Ecosystem building is coalition building
But ecosystem building is about bringing together diverse groups to support entrepreneurship, technology and economic development.
So despite national political turmoil, many local organizers remain focused on practical solutions and community-driven economic growth. Shared goals like job creation can bridge political divides.
One definition of justice is ensuring everyone has a fair shot at thriving.
That's what lights me up about entrepreneurship, technology and career training. It's also why I care about information resources (read: journalism) and the rule of law.
I'll talk to practically anyone who is serious about this work, even if I disagree with them on plenty else. This is the heart of ecosystem building, which I think of as the art of encouraging the big and the small, the weird and the square, the fast and the slow to inhabit the same environment. Not all species need to interact, and when they do some may even be at odds. My pursuit: Find the most important work that stitches together the most good-faith actors.
Ecosystem building is coalition building, then — and boy could we use coalition building right now.
This week, I recorded the next in Technically's ecosystem-building podcast with investor Brian Brackeen, the founding partner of Lightship Capital, and small business advocate Victor Hwang, the founder/CEO of Right to Start. What unites us is a passion for how local organizing and entrepreneurship define the American project. Our intention is to focus on that local work, which we've all found is better at uniting than dividing.
'When you start talking about entrepreneurship and the power to create jobs, to lift communities, to create wealth, to raise incomes, to fight poverty, fight inequality, it's pretty universal how [popular] that is,' Hwang said. 'But it's also one of those issues that doesn't get talked about much, which means it's still pretty fresh.'
Trouble is, I feel unable to ignore how a bombastic start to the Trump administration has impacted local organizing around the country. In addition to firing an estimated 200,000 federal workers and cutting federal funding less out of budgetary consequence than political motivation, the bipartisan Tech Hubs program has been under fire, as Technical.ly has reported, alongside data gathering and AI research.
And so, with a pledge to work to focus more on local, Hwang, Brackeen and I took some time to gather our advice for each other, and peers, that are in ecosystem building work around the country.
Local bright spots in entrepreneurship
Plenty of local organizing continues.
Brackeen praised Endeavor, a global network that supports entrepreneurs outside traditional venture capital strongholds like Silicon Valley and New York.
'[Endeavor is] doubling down on ecosystems and investing in positive entrepreneurs who create a multiplier effect in their communities,' Brackeen said.
Hwang, reflecting on a road trip he took last fall, emphasized the unlikely places where entrepreneurial energy is thriving.
'In Portland, Oregon, there's an effort to build a shoe innovation district in Old Town,' Hwang said. 'In Akron, Ohio, they turned an old Goodyear tire plant into Bounce Innovation Hub, a massive coworking and innovation space.'
The federal policy landscape: A challenge for local builders
Entrepreneurship-led economic development may be on the rise. But strategies developed under the climate and racial justice–focused industrial policy of the Biden administration are being scrutinized, if not abandoned altogether.
A report released last fall by Senate Republicans as an analysis of National Science Foundation grants titled ' DEI: Division. Extremism. Ideology. ' was recirculated this month by organizations attempting to redact politicized terms from their websites and applications.
Of the major innovation role research universities play in many regions, Brackeen said: 'If you're Columbus and your ecosystem is driven by Ohio State spin-offs, you could be affected more than, say, Tulsa, which relies on philanthropic private capital.'
'The news makes it seem like we're at war with each other, but when you actually visit communities, people are just focused on doing the work.'
Victor Hwang, Right to Start
Technical.ly's national Map of Innovation Ecosystems includes an index that relies heavily on the influence of major R&D investments. How much those investments change over time will shake up where technology is commercialized. Federally-funded Tech Hubs organizers are nervous.
Yet Hwang says on the ground, local organizers and entrepreneur supporters can only focus on what they can control — and many are doing just that.
'It's almost like we live in two different universes,' he said. 'The news makes it seem like we're at war with each other, but when you actually visit communities, people are just focused on doing the work.'
