Maine saw more tourists than expected over Memorial Day weekend
The turnpike recorded more than 1 million vehicle "transactions" between Friday and Monday, putting it on par with recent years. Officials originally predicted fewer than 1 million transactions.
Friday was the busiest day, with 343,346 of the 1,008,400 trips.
Erin Courtney, turnpike authority spokesperson, said that most travelers at the Kennebunk service plaza on Saturday said they were headed to Acadia National Park.
People who booked a trip months ago "are not going to cancel everything based on the weather," she said. "More likely, the folks that live in Maine probably weren't doing as much travel."
This year's numbers reflect a slight decrease from 2024's 1,011,200 vehicles, but this year's total could surpass last year's once all the numbers are tallied. Last year, more than 5,000 transactions were added between the preliminary and final counts.
Gas prices could have also played a role in better-than-expected turnpike traffic.
Nationally, gas prices last weekend were the lowest Memorial Day weekend prices since 2021, and, if adjusted for inflation, the lowest in nearly a decade, according to AAA. Heading into the weekend, Maine had an average price at the pump of $3.05 per gallon, compared to about $3.17 nationally.
National gas prices were around $3.59 over the same weekend in 2024 and $4.60 in 2022.
The last few years have been "banner" years for Memorial Day weekend travel, Courtney said, but 2019 still holds the record with 1,014,225 vehicles. Traffic plummeted in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic, when the turnpike recorded just 564,000 vehicles.
It's too soon to say whether the stronger-than-expected traffic numbers will correlate with a booming summer tourist season, but Courtney said that historically, a good season has followed a strong start.
"It's pretty encouraging that given a less than ideal forecast, we still had good numbers," she said.
Maine's busiest summer communities are gearing up for an uncertain season, as travelers grapple with an unsteady economy and polarizing political climate that could have some Canadian visitors staying home.
Tony Cameron, CEO of the Maine Tourism Association, said advanced bookings are tracking closely to last year, with many businesses feeling optimistic.
"At the same time, there's an awareness of ongoing uncertainties, and businesses are staying mindful of evolving trends and traveler behavior," he said in an emailed statement.
The number of tourists visiting Maine has been declining, though the money they spend has increased.
Last year, an estimated 7.75 million travelers visited Maine and spent $5.1 billion, according to the Maine Office of Tourism. That's a 9.1% decrease in visitors but a 9.7% increase in the amount of money spent per traveler compared to the year before.
The Maine Office of Tourism launched its 2025 summer campaign early, "knowing that competition for domestic visitors will be strong this summer," Carolann Ouellette, director of the Maine Office of Tourism said in a news release.
While it's typically seen as the official kickoff to summer, Memorial Day Weekend is not Maine's busiest travel day.
It's usually in the top five, Courtney said, wedged somewhere between Labor Day, which is always the busiest and the first two weekends in August. The Fourth of July and Indigenous People's Day are also often busy.
Nationally, AAA predicted a record-breaking weekend for travel, with 45.1 million people traveling at least 50 miles from home between May 22 and May 26. Updated numbers were not available Tuesday.
Copy the Story Link
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
21 minutes ago
- Forbes
Inflation Outpaces Wage Growth For Over 40% Of Americans
Topline Wage growth for a large swath of Americans is being outpaced by the rate of inflation, according to data from Indeed, which reported people with low- and middle-paying jobs are likely feeling the most pressure. US Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell has said he would like to wait to see the impact of ... More President Donald Trump's tariffs before making changes to interest rates. (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images) AFP via Getty Images Key Facts Purchasing power for 57% of U.S. workers increased last year, according to Indeed, leaving 43% lagging behind the rise in cost of living. While annual wage growth remains just above the annual rate of inflation, which grew to 2.7% in June, 'the gap between the two is the narrowest it's been in 12 months' Indeed added. Wage growth has usually remained faster than the pace of inflation during periods of normal market conditions in the last few years, according to data from the Atlanta Fed's wage growth tracker. As 'jobs at the low-to-middle end of the pay spectrum' are likely feeling the crunch of reduced purchasing power, wages of higher-paying jobs have typically grown the fastest in the past year, though Indeed notes annual growth among those jobs have receded in recent months. Get Forbes Breaking News Text Alerts: We're launching text message alerts so you'll always know the biggest stories shaping the day's headlines. Text 'Alerts' to (201) 335-0739 or sign up here. Contra Overall wage growth remains 'healthy and above inflation,' Indeed noted, even though many low- and middle-wage jobs have experienced pay increases at or below the pace of inflation. What Kinds Of Jobs Have The Fastest-Growing Wage Growth Since Last Year? Jobs in electrical engineering topped Indeed's list of fastest-growing wages with a 'much higher-than-average annual advertised pay growth of 6.3%' Wage growth of electrical engineering jobs was followed by legal (5.1%), marketing (5.1%), project management (4.6%), mathematics (4.5%) and IT operations (4.4%). What Kinds Of Jobs Have The