
Democrats slam latest version of Trump's budget bill as anti-poor, Musk says it would destroy jobs and harm US
WASHINGTON: Billionaire Elon Musk on Saturday criticized the latest version of President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill released by the US Senate, calling it 'utterly insane and destructive.'
As Senate Republicans prepared to vote on the measure, Democrats warned that its tax-cut elements would disproportionately benefit the wealthy at the expense of social programs relied upon by lower-income Americans.
'The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country!' Musk wrote in a post on X. 'It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future.'
Musk's renewed his tirade against the proposed measure, called One Big Beautiful Bill Act, weeks after the world's richest person and Trump, the world's most powerful, ended a feud sparked by Musk's opposition to the bill.
Senate Republicans planned to vote Saturday on the bill after agreeing on changes to address concerns about funding for rural hospitals and the deductibility of state taxes.
Several Republican senators who had previously expressed hesitancy about voting for the bill told reporters that their concerns had been assuaged and that they were ready to vote to clear a first procedural hurdle in the coming hours.
Senator John Barrasso, the chamber's No. 2 Republican, said the first procedural vote on the legislation would take place shortly, though it did not start by 4 p.m. (2000 GMT), as he had predicted. The bill is Trump's top legislative goal. With his fellow Republicans controlling both chambers, Congress has so far not rejected any of Trump's priorities.
The 940-page megabill would extend the 2017 tax cuts that were Trump's main legislative achievement during his first term as president, cut other taxes and boost spending on the military and border security. Nonpartisan analysts estimate that a version passed by the House of Representatives last month would add about $3 trillion to the $36.2 trillion US government debt.
The Congressional Budget Office has not released a forecast for how much the Senate version — still subject to change — would add to the debt if enacted.
Partial to the wealthy
Senator Chuck Schumer, the Senate's top Democrat, called for the bill's full text to be read on the Senate floor after the vote, a procedure that was sure to run late into the night, if not past dawn.
'Under this draft Republicans will take food away from hungry kids to pay for tax breaks to the rich,' Schumer said. 'Future generations will be saddled with trillions in debt.'
The nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget public policy organization on Saturday said its preliminary estimate is that the Senate version would add $4 trillion to the debt over the next decade, including interest costs.
'If you thought the House bill borrowed too much — and it did — the Senate manages to make things even worse,' Maya MacGuineas, the group's president, said in a statement.
The White House said this month that the legislation, titled the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, would reduce the annual deficit by $1.4 trillion.
Ready to move forward
Republican Senators Josh Hawley of Missouri and Susan Collins of Maine, who had opposed concern about tax-code changes that could hurt rural hospitals, told reporters they were ready to move forward.
A successful vote would kick off a lengthy process that could run into Sunday, as Democrats unveil a series of amendments unlikely to pass in a chamber that Republicans control 53-47.
'By passing this bill now, we will make our nation more prosperous and secure,' Senate Budget Committee chairman Lindsey Graham said in a statement accompanying the bill text.
Republicans from states with large rural populations have opposed a reduction in state tax revenue for Medicaid providers including rural hospitals. The newly released legislation would delay that reduction and would include $25 billion to support rural Medicaid providers from 2028 to 2032.
'If you want to be a working-class party, you've got to get and deliver for working-class people,' Hawley told reporters. 'You cannot take away health care for working people.'
The legislation would raise the cap on federal deductions for state and local taxes to $40,000 with an annual 1 percent inflation adjustment through 2029, after which it would fall back to the current $10,000. The bill would also phase the cap down for those earning more than $500,000 a year.
That is a major concern of House Republicans from coastal states including New York, New Jersey and California, who play an important role in keeping the party's narrow House majority.
Republicans are using a legislative maneuver to bypass the Senate's 60-vote threshold to advance most legislation in the 100-member chamber.
Narrow path
The narrow majorities for Republicans in the Senate and House mean they can afford no more than three no votes from the party in either chamber to advance a bill that Democrats are united in opposing.
Democrats will focus their firepower with amendments aimed at reversing Republican spending cuts to programs that provide government-backed health care to the elderly, poor and disabled, as well as food aid to low-income families.
