logo
Royal Marines in DEI row over women on front line

Royal Marines in DEI row over women on front line

Telegraph29-04-2025
The Royal Marines have become embroiled in a row over the role of women on the front line.
In a highly unusual move, a serving member of the elite corps has publicly raised concerns about the possible lowering of standards for female trainees – and claimed that lives could be at risk if Britain goes to war.
The commando has claimed that up to 1,000 of his fellow Marines backed a private letter to military chiefs raising fears that so-called diversity, equality and inclusion (DEI) policies were in danger of creating an 'unrecognisable, weak and compromised version of the corps'.
The letter claimed that some women at the Commando Training Centre were being 'artificially pushed through training ', resulting in what was described as 'unearned paper-passes'.
In a video subsequently posted online, the commando – who does not give his name – said: 'We believe that we have the high standards that we keep for [a] very important reason, which is to prevent Marines from being killed in dangerous situations when we go to war... We are concerned that those standards are being dropped.'
He also alleges that after raising concerns with his chain of command about the lowering of physical fitness standards for female recruits, he was treated 'like a terrorist and a criminal'.
This included being briefly held by police under counter-terrorism legislation.
'I ask them: 'Am I being detained?' They say: 'No, you're not being detained, but we're holding you here under the Terrorism Act. And I'm just shaking my head in this instance. And I said: 'Have I committed any acts of terrorism? Am I expected to commit any acts of terrorism?' And they said: 'No, we have you here because of your views,'' he states in the video.
The ban on women serving in ground close combat roles was lifted by David Cameron, the prime minister at the time, in 2016.
Two years later, Gavin Williamson, the defence minister at the time, announced that all military roles, including those in the Marines, would be open to female recruits.
The Ministry of Defence denies any positive discrimination – pointing out that to date, not a single woman has met the gruelling physical standards required to earn the coveted green beret.
However, a number of women do serve in the elite corps in other roles, while hundreds of others are attempting to enter the service.
According to the commando, there is widespread concern privately within the corps that female trainees are passing elements of Marines training based on lower standards of performance.
In an attempt to demonstrate the strength of feeling among fellow commandos, some weeks ago, he circulated an anonymous petition to his peers. He claimed that it has received a flood of support.
'Full-on witch hunt'
In the online video, he said: 'That survey exploded in the Royal Marines. Within 24 hours, I can tell you that nearly a thousand people had signed up [to] that survey. Now why do I say within 24 hours? Because within 24 hours it was deleted. That survey was taken down.'
He said that after the letter and petition reached military chiefs, he was 'cautiously optimistic' it would be taken seriously.
Instead, he has accused the MoD of launching what he describes as a 'full-on witch hunt'.
He claimed that his superiors initially tried to blame the letter on 'Russian bots' before launching an investigation to identify who was behind the letter.
During the internal inquiry, he said that colleagues were made 'to feel like they would go to jail' if they did not give up his identity.
After handing himself in to his chain of command, he was flown from his military base – thought to be in Scotland – to MoD headquarters in London for what he describes as 'two-hour interrogation'.
'They tell me that they deal with security leaks. And they essentially try and make what is a genuine issue look like it was just some uppity Marines that are just being sexist, being evil... It's absurd because we wrote that in the survey, that we were concerned that... we will be painted as sexists. And that is exactly how they treated us. Telling me that I should be concerned for my career. Telling me that I should comply for the sake of myself and my family.'
'Thousands are concerned'
He claims that military officials showed no interest in the fundamental issue he raised, despite what he described as the 'vast majority' of the Marine Corps sharing his concerns.
'I asked them explicitly. 'So thousands of Marines are concerned about this issue. I'm concerned about this issue. I'm here representing these Marines now.' And that made me feel strong, to be honest... because I've had the backing of the vast majority of the Marine Corps. And I said: 'Are you looking into our concerns at all?' ... They said: 'Absolutely not... we are here to talk about you,'' he said.
During the two-hour discussion, he was told that questioning DEI policies could 'distress' female recruits currently going through marine training, he said in the video.
After questioning, he was allowed to return to his duties. However, he was subsequently detained for questioning under counter-terrorism legislation.
He claimed that officers from Police Scotland were waiting for him at immigration on his arrival at a Scottish airport following a family holiday.
The MoD does not deny that the commando was flown to London for questioning; nor that he was detained by Police Scotland under counter-terrorism legislation.
Whitehall sources have suggested that Police Scotland was concerned he may be linked to 'extreme far-Right politics.'
However, he was never arrested or charged, and continues to serve as a Royal Marine commando.
The MoD denies that as many as 1,000 Marines backed the petition. A Whitehall source described the figure as 'unverified'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Police fail to arrest supporters of banned group Palestine Action in sign demos - despite more than 100 arrests last week
Police fail to arrest supporters of banned group Palestine Action in sign demos - despite more than 100 arrests last week

