US aid workers 'lobbied for weeks' to save food stocks from destruction after Trump cuts
The deal saved 622 tonnes of the energy-dense biscuits in June — but 496 tonnes, worth $793,000 (R14.2m) before they expired this month, will be destroyed, according to two internal US Agency for International Development (USAid) memos reviewed by Reuters, dated May 5 and May 19, and four sources familiar with the matter.
The wasted biscuits will be turned into landfill or incinerated in the UAE, two sources said. That will cost the US government an additional $100,000 (R1.8m), according to the May 5 memo verified by three sources familiar with the matter.
The delays and waste are further examples of how the freeze and then cutbacks, which led to the firing of thousands of USAid employees and contractors, have thrown global humanitarian operations into chaos.
A spokesperson for the state department, which is now responsible for US foreign aid, confirmed in an email that the biscuits would have to be destroyed. But they said the stocks were 'purchased as a contingency beyond projections' under the administration of former president Joe Biden, resulting in their expiration.
Trump has said the US pays disproportionately for foreign aid and he wants other countries to shoulder more of the burden.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

TimesLIVE
35 minutes ago
- TimesLIVE
Barcelona soccer club inks DRC sponsorship deal to promote tourism
The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has agreed to pay more than €40m (R828.5m) in a sponsorship deal with Spanish soccer club Barcelona that would see a logo promoting tourism appear on some team apparel. This is according to a contract seen by Reuters on Thursday. The contract with Barcelona is dated June 29 and stipulates a logo branding the war-hit central African country as the "heart of Africa" will appear on the backs of training and warm-up jerseys for the men's and women's teams. The logo will also appear in advertising for the club and in the club magazine and annual report, the contract said. The DRC will pay the club between €10m and €11.5m (R207m and R238.2m) annually over the next four seasons, it said. Details of the deal between the DRC and Barcelona have not been announced. AS Monaco and AC Milan last month also announced sponsorship deals with the DRC without disclosing the amounts. DRC sports minister Didier Budimbu told Reuters the contract with AS Monaco is worth €1.6m (R33.1m) per season. He did not disclose the amounts for the contracts with AC Milan and Barcelona. A DRC government source said the contract with AC Milan was worth €14m (R290m) per season. Announcing the AC Milan deal on June 20, DRC tourism minister Didier M'Pambia said it was part of a government strategy "to reposition the DRC on the international stage as an undisputed leader on the African continent" by promoting tourism and investment opportunities. The DRC's tourism ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Thursday, while Barcelona told Reuters they had no comment at this time. In February DRC foreign minister Therese Kayikwamba Wagner urged football clubs Arsenal, Bayern Munich and Paris St Germain to end their "blood-stained" sponsorship agreements with "Visit Rwanda". The appeal came less than a week after M23 rebels seized eastern DRC's biggest city, Goma, as part of a lightning advance. Rwanda has denied backing M23, saying it is defending itself. A report by a group of UN experts obtained by Reuters this month said Kigali exercised command and control over the rebels during their advance, gaining political influence and access to mineral rich territory.

IOL News
16 hours ago
- IOL News
Civil organisations call out Ramaphosa over silence on Edgar Lungu's burial controversy
Late former Zambian President Edgar Lungu who died on South African soil. Image: Rogan Ward/Reuters Civil organisations have questioned President Cyril Ramaphosa's silence regarding the controversy surrounding the burial of late former Zambian President Edgar Lungu. The organisations under the banner Progressive Forces For South Africa that include, The South African Concerned Citizens Association, March and March and Reakga Community Project among others laid their concerns bare during a press briefing in Midrand on Thursday. A dispute has erupted between the Zambian government and Lungu's family over whether he should be buried in South Africa or repatriated to Zambia for a state funeral. Lungu died last month in South Africa and his remains have become the centre of a dispute. In the Pretoria High Court, the Zambian government filed an urgent application to prevent Lungu's burial in South Africa. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ They argued that as a former president, Lungu "belongs to the nation of Zambia" and should be interred there. Zambian President Hakainde Hichilema underscored this point, drawing a parallel to the precedent of founding President Kenneth Kaunda's burial in Zambia, which occurred despite his family's desires. Lungu's family, however, had opted for a private ceremony in South Africa. The High Court halted plans for the burial in South Africa just as it was about to start, following an agreement between the parties. The court has given the Zambian attorney general until a specified date to submit papers in support of Lungu's repatriation to Zambia, with the matter to be heard on August 4, 2025. Leader of the organisation, Mthetho Ngcukayithobi is questioning why Ramaphosa has remained silent on the matter saying that South Africa has a diplomatic stance when it comes to former presidents of other states. Ngcukayithobi also alleged that Lungu was admitted into a Pretoria hospital under a fake name prompting more questions for the South African government. 'The Lungu saga makes us ask critical questions about our own government. Who did the authorities declare dead?...When a former president dies on foreign soil there are diplomatic processes…But in this case it seems none of the steps were followed. Why is our government silent on this?' Ngcukayithobi asked. "We are saying go and clear your name. We are also saying the former president cannot be buried in a foreign country when he was a president in Zambia. The Zambians deserve to bury their leader," said Ngcukayithobi. The organisation expresses concerns about potential land claims by the Lungu family in South Africa if he is buried there, highlighting the country's ongoing issues with land claims. 'We, in South Africa, have land issues, with some claims still being processed. We don't want a situation where Lungu's descendants come to claim land here because their ancestor is buried here,' Ngcukayithobi said. Ngcukayithobi also pointed out that members of Lungu's family are facing serious corruption charges in Zambia, including charges related to proceeds of crime and money laundering against his children. "The former first family are facing serious corruption charges back home. This is about state capture and asset looting in Zambia. These beneficiaries live in SA comfortably," said Ngcukayithobi. The dispute over Lungu's burial underscores the tense relationship between him and his successor, President Hichilema, which continued even after Lungu's death. During Lungu's presidency, Hichilema was arrested for treason. Lungu's family during a press briefing recently asserted that the reason they did not want the former president to be buried in Zambia was because they feared his remains would not be properly buried because of the feud with the current president. South African presidency spokesperson Vincent Magwenya had not responded to the allegations at the time of going to print


Daily Maverick
18 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
US strikes destroyed only one of three Iranian nuclear sites, NBC News reports
The report said that U.S. officials believe the attack on Iran's Fordow nuclear facility was successful in setting back enrichment capabilities there by as much as two years, citing two current officials. The two other facilities that the U.S. struck were not as badly damaged and may have been degraded only to a point where nuclear enrichment could resume in the next several months if Iran wants it to, the report added. Reuters could not immediately verify the NBC report. The White House did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. White House spokesperson Anna Kelly told NBC News in a statement: 'As the President has said and experts have verified, Operation Midnight Hammer totally obliterated Iran's nuclear capabilities.' The chief Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell told NBC that U.S. President Donald Trump 'was clear and the American people understand: Iran's nuclear facilities in Fordow, Isfahan, and Natanz were completely and totally obliterated. There is no doubt about that.' The U.S. launched strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities last month, saying that they were part of a program geared towards developing nuclear weapons. Tehran maintains that its nuclear development is purely for civilian purposes. A preliminary assessment in June from the Defense Intelligence Agency suggested that the strikes may have only set back Iran's nuclear program by months. But Trump administration officials said that assessment was low confidence and had been overtaken by intelligence showing Iran's nuclear program was severely damaged. According to Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi, the strikes on the Fordow nuclear site caused severe damage.