Coalition building as a path forward
As ecosystem builders look for ways to sustain momentum, the conversation turned to coalition building as a strategy for navigating political uncertainty. Hwang's Right to Start organization is actively working across political divides, launching in-state coalitions in places like Arkansas and Indiana, with plans for expansion into California, Michigan, Missouri, New York and North Carolina.
'We had over a dozen Right to Start Act bills introduced across states with vastly different political leadership,' he said. 'Creating an office of entrepreneurship, tracking entrepreneurs, shifting economic development priorities — all of these are ideas with broad appeal.'
Brackeen added that economic development strategies differ by region but ultimately share the same goal. 'Ohio's model is very different from New York's, but at the end of the day, they both want the same thing — thriving businesses,' he said. 'If you strip away the political middleman, it's clear that entrepreneurship is a common ground.'
Can local ecosystem builders continue to thrive in an era of political division? Hwang and Brackeen remain optimistic but realistic.
'This is still a bottom-up democracy,' Hwang said. 'Both parties haven't quite figured out how to tap into the energy of entrepreneurship, but the leader who does will have a major political advantage in the coming years.'
Policing language is easier than forging connections
My favorite social video of the week is from TikTok user @nopebrigade0 who identifies as a sociology PhD candidate and argues two of my favorite points: If you call everything fascism, the word loses meaning, and policing language is often classist virtue signaling.
After I published an op-ed critiquing Elon Musk for arrogantly overriding democratic ideals, plenty of readers criticized me for not being critical enough. Following my last Technical.ly column in which I argued that a Trump-championed witch hunt for DEI programs was no less an attack on free speech than mandating DEI language, one friend belittled my writing as daring to equate his political views with those of his political opponent. I find this unproductive.
As the social activist Bernice Johnson Reagon, who sadly died last year, put it: 'If you're in a coalition and you're comfortable, you know it's not a broad enough coalition.'
It is so much easier to police the language of someone you mostly agree with, than it is to build bridges to someone you mostly disagree with. Better to build a coalition around important issues we can agree on.
'What we need is a narrative of who we are together, who we are as a nation,' as that TikTok user eloquently puts it. 'It can be a big, expansive, wonderful one.'
National politics and federal priorities do shape state and local strategies. They did under the Biden administration, and they will under Trump. Activism is necessary, so do call your elected officials and attend town halls. For most of us though,the best path forward remains at the community level.
'People ascribe evilness to the 'other side' without actually knowing them,' Brackeen said. 'But when you focus on real entrepreneurs, real businesses, and real job creation, you can find common ground in any political environment.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Technical.ly
3 days ago
- Technical.ly
All the things Americans do agree about
Despite political dysfunction and rapid swings in national mood, Americans retain a strong belief in bottom-up power and their ability to shape society, a sentiment that fuels optimism even in difficult times. While the US produces a disproportionate global share of top researchers and maintains trade surpluses in high-value services, the country is capable of both exceptional good and deep missteps — and progress depends on coalition-building and sustained civic engagement. Entrepreneurship is increasingly viewed as a unifying force that transcends political divides, offering practical solutions to economic and social challenges and garnering bipartisan policy interest. Karl Marx and Abraham Lincoln exchanged letters. In early 1865, Marx wrote to congratulate Lincoln on his reelection. 'The workingmen of Europe feel sure that,' Marx wrote, 'as the American War of Independence initiated a new era of ascendancy for the middle class, so the American Antislavery War will do for the working class.' Lincoln was no communist. But he famously sought out competing perspectives and built coalitions to advance his causes. Marx thought of the Union as a force for progress. It's again a complicated time to be American: 3 in 5 report a high-degree of pride in nationality. It's the lowest overall score in the 25 years of Gallup's survey, but, like with so many issues, our feelings range widely by political affiliation. We're swapping national myth for tribal myth. We squandered post-Cold War global hegemony with financial indiscretion and foreign entanglements. Our unregulated information sector undermined local news, amplifying polarization. Yet the American project remains fundamentally valuable: more than any other country over the last century, we've been a net force for democracy, peace and economic prosperity — because most voters have wanted it. 