The bill also would raise the Treasury Department's debt ceiling by trillions of dollars to stave off a potentially disastrous default on the nation's debt in the coming months. If the Senate passes the bill, it will then return to the House for another vote before Trump could sign it into law.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Arab News
32 minutes ago
- Arab News
Democracies rediscover the importance of bread, housing and a decent life
The rise of Zohran Mamdani, who last week won the Democratic mayoral primary in New York City, the largest and most impressive city in the US, has jolted the American public out of their slumber, which had seemed endless since Donald Trump entered the White House. To avoid drawing hasty conclusions, we must acknowledge that this young Afro-Asian Muslim who openly identifies as a socialist has only won a single round. Just one round in the fierce battle that the moderate and progressive wings of Western democracies are waging with the rising far right in its conservative, fascist and racist iterations across Europe and its control over the world's two largest democracies: India and the US. On these pages, I have written about what a university professor of mine once told me: If the 20th century was the century of ideology, the 21st is the century of technology. His claim is that the incredible pace of technological progress in our era will, in practice, solve many of the economic and ideological struggles that once pushed humanity to develop theories and abstract solutions. Of course, we cannot fully endorse or entirely reject this claim just yet. We are only a quarter of the way through the 21st century and technological progress continues at a truly astonishing pace. Achievements and discoveries that once took centuries or generations are now emerging in months, not years. Even in Western democracies that have long found comfort in the stability of their institutions, everything is changing Eyad Abu Shakra The whole is no longer what it was, and it will never again be what it is today, given the pace of economic shifts, innovations, shifts in professions, evolving beliefs and interests, the tremors shaking the structures of societies and their interactions, and the limbo that politics and value systems have entered. Our societies, all of them, are intellectually teetering between extremism and counterextremism, and between isolationism and the collapse of barriers to invasions that had stood in their way regardless of pretext. In short, these are uncertain times. And the wisest among us are those who place no bets, believe no one's rhetoric and take no risks backing any political project. Even in Western democracies that have long found comfort in the stability of their institutions, unlike our own 'young' states in the so-called Third World, everything is changing before our eyes and the eyes of their citizens. The very notion of the nation state, although it seemed firmly entrenched and secure after the end of the Cold War, is now threatened by populist and racist politics. The Ukraine war has sparked immense fear across Europe, which has become terrified of a power that is still nostalgic for the era of czars and red banners. Meanwhile, the UK's exit from the EU was driven by the far-right isolationists who now threaten to dethrone the country's two major parties, the Conservatives and Labour, with the rising proto-fascist isolationists well placed to replace them. At the same time, a resurgence of the Labour left seems to be on the cards, as the credibility of the current Labour government declines. The state of affairs in Britain is part of a broader pattern across Western Europe: moderate forces on the right and left are in decline, while the extreme right and, to a lesser extent, the radical left are gaining ground. This is also obvious in France, where Marine Le Pen's far-right and Jean-Luc Melenchon's left-wing movements have gained ground. In Germany, it can be seen in the rising popularity of the Alternative for Germany party, while Italy's Giorgia Meloni is the leader of the Brothers of Italy party. In Portugal and Spain, the far right (Chega and Vox, respectively) are embracing the legacies of the fascist regimes, led by dictators Antonio Salazar and Francisco Franco, that imposed their rule for decades. With its strategy for reversing the challenge posed by the far right's upward trajectory, the traditional moderate left is losing its soul and ability to resist. Frankly, this outcome is not surprising at all. The most these anti-far-right forces can hope for is to build fragile, ad hoc alliances that have no credibility, principles or platform. Yes, all the moderate Western left has done is evade honest conversations, buy time with empty rhetoric and seek to contain the rise of the far right, whose fervor drives its pursuit of wiping out its opponents entirely. The result? The far right is now dictating the political agenda and determining priorities. In Britain, for instance, the far-right Reform UK party recently surpassed the ruling Labour Party in opinion polls. This is a telling message and a dire warning delivered to a party that has sacrificed its core principles in an attempt to appease powerful lobbies and temporarily broaden its appeal in the face of a populist force willing to ride any wave. Mamdani has shown his party that victory is impossible without clear principles, no matter how risky sticking to them may seem Eyad Abu Shakra In the US, the Democratic Party has made serious mistakes, dragging its feet far too long and trying to cash in on empty slogans. Democrats understood the nature of the battle they faced in 2016 against Trump and his populist 'Make America Great Again' base. However, they have committed two grave errors. First, they underestimated the far-right's capacity for stirring anti-immigrant sentiment among unskilled workers and the Rust Belt. Second, they ignored the material demands at the heart of this struggle. The US' most prominent left-wing politician, Sen. Bernie Sanders, did recognize this problem. He tried to appeal to disaffected working-class voters and bring them back into the Democratic fold to ensure they did not become easy prey for Trump and MAGA. The Democrats repeated the same mistake later. This time, it was more egregious. The unconditional support of Joe Biden's administration for Benjamin Netanyahu and his Gaza war cost the party's 2024 candidate, Kamala Harris, tens of thousands of votes from the left, as well as the votes of Muslims and Arab Americans in key swing states … votes that could have gone her way, at least in theory. Mamdani may or may not win November's mayoral race in New York — a city that remains the hub of Jewish American life. Nonetheless, he has shown his party that victory is impossible without clear principles, no matter how risky sticking to them may seem. Mamdani understands that the people of New York face urgent material crises that need solutions, not the empty slogans of opportunists and domestic and foreign lobbies that are amplified by Fox News and the like. Even in the century of technology and virtual worlds, people still need bread, jobs, medicine, employment and social security.


