stuff out in August,' Rep. Chip Roy said. 'And like I said, if they don't, then I promise you, there's going to be some more looking at this in the first week of September.' Thune's betting on a short-term stopgap Thune said Congress will need to pass a short-term funding bill to prevent a shutdown in October, Jordain reports from her exclusive interview with Thune, who detailed his early strategy ahead of the fall funding fight. The Senate majority leader added the plan is to get signed into law as many of the 12 appropriations bills as possible, then use the patch to fund the rest of the government. Thune didn't co-sign an end date for the stopgap but acknowledged that Appropriations Committee Republicans are likely to want that it to go until only the year-end holidays. He also cautioned against the full-year continuing resolution that some GOP hard-liners want. 'It locks in spending from the last year,' Thune told Jordain. 'You don't get a chance to make judgments or decisions.' Roy responded to Jordain's reporting on X, saying the deal for the GOP megabill put fiscal 2026 spending below current levels, whether through a continuing resolution or full appropriations bills. 'It should also be net of rescissions. And there should be more rescissions,' Roy wrote. 'Thank you for your attention to this matter.' Sen. Mike Lee responded to the post with a '100' emoji. Thune, for his part, noted the Senate's bills will generally be at or below previous-year spending levels. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise agreed in a separate interview with Meredith on Wednesday that doing stopgap funding is 'not ideal' and that it's 'bad for defense.' 'We want to try to get a negotiated appropriations process. And we still have that ability,' Scalise told Meredith. 'That's why I'm so encouraged by the Senate finally ... moving appropriations bills through that chamber.' Scalise eyes permitting reform for the fall GOP leaders are looking at bipartisan permitting legislation this fall, Scalise said in the interview with Meredith. The majority leader said they would consider putting it in a standalone bill that would ideally require a bipartisan deal with Democrats. 'There is a lot of interest in getting that done, and Democrats in the past, some have said, 'We want to see permitting reform.' Let's give them that opportunity to help us get it done,' he said. POLICY RUNDOWN MILLER DETAILS NEW CRYPTO TAX BILL — House Ways and Means member Max Miller is now socializing the details of his sweeping cryptocurrency tax legislation, which was shared exclusively with POLITICO. Benjamin reports the proposal would make a variety of tax changes to provide better guidance to taxpayers and increase U.S. competitiveness in the digital asset space. Among other policies, Miller's forthcoming draft bill would establish tax treatment for 'airdrops,' where crypto companies distribute free cryptocurrency to holders. It would also set rules for crypto lending protocols and create a new 'de minimis' rule exempting small transactions from capital gains tax. Miller says he is now accepting public feedback on the framework and expects to release preliminary text in the coming weeks. Ways and Means Chair Jason Smith appears to be on board, too. When asked Wednesday if he had given Miller's plan his blessing, Smith replied, 'We love Max Miller!' FIRST IN INSIDE CONGRESS: BOOZMAN ANNOUNCES PHYSICIAN LEGISLATION — Sen. John Boozman is releasing bipartisan legislation today that would increase the number of Medicare-supported Graduate Medical Education residencies in the face of stark projections of physician shortages. The bill is co-sponsored by Sen. Raphael Warnock and co-led by Sen. Susan Collins and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer. It could get combined with other bipartisan health legislation later this year. Boozman's legislation would increase positions in rural hospitals, which are set to get hit hard by Medicaid cuts implemented by the GOP's recently-enacted domestic policy bill. Finance Chair Mike Crapo took to the Senate floor Wednesday to renew a bipartisan push for an overhaul to drug intermediaries, which faltered at the end of last year. But with Democrats frustrated over the GOP's party-line actions, Finance member Thom Tillis told reporters Tuesday that he expects any health care policy to be shoehorned into a year-end appropriations bill. NAME, IMAGE AND LIKENESS LEGISLATION FACES UPHILL BATTLE — Legislation that would codify brand rights for college athletes may face an uphill battle in the Senate, even if it can clear the House with the approval of the GOP and a handful of Democrats. The bill was advanced Wednesday by both the Energy and Commerce and the Education and Workforce committees, as Nick Niedzwiadek reported. The measure has two original Democratic co-sponsors, but Energy and Commerce Democrats said the GOP was steamrolling them instead of working toward compromise on a number of issues, for instance the need for stronger guardrails against predatory agents who represent student athletes. The top Democrat on the Senate Commerce committee, Maria Cantwell, also said that many of her colleagues had concerns about the legislation, which would need 60 votes to clear the chamber. 'We need to do a better job of taking care of mid-size and smaller schools,' Cantwell told Benjamin. 'We want to get something done, but can't do something that is just so in favor of the biggest institutions getting most of the revenue.' GOP OPTIMISTIC ABOUT TRADE DEALS — Republicans left back-to-back meetings with U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer this week praising current agreements from the Trump administration and predicting there would be more to come, Daniel Desrochers reports. 