logo
Royal Marines in DEI row over women on front line

Royal Marines in DEI row over women on front line

Telegraph29-04-2025
The Royal Marines have become embroiled in a row over the role of women on the front line.
In a highly unusual move, a serving member of the elite corps has publicly raised concerns about the possible lowering of standards for female trainees – and claimed that lives could be at risk if Britain goes to war.
The commando has claimed that up to 1,000 of his fellow Marines backed a private letter to military chiefs raising fears that so-called diversity, equality and inclusion (DEI) policies were in danger of creating an 'unrecognisable, weak and compromised version of the corps'.
The letter claimed that some women at the Commando Training Centre were being 'artificially pushed through training ', resulting in what was described as 'unearned paper-passes'.
In a video subsequently posted online, the commando – who does not give his name – said: 'We believe that we have the high standards that we keep for [a] very important reason, which is to prevent Marines from being killed in dangerous situations when we go to war... We are concerned that those standards are being dropped.'
He also alleges that after raising concerns with his chain of command about the lowering of physical fitness standards for female recruits, he was treated 'like a terrorist and a criminal'.
This included being briefly held by police under counter-terrorism legislation.
'I ask them: 'Am I being detained?' They say: 'No, you're not being detained, but we're holding you here under the Terrorism Act. And I'm just shaking my head in this instance. And I said: 'Have I committed any acts of terrorism? Am I expected to commit any acts of terrorism?' And they said: 'No, we have you here because of your views,'' he states in the video.
The ban on women serving in ground close combat roles was lifted by David Cameron, the prime minister at the time, in 2016.
Two years later, Gavin Williamson, the defence minister at the time, announced that all military roles, including those in the Marines, would be open to female recruits.
The Ministry of Defence denies any positive discrimination – pointing out that to date, not a single woman has met the gruelling physical standards required to earn the coveted green beret.
However, a number of women do serve in the elite corps in other roles, while hundreds of others are attempting to enter the service.
According to the commando, there is widespread concern privately within the corps that female trainees are passing elements of Marines training based on lower standards of performance.
In an attempt to demonstrate the strength of feeling among fellow commandos, some weeks ago, he circulated an anonymous petition to his peers. He claimed that it has received a flood of support.
'Full-on witch hunt'
In the online video, he said: 'That survey exploded in the Royal Marines. Within 24 hours, I can tell you that nearly a thousand people had signed up [to] that survey. Now why do I say within 24 hours? Because within 24 hours it was deleted. That survey was taken down.'
He said that after the letter and petition reached military chiefs, he was 'cautiously optimistic' it would be taken seriously.
Instead, he has accused the MoD of launching what he describes as a 'full-on witch hunt'.
He claimed that his superiors initially tried to blame the letter on 'Russian bots' before launching an investigation to identify who was behind the letter.
During the internal inquiry, he said that colleagues were made 'to feel like they would go to jail' if they did not give up his identity.
After handing himself in to his chain of command, he was flown from his military base – thought to be in Scotland – to MoD headquarters in London for what he describes as 'two-hour interrogation'.
'They tell me that they deal with security leaks. And they essentially try and make what is a genuine issue look like it was just some uppity Marines that are just being sexist, being evil... It's absurd because we wrote that in the survey, that we were concerned that... we will be painted as sexists. And that is exactly how they treated us. Telling me that I should be concerned for my career. Telling me that I should comply for the sake of myself and my family.'
'Thousands are concerned'
He claims that military officials showed no interest in the fundamental issue he raised, despite what he described as the 'vast majority' of the Marine Corps sharing his concerns.
'I asked them explicitly. 'So thousands of Marines are concerned about this issue. I'm concerned about this issue. I'm here representing these Marines now.' And that made me feel strong, to be honest... because I've had the backing of the vast majority of the Marine Corps. And I said: 'Are you looking into our concerns at all?' ... They said: 'Absolutely not... we are here to talk about you,'' he said.
During the two-hour discussion, he was told that questioning DEI policies could 'distress' female recruits currently going through marine training, he said in the video.
After questioning, he was allowed to return to his duties. However, he was subsequently detained for questioning under counter-terrorism legislation.
He claimed that officers from Police Scotland were waiting for him at immigration on his arrival at a Scottish airport following a family holiday.
The MoD does not deny that the commando was flown to London for questioning; nor that he was detained by Police Scotland under counter-terrorism legislation.
Whitehall sources have suggested that Police Scotland was concerned he may be linked to 'extreme far-Right politics.'
However, he was never arrested or charged, and continues to serve as a Royal Marine commando.
The MoD denies that as many as 1,000 Marines backed the petition. A Whitehall source described the figure as 'unverified'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

FCC approves Skydance merger with Paramount
FCC approves Skydance merger with Paramount

The Independent

time2 hours ago

  • The Independent

FCC approves Skydance merger with Paramount

A merger between Paramount Global and Skydance Media has been formally approved by the Federal Communications Commisison, following months of uncertainty. The $8.4 billion deal was formally approved by the Trump administration Thursday, after FCC commissioners voted 2-1 along party lines. It means that Skydance will take control of Paramount in the coming weeks. Earlier this week Skydance told the Trump administration that it would eliminate diversity, equity and inclusion policies and hire an ombudsman to review 'complaints of bias' at CBS News once the merger has been completed. In a pair of letters to FCC Chairman Brendan Carr, Skydance's general counsel Kyoko McKinnon noted that while Skydance 'does not have DEI programs in place today,' the company confirmed that the New Paramount would not establish any similar practices in the future.

