Erin Patterson: Jury starts deliberations in mushroom murder trial
The jury in the high-profile murder trial of an Australian woman accused of cooking a deadly mushroom lunch for relatives has retired to decide her fate.Erin Patterson, 50, has pleaded not guilty to four charges - three of murder and one of attempted murder - over the beef Wellington lunch at her regional Victorian house in July 2023.The prosecution have claimed Ms Patterson knowingly put toxic death cap mushrooms into the home-cooked meal, before lying to police and disposing of evidence.But the defence argue Ms Patterson accidentally included the poisonous fungi in the dish and only lied because she panicked after hurting people she loved.
Ms Patterson's in-laws, Don and Gail Patterson, both 70, along with Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson, 66, all fell ill and died days after the lunch in Leongatha.Heather's husband, local pastor Ian Wilkinson, recovered after weeks in an induced coma. Simon Patterson, the accused's estranged husband, had been invited to the lunch too, but pulled out the day before.On Monday, Justice Christopher Beale gave his final instructions to the 14-member jury, summing up evidence from the prosecution and the sole defence witness, Ms Patterson.After almost two months and more than 50 witnesses, the final 12 jurors were decided by a ballot before the group retired for deliberations. In her closing arguments, prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC said Ms Patterson has "told so many lies it's hard to keep track of them".The prosecution alleged Ms Patterson lied to her relatives about a cancer diagnosis to convince them to attend the fatal lunch, poisoned them and then faked an illness to cover her tracks.Ms Patterson's further lies to police and medical staff about foraging for wild mushrooms, as well as her decision to dump a food dehydrator used to prepare the meal, were evidence of her guilt, they argued."She has told lies upon lies because she knew the truth would implicate her," Nanette Rogers said."When she knew her lies had been uncovered, she came up with a carefully constructed narrative to fit with the evidence – almost."There was no "particular motive" for the alleged crime, Dr Rogers told the court, but the jury should still have "no difficulty" in rejecting the argument "this was all a horrible foraging accident".However, the defence argued the lack of motive was key. Ms Patterson had no reason to kill her guests, they said.During Ms Patterson's evidence, she told the jury she was very close to her in-laws and never intended to harm them. As she was preparing the lunch, Ms Patterson claimed she added mushrooms from a container in her pantry that she now realised may have included both store-bought and foraged mushrooms. She also told the court she had suffered from bulimia for years, and had made herself throw up after the beef Wellington meal - something her defence team says explains why she did not become as sick as the others who ate it.The lie about having cancer was because she was embarrassed about plans to get weight-loss surgery, Ms Patterson said, and she didn't tell authorities the truth about her mushroom foraging hobby because she feared they might blame her for making her relatives sick. "She's not on trial for lying," defence lawyer Colin Mandy SC, "this is not a court of moral judgment".He accused the prosecution of trying to force "puzzle pieces" of evidence together, "stretching interpretations, ignoring alternative explanations because they don't align perfectly with the narrative".In his final instructions, Justice Beale told the jury members they alone are the "judges of the facts in this case".He said they should not convict Ms Patterson simply for lying, as there are "all sorts of reasons why a person might behave in a way that makes the person look guilty".He added that while "any reasonable person would feel great sympathy" for the Patterson and Wilkinson families, jurors also must not allow themselves to be swayed by emotions.The jury has now been sequestered, which means that while they deliberate, they will stay in supervised accommodation where they will have little to no contact with the outside world until they have reached a decision.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Heart-wrenching moment mourner chases after the hearse at Pheobe Bishop's funeral - as devastated loved ones bid farewell to the murdered teen
A large crowd has turned out for murdered teenager Pheobe Bishop's funeral, with one mourner seen chasing after the hearse as other attendees tried to hold her back. Pheobe, 17, went missing near Bundaberg Airport about 8.30am on May 15, after booking a trip to WA to visit her boyfriend. Earlier this month, police discovered Pheobe's remains near Goodnight Scrub National Park. Her former housemates, 33-year-old Tanika Bromley and 34-year-old James Wood, were charged with her murder and are being held in jail on remand while they await their next court appearance. Neither have entered pleas. At 2pm on a rainy day in Bundaberg, Pheobe's family, including mum Kylie Johnson and sister Kaylea Bishop, gave the teen a send-off before a private cremation at the Springfields Crematorium. Ms Johnson was seen outside the service in a pink dress with her arm around another mourner and, at one point, reached out to touch the white hearse as it drove Pheobe from the funeral. In a particularly emotional moment, another younger mourner was seen running after the hearse as a young man held her back. Pheobe's funeral notice described her as the 'beloved daughter of Kylie and Ray, Kevin and Stacey. Dearly loved sister of Jamie, Jesse, Kaylea, Ruby-Leigh, Aybel and sister-in-law to Janay. Loving aunty to Tallullah. Much loved niece, cousin and friend to many'. Ms Johnson said she was 'devastated' to farewell her daughter. 