UK to name envoy for jailed nationals amid criticism over secrecy, delays in high-profile detention cases
High-profile cases like jailed Egyptian-British activist Alaa Abdel Fattah and imprisoned Hong Kong media mogul Jimmy Lai have spotlighted the plight of Britons held in jails overseas.
The UK foreign ministry insists it continues to press such cases with governments, but relatives of detainees and human rights organisations complain of a lack of urgency and transparency.
'The government is committed to strengthening support for British nationals, including through the appointment of a new envoy,' a Foreign Office spokesperson told AFP.
Middle East Minister Hamish Falconer has said an 'Envoy for Complex Consular Detentions' is expected to be appointed 'before the summer'.
The government has not specified the terms of the role but it could be similar to America's Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage Affairs, a position created in 2015.
Unlike the United States though, Britain does not take part in prisoner exchanges.
Professor Carla Ferstman, an expert on arbitrary detentions at the Human Rights Centre at Essex Law School, said appointing someone would be the 'clearest thing that the UK can do that it hasn't done yet'.
'When you have someone at the highest level they command a certain level of respect,' she told AFP.
Abdel Fattah was arrested in September 2019 and sentenced to five years in prison on charges of 'spreading false news' after sharing a Facebook post about police brutality.
He is still imprisoned despite a hunger strike by his mother and Britain's foreign ministry saying it is pushing for his release 'at the highest levels of the Egyptian government'.
His sister Sanaa Seif said an envoy would mean 'a proper continued focus on' freeing detainees.
'Clear strategy'
'It's also important to have a focal point that can help coordinate between different government bodies so that they all work in synchronisation,' she told AFP.
Seif believes the government should consider revising travel advice to Egypt too, a call also made by lawmakers who have suggested the government should sanction Egyptian officials as well.
'Is it not clear that words are no longer sufficient?' Conservative peer Guy Black asked in parliament's House of Lords recently.
Ferstman said tightening travel guidance can be a powerful tool.
'It's a big deal because all of a sudden tourists can't get insurance and it's harder for business travel to happen. There's all kinds of implications,' she explained.
Amnesty International recently called for the government to develop a 'clear strategy' to support arbitrarily detained Britons, including by demanding that UK officials attend trials.
The Labour government pledged in its general election-winning manifesto last year that it would introduce 'a new right to consular assistance in cases of human rights violations'.
Amnesty also wants the government to call for a person's 'immediate release', including publicly when it is requested by the family.
It said London took three years to publicly call for Lai to be freed, something his son Sebastian said 'sends the wrong message' to 'autocratic states'.
'The quicker we have the government speak out post-arrest, that's the window of opportunity to have people released,' Eilidh Macpherson, Amnesty's campaigns manager for individuals at risk told AFP.
UK officials say the government can be wary of accusations it is interfering in another country's judicial system.
'Sometimes it may need to be quiet about what it's doing, but this shouldn't come at the expense of transparency,' said Ferstman.
Jagtar Singh Johal, a Sikh blogger from Scotland, was arrested in India in November 2017 while there for his wedding on accusations of being part of a terror plot against right-wing Hindu leaders.
He has not been convicted of a crime and in March was cleared in one of the nine charges against him.
The foreign ministry spokesperson said Foreign Secretary David Lammy 'continues to raise concerns' about the detention with India's government 'at every appropriate opportunity'.
But his brother, Gurpreet Singh Johal complains of being kept in the dark.
'We don't know what's actually being said,' he told AFP.
Gurpreet said an envoy would be a 'good thing' but until the position is in place, 'We won't know exactly what it means.' — AFP
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Malay Mail
14 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Suaram urges Putrajaya, police to embrace Federal Court ruling on Peaceful Assembly Act
KUALA LUMPUR, July 1— The Federal Court's decision to strike down a controversial section of the Peaceful Assembly Act offers the Malaysian government a critical chance to reaffirm its democratic commitments, said rights group Suaram today. The apex court ruled that Section 9(5), which penalised organisers for failing to give prior notice of assemblies, violates constitutional protections under Article 10(1)(b). Suaram said the ruling challenges years of repressive enforcement and state overreach that treated peaceful protests as criminal acts. It noted that the clause had been used as a political tool, with cases like Fadhil Kasim's highlighting how it was deployed to stifle dissent. The group said the court's decision obliges the state to actively support, rather than obstruct, citizens exercising their right to protest. 'To this end, we call on the government to honour this landmark decision by immediately imposing a moratorium on the use of Section 9(5) and ensuring its full repeal in the upcoming PAA amendments slated for October this year,' it said in a statement. It further urged Parliament to take this opportunity to strengthen participatory democracy by embedding protections for urgent and spontaneous assemblies into law. The group also pushed for the police to incorporate new, rights-based protocols into their training programmes, as previously agreed with Suhakam. Suaram reminded authorities that Malaysia had accepted international recommendations to improve assembly rights during its last Universal Periodic Review. This morning, a five-judge panel at the Federal Court unanimously ruled the provision requiring five days' notice to the police prior to public rallies to be unconstitutional.


