logo
NGO ADR moves SC over revision of Bihar electoral rolls: ‘No reason for such a drastic exercise in a poll-bound state'

NGO ADR moves SC over revision of Bihar electoral rolls: ‘No reason for such a drastic exercise in a poll-bound state'

Indian Express2 days ago
The NGO, Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), has approached the Supreme Court challenging the Election Commission's 'special intensive revision of electoral rolls' in Bihar, terming it unconstitutional, saying it would disenfranchise lakhs of voters.
'The present Writ Petition has been filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India seeking setting aside of Order and communication dated 24.06.2025 issued by the Respondent Election Commission of India (ECI) directing for Special Intensive Revision of Electoral Rolls in Bihar (SIR Order) as being in violation of Articles 14, 19, 21, 325 and 326 of the Constitution of India as well as provisions of Representation of People's Act, 1950 and Rule 21A of the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960,' the plea said.
It added that if the order was not set aside, '…(it) can arbitrarily and without due process disenfranchise lakhs of voters from electing their representatives, thereby disrupting free and fair elections and democracy in the country, which are part of basic structure of the Constitution'.
It argued that 'the documentation requirements of the directive, lack of due process as well as the unreasonably short timeline for the said…Revision…further make this exercise bound to result in removal of names of lakhs of genuine voters from electoral rolls leading to their disenfranchisement'.
As per the EC's June 24 order, the Bihar electoral roll will be prepared afresh, with the 2003 roll as the basis. All 7.8 crore electors in the state will have to fill out enumeration forms. While those who were on the 2003 rolls—4.96 crore electors—will not have to provide any additional documents, the post-2003 electors—2.93 crore people—would have to give their own and their parents' date and/or place of birth proof.
In its plea, ADR said the June 24 order 'has shifted the onus of being on the voters' list from the State to citizens. It has excluded identification documents such as Aadhaar or ration cards which further make marginalised communities and the poor more vulnerable to exclusion from voting'.
The plea said the declaration, as required under the special intensive revision process, is violative of Article 326 'in so far as it requires a voter to provide documents to prove his/her citizenship and also citizenships of his/her mother or father, failing which his/her name would not be added to the draft electoral roll and can be deleted from the same'.
The plea contended that the Election Commission has issued 'unreasonable and impractical timeline' to conduct the special intensive revision in Bihar, so close to state elections which are due in November 2025. 'There are lakhs of citizens (whose names did not appear in 2003 ER) who do not possess the documents as required under the SIR order, there are many who may be able to procure the documents but the short timeline mentioned in directive may preclude them from being able to supply the same within the time period,' the plea said.
Pointing out that 'Bihar is a state with high poverty and migration rates where many lack access to documents like birth certificates or parental records,' it added that 'as per estimates over 3 crore voters and more particularly from marginalised communities (such as SC, STs and migrant workers) could be excluded from voting due to the stringent requirements as mentioned in the SIR order'.
The writ petition said, 'The current reports from Bihar, where SIR is already underway, show that lakhs of voters from villages and marginalized communities do not possess the documents as being sought for them.'
The NGO said that Section 21(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1950 allows the ECI to direct a special revision of electoral rolls 'for reasons to be recorded', but the directive for Bihar 'lacks recorded reasons supported by any evidence or transparent methodology, rendering it arbitrary and thus liable to be struck down'.
The plea said that 'while SIR of Bihar or any other state of country is a positive step, but the manner in which ECI has directed the conduct of SIR in a poll bound state like Bihar, has raised questions from all stakeholders, particularly the voters'.
The NGO said the Special Summary Revision (SSR) was already conducted between October 29, 2024 and January 6, 2025 and addressed issues such as migration and ineligible voters due to death or other reasons and 'thus, there is no reason for such a drastic exercise in a poll bound state in such a short period of time, violating right to vote of lakhs of voters'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Congress backs PM Modi's BRICS stand, vows firm fight against terrorism
Congress backs PM Modi's BRICS stand, vows firm fight against terrorism

Hans India

time20 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Congress backs PM Modi's BRICS stand, vows firm fight against terrorism