'This is absolutely everybody's worst nightmare, however, we promised to get Phee home and give her a send-off that Phee would approve of and that's what will happen,' she said in a statement. Meanwhile, Pheobe's maternal auntie Caz Johnson took to social media on Monday to point out that she had not been invited to the funeral. 'It was nice to say goodbye to Pheobe my own way, since I was asked, please don't go to the funeral to keep the peace,' Caz said. 'It makes my blood boil that people from South Windsor (are) driving up to attend Pheobe's funeral when they couldn't be there to help her when she needed it.' Caz and Pheobe's mother have frequently butted heads in public since the teen's disappearance in May. It began when Caz went on Network Ten's The Project to share disturbing texts from the teen sent before she went missing, and make allegations about her tumultuous upbringing. She revealed Pheobe sent text messages out of the blue on April 26 to say her mother had told her to 'get out', but didn't want to talk about the matter as it was 'a long story'. 'Up s*** creek but s*** happens,' Pheobe wrote, in texts shown on Ten. 'I'm flying the f*** out of here to see my boyfriend. 'If it goes to plan I'm not coming back. I can't do s*** anymore. I need to get out of this hell hole.' Caz Johnson also said that Pheobe had an unsettled childhood, regularly changing schools and having to deal with new stepdads coming in and out of her life. But Pheobe's mother reacted immediately on social media after The Project segment aired, saying her sister knew 'nothing' about her daughter. Caz Johnson 'hasn't spoken to my children or myself for the last 13-14 years', she wrote. 'She knows nothing about Pheobe and who she was as a person.' The pair later clashed earlier this month over whether or not Pheobe had a disability. 'Pheobe had no disabilities but (was) a child who was out of control that had no parent figure who paid an (alleged) killer to look after her,' Caz wrote in one scathing post. 'Please refrain from referencing my daughter as your family, she may be blood related however you know nothing about her,' Ms Johnson replied. 'You state Phee Phee had no disability? Where is your evidence? Where are your Professional reports or better yet your qualifications to state that she didn't have a disability? Oh wait you wouldn't know because you didn't know her!' Before she disappeared, Pheobe made reference on social media to borderline personality disorder (BPD). Ms Johnson did not specify what Pheobe's disability was. However, before she disappeared, the teen had shared a post to TikTok about borderline personality disorder. 'Having a partner with bpd (borderline personality disorder) means... getting blocked or left over small incidents... they will say very harsh things they don't mean when having an episode,' the post said, apparently in an attempt to explain her sometimes unpredictable behaviour. Ms Johnson previously said Pheobe 'didn't fit the mainstream school model' and struggled with her education until she was enrolled at the alternative Y School in Bundaberg.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Lawyers investigate whether Hannah Thomas could sue police over alleged excessive use of force at Sydney protest
Lawyers are investigating whether protesters could sue New South Wales police over alleged excessive use of force during a pro-Palestine protest in Sydney, after which the former Greens candidate Hannah Thomas said she could lose sight in her right eye. Thomas, 35, who ran against the prime minister at the federal election, was arrested at the Belmore protest which was attended by about 60 people on Friday. She was subsequently taken to hospital and underwent surgery. O'Brien Criminal and Civil Solicitors said on Monday it was acting for several people, including Thomas, involved in the protest and the firm was 'investigating the viability of civil proceedings'. Thomas and four others were arrested and charged after Friday's protest outside a business in Belmore accused of 'supplying electroplating and surface coating services for a variety of applications including aerospace and defence technology' to Israel. The 35-year-old was charged with resisting police and refusing or failing to comply with a direction to disperse. Principal solicitor Peter O'Brien said in a statement: 'Given that recent changes in the law in relation to protests have attempted to expand police powers to give directions, now subject to constitutional challenge, police may well have felt emboldened to act without proper and lawful acknowledgment of the right to protest. 'The government was warned that these changes to expand police powers to disperse protestors could lead to serious and ugly confrontations,' the lawyer said. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email The assistant police commissioner Brett McFadden on Monday morning denied any police wrongdoing. McFadden told the ABC he had reviewed body-worn-camera footage, and it did not show 'any misconduct on behalf of my officers'. On Monday afternoon, McFadden declared a critical incident investigation into Thomas's arrest after police determined 'the level of injury warranted a critical incident declaration'. Police said they had requested Thomas's medical information multiple times before being given the information needed to declare a critical incident. The investigation would be overseen by the police watchdog, the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission. The NSW Labor government passed legislation earlier this year aimed at curbing antisemitism. It expanded police move-on powers for protests near places of worship. The protest does not have to be directed at the place of worship. The legislation does not define how 'near' a person must be to a place of worship before police can enact the powers. A constitutional challenge now under way against the laws by the Palestine Action Group recently heard that the catalyst for the laws was a protest outside a synagogue where a member of the Israel Defense Forces was speaking. The reforms were met with a fierce backlash, including from one Labor MLC who told an internal meeting it was the most 'draconian' change to protest laws in decades. