Supreme Court takes up a Republican appeal to end limits on party spending in federal elections
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court will take up a Republican-led drive, backed by President Donald Trump's administration, to wipe away limits on how much political parties can spend in coordination with candidates for Congress and president.
The justices said Monday they will review an appellate ruling that upheld a provision of federal election law that is more than 50 years old, ignoring pleas from Democrats to leave the law in place. The Supreme Court itself upheld it in 2001.
But since Chief Justice John Roberts joined the court in 2005, a conservative majority has upended a variety of congressionally enacted limits on raising and spending money to influence elections. The court's 2010 Citizens United decision opened the door to unlimited independent spending in federal elections.
Without the limits on party spending, large donors would be able to skirt caps on individual contributions to a candidate by directing unlimited sums to the party with the understanding that the money will be spent on behalf of the candidate, supporters of the law say.
The case will be argued in the fall.
Richard Hasen. an election law expert at the University of California at Los Angeles law school, has predicted the court will strike down the limits. 'That may even make sense now in light of the prevalence of super PAC spending that has undermined political parties and done nothing to limit (and in fact increased) corruption and inequality,' Hasen wrote on the Election Law blog.
The Justice Department almost always defends federal laws when they are challenged in court. But the Trump administration notified the court that 'this is the rare case that warrants an exception to that general approach' because it believes the law violates free-speech protections in the First Amendment.
The Republican committees for House and Senate candidates filed the lawsuit in Ohio in 2022, joined by two Ohio Republicans in Congress, then-Sen. J.D. Vance, who's now vice president, and then-Rep. Steve Chabot.
In 2025, the coordinated party spending for Senate races ranges from $127,200 in several states with small populations to nearly $4 million in California. For House races, the limits are $127,200 in states with only one representative and $63,600 everywhere else.
___
Follow the AP's coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court at https://apnews.com/hub/us-supreme-court.
Mark Sherman, The Associated Press
Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten
Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen.
Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten
Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten
Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten
Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US tech giants saved billions with Canada backing off its digital services tax
Canada scrapped a digital services tax after a trade threat from President Donald Trump. The tax would have cost US tech firms billions each year and $3 billion in retroactive payments. Similar digital taxes also exist in France and the UK, aimed at large digital companies. US tech giants came close to paying billions to Canada under a new tax law. Had Canada not halted a digital services tax enacted in 2024 that applies retroactively to 2022, US tech giants would have needed to pay Canada approximately $3 billion upfront on Monday, on top of a 3% levy on all revenue earned from digital services linked to Canadian users going forward. The Computer & Communications Industry Association estimated that Canada's tax measure would lead to annual losses of between $900 million and $2.3 billion for US firms and could result in up to 3,000 job losses in the country. In a separate estimate by Canada's Parliamentary Budget Officer in 2023, the DST would generate CA$7.2 billion in revenue for the government over five years, which is about $5.29 billion at the current exchange rate. The digital services tax, which is a tax on companies that earn revenue in Canada through social media advertisements and other online services, was halted on Sunday after President Donald Trump announced on his social media on Friday that the US would be "terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada" over the measure. Canadian Minister of Finance and National Revenue François-Philippe Champagne will introduce legislation to officially rescind the tax. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent also discussed launching a Section 301 investigation on Canada's tax measure on CNBC on Friday. "Today's announcement will support a resumption of negotiations toward the July 21, 2025, timeline set out at this month's G7 Leaders' Summit in Kananaskis," wrote Mark Carney, Canada's Prime Minister, in a statement posted by Canada's Department of Finance. The tax measure would have applied to tech companies with worldwide annual revenues greater than 750 million euros ($885 million) and Canadian digital services revenue greater than $20 million a year. Services subject to the tax include advertising, social media, and marketplaces, and large tech companies in the US, like Meta, Amazon, and Apple, would primarily be affected. Canada is the US's second-largest trading partner and the top buyer of US exports. According to the Census Bureau, the northern neighbour bought $349.4 billion in US exports in 2024 and exported $412.7 billion worth of goods across the border. Canada has been spared from some of Trump's highest tariffs, but still faces a 50% duty on steel and aluminum. Canada is not the first or the only country to propose a digital services tax. Both France and the UK have similar measures aimed at taxing revenue generated by large multinational digital companies. The White House has restarted trade talks with Canada following the scrapped tax policy. Carney's office, the White House, Meta, and Apple did not immediately respond to requests for comments. Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Richest 20% Get an Average $6,055 Income Boost in Trump Tax Bill
(Bloomberg) — The Senate's version of President Donald Trump's proposed tax cut bill will cost the bottom 20% of taxpayers an average of $560 a year while giving an average boost of $6,055 to those at the top end. Struggling Downtowns Are Looking to Lure New Crowds Philadelphia Transit System Votes to Cut Service by 45%, Hike Fares Squeezed by Crowds, the Roads of Central Park Are Being Reimagined Sao Paulo Pushes Out Favela Residents, Drug Users to Revive Its City Center Sprawl Is Still Not the Answer That analysis from economists at the Budget Lab at Yale University bolsters Democratic critiques that the bill takes money out of the pockets of the working poor to give tax cuts to the rich. The uneven distribution of the bill's costs and benefits comes from a mix of tax and spending provisions. While the poorest taxpayers bear the brunt of cuts to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, those at the top end of the income charts would get the biggest benefit of the tax cuts, including income rate cuts and an expanded state and local tax deduction. A proposal by Republican Senator Rick Scott of Florida would cut Medicaid even further. But the Budget Lab, a nonpartisan policy research group, cites economic studies showing that a little more than half of changes to the federal-and-state-funded health insurance program fall on providers rather than enrollees. And it assumes that states will pick up part of the cost of the social safety net programs, replacing about 1% of the income that the poorest families would have lost. That proposal, if approved by the Senate during an ongoing voting session, could be added to the final bill. Senators are in the final stages of approving Trump's tax bill in a bid to get it to the president's desk by July 4. The analysis excludes the effects of tariffs, which Senate negotiators have floated as a potential way to pay for income tax cuts. The Budget Lab said the bill would be even more regressive if tariffs were included. America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried How to Steal a House SNAP Cuts in Big Tax Bill Will Hit a Lot of Trump Voters Too Pistachios Are Everywhere Right Now, Not Just in Dubai Chocolate Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This summer will be decisive for the economy and Wall Street