Slowest-Growing Wage Growth Since Last Year? Physicians and surgeons led the way in slowest growing wage growth with a 0.8% increase since last year, which was followed by driving jobs (1%). Other slow-growing categories include arts and entertainment (1.2%), software development (1.4%), beauty and wellness (1.6%) and logistic support (1.7%). What To Watch For The impact of President Donald Trump's tariff policy on American households. A Yale University report published this month found the president's policy could cost U.S. households an additional $2,400 this year as tariffs may potentially trigger a 1.8% increase in short-term prices for consumers. The tariffs could cause other economic impacts, such as a rise in the unemployment rate and a drop in the U.S. gross domestic product. Key Background Low-paying jobs experienced their largest wage gains as the economy charged back from the throes of the COVID-19 pandemic's early days, with annual growth spiking as high as 7.5% in October 2022, according to the Atlanta Fed's wage growth tracker. That rate of wage gains dropped to 3.7% last month. June's 2.7% inflation rate was the highest level since February. Trump has pushed Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell to cut interest rates as inflation has approached the Fed's long-term target of 2%, but the Associated Press notes the current inflation figures will 'make it more likely that the central bank will leave rates where they are,' citing Powell's desire to understand the impact of Trump's tariffs before making any moves. Further Reading Trump's New Tariffs Could Cost Households $2,400 This Year, Analysis Finds (Forbes) Inflation Rose More Than Expected Last Month As Trump's Tariffs Raise Prices (Forbes)
Business Wire
22 minutes ago
- Business Wire
Gilead Sciences to Release Second Quarter 2025 Financial Results on Thursday, August 7, 2025
FOSTER CITY, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Nasdaq: GILD) announced today that its second quarter 2025 financial results and guidance will be released on Thursday, August 7, 2025 after the market closes. At 4:30 p.m. Eastern Time that day, Gilead's management will host a webcast to discuss the company's second quarter 2025 financial results and provide a business update. A live webcast will be available in the Investors section of and will be archived there for one year. About Gilead Sciences Gilead Sciences, Inc. is a biopharmaceutical company that has pursued and achieved breakthroughs in medicine for more than three decades, with the goal of creating a healthier world for all people. The company is committed to advancing innovative medicines to prevent and treat life-threatening diseases, including HIV, viral hepatitis, COVID-19, and cancer. Gilead operates in more than 35 countries worldwide, with headquarters in Foster City, California. For more information on Gilead Sciences, please visit the company's website at follow Gilead on Twitter (@GileadSciences) or call Gilead Public Affairs at 1-800-GILEAD-5 or 1-650-574-3000.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Would a new $150,000 limit be enough to protect Canadians' deposits in case of a bank failure?
The federal government's recent proposal to increase the insurance coverage for bank deposits in Canada to $150,000 aims to protect depositors in case of a bank failure. But would the new amount be enough? Financial Post explains who is protected, why the amount is changing and how likely a bank failure might be in Canada. What is the government proposing? Ottawa released a consultation paper on Tuesday aiming to get feedback from 'interested Canadians and stakeholders' on a range of proposals to do with deposit insurance. Currently, the amount of money that Canadians can get back if a bank shuts down is limited to $100,000 per category of deposit, such as a chequing account, a joint deposit or a registered retirement savings plan (RRSP), per member firm. This is guaranteed by the Canada Deposit Insurance Corp. (CDIC), a Crown corporation established in 1967. All large Canadian banks and many other financial institutions such as federal credit unions are insured by the CDIC, though deposit categories such as mutual funds, stocks, bonds or cryptocurrencies are not included. The government is now considering increasing the insured limit to $150,000 and providing even higher coverage for businesses and other non-retail investors. Why does Ottawa want to change the limit? The paper, released by the Department of Finance, mentions a number of reasons behind the proposed increases. For one, the last time the limit was increased was in 2005 and Ottawa wants to adjust the amount for inflation. It also noted that Canadians' saving patterns and changing demographics have increased the number of deposits that exceed the $100,000 limit, with fewer fully protected depositors. Uninsured eligible deposits, or deposits that are in excess of $100,000, grew by 594 per cent from 2005 to 2024 in Canada, while insured deposits grew by 183 per cent over the same time, the paper said. The proportion of deposits that are insured as a percentage of total eligible deposits has declined from 58 per cent in 2005, to 36 per cent in 2024. Increasing the deposits could boost confidence and potentially lower the risk of bank runs, the paper noted. It referred to the 2023 crisis in the United States when three banks had to be shut down. While Canada's financial sector was not affected by the fall of the Silicon Valley Bank and the other lenders in the U.S. in 2023, it was a reminder that large banks could experience runs that could quickly lead to their end and highlighted the important role of the federal deposit insurance, the Department of Finance said in the paper. What are the details? The paper mentions five proposals. Aside from increasing the insurance limit to $150,000, it also wants to explore whether non-retail depositors such as corporations, municipalities, universities, schools or hospitals should receive a higher deposit insurance of about $500,000 per category. The current insurance framework does not differentiate between individual depositors and non-retail depositors, but the needs of the latter group are different, the paper stated. 