TSA to end shoe removal policy at some airport security checkpoints, government source says
The Transportation Safety Administration will allow passengers at selected airports to keep their footwear on as they go through security checkpoints, a senior government official tells NBC News.
People in screening lanes will have to keep their shoes on at selected airports, but the source said the relaxation of the rules could expand nationwide in the near future.
The TSA has yet to announce the move formally, but stated in a Monday press release that it is "exploring new and innovative ways to enhance the passenger experience and our strong security posture."
Shoe removal has been part of the airport experience since 2006, when the TSA instituted the requirement, citing intelligence indicating a "continuing threat" of explosives.
The rule came after Richard Reid tried — and failed — to ignite his homemade shoe explosives on an American Airlines flight from Paris to Miami on Dec. 22, 2001.
Reid's plan was disrupted when he struggled to light a fuse attached to his shoes, which contained roughly 10 ounces of explosive material, according to the FBI.
He was subdued by passengers and crew members and taken into custody when the flight diverted to Logan International Airport in Boston.
Reid pleaded guilty to terrorism charges and is serving a life sentence at a "Supermax" prison in Colorado.
After the bombing attempt, the shoe removal rule was implemented, then relaxed, then resurrected.
The requirement has apparently remained annoying enough that the TSA released an advertisement in October for its fee-based PreCheck service, which featured four people endorsing their membership for a single reason: they didn't have to take their shoes off at the airport.
"It's my favorite thing," one of them said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
16 hours ago
- The Hill
Senate Republican: ‘America is safer with Pam Bondi as attorney general'
Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) on Sunday said he has confidence in Attorney General Pam Bondi despite reports that she is feuding with FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino over her handling of the case related to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. 'I do,' Barrasso said, when asked in an interview on NBC News's 'Meet the Press' whether he has confidence in Bondi. 'We ran to make this country safer and more prosperous. Pam Bondi and her team are getting hardened criminals off the streets,' he continued. 'America is safer with Pam Bondi as attorney general.' Barrasso said, 'I do,' when moderator Kristen Welker followed up to ask if he has confidence in Patel. The interview comes after President Trump reiterated his confidence in Bondi on Saturday amid fierce backlash from segments of his base over her handling of the Epstein files. The Justice Department released a memo on Monday concluding there was no evidence Epstein kept a 'client list,' nor that the convicted sex offender sought to blackmail powerful figures implicated in his crimes. The memo also found no evidence suggesting foul play involved in Epstein's death, which had previously been ruled a suicide. Those revelations contradict conspiracy theories pushed by several right-wing media personalities and internet influencers; many of whom fumed Monday over the memo and alleged a cover-up was taking place.
USA Today
19 hours ago
- USA Today
Stunning Texas flood video, TSA's shoe drop, NASA on Netflix: The week in review
The shoe drops at TSA checkpoints Good news for shoe-stingy travelers: Effective immediately, you no longer need to remove your footwear at airport TSA checkpoints. 'We've gone back and looked at our security processes,' Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced, and determined that the shoe removal policy was no longer an effective screening tool and that the TSA is confident in its existing technology. (Some travelers, she added, may still be asked to take off their shoes if additional screening is needed.) The removal policy had been around since 2006 after a passenger tried to conceal a bomb in his shoe in December 2001. Epstein didn't have a 'client list,' FBI says Case closed, the government says: There's no evidence sex offender Jeffrey Epstein kept a 'client list,' nor was he murdered in prison, the Justice Department and the FBI concluded in a memo. The announcement didn't sit well in conservative circles, which had long expected Attorney General Pam Bondi to unveil something huge, especially after she seemed to suggest in an interview in February that a client list was 'sitting on my desk right now.' Despite rampant conspiracy theories, the FBI has concluded Epstein died after he hanged himself in federal prison on Aug. 10, 2019, the memo said, just as New York authorities initially determined. MAGA cries foul: Conservatives turn on Bondi, Trump administration over Epstein files New Barbie dresses for diabetes Who says a glucose monitor can't be chic? Barbie is launching a doll with Type 1 diabetes, complete with blood sugar meter and insulin pump, for its Fashionistas line in a partnership with the diabetes research organization Breakthrough T1D. The new Barbie 'marks an important step in our commitment to inclusivity and representation,' Mattel's Krista Berger said in a news release. The doll, available now at a suggested retail price of $10.99, also comes with a mini-phone with tracking app, blue polka dot top and matching skirt (symbols of diabetes awareness), and a pastel blue purse to carry essentials like diabetes supplies and snacks. And it's liftoff for NASA and Netflix Netflix is joining NASA in reaching for the stars. The streaming giant and the space agency announced that live space coverage now offered on NASA+, formerly NASA TV, such as rocket launches and spacewalks, will also be coming to Netflix soon