Leaders
an hour ago
- Leaders
‘Big Beautiful Bill' Renews Trump-Musk Clash
The feud between the US President, Donald Trump, and the tech billionaire, Elon Musk, has resurfaced again over Trump's spending bill, known as the 'Big, Beautiful Bill.' Musk lashed out against the new bill, threatening to unseat Republican lawmakers who support the tax cuts and spending bill and to form a new political party if the bill passes in the Senate. Musk's Warning In a series of posts on X, Musk on Monday warned lawmakers who support Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' as the Senate was debating the bill before a final vote. He criticized Republican lawmakers who voted for the bill, suggesting that he would support primary challenges against Republicans who backed the bill. 'Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame! And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth,' he said. Musk has criticized the bill due to its 'insane' spending levels, attacking a provision in the Senate version of the bill that would raise the debt ceiling by $5 trillion. He also slammed the bill's cuts to green energy subsidies, calling it 'utter madness' that could 'destroy millions of jobs in America,' according to CBS News. New Party Musk ramped up his threats by announcing that he would form a new party if the bill passes – an idea he floated earlier this month. 'If this insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day. Our country needs an alternative to the Democrat-Republican uniparty so that the people actually have a VOICE,' he wrote. He doubled down on the idea in a separate post: 'It is obvious with the insane spending of this bill, which increases the debt ceiling by a record FIVE TRILLION DOLLARS that we live in a one-party country – the PORKY PIG PARTY!! Time for a new political party that actually cares about the people.' The tech billionaire backed Trump and other Republicans in their election campaigns last year with an estimated $250 million. However, he suggested last month that he would scale back his political spending, saying 'I think I've done enough.' In early June, Musk also lashed out against Trump over the legislation, calling it a 'disgusting abomination,' engaging in a feud with the US President for days, before backing down in mid-June and acknowledging that his attacks 'went too far.' He once again intensified his criticism in recent days as the bill approaches a final approval. The Big, Beautiful Bill The US Senate held a marathon vote session, known as 'vote-a-rama,' on amendments to the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill Act' – a sweeping tax cuts and spending package. Senators hope to get approval of the bill and send it to the President's desk to sign it by the Fourth of July, according to CNN. However, their version of the bill must comply with certain Senate-specific budget reconciliation rules and get enough support before passing back to the House. According to a congressional budget office estimate, the Senate bill will add around $3.3 trillion to the deficit over the next decade. On the other hand, the House-approved bill will add $2.4 trillion to the deficit over the same period. The Senate bill includes further tax cuts, less spending cuts, and provisions that will raise revenue. The House narrowly passed its own version of the bill in May. However, the two chambers have to approve one text before sending it to Trump. Trump's Response The US President accused Tesla and SpaceX CEO of opposing the bill because he would lose electric vehicle (EV) and solar energy subsidies granted under the federal electric vehicle tax credits – a program that the new bill would end. In a post on Truth Social, Trump defended his position, saying: 'Elon Musk knew, long before he so strongly Endorsed me for President, that I was strongly against the EV Mandate. It is ridiculous, and was always a major part of my campaign. Electric cars are fine, but not everyone should be forced to own one.' Trump also threatened Musk, suggesting that he would order the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which Musk once spearheaded, to look at other subsidies that the billionaire benefits from. 'Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa. No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE. Perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this? BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED!!!' Trump noted. Short link : Post Views: 8


Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
Israel's Netanyahu says he is expected to meet Trump next week
JERUSALEM: Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Tuesday he is expected to travel next week to the United States for meetings with President Donald Trump. Last month Trump announced a ceasefire ending 12 days of hostilities between Israel and Iran.