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion The NSW Greens spokesperson for justice, Sue Higginson, wrote a letter to Minns on Monday urging the charges against Thomas and four other protesters to be withdrawn. She urged Minns to repeal the anti-protest laws, arguing they were 'introduced as a mechanism to chill legitimate and peaceful political expression in NSW'. Minns told reporters on Monday that police did not use the controversial places of worship legislation and instead relied on previously existing powers. However, Higginson rebutted this, arguing NSW police 'expressly included references to a place of worship in their fact sheets that describe the alleged offences that led to the arrests and assault at Belmore'. Police alleged one protester was issued a second move-on order after she walked 'across the road to the opposite side of SEC Plating which is a place of worship'. The protest was outside SEC Plating, which protesters claimed was manufacturing parts for used in the F-35 Jet program. However, SEC Plating has denied this is the case. The business is across the road from a mosque called the Teebah Islamic Association. Police arrested and charged five people, including Thomas, a 29-year-old woman and three men aged 24, 29 and 41.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Senior home affairs official abused public office to get her future brother-in-law a job, Nacc finds
A senior home affairs department official has been found to have abused public office and misused internal information to get her future brother-in-law a job, including hiding their relationship and sharing job interview questions with her sister. A damning National Anti-Corruption Commission report released on Monday found the woman, who was given the pseudonym Joanne Simeson, forged a signature and coached her sister on how to hide the family relationship, eliciting suspicions from colleagues involved in the recruitment process. The report into the Nacc's Operation Kingscliff said Simeson, who at the time was the acting assistant secretary overseeing the department's global initiatives branch, had resigned from the public service before she could be terminated. While at home affairs, she praised her sister's partner to colleagues, created a job requisition, approved it herself and forged a witness signature on paperwork to fast-track the process. The woman's sister, known as Melissa in the report, was employed overseas. Her husband, known as Mark, studied while living overseas. Joanne sought Mark's resume for the job application in late 2022 and told her sister an assistant secretary was eager to conduct a job interview. 'We'll talk [Mark] through the lie,' she wrote in a text message. Her sister responded: '… he's so bad at lying he's too honest.' 'Well he's gonna have to do better or I'll get in trouble,' Joanne said. Melissa replied: 'Yes good say that and scare him haha.' Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email In March 2023, when Joanne put her Mark forward for another role in the department, a staff member asked if he would be suitable for the role, saying 'just want to check as his CV alone does not make him an obvious choice'. She called him a 'friend of a friend' and said he should 'play along' with the lie. 'Also I'm the boss so they will do whatever I say,' she told her sister. A colleague involved in the recruitment process said Joanne's interest in the role was unusual, describing Mark as 'this dude in Italy'. They asked another staff member if there was a connection or if Joanne thought they were underperforming. After he was employed, Joanne told her sister she met Mark at the office. 'HAHAHAHAHA I JUST WENT TO HUG HIM THANK GOD HE STUCK HIS HAND OUT,' she wrote. Melissa replied: 'GAHAHAHAH … What a good boy he's such a good boy.' Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Nacc said her conduct was serious because of her seniority and 'because nepotism, cronyism and undeclared conflicts of interest in APS recruitment are an area of widespread concern'. Submissions made on the woman's behalf said she had not received any workplace training on recruitment, had not had ongoing conflict of interest training and did not give proper and due consideration to her decision not to disclose the familial relationship. She was described as being very remorseful. The Nacc commissioner, Paul Brereton, said nepotism and cronyism were among the most frequently observed corrupt behaviours reported to the commission. The corruption finding is the first publicly completed investigation by Nacc, which was established in June 2023. Separately on Monday, a former home affairs immigration officer was sentenced for abuse of public office, after approving a visa application for her brother-in-law, and for causing unauthorised access to restricted data related to 17 people. The man had his application for a visitor visa refused in November 2019. About 16 minutes after he reapplied, the employee self-allocated the case to herself as the visa decision-maker. She was sentenced to eight months imprisonment, but will be released immediately to serve a 12-month good behaviour bond and pay a $10,000 fine.
