Student pilot from India dies in mid-air crash in Canada
'With profound sorrow, we mourn the tragic passing of Mr. Sreehari Sukesh, a young Indian student pilot,' the Consulate said in a post on X. 'We extend our deepest condolences to his family.'
The Consulate added that it is in contact with Sukesh's family, the pilot training school, and local police to ensure all necessary assistance is being provided.
Tagging the Indian High Commission in Ottawa, the Ministry of External Affairs, and the Chief Minister's Office of Kerala, the Consulate assured continued support to the affected family.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
23 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Punjab Police investigating ‘cybersecurity breach' of its X handle after derogatory post
The Punjab Police is investigating a possible cybersecurity breach after a derogatory post was made public from its official X handle. The post appeared on the handle of Punjab Police on X on the intervening night of July 17-18 in the form of an AI generated image apparently based on the George Floyd incident in the USA in May 2020. The post was noticed by many X users and a war of tweets had erupted between Indian and Pakistani handles. At one point there was a further reply by the Punjab Police handle with a cryptic 'X' in red colour. The derogatory post was quickly pointed out in the middle by a prominent handle on X by the name of @Joydas. 'This is an actual tweet by Punjab Police India. They chose an image which depicts the worst racism and police brutality in US to score a point. This image was viral worldwide to represent Police Atrocity but Punjab Police thought this is what they stand for,' he wrote tagging the Punjab Police post. It has come to our attention that a contentious post was briefly visible on the official Punjab Police X handle and has since been deleted. Preliminary findings indicate that the imagery used in the post was AI-generated. We are currently investigating whether this incident… — Punjab Police India (@PunjabPoliceInd) July 20, 2025 Senior Supreme Court Advocate Sanjay Hegde also noticed the image and posted on his handle on X tagging Punjab Police and the DGP saying these kinds of posts were best avoided. The Punjab Police official handle on X put out a post later in the evening referring to the incident as a possible cybersecurity breach and said, 'It has come to our attention that a contentious post was briefly visible on the official Punjab Police X handle and has since been deleted. Preliminary findings indicate that the imagery used in the post was AI-generated. We are currently investigating whether this incident resulted from unauthorised access.' 'Our technical teams are actively probing the matter, including the possibility of a cybersecurity breach. We urge the public not to circulate unverified content and to rely only on information shared through our verified official handles. Your trust and safety remain our highest priority. Punjab Police does not endorse any such content in any form'. The George Floyd incident had hit the headlines on May 25, 2020. Floyd, 46, died in Minneapolis, USA, when a policeman knelt on his neck for over nine minutes while he was being handcuffed. The incident had led to widespread protests and riots in the USA.
United News of India
33 minutes ago
- United News of India
Boeing crash: Geofenced asymmetric cyberterrorism attack can happen again
Thiruvananthapuram, July 21 (UNI) In a disturbing possibility of a geofenced asymmetric cyberterrorism attack, if the engines of the Boeing 787-8 aircraft that crashed in Ahmedabad on June 12 responded to software commands rather than to those from the humans on board, it could happen again, warranting urgent rectification. "The invisible cutoff of fuel switches poses a serious challenge to India's scientists, engineers, and pilots. It is possible that someone interfered remotely, using software to control a critical part of the aircraft. This could mean the aircraft was hijacked through code rather than by force — and if that's true, it could happen again," internationally renowned CPS security researcher and CII-SCADA engineer KS Manoj told UNI. In a potentially grave breach of aviation safety, the recent incident involving Air India's Boeing 787 Dreamliner (VT-ANB) at Ahmedabad airport has raised serious concerns over the possibility of the geofenced asymmetric cyberattack, leading to a sudden and simultaneous shutdown of both engines during takeoff. The aircraft, which had completed a routine flight from Delhi earlier that day without any technical anomalies, reportedly experienced an unexplained dual engine failure as it began its takeoff roll from Ahmedabad. According to preliminary findings, both fuel control switches moved to the OFF position without any pilot input, a highly improbable and dangerous scenario that could have resulted in catastrophe had the aircraft been airborne. Cybersecurity and aviation experts believe the nature and timing of the incident suggest the presence of a pre-programmed cyber trigger, possibly linked to the aircraft's GPS coordinates, making it a textbook example of a geofenced asymmetric cyberattack. Such attacks are designed to activate only when the aircraft enters or exits a specific physical location, bypassing manual controls and exploiting vulnerabilities in the aircraft's digital control systems. The incident has drawn attention from international aviation authorities. The US National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), which is monitoring the investigation given the aircraft's American origin, has reportedly criticized the Indian preliminary report for being speculative and lacking technical depth. Experts in aerospace cybersecurity