The coming months will likely see several major events, datasets, progress reports, and deals that will determine the path forward for the economy and financial markets. By the fall, the impact of President Donald Trump's tariffs and fiscal policies should be clearer, giving the Federal Reserve more confidence to act. If you followed the seasonal investing advice of 'sell in May and go away,' you may want to reconsider because the outlook for the economy and financial markets will likely be determined in the coming months. Several major events, datasets, progress reports, and deals are due this summer. By fall, the impact of President Donald Trump's tariffs and fiscal policies should be clearer, giving the Federal Reserve enough confidence to act on interest rates. Here's a look at the factors that will tip the scales: A key piece could come as soon as this week. Trump has set a July 4 deadline for Congress to pass his so-called One Big Beautiful Bill, which contains his tax cuts and spending priorities. While the House of Representatives passed one version of the legislation and the Senate advanced a separate one, the GOP's narrow majorities in both chambers make the timing of the eventual package and its exact provisions less certain. All the congressional logrolling that's needed could push the timeline past July 4, especially now that a few Republicans have announced they will not seek reelection, making them less susceptible to Trump's arm-twisting. Wall Street expects the tax cuts to juice the economy and the stock market, while the bond market will watch the bill's impact on U.S. debt. The Congressional Budget Office has estimated the Senate's version of the bill will add nearly $3.3 trillion to deficits over a decade. More fiscal sticker shock could send Treasury yields higher and add more pressure on the dollar, which is already down 10% this year, its worst first-half performance in more than 50 years. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has estimated that the U.S. will no longer be able to pay its bills by mid- to late summer, unless the debt ceiling is raised. While he has vowed that the U.S. will never default, it's up to Congress to raise the debt limit so that the Treasury Department can issue fresh bonds to service interest expenses and maturities. The Big Beautiful Bill would increase the debt ceiling by trillions of dollars. In the meantime, the Treasury Department has been using its extraordinary cash management measures to avoid default. Bessent said last week he extended his department's authority to use those extraordinary measures to July 24, in an apparent reminder for Congress to raise the debt ceiling before its typical August recess. Failure to raise the debt limit and prevent a U.S. default would spark a global financial meltdown. Trump administration officials have been saying since 'Liberation Day' in April that major trade deals are imminent. So far, the U.S. has reached agreements with the U.K. and China, while negotiations with other top trade partners continue. Meanwhile, the 90-day pause on Trump's 'reciprocal' tariffs will expire on July 9, after which they would spike back to levels that triggered an epic stock market selloff. Bessent has signaled flexibility on that deadline, saying a dozen or so trade deals could be reached by Labor Day. But over the weekend, Trump reiterated his desire to dispense with any further talks and unilaterally set a tariff rate on each country. A sudden return to high tariffs would deliver another jolt to Wall Street, which had been expecting duties to eventually settle at 10% for most countries and 30% for China—manageable levels that could largely be absorbed without too much pain. Tariffs and their impact on inflation will heavily influence the central bank as it weighs whether to trim interest rates. Pricing data so far hasn't revealed a big impact from tariffs, and a few Fed officials have said that's evidence that inflation is tame enough to justify rate cuts. But Fed Chairman Jerome Powell and other policymakers have indicated they need at least a few more months of data to be confident that inflation is indeed on the right track. If the upcoming data show that any tariff-related inflation effects are only one-offs that aren't raising consumers' inflation expectations over the longer run, then rate cuts could come in the fall. While Trump has demanded the Fed lower rates immediately, he could also make it harder for policymakers to do that. They may more reluctant to cut just to prove to markets that they are independent from political pressure. Re-escalation of tariffs could muddy the inflation picture. The naming of a 'shadow' Fed chair could even stir a revolt on the Federal Open Market Committee. Starting in July, earnings reports for the second quarter will start coming out, giving Wall Street a more fulsome view of how tariffs—and the economic uncertainty they've caused—are affecting profits as well as the outlook for profits. Because companies rushed to stock up on imports earlier in the year to get ahead of tariffs, first-quarter results didn't fully reflect higher rates. But those stockpiles are being exhausted, forcing companies to hike prices on consumers or eat tariff costs and shrink profit margins. Also factoring into earnings will be how much or how little companies plan to invest and hire in an economy that is slowing amid Trump's trade war. The White House's fiscal policies will sway earnings too, as tax cuts, the end of certain tax credits, more spending on defense, and less spending on the social safety net ripple through corporate America and consumers. A tenuous ceasefire has taken hold between Israel, Iran, and the U.S., sending oil prices lower as markets worry less about a sudden supply disruption. But Trump has said he is open to bombing Iran again if it's necessary to cripple Tehran's nuclear program. That's as conflicting reports emerge over how much Iran's capabilities have actually been damaged. Renewed fighting could set off another surge in crude prices, sapping consumers of spending power, reigniting inflation, and further complicating the outlook for Fed rate cuts and the economy. Have a great summer. This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