'America is a country where power flows from the bottom up. People feel like they own the country, unlike almost anywhere else on Earth,' said Victor Hwang, the founder-CEO of pro-entrepreneurship advocacy group Right to Start. He's one of my cohosts for our monthly Builders Live podcast. 'Long-term optimism comes from our narrative of shareholder activism,' Hwang said. So many interests want to divide us. At the risk of sounding naive, Hwang says we need to focus more on what we agree on. 'Americans believe deeply in their power to shape society.' America's complex modern moment Hwang is a son of Chinese immigrants who grew up in Middle America. He's taken a series of cross-country roadtrips in recent years, alongside international travel. He spoke to me last month in the middle of the night from a hotel lobby in Japan's Osaka. He's celebrating July 4 with family, taking in a Dodgers baseball game and fireworks. It's a small respite before he continues his policy work, and supporting America the Entrepreneurial — a year-long campaign to engage 250,000 Americans in starting new businesses in time for next year's 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence. Despite uneven national identity, three-quarters of Americans have a positive view of the Fourth of July holiday, according to a poll from last year, including majorities run across the political spectrum. I agree with them, even if that comes with an awareness of the holiday's complexity. I also have a positive association with Juneteenth, which serves as a powerful reminder of how the American promise has always been justice delayed — which is to say justice denied. The newsroom looks over the spot where the Declaration was signed, and first read publicly, in both English and German. I bicycle past daily, and I've decided my discomfort with the holiday is part of the point. I am a proud American, which is exactly why I have expectations that can be missed. Think of the good. America's innovations in science, technology, and culture continue to profoundly shape the world. With just 4% of the population, the United States hosts almost 40% of the world's 'highly-cited researchers,' a proxy for impact. Meanwhile, for all the talk of a global trade imbalance for goods, Americans have a trade surplus in services, including law, technology and all those international students at our universities. Like it or not, the American economy and military have underwritten relative peace and prosperity around the world for most of the last 80 years. That's why politically-charged gutting of American science research is frustrating. That's why videos of masked ICE agents rounding up American citizens is gut-wrenching. That's why the genuine fear I hear from friends is alarming. 'As a woman in Alabama preparing to give birth, I'm acutely aware of the backslide in healthcare and women's rights,' said Maria Underwood, another podcast cohost who is TechBirmingham chair and an Alabama native expecting her second child. Yet she too holds a kind of hope. 'Optimism comes from seeing people actively working to push against this,' Underwood said. 'I see people organizing more than ever, building companies, solving real problems.' What do Americans agree about? My passion for journalism is rooted in this belief: To love a thing is to do so even while understanding the worst of it. My personal philosophy opposes any concentration of power — corporate, government, or otherwise. Coalition building, for me, means focusing more on what we agree on, rather than what we disagree about. That's how I understand longterm political change is made. Americans are a 'thermostatic electorate,' to use a political science term, meaning that we tend to throw out each successful political movement — which routinely overestimates the depth of their support. Famously, a 1969 book called 'The Emerging Republican Majority' was responded with a 2002 book called 'The Emerging Democratic Majority,' which was fulfilled by an Obama-era that was followed by a Trump era. The president's political party almost always loses midterm elections, and yet somehow each cycle we treat it as a surprise. Lately the concern is all this is swinging back and forth harder and faster. The rise of ' two-year presidencies ' has introduced a move-fast-and-break-things style of governance. A constitutional scholar warned last fall that ' the regulatory pendulum ' is operating more like a bullwhip: Business leaders and advocates push harder with each cycle. Consumer confidence, economic certainty and the general national mood appear to switch even more dramatically than before. If your preferred national political party is in office, you think things are getting better. If they're out of power, you think things are getting worse. Entrepreneurship