Malay Mail
16 hours ago
- Malay Mail
‘Death to IDF' chant at Glastonbury sparks UK police probe into Bob Vylan, Kneecap
LONDON, July 1 — British police on Monday launched a criminal investigation into musical duo Bob Vylan and Irish rap band Kneecap's gigs at the Glastonbury music festival after they led chanting against the Israeli military and Prime Minister Keir Starmer. The police are investigating 'comments made on stage' by both groups for possible public order offences after reviewing video footage and audio from their performances, the Avon and Somerset regional police force said. Vylan's set included on-stage chants of 'death, death to the IDF', a reference to the Israel Defense Forces fighting a war in Gaza, while Kneecap led chants against British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and condemned Israel in front of a huge crowd. 'This has been recorded as a public order incident at this time while our enquiries are at an early stage,' the police statement said. 'The investigation will be evidence-led and will closely consider all appropriate legislation, including relating to hate crimes.' Earlier, the BBC said it regretted not stopping the livestream of Bob Vylan's set at Glastonbury, south-west England, after a member of the punk-rap duo led what the broadcaster called antisemitic chants against Israel's military. Saturday's set also included on-stage chants of 'From the river to the sea, Palestine must be, will be, inshallah, it will be free'. That chant is a hotly disputed phrase often taken as a call for Israel's destruction and a denial of its right to exist, although many Palestinians dispute that. The national broadcaster's decision to keep the set streaming live was condemned by Starmer, and media regulator Ofcom said the BBC had questions to answer. The BBC, which broadcasts the annual festival, issued a warning on screen for strong and discriminatory language while the set was being streamed online, but said on Monday it should have gone further. The Israeli Embassy in London also condemned the incident, while Starmer demanded answers from the BBC on 'how these scenes came to be broadcast.' 'I said what I said' The rap duo's lead vocalist, who also goes by the stage name Bobby Vylan, wrote on Instagram: 'I said what I said,' adding he had been 'inundated with messages of both support and hatred'. 'Teaching our children to speak up for the change they want and need is the only way that we make this world a better place,' he said in the post, apparently in reference to the incident. Bob Vylan, known for their mix of grime and punk rock, have been outspoken about their support for Palestinians in the past. Their songs tackle a range of issues including racism, homophobia and the class divide. Political statements by musicians on stage have been in focus since a member of Kneecap was charged last month with a terrorism offence for allegedly displaying a flag of Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed group that is proscribed as a terrorist organisation in Britain. He denies the offence. Israel has repeatedly denied committing abuses in its war in Gaza, which began when Hamas launched a surprise attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, killing nearly 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and taking 251 others as hostages into Gaza. Israel launched a military campaign that has since killed more than 56,000 Palestinians, the majority of them civilians, according to local health authorities in Gaza. — Reuters


Free Malaysia Today
17 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
China condemns British warship's ‘troublemaking' Taiwan Strait transit
The British Royal Navy said the HMS Spey conducted a routine navigation that complied with international law. (US Navy/AFP pic) BEIJING : China's military on Friday condemned the sailing of a British warship through the Taiwan Strait as a deliberate attempt to 'cause trouble', saying it undermined peace and stability in the region. Britain's Royal Navy said the patrol vessel HMS Spey conducted a routine navigation through the narrow waterway that was part of a long-planned deployment and took place in full compliance with international law. China, which views Taiwan as its own territory, considers the strait to be Chinese waters. Taiwan, the United States and many of its allies say it is an international waterway. The Eastern Theatre Command of China's People's Liberation Army said the Wednesday sailing of the ship was 'public hyping' and that its forces followed and monitored the Spey. 'The British side's remarks distort legal principles and mislead the public; its actions deliberately cause trouble and disrupt things, undermining peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait,' it said in a statement. 'Troops in the theatre are on high alert at all times and will resolutely counter all threats and provocations.' Taiwan's government welcomed the sailing. 'The foreign ministry welcomes and affirms the British side once again taking concrete actions to defend the freedom of navigation in the Taiwan Strait, demonstrating its firm position that the Taiwan Strait is international waters,' the ministry said in a statement. The last time a British warship sailed through the strait was in 2021, when HMS Richmond was deployed in the East China Sea en route to Vietnam. The Chinese military followed it at the time and warned it away. The latest passage comes at a time when Britain and China are seeking to mend their relations, with Prime Minister Keir Starmer expected to visit Beijing later this year – the first trip to the country by a British leader since 2018. US Navy ships sail through the strait around once every two months, sometimes accompanied by allied nations.