Trump administration asks US Supreme Court to allow NIH diversity-related cuts
Trump administration asks US Supreme Court to allow NIH diversity-related cuts

Reuters

time4 hours ago

  • Reuters

Trump administration asks US Supreme Court to allow NIH diversity-related cuts

July 24 (Reuters) - Donald Trump's administration asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday to allow the government to proceed with sweeping cuts to National Institutes of Health grants as part of the Republican president's crackdown on diversity initiatives. The Justice Department asked the justices to lift Boston-based U.S. District Judge William Young's June ruling that halted the plan as a violation of federal law and required the government to reinstate access to the grant funds. The judge acted in a legal challenge by researchers and 16 U.S. states, led by Democratic-governed Massachusetts. The NIH is the world's largest funder of biomedical research. The cuts are part of Trump's wide-ranging actions to reshape the U.S. government, slash federal spending and end government support for diversity, equity and inclusion programs and transgender healthcare. The administration repeatedly has sought the Supreme Court's intervention to allow implementation of Trump policies impeded by lower courts. The Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, has sided with the administration in almost every case that it has been called upon to review since Trump returned to the presidency in January. In June, dozens of scientists, researchers and other NIH employees signed an open letter criticizing the agency's actions and spending cuts under Trump that they said politicize research and "harm the health of Americans and people across the globe." Young's ruling came in two lawsuits challenging the cuts. One was filed by the American Public Health Association, individual researchers and other plaintiffs who called the cuts an "ongoing ideological purge" of projects with a purported connection to gender identity, DEI "or other vague, now-forbidden language." The other was filed by the states, most of them Democratic-led. Young, an appointee of Republican former President Ronald Reagan, invalidated the grant terminations in June. The judge wrote that every new administration is entitled to make policy changes but that these must be reasonable and reasonably explained. Instead, according to the judge, the steps taken by Trump administration officials were "breathtakingly arbitrary and capricious," violating a federal law governing the actions of agencies. Young criticized administration officials for not offering any definition of DEI while disparaging studies they deemed low-value and unscientific that the officials claimed were used to unlawfully discriminate on the basis of race and other protected characteristics. "There is not a shred of evidence supporting any of these statements in the record," Young wrote. Many U.S. conservatives contend that DEI policies discriminate against white people. The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on July 18 denied the administration's request to put Young's decision on hold. The administration has argued that the litigation should have been brought in a different judicial body, the Washington-based Court of Federal Claims, which specializes in money damages claims against the U.S. government. That reasoning was also the basis for the Supreme Court's decision in April that let Trump's administration proceed with millions of dollars of cuts to teacher training grants also targeted under the DEI crackdown.

FCC chair pleased with Skydance vow to make changes at CBS
FCC chair pleased with Skydance vow to make changes at CBS

Reuters

time5 hours ago

  • Reuters

FCC chair pleased with Skydance vow to make changes at CBS

July 24 (Reuters) - The chair of the Federal Communications Commission said on Thursday he is pleased with commitments that Skydance has made to make serious changes at CBS under a proposed merger with Paramount (PARA.O), opens new tab, but said the agency has not made a decision on the tie-up. CBS parent Paramount needs approval from the FCC for an $8.4-billion merger with Skydance Media. FCC Chair Brendan Carr said after a commission meeting the agency continues to review the deal and praised commitments to end diversity programs. Skydance has agreed to have an ombudsman in place for at least two years to evaluate complaints about bias in CBS News' programming if the deal is approved. "I was very pleased to see Skydance put in a filing that says if this deal goes through they are committing to serious changes at CBS. I think that would be a good thing," Carr said. "They have committed to addressing bias issues. They've committed to embracing fact-based journalism." Paramount declined to comment. Carr cited polls that Americans' trust in national programs has fallen to historic lows. This month, Paramount agreed to pay $16 million to settle a lawsuit filed by U.S. President Donald Trump, claiming the CBS News program "60 Minutes" deceptively edited an interview with former Vice President Kamala Harris that the network broadcast in October. Paramount did not admit to any wrongdoing. The FCC has required other companies like T-Mobile and Verizon to end diversity, equity and inclusion programs before approving deals. In January, Trump issued sweeping executive orders to dismantle U.S. government DEI programs, and pressured the private sector to join the initiative. The FCC did not make a decision by the 180-day informal deadline in mid-May and Carr previously denied Trump's lawsuit was a factor. Trump and CBS formally agreed on Tuesday to the dismissal of his lawsuit, according to a court filing. Skydance and its investors plan to acquire National Amusements, which holds the family's controlling stake in Paramount. Skydance will subsequently be merged into Paramount, with its CEO David Ellison becoming Paramount's next chief executive.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store