is a tool for coalition building Entrepreneurship still promises a kind of salve. Hwang reminds that polling for new and small business looks sky-high among Americans across the political spectrum. Here it helps to remember the 'horseshoe theory of politics,' which depicts the American electorate as bent in a half-circle so that the two extremes of the political spectrum begin to reach agreement, in their desire for destruction and disagreement. In his 2021 book ' The Story Paradox,' professor Jonathan Gottschall argues that Americans are locked in a battle between two competing myths, that the country is either uniquely exceptional or uniquely terrible. Rather, it's something in between: a reigning superpower capable of great good that also takes far-reaching missteps. 'The data would tell you, if you turn off Fox News or MSNBC and focus only on economic numbers, we're in a good economic environment, surprisingly perhaps, and it's improving,' said podcast cohost Brian Brackeen, the entrepreneur turned venture capitalist. The American economy remains the world's best, made so by a pro-entrepreneur commitment to the rule of law, Brackeen said. 'I would love to see raised expectations across the country, because that would come from a greater hope of what's possible.' Brian Brackeen, Lightship Capital As one of the country's few Black venture capitalists leading his own fund, Brackeen is not naive to structural racism or corrosive polarization. His grandfather, who died in 2002, was an influential social activist and pastor who helped launch one of the country's first Black-owned banks. That inspired Brackeen's own career journey. 'It's in my blood to serve people through finance and community organization,' Brackeen said. 'I would love to see raised expectations across the country, because that would come from a greater hope of what's possible.' Entrepreneurship, perhaps more than any other force, embodies this duality. It solves problems big and small, creates jobs and drives economic mobility. Policymakers across the political spectrum are increasingly turning to entrepreneurship as a strategy for unity and prosperity. As we celebrate July 4, reflecting on our nation's complicated past and uncertain future, I find optimism in the entrepreneurial spirit. The inspiration I've always taken from Lincoln, who exchanged letters with everyone from Karl Marx and abolitionists to confederate generals, is that we are not defined by any one correspondence but by their sum and the actions we take. Nothing is more effective than a leader who can balance perspective to get the best outcome for the most people — and therefore nothing is more dangerous to those who oppose that. Marx's letter got to Lincoln just a few months before the end of the Civil War. The Union held. A few days after, Lincoln was assassinated, another mark in the long violent struggle to fulfill the American promise. I celebrate this uneven, inconsistent and incomplete journey.
Libya Observer
23-06-2025
- Libya Observer
Libya condemns airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, calls for de-escalation
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Government of National Unity has expressed deep concern over the airstrikes targeting nuclear facilities in the Islamic Republic of Iran, describing the attack as a 'dangerous escalation' that threatens regional and global security. In an official statement, the Ministry reaffirmed Libya's firm stance against the use of force in international relations outside the framework of international legitimacy. It called for dialogue, restraint, and the avoidance of actions that could further escalate military tensions in the region. The statement stressed the importance of respecting the sovereignty and territorial integrity of states, in line with the United Nations Charter and the principles of international law. It also reiterated Libya's full support for all efforts aimed at de-escalation and resolving conflicts through peaceful and diplomatic means. The Foreign Ministry urged the international community to assume its responsibilities in preventing further deterioration of the situation and avoiding a slide into more violence, in order to preserve the security and stability of the region's peoples. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump announced that the US had carried out extensive strikes on Iran's main nuclear sites, warning Tehran of severe consequences if it refuses to embrace peace. Trump confirmed that Iran's uranium enrichment facilities in Tehran had been 'completely destroyed' following a series of American strikes on three key sites: Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. In response, Iranian sources reported that most of the highly enriched uranium at Fordow had been moved to an undisclosed location before the US attack, and that the number of personnel at the site had been reduced to a minimum. Tags:
Technical.ly
22-06-2025
- Technical.ly
Will there be more software developers working next year?