New Delhi: Backing Prime Minister Narendra Modi's firm stance on terrorism at the BRICS Summit, senior Congress leader and Rajya Sabha MP Pramod Tiwari on Monday expressed his complete faith that India will fight terrorism with full resolve and determination. His remarks came in response to PM Modi's statement at the global summit, where he called terrorism 'the most serious challenge facing humanity' and emphasised that condemning terrorism must be a matter of principle, not convenience. Speaking to IANS, Pramod Tiwari supported the Prime Minister, stating, 'At the BRICS Summit, voices should have been more vocal against terrorism. The platform should also raise social, economic, and global concerns of its member nations. India has consistently spoken for global peace and justice. "I have full faith that our country will fight terrorism with unwavering determination. I wish those responsible for the recent attack in Pahalgam had been caught — it would have revealed who trained and supported them. Such information is crucial and would have commanded greater respect globally.' Tiwari also took a swipe at US President Donald Trump, who recently lashed out at the BRICS alliance and warned of an 'additional 10 per cent tariff' on countries aligning with what he termed 'anti-American policies.' 'BRICS is for protecting nations who are in it. President Trump had previously issued similar warnings during his visit to India. At that time, Prime Minister Modi should not have laughed or responded lightly. He should have stood firm and reminded Trump that BRICS works on its own principles and is committed to its founding objectives,' said Tiwari. The Congress leader criticised the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar. On Sunday, Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar stated that extensive consultations had been held with political parties and acknowledged that 'no one was satisfied' with the current status of the electoral rolls. Reacting to the development, Tiwari said, 'We are not satisfied with the Election Commission of India's response. The documents required for voter list revision are unnecessarily complicated and impractical. If the process is designed to make it difficult for traditional voters who are against the BJP, Scheduled Castes, Backward Classes, and minority voters, to remain on the rolls, then this raises serious questions about the Election Commission's intent. If the ECI wants to remove them.' He added that while some groups have approached the Supreme Court, others are considering forming 'people's courts' to ensure fairness. 'The Congress has always upheld the voter's right to participate in democracy. We will continue to stand by that principle and ensure that all necessary documentation is provided,' he asserted. Tiwari also took aim at the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) in Bihar, particularly targeting Lok Janshakti Party (Ram Vilas) leader Chirag Paswan. During a political rally in Saran district on Sunday, Chirag announced that he would contest the upcoming Bihar Assembly elections and urged his party workers to prepare for all 243 constituencies in alliance with the BJP and JD(U). Mocking the move, Tiwari remarked, 'The NDA in Bihar is a sinking ship. Chirag Paswan, despite being the son of a respected leader like Ram Vilas Paswan, is trying to stay afloat in turbulent political waters. If he's contesting all 243 seats, it means internal cracks have widened and many alliance members are already looking for the exit door ahead of elections.' He continued, 'It's clear that NDA leaders are aware they are going to lose many seats. Their desperation is evident. While they are forming the central government, they are losing their grip on the state. This creates confusion among their own allies.' In the 2020 Bihar Assembly elections, Chirag Paswan's LJP had contested 137 seats but managed to win only one, Matihani. Despite this, Chirag currently holds a Lok Sabha seat and serves as a Cabinet Minister in the BJP-led central government, which includes JD(U) and Telugu Desam Party (TDP) as key allies.

Why were they allowed in Lok Sabha polls? Owaisi slams Bihar voter list clean-up
Why were they allowed in Lok Sabha polls? Owaisi slams Bihar voter list clean-up

India Today

time41 minutes ago

  • India Today

Why were they allowed in Lok Sabha polls? Owaisi slams Bihar voter list clean-up

All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) chief Asaduddin Owaisi on Monday raised serious concerns over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls underway in Bihar ahead of the Assembly elections, questioning both the timing and the process adopted by the Election Commission of to reporters after visiting the Election Commission's office, Owaisi said, "Even if 15–20% of people are missed from the list, they will also lose their citizenship. We are not against the Special Intensive Revision, but time must be given. If there were illegal migrants, then why were they allowed to vote in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections? How did they vote then?' he asked. He also accused the BJP and RSS of spreading misinformation about 'infiltrators' from Bangladesh. 'After the 1971 war, India allowed them to stay. How did they suddenly become infiltrators today?".advertisementOwaisi warned that removing names from the voter list is not just about losing the right to vote, but also threatens people's livelihood and access to welfare benefits. "If someone's name is struck off, it's not just a missed vote — it is an issue of survival for the poor who have no documents. Many migrant workers returned to Bihar but now have no papers to prove their identity," he said. He alleged that the decision to launch the clean-up drive was rushed. "We have told the Commission that this decision was taken in haste. Booth Level Officers (BLOs) have not even been given proper handbooks to carry out the work," he AIMIM chief hinted that legal action could be an option but stopped short of a commitment. "Whether we go to court or not, time will tell," he said, adding that the party will also consult with other opposition parties on the next Bihar state president and MLA Akhtarul Iman echoed similar concerns. He urged the ECI to extend the deadline or halt the process, citing widespread lack of documentation among the poor, migrant labourers, and those affected by seasonal floods."In Bihar, only 2 per cent of people have passports, and just 14 per cent are graduates. Most poor people don't have documents. Many have lost their papers during floods. There is fear that these people will lose their right to vote," Iman June 24, the Election Commission directed a Special Intensive Revision of the state's electoral rolls, the first such large-scale exercise since 2003. The ECI said the revision is aimed at removing ineligible names, including deceased voters and alleged illegal immigrants, and ensuring only genuine citizens remain on the rolls. The Commission cited factors like rapid urbanisation, high migration, and under-reporting of deaths to justify the however, remains firm and said, "Our only issue is how the Election Commission can carry out such a huge exercise in such a short time. People will face the consequences".- Ends