'The good thing was the Japanese agreement was reached and there are a lot of other agreements that are coming to a head,' Rep. Greg Murphy said. 'We knew it was going to take a while, we knew it was going to be an uphill, I don't want to say fight, a challenge.' Best of POLITICO Pro and E&E: CAMPAIGN STOP COOPER WATCH — Former North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper is expected to announce a campaign for Senate as soon as Monday, two people familiar with his decision tell Elena Schneider. The announcement would be enthusiastically welcomed by state and national Democrats as North Carolina represents one of the few offensive opportunities for the party. On the Republican side, Lara Trump, the president's daughter-in-law, is considered by many to be a viable candidate, but it's unclear whether she would run at this point. RNC Chair Michael Whatley, who served as the head of the state's party, is interested but is deferring to Trump, POLITICO reported last month. HUIZENGA FORGOES SENATE RUN — GOP Rep. Bill Huizenga will not run for Senate in Michigan next year after spending months irking congressional leadership by considering a bid for the open battleground seat, Gregory Svirnovskiy reports. National Republicans pressured him out of the race to make way for former Rep. Mike Rogers and avoid a messy and expensive primary fight. TUNNEL TALK DEMOCRATS, FOOD WORKERS STAGE BOYCOTT — House food service workers, with support from Democratic lawmakers in the Labor Caucus, called for a boycott of some Capitol complex restaurants Wednesday. They're demanding that the new dining vendors agree to rehire the House's existing workforce and maintain their previous union-negotiated base pay and benefits. Reps. Steven Horsford, Donald Norcross and Debbie Dingell joined the workers in protest outside the Capitol Building as the vendors delay recognition of their bargaining unit, Unite Here Local 23. The boycott, which begins immediately despite the recess, includes six new venues: Starbucks, Pakistani food restaurant CHA Street Food, Jimmy John's, Common Grounds, Java House and PX Tacos. Employees have only received return offers from one of the seven contractors so far — Metz, which is running the cafeterias, according to a statement from Unite Here. JOB BOARD Kobe Walker has been promoted to legislative assistant for Rep. Greg Landsman. She covers health policy for Energy and Commerce. Joel Graham is now associate administrator for the Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs at NASA. He previously was a partner at Meeks, Butera and Israel. Avery Blank is joining Qualcomm's AI legal team as senior legal counsel. She was previously counsel for the Senate Homeland Security committee. THE BEST OF THE REST As Palantir Cashes In on Trump 2.0, Peter Thiel Is Bankrolling Republicans Again, from Dan Friedman and David Corn at Mother Jones Trump relents on his Senate grudges ahead of the midterms, from Burgess Everett and Shelby Talcott at Semafor HAPPY BIRTHDAY Reps. Andy Barr and Rashida Tlaib … former Sen. Claire McCaskill … former Reps. Vin Weber and Charlie Crist … Margo Martin (3-0) … Vox Global's Robert Hoopes … John Brabender of BrabenderCox … POLITICO's Jessica Piper … Hillary Parkinson of Rep. Keith Self's office … Megan Ruane of Rep. Madeleine Dean's office … Allie Bedell of Canvass America … Ann Berry (7-0) … Chris Bond of AHIP … David Fuscus … former RNC Chair Marc Racicot … Christianné Allen Hughes … Adriane Casalotti of the National Association of County and City Health Officials … Agustina Pardal TRIVIA WEDNESDAY'S ANSWER: Charlie Dent correctly answered that President Harry Truman's daughter, Martha, pursued a career as an opera singer. TODAY'S QUESTION, from Charlie: Which father-son pair held the same House seat and chaired the same committee? Name the seat and committee. The first person to correctly guess gets a mention in the next edition of Inside Congress. Send your answers to insidecongress@

2 hours ago
Gabbard's claims of an anti-Trump conspiracy are not supported by declassified documents
WASHINGTON -- Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard this month declassified material that she claimed proved a 'treasonous conspiracy' by the Obama administration in 2016 to politicize U.S. intelligence in service of casting doubt on the legitimacy of Donald Trump's election victory. As evidence, Gabbard cited newly declassified emails from Obama officials and a five-year-old classified House report in hopes of undermining the intelligence community's conclusion that Russian President Vladimir Putin wanted to boost Trump and denigrate his Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton. Russia's activities during the 2016 election remain some of the most examined events in recent history. The Kremlin's campaign and the subsequent U.S. government response were the subject of at least five major investigations by the Republican-led House and Senate intelligence committee; two Justice Department special counsels; and the department's inspector general. Those investigations either concluded — or accepted the conclusion — that Russia embarked on a campaign to interfere in the election through the use of social media and hacked material. The House-led probe, conducted by Trump allies, also concurred that Russia ran an election interference campaign but said the