For the first time, the number of software jobs in the US has stagnated. This coincides with the broader trend of lower labor force participation across sectors. Previously, recent college grads always had a lower unemployment rate than the general workforce. That has flipped — now recent grads have a notably higher unemployment rate. Societal shifts because of new technology tend to be more noticeable over a decade than over a single year. Is AI different? Brian Brackeen says there will be fewer software developers working in the United States a year from now. I call bullshit. We're making a bet of it: Loser has to wait in line to buy the other a cheesesteak from South Philadelphia's beloved Angelo's — since we'll both be in that city for a tech-inspired celebration of the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence around the next Builders Conference (Here's coverage of our most recent one). Contrary to what I say to my friend's face, Brackeen is no fool. The proven entrepreneur–turned–provocateur venture capitalist has a point. Two big changes are hitting software development at the same time, making it difficult to distinguish between them: Higher interest rates have chilled speculative tech building, and new artificial intelligence tools are creating new efficiencies. Further complicating the trend, pandemic habits boosted international tech hiring, and the decades-old digital transformation appears to be aging. Expensive software developers seem an ideal role for executives to replace. In 2024, the American economy added new software developer jobs at the slowest year-over-year rate on record. All this comes in a strange macroeconomic moment. Take the first quarter of 2025: Tech hiring didn't just stall — it retreated. Software developer job postings were still falling even long after the pandemic-fueled bonanza had faded, a Wall Street Journal analysis found. Tech unemployment climbed above the national average, peaking at 5.7% in February. Other than robotics, most current AI excitement is concentrated in knowledge work, something college graduates specialize in. (The plumber I once worked for used to say that getting a college degree was a way to buy a chance to work in air-conditioning). So as economists research whether AI is affecting job prospects, they're focusing on degree holders. A real change is underway. For decades, the unemployment rate for recent college graduates was almost always lower than the overall unemployment rate. Following the Great Recession, unemployment peaked in June 2010 at 9.5%; It was bad for recent college graduates too, but that rate never got above 7.8%, according to the Federal Reserve Bank. The same thing happened in the recessions of 1990 and 2001. But those figures have flipped in recent years — and the gap is widening. The first quarter of 2025 ended with an unemployment rate for recent college graduates that was almost one-and-a-half times higher (5.8% versus 4% for all workers). Amazon CEO Andy Jassy told employees this week that over the next few years, the online commerce giant 'will reduce [its] total corporate workforce as we get efficiency gains from using AI extensively across the company.' Any move toward the end of knowledge work bodes poorly for software development, an especially well-paid (and occasionally rote) trade. Fewer people are working — but not (yet) because of AI This coincides with a broader trend: Labor force participation remains down from pre-pandemic levels. A recent explainer from the Federal Reserve underlined the stakes: Either we grow our economy by improving productivity or by adding more workers. With aging demographics and early retirements, we've been trending in the opposite direction. That drop isn't theoretical. There are 1.7 million fewer Americans in the workforce now than in February 2020, per the US Chamber of Commerce. That means many jobs, including tech roles, are going unfilled. So software developers are harder to come by. But I'm still betting we'll have more of them by next year. Why? For one, the trends don't line up with AI breakthroughs. The unemployment rate for recent college grads crested above the overall rate way back in 2018 – though the gulf has gotten larger. Something else is happening. Next, pricing pressure can create surprising outcomes. Often called the Jevons Paradox, falling costs in something (like the price of building software) can boost demand for it (resulting in more need). The time required for any given software development can shrink, even as the need for people to do adjacent work can grow. Job titles can change — witness the decline of ' computer programmer ' — and job descriptions too. But software skills will remain in-demand for the foreseeable future. The third reason I took the bet is the maxim credited to Bill Gates: We tend to overestimate what we can achieve in a year and underestimate what we can in a decade. (Note: I was less sure about taking Brian up on a bet over 5 years, but jumped at the bet for a year out — check the video here.) Early this year, University of Oxford researchers published a paper documenting the impact automation has had on language translators. It's changing the job and shifting the skills needed, but certain tasks remain stubbornly human. Will AI be different from other tech advancements? No question getting a job, especially a first job, in tech is harder than it has been. The leader of one coding bootcamp told me there's been 'a collapse,' and they're feverishly adapting their model. At present, that is more to do with higher-interest rates and general macroeconomic trends, with AI as window dressing. Focused on the medium term, boosters remain bullish that the growth in tech apprenticeship will continue. Brackeen's side of the bet is that AI is different from past technologies, and that the speed will sneak up on us. AI legend Geoffrey Hinton recently argued the same. My side of the bet is that even if this is right, it will happen slower than we think, and that titles like software developer will adapt, and therefore grow, for at least a while longer. We'll settle it over cheesesteaks. See you in Philadelphia next May.