Electoral roll revision is a pretext to snatch citizenship
Electoral roll revision is a pretext to snatch citizenship

Deccan Herald

time41 minutes ago

  • Deccan Herald

Electoral roll revision is a pretext to snatch citizenship

Impervious to protests registered by opposition parties, on July 3, the Election Commission of India (ECI) expressed its resolve to complete the special intensive revision (SIR) of the election rolls in Bihar, before the Assembly elections election watchdog will potentially disenfranchise millions of voters in Bihar on the most specious of pretexts, preliminary to rolling out a similar programme in West Bengal, which will have to constitute a new Assembly by May. Iterating the ECI's resolve, Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar said implementation was proceeding on schedule and despite apprehensions, 'all eligible persons' would be included. He also cited constitutional and legislative provisions to assert the necessity of this drastic revision in June 24, the ECI announced that all new applicants for the franchise and voters registered after the last SIR in 2003-2004 would have to submit a self-attested declaration that they were Indian citizens by birth or naturalisation, with documentary proof of place and date of birth or certificate of naturalisation. From the outset, it was made clear that Bihar is the first step in a nationwide process that looks no different than an attempt to compile a National Register of Citizens (NRC)..Roll revision and fears of as so often is the case, the devil lies in the details — in this case, the definition. Thus, what does 'eligible' mean, and what precise documentation is required? Given that the ECI has been prevaricating for about a fortnight, we need a blow-by-blow the initial announcement, the ECI said that since the last SIR was undertaken in Bihar in 2003, the electoral rolls of that year would be treated as 'probative evidence of eligibility, including presumption of citizenship'. Thus, this is clearly as much an NRC exercise as it is an enfranchisement/disenfranchisement important question relates to what presumptions underlie the status of those who have registered as voters since 2003 and voted in myriad elections? Are we to assume that many of them could not just have been ineligible to exercise their franchise but could have been non-citizens as well?The ECI has conducted SIRs 13 times, with the last time being in 2004. Why has it taken 21 years to conduct an exercise that has been normally undertaken every few years, with the exception of a 17-year gap between 1966 and 1983? Whatever the compulsions, why is it that once the ECI decided to undertake the exercise, it set a deadline that is impractical, to say the least? The Bihar SIR began on June 28, and the final rolls will be published on September 30: three months have been allowed to jump through seven exercise that is being rammed through in Bihar will not just disenfranchise voters, which can be corrected, but deprive them of their citizenship, a condition that will usually be opposition parties lit into the ECI's unilateral decision, it announced on June 26 that an SIR would be conducted in West Bengal between July and November: a five-month rush job, the ultimate goal of which is party representatives met the ECI members on July 2, to no avail. The watchdog reiterated on June 28 and July 1 that the 2003 rolls would be exempt from scrutiny, but had nothing to say about a Trinamool Congress suggestion that the rolls used for the 2024 general elections be made the baseline eligibility criterion. It's a ECI has claimed in its circular and elsewhere an inclusive goal, but the numbers don't lie: Bihar has an estimated 79 million-odd voters, while the 2003 roll includes only 49 million. In Bihar alone, thus, 30 million people's franchise and citizenship will be scrutinised, which brings us to a category of voters who are numerous in Bihar and West Bengal, especially: migrant ECI has said that people will be entitled to vote in places where they are ordinarily resident rather than where they own a house. Migrant workers from these states preponderantly travel back and forth from their homes to workplaces, often following the agricultural cycles. Where will they vote? How will they do the paperwork, which will supposedly be sent to them and involve online access?Whether or not bogus voters were added in short order on a significant scale in Maharashtra and Haryana last year is an open question, but it does appear that Bihar and West Bengal will experience significant disenfranchisement, not to say loss of citizenship. There is a partisan agenda at work, but, critically, the poor and marginalised will be K Sen is author of 'The Paradox of Populism: The Indira Gandhi Years, 1966-1977'.Disclaimer: The views expressed above are the author's own. They do not necessarily reflect the views of DH.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store