Daily Mail​

time24 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Police fail to arrest supporters of banned group Palestine Action in sign demos - despite more than 100 arrests last week

Police have failed to arrest supporters of the banned group Palestine Action as 11 activists sat holding signs for 60 minutes without being detained. Protests were held in both Totnes and Edinburgh today as part of a campaign opposing the proscription of the direct action organisation. But despite more than 100 arrests last week and 200 total arrests since the ban came into force on July 5, protesters today were allowed to hold their signs. It marked a stark contrast to last week when rallies were held in London, Manchester, Bristol, Edinburgh and Truro where activists were physically carried away and detained by police amid shouts of 'fascist' and 'Starmer's project of fear has failed'. The ban on Palestine Action means membership of or support for the direct action group is now a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison, under the Terrorism Act 2000. Due to the ban, inviting or expressing support for the organisation - through chanting, clothing or displaying articles like flags, signs or logos - is a criminal offence. Organisers behind today's protests, Defend Our Juries, have argued police's decision to 'exercise discretion to leave peaceful protestors be' has suggested the ban on the group is unworkable as activists (in Totnes) 'defend our ancient liberties in a small, rural town'. It comes as yesterday UN Human Rights Chief Volker Türk argued the proscription of Palestine Action was a violation of international law. The group was proscribed by Home Secretary Yvette Cooper after its members caused an estimated seven million pounds worth of damage to RAF Brize Norton planes on June 20. Ms Cooper also claimed '[the group's] activity has increased in frequency and severity since the start of 2024 and its methods have become more aggressive, with its members demonstrating a willingness to use violence'. Defend Our Juries says around 500 people are expected to take part in a 'mass sign-holding' on August 9 after today's protesters held signs saying 'I Oppose Genocide. I Support Palestine Action'. In Totnes protesters were joined by dozens more holding signs with their own wording, as well as people holding trade union flags and hundreds of supporters singing 'Lift the ban, now, for Gaza' and applauding speeches calling for the Home Secretary to Lift The Ban. Attending the protest was journalist George Monbiot who argued 'Palestine Action are protesters not terrorists'. He said: 'The proscription of Palestine Action is the most illiberal thing any Home Secretary has done for at least 30 years. 'The result is an Orwellian situation, in which people gently calling for peace are arrested under the Terrorism Act, while the government actively assists Israeli state terror, as it perpetrates genocide in Gaza. This is an assault on free speech, on logic and on human decency.' In a letter to police ahead of the demo, the Totnes residents claimed: 'In continuing to support the Israeli government in its genocide, including through the ongoing export of parts for F-35 fighter jets, the British government is committing crimes under the Genocide Act 1969, which is binding in UK law.' Rallies were also held in Edinburgh and Truro last week to protest the proscription of the campaign group as a terrorist organisation earlier this month. Pictured: Protesters hold up signs in support of Palestine Action at the demonstration in London Similar sign-holding protests are scheduled to take place today in Derry for a third week where, so far, the local police have made no arrests. On Wednesday Derry City & Strabane District Council became the first elected politicians to openly defy the ban and call for it to be lifted. Activists have been protesting against the UK's supplying of arms in Gaza, which has killed more than 57,000 Palestinians since October 7 - when 1,200 Israelis were killed by a Hamas incursion into the country amid the continued occupation of Palestinian territories. Although seemingly absent from today's protest, Devon and Cornwall Police said in a statement on demonstrations last week: 'A number of placards which were contrary to the law remained on display despite police advice. 'Eight people, two men and six women, were arrested on suspicion of offences under Section 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000. They remain in police custody.' The force has been contacted for further comment as has Police Scotland.