argue that the investigation so far has failed to examine key attack surfaces such as the FADEC (Full Authority Digital Engine Control), cockpit display integrity, and avionics network security. Notably, no cockpit video footage has been provided to verify whether the fuel switch toggling occurred physically or as a deceptive display artifact. Furthermore, the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) has come under scrutiny for its composition, which lacks specialists in avionics cybersecurity, SCADA/ICS forensics, or digital sabotage detection. Despite the Dreamliner being a highly computerized, software-defined platform connected through networked critical systems, the probe team reportedly does not include representation from CERT-In, NCIIPC, DRDO, or any digital avionics research wing. Senior cyber intelligence analysts warn that the incident bears chilling similarities to asymmetric cyber warfare techniques previously observed in other sectors, including the 2020 Mumbai power grid disruption — despite a predictive FIR filed by the Kerala Police. In that case, a cyberattack was initially dismissed as human error. Analysts argue that if this latest aviation incident is not addressed with urgency and transparency, it may embolden further attacks on India's critical aviation infrastructure. The concern is heightened by the aircraft's classification as Critical Information Infrastructure (CII) under Section 70 of the IT Act, which mandates specialized cyber protection and forensic oversight. Aviation safety experts stress that the absence of pilot error, the unexplained movement of both fuel switches, the geographical specificity of the incident, and the aircraft's earlier normal operation from Delhi all point toward a location-bound malicious trigger. If the display screens inside the cockpit were compromised to hide or spoof the switch status, it would have rendered the pilots helpless in a high-stakes scenario. The broader fear is that such attacks could bypass even highly trained flight crews, by silently manipulating systems they are taught to trust, KS Manoj, who is also a Research Engineer at CPS Security CPS Security Intelegrid ECC (P) Ltd, pointed out. Experts are calling for an immediate joint investigation by AAIB, CERT-In, NCIIPC, and DRDO, and have urged the Ministry of Civil Aviation to treat the incident as a suspected act of cyber terrorism under Section 66F of the IT Act. There is also a growing demand for a comprehensive audit of all FADEC equipped aircraft and for pre-flight security verifications that include geolocation-bound logic checks. Unless acknowledged and mitigated at the earliest, experts warn that these emerging forms of cyber-physical sabotage could serve as a prelude to far more catastrophic events. Rather than remaining sitting ducks, authorities must act decisively. Analysts also caution that many of India's VVIPs regularly depend on such modes of air transportation, raising national security stakes. The incident is being closely watched not only as a measure of India's technical preparedness, but also as a bellwether for the global aviation industry's ability to confront the next generation of threats -- where software, not explosives, may become the preferred weapon of choice. The detailed statement of technical author KS Manoj is given below: The Invisible Cutoff: A Chilling Mystery in the Sky The Boeing 787 Dreamliner had just lifted off from Ahmedabad. The engines roared to life as expected, and the nose of the aircraft pointed confidently toward the skies. Everything seemed normal — until it wasn't. Just moments into the climb, something unthinkable happened. A sudden shutdown in the sky. Inside the cockpit, a strange silence replaced the usual hum of the powerful engines. The captain, Pilot 1, stared at the electronic display screen in front of him. This screen, called EICAS (Engine Indicating and Crew Alerting System), monitors the health of the aircraft's engines and systems. Then came the shock. The fuel flow dropped to zero. The engine speed began to fall. A warning flashed: 'ENGINE SHUTDOWN.' The captain was stunned. He immediately turned to his co-pilot and asked: 'Why did you cut off?' To which the co-pilot, equally confused, replied: 'I didn't.' Who turned off the fuel? Here lies the mystery: No one in the cockpit admitted to shutting off the engines. And why would they? Cutting off fuel just after takeoff is practically unthinkable. Both pilots denied touching the switches. There was no reason to shut down the engines at that moment. The conversation recorded on the Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) proves that the captain was shocked and the co-pilot clearly denied any action. But is there any proof? Sadly, no. There is no CCTV camera inside the cockpit. There is no video footage showing the pilots' hand movements. And Boeing 787s do not come equipped with inbuilt cockpit cameras. So we cannot visually confirm what actually happened. However, the aircraft's Flight Data Recorder (FDR) tells us one thing with certainty: The fuel switches moved from ON to OFF (CUTOFF), and then were turned back ON (RUN) during flight. This was not imagined. It happened. But the how and why remain a mystery. The pilots tried to save the plane Realizing what had happened, the pilots acted swiftly. They followed emergency procedures: they turned the fuel switches OFF (CUTOFF), then back ON (RUN) — trying to restart the engines. It's similar to restarting a frozen phone. But this wasn't a phone — it was a passenger aircraft full of lives, and time was running out. One engine showed signs of recovery. The other did not. The aircraft could not stay in the air. What Did the Investigation Find? The investigation confirmed