purpose was to sow chaos in the U.S. rather than boost Trump. Several of the reports criticize the actions of Obama administration officials, particularly at the FBI, but do not dispute the fundamental findings that Moscow sought to interfere in the election. The Associated Press has reviewed those reports to evaluate how Gabbard's claims stack up: CLAIM: 'The intelligence community had one assessment: that Russia did not have the intent and capability to try to impact the outcome of the U.S. election leading up to Election Day. The same assessment was made after the election.' — Gabbard to Fox News on Tuesday. The documents Gabbard released do not support her claim. She cites a handful of emails from 2016 in which officials conclude that Russia had no intention of manipulating the U.S. vote count through cyberattacks on voting systems. President Barack Obama's administration never alleged that voting infrastructure was tampered with. Rather, the administration said Russia ran a covert influence campaign using hacked and stolen material from prominent Democrats. Russian operatives then used that information as part of state-funded media and social media operations to inflame U.S. public opinion. More than two dozen Russians were indicted in 2018 in connection with those efforts. Republican-led investigations in Congress have affirmed that conclusion, and the emails that Gabbard released do not contradict that finding. CLAIM: 'There was a shift, a 180-degree shift, from the intelligence community's assessment leading up to the election to the one that President Obama directed be produced after Donald Trump won the election that completely contradicted those assessments that had come previously.' — Gabbard to Fox News on Tuesday. There was no shift. The emails Gabbard released show that a Department of Homeland Security official in August 2016 told then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper there was 'no indication of a Russian threat to directly manipulate the actual vote count.' The public assessment the Obama administration made public in January 2017 reached the same conclusion: 'DHS assesses that the types of systems Russian actors targeted or compromised were not involved in vote tallying." CLAIM: The Obama administration "manufactured the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment that they knew was false promoting the LIE that Vladimir Putin and the Russian government helped President Trump win the 2016 election.' — Gabbard on Truth Social Wednesday. The material declassified this week reveals some dissent within the intelligence community about whether Putin wanted to help Trump or simply inflame the U.S. public. That same question led to a partisan divide on the House Intelligence panel when it examined the matter several years later. Gabbard's memo released last week cites a 'whistleblower' who she says served in the intelligence community at the time and who is quoted as saying that he could not 'concur in good conscience' with the intelligence community's judgment that Russia had a 'decisive preference' for Trump. Such dissent and debate are not unusual in the drafting of intelligence reports. The Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee examined whether there was any political interference in the Obama administration's conclusions and reported that 'all analysts expressed that they were free to debate, object to content, and assess confidence levels, as is normal and proper.' In 2018, Putin directly addressed the question of whether he preferred Trump at a press conference in Helsinki even as he sidestepped a question about whether he directed any of his subordinates to help Trump. 'Yes, I did,' Putin said. 'Because he talked about bringing the U.S.-Russia relationship back to normal.' CLAIM: 'They used already discredited information like the Steele dossier — they knew it was discredited at the time.' — Gabbard to Fox News on Tuesday. The dossier refers to a collection of opposition research files compiled by a former British spy, Christopher Steele, whose work was funded by Democrats during the 2016 election. Those files included uncorroborated tips and salacious gossip about Trump's ties to Russia, but the importance to the Russia investigation has sometimes been overstated. It was not the basis for the FBI's decision to open an investigation in July 2016 into potential coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia, the Justice Department's inspector general found. Some of the records released by Gabbard this week also reveal that it was a Central Intelligence Agency human source close to the Kremlin that the agency primarily relied on for its conclusion that Putin wanted to help Trump and hurt Clinton, not the Steele dossier. FBI agents on the case didn't even come to possess the dossier until weeks into their inquiry. Even so, Trump supporters have seized on the unverified innuendo in the document to undercut the broader Russia investigation. Many of Steele's claims have since been discredited or denied. It is true, however, that the FBI and Justice Department relied in part on the Steele dossier to obtain surveillance warrants to eavesdrop on the communications of a former Trump campaign adviser, the inspector general found. FBI agents continued to pursue those warrants even after questions arose about the credibility of Steele's reporting. The dossier was also summarized — over the objections of then-CIA Director John Brennan, he has said — in a two-page annex to the classified version of the intelligence community assessment.