this summer, alongside other popular series. (In May, NASA+ similarly arrived on Amazon Prime without requiring a subscription; Netflix, however, will require a subscription.) As for SpaceX, the big dog in the modern space race, it has its own online coverage; its launches are on NASA+ only when NASA is a mission partner. Hot dog contest ends with an upchuck Yes, there's an ugly underbelly to the annual July Fourth Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Contest. The thrill of victory went to Joey Chestnut (again, with 70½ dogs and buns) and Miki Sudo (the women's champ at 33 dogs), but the agony of defeat landed on Madison Barone, who was disqualified because judges found she 'experienced urges contrary to swallowing' before the contest was officially over. She later confirmed to USA TODAY Sports that, indeed, 'everything came up.' No elaboration necessary, said contest announcer George Shea: 'We never utter other words. It is like saying Voldemort.' − Compiled and written by Robert Abitbol, USA TODAY copy chief
Boston Globe
a day ago
- Boston Globe
Keep your shoes on
Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Why the TSA waited five years after Reid's abortive shoe bombing to institute its shoes-off rule has never been clearly explained, but in all that time no one else has tried to take down a plane using explosive footwear. Nor have any passengers ever been caught with a shoe bomb in the nearly two decades after the rule went into effect. Advertisement In other words, there has never been any evidence that making millions of travelers shed their shoes contributed to anyone's safety. It was all things rather than bad people — with screening for forbidden bottles of shampoo or corkscrews or lighters as if they posed deadly threats, instead of monitoring for behavior that represents a real threat to planes and their passengers. Advertisement From the day it was created, the TSA has specialized in fighting the last war and in overreacting to one-time long shots. One Islamist radical tried to hide explosives in his shoes, so hundreds of millions of travelers had to start removing their shoes. Another would-be terrorist, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, attempted to hide a bomb in his underwear, so we all had to submit to full-body scans or (for several years) pat-downs. British officials learned of a plot to I often reflected in the years after 9/11 that if Osama bin Laden's terrorists had destroyed not four airliners on that terrible day but four crowded movie theaters, then Americans would have had to radically change the way they went to the movies — advance reservations would have become mandatory, audiences would have had to get to the cineplex (with photo ID) two hours early, and X-ray equipment operated by a vast new federal bureaucracy, the Theater Security Administration, would have scanned everyone entering and leaving. But at airports there would be no interminable security lines, a box cutter in your carry-on wouldn't raise any eyebrows, and you could arrive for your flight 20 minutes before departure. We would still be as vulnerable to a hijacking-massacre as we actually were on 9/11 — but almost no one would be thinking about that because the 'last war' would have taken a different form. Advertisement Former TSA administrator And even that they aren't very good at. The government's own 'red team' tests — in which undercover inspectors try to smuggle weapons or contraband through security — have As Americans who travel abroad are aware, other countries never deemed it necessary to adopt the shoes-off rule. That includes countries in which the threat of terrorism is far more acute. In Israel, for example, security screening begins even before passengers enter the terminal, officials make a point of engaging in dialogue with almost everyone who's catching a plane, and travelers remain with their luggage until after the security check is completed. But nobody has to take their shoes off or remove their laptop from their bag to be scanned separately. Security agents there are watching for nervousness, inconsistencies, or suspicious behavior. They aren't preoccupied with confiscating bottled water or whether you're wearing a belt. Advertisement The TSA's ritualized absurdities have come at a steep cost. They waste billions of dollars annually. They consume countless hours of passengers' time. They treat everyone like a potential terrorist. To prove that no one is exempt, they have gone to the extreme of patting down Nearly a quarter-century after 9/11, there is no evidence that any of this has ever prevented a hijacking. 'TSA has played next to no role in the biggest counterterrorism stories of the past two decades,' journalist Darryl Campbell, who writes extensively about air travel and airline security, wrote in 2022. It is widely agreed that the two most effective deterrents to another hijacking have nothing to do with airport checkpoints. One was a physical change: the locking and reinforcing of cockpit doors, so that no terrorist could ever again breach the cockpit during flight. The other was psychological. The passengers on 9/11's United Flight 93, by overpowering the terrorists and forcing them to crash the plane into a field, prevented a far greater catastrophe that day — and thereby taught future travelers of the importance of fighting back. Advertisement The end of the shoes-off rule is long overdue. But it's just one small retreat in a long war of make-believe. The TSA remains fixated on creating the illusion of security rather than actually providing it. If the agency truly wants to protect travelers, it should abandon its theater of confiscated water bottles and trampled dignity and learn to focus instead on what truly keeps passengers safe. But until that happens, we can at least keep our shoes on. It's a start. Jeff Jacoby can be reached at