that the fuel switches were OFF, then turned ON again — mid-air. The voice recording revealed the pilots reacting in real-time, trying desperately to recover. And when the wreckage was recovered, the fuel switches were found in the ON (RUN) position — proving that the pilots tried to save the aircraft until the very end. So, What Really Happened? The facts are chilling: Both engines shut down. Neither pilot touched the fuel switches. There is no video evidence. The data confirms the switches were moved. The pilots responded immediately to restart the engines. This leads to a disturbing possibility: Was this a technical malfunction — or something far more sinister? Could it have been a cyberattack? A remote instruction sent to the aircraft's systems? Did the engines follow commands from software, not from the humans on board? Why this cannot be ignored If this was not pilot error — If this was not a normal mechanical fault — then someone might have interfered remotely, using software to take control of a critical part of the aircraft. It could mean the aircraft was hijacked — not by force, but through code. And if that's true, it could happen again. A timeline that raises questions Flight VT-ANB flew safely from Delhi earlier that day. But during takeoff from Ahmedabad, both engines suddenly shut down — without warning. The pilots didn't touch the fuel switches. Yet they moved. And there's no video to explain how. Everything had been normal just hours earlier. So, what changed between Delhi and Ahmedabad? Can anyone connect the dots? UNI DS PRS
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
The story of Indian women: Empowered and powerless
Typically, the politics of gender in India has been a backlash against the perceived educational and financial independence of women. The reactions, particularly on social media, to the recent murder of a young tennis player allegedly by her father show that there are groups that view the rise of women celebrities and influencers as a threat to a system that rests on male power. The murdered girl's father told the Haryana police that he had been driven to the act because he had been constantly taunted for 'living off his daughter's income'. Barely a week later, Balasore district in Odisha faced a public bandh with angry citizens demanding justice for a 20-year-old student who had immolated herself after the college turned a deaf ear to her repeated complaints about a senior faculty member harassing her sexually. Former CM and Leader of Opposition Naveen Patnaik said in a post on X that a failed system did not help a female student struggling for justice. There is little sensible discussion over such deaths. Both deaths coincidentally occurred in BJP-ruled states and are being politicised by the Opposition. This has resulted in the usual whataboutery from the ruling party's quarters: Why focus only on BJP-ruled states? What about the rape-murder of a doctor on a West Bengal campus? Some have called the Haryana incident an 'honour killing' since the family was prosperous, and the FIR states that the father of the player-turned-coach was angry with his increasingly defiant daughter. Even the term he used in his confession to his cousin used patriarchal archaism: 'Maine kanya vadh kiya hai (I have committed filicide).' Ironically, it is obvious from both these cases how, whatever the ground reality, gender equality has acquired the aura of an ideal socio-political stance for all Indian political parties. Even while defending perpetrators from their fold, all parties are quick to proclaim support for nari shakti and nari mukti. When elections are due, they promise subsidies and cash donations — now an inalienable part of all manifestos. But the promises printed on posters plastered all over town with the party supremo's beaming mugshot hide the ugly reality that the daily news unveils. From Vinesh Phogat and Radhika Yadav, to the Balasore case, we can clearly see the injustices that prevail within homes and workplaces even for women who appear to be protected, well-off and financially independent. Whatever the politicians' proclaimed position, scores of young Indian women are learning how their deemed empowerment may reveal another facet of their powerlessness as daughters, mothers, sisters, students and employees. Committees to register complaints against sexual harassment at the workplace often underscore a woman's powerlessness to access justice. We also realise how daily actions and quips, seemingly innocent or unintended, remind women of all ages of the Laxman rekha marking boundaries of female ambition and what society/employers will expect of them after elections and Mahila Shakti Divas and Ladli bahin/ beti celebrations are over. Inequality has many champions on social media. Not just trolls but many well-known influencers openly victim-shame and promote prejudice. This impacts the young indelibly. We can claim to have some of the most progressive laws to help and protect women from sexual predators. In reality, women see the law and instruments of the state treating those without connections in high places as abstract creatures with abstract rights. In Amrit Kaal, no law will sanction a father shooting his daughter. But the state often only intervenes once the most serious crime has already been committed. No state allows kanwariyas to assault a girl on a scooty with shoes because she defiled their holy cargo either. But this happened. No law in India will silence women or stop them from filing complaints of abuse against predatory male bosses. Women, though, know the standard reaction of college authorities, company boardrooms and office fact-finding committees in these circumstances. The writer is former chairperson, Prasar Bharati