'Many non-retail depositors hold deposit accounts specifically for operational purposes, to fund their ongoing operations (e.g. transactional accounts to cover payroll, pay suppliers, etc.),' the paper said. 'Any delay or cessation in access to the funds in these accounts could be highly disruptive.' Mark Zelmer, a former deputy superintendent at Canada's top banking regulatory agency, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions, and currently a Fellow-In-Residence at the C.D. Howe Institute, said he is not a fan of introducing different coverages for different groups of people. It further complicates the system and makes it easier for people to 'game' it. 'Let's say somebody manages their personal savings through a Trust, as opposed to themselves. Is that trust suddenly going to be a non-retail deposit versus a retail deposit,' he said. The paper is also proposes an insurance limit of $1 million for 'temporary high balances,' for a brief period of time. The payments that fall in this category include large sums that depositors hold for a limited amount of time, such as an inheritance, an insurance payout, a divorce settlement, or the proceeds from the sale of a home. Canada's aging population may increase the circumstances leading to temporary high balances, it said. Ottawa has also proposed asking banks to provide its customers with 'tailored information explaining the amount of insured deposits that are held' in order to strengthen depositor confidence. 'Recent financial market turbulence in the United States highlighted the impact that social media can have during a financial crisis,' the paper said. 'The speed with which negative information (whether true or false) about a financial institution and deposit insurance can reach depositors is faster than ever before.' CDIC members are currently required to provide depositors with general information about the insurance framework and about the CDIC itself. But they are not required to inform them about the actual deposit insurance coverage applicable to the funds they hold at the institution, the paper said. The additional disclosure could 'support financial stability,' the paper said. Can increasing the deposit insurance prevent bank runs? While the paper suggests a higher insurance coverage could mean that depositors are less likely to withdraw funds in times of stress and reduce the risk of bank runs, Zelmer 'doesn't buy it,' he said. 'If somebody reads in the newspaper or on social media that there are some questions about the strength of their institution, they're going to run,' he said. 'You run first and ask questions later. We saw that with Silicon Valley Bank. They lost most of their deposit base within a day. The insured depositors ran too.' Cristian Bravo Roman, a professor at Western University who is also the Canada Research Chair in Banking and Insurance Analytics, said funds today are more fluid and easy to to take out of a bank. As such, increasing the deposit insurance may not prevent a bank run in a single institution, but what it can do is potentially prevent the fear from spreading to other banks, he said. If the banking system of a country is perceived safe as a result of the protections, this would avoid an 'overall run' in the system. 'If a small retailer bank is having issues, people won't run to one of the Big Six to get their money out thinking that the entire system is crumbling,' he said. Increasing the coverage could help boost competitiveness in the banking sector, which is overly reliant on a few lenders, Zelmer said. If it increased the public's confidence in smaller financial players, it may provide them with more options. The bigger players are already considered safe, he said. But the benefit would depend upon how much premium CDIC members would have to pay. The government would consider the fact that any increase in the scope and level of coverage could lead to additional premiums paid by CDIC members and affect the cost of financial services to consumers, the paper said. This could decrease competitiveness, Roman said, if smaller institutions had to pay higher premiums and either charge customers more or earn less profit. The proposal did not discuss how increasing coverage would affect the premiums banks are paying, he said. How likely is a bank failure in Canada? Canadian big banks follow guidelines that are stricter than their global peers when it comes to ensuring they have sufficient capital on hand, so a major bank failure is generally deemed an unlikely event. There has not been a deposit insurance payout in almost 30 years. However, questions were raised about the deposit insurance in Canada in 2023 after the collapse of a few U.S. banks and whether a limit of up to $100,000 was enough. Some analysts urged the need to increase it back then, saying that the U.S. limit of US$250,000 was much higher. Ottawa considers hiking bank deposit insurance limit to $150,000 Canadians are finally getting choice in their banking, but will it last? Amir Barnea, an associate professor of finance at HEC Montreal, for instance, said at the time that the number needed a 'serious update.' He said that the number in 2023 should be 42 per cent higher just to keep up with inflation. In 2023, the finance minister temporarily received the authority, upon the Governor in Council's approval, to increase the deposit insurance limit, but it wasn't used and the limit remained unchanged. • Email: bcousins@