Plymouth marines participate in Sydney training
Plymouth marines participate in Sydney training

BBC News

timea day ago

  • BBC News

Plymouth marines participate in Sydney training

A Royal Marines unit helped swoop on a passenger ferry in Australia during anti-terrorism training in view of tourists visiting Sydney Opera part of Australia's largest-ever military exercise marines from Plymouth-based 42 Commando worked with counterparts from the host nation, the US, Japan and Singapore in Sydney training saw allies work on boarding operations, which the Royal Navy said aimed to perfect the skills needed to hunt down smugglers, terrorists and pirates around the training in Sydney finished with the recapture of an iconic green and yellow New South Wales ferry using US Black Hawk helicopters among other specialist vehicles. The 42 Commando unit was recently involved with the seizure of 1.5 tonnes of illegal narcotics in the Middle East.

Trump is fighting to kill off DEI – and the corporate cowardice over Gaza shows he's winning
Trump is fighting to kill off DEI – and the corporate cowardice over Gaza shows he's winning

The Guardian

timea day ago

  • The Guardian

Trump is fighting to kill off DEI – and the corporate cowardice over Gaza shows he's winning

I have been working in diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) for more than six years. This year, more than ever, I have started to question what the purpose of it really is. Though I've been celebrating companies that took a stand against Donald Trump's anti-DEI executive orders, under the radar I have noticed an insidious censorship rearing its head. Since 2023 we have been witness to one of the worst atrocities of our lifetimes. Livestreamed to our phones, we have seen the slaughter of at least 58,000 Palestinians, more than 17,000 of them children, and many of them in hospitals, schools, refugee camps and food queues. We have seen the denial of water, electricity and medical supplies, the obliteration of communities, mass manmade starvation, and continued calls by Israeli ministers for the permanent expulsion or eradication of Palestinians in Gaza. Israel's plans for a so-called humanitarian city to be built on the ruins of Rafah has been described by the former Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert as a 'concentration camp'. Yet, although more than 200 companies released statements after the Hamas attack on 7 October 2023 – wholeheartedly condemning it and donating money to relief funds – since then, there has been a relative silence in the face of the ongoing destruction in Gaza. One senior manager I spoke to said he had received an email telling him to remind staff they weren't allowed to wear 'political' badges during the Gaza conflict. Another company leader firmly stated, 'We're an apolitical company. Our staff need to remember that.' Last year, 50 employees were fired by Google after protesting against its and Amazon's $1.2bn (£900m) Project Nimbus cloud infrastructure contract with the Israeli government. And just last weekend we saw an official at the Royal Opera House attempt to snatch the Palestinian flag from a cast member who unfurled it on stage after a performance. All these organisations have DEI agendas. They say they are committed to inclusion and equal opportunity, and to enhancing business growth through diversity. Yet it seems this commitment is conditional on people's silence. You can belong, as long as you don't make us uncomfortable. We value your identity, as long as it's not political. Yet the companies themselves are not devoid of politics. A recent report by the UN special rapporteur for Palestinian territories, Francesca Albanese, backed by a number of high-profile economists, exposes the vast number of businesses who have been enabling or profiting from the Israeli military operation in Gaza. 'The report shows why the genocide carried out by Israel continues … because it is lucrative for many,' it says, highlighting not just arms manufacturers but also the complicity of big tech, household brands and even educational institutions. and Airbnb have been listing properties in illegal Israeli settlements, enabling profit from stolen land. And, in the most stark cases of corporate hypocrisy, companies such as BAE Systems, which is directly tied to the Israeli military machine and dehumanisation of Palestinians, proudly brand themselves as champions of dignity and respect. For the first time, I have found myself questioning not just how we do DEI work, but whether it means anything at all. If DEI is about rewiring unjust systems, how can companies silence staff who speak out or, worse, actively profit from a brutal war machine, and still claim to be inclusive? What is the role of DEI, if not to embed values and basic humanity within the company? What is even more frustrating is that we have a direct blueprint of how business leaders can approach this. Since the invasion of Ukraine, more than 1,000 companies have voluntarily curtailed operations in Russia as a recognition that they don't stand for war crimes, the murder of civilians or the ensuing humanitarian crisis. They hung Ukrainian flags on their buildings, donated tens of millions to humanitarian organisations, offered housing and created fast-track hiring schemes for Ukrainian refugees. The Royal Opera House itself published a statement in support of Ukraine, lit up its building in the Ukrainian flag colours, and for a period of time played the Ukrainian national anthem before every performance. For many staff, this contrast makes the corporate silence on Gaza feel even more pointed. It's not 'apolitical', it's a choice. And it is a failure of DEI, which at its core is about challenging systems that breed inequality. It is rooted in values of fairness, dignity and respect for all. This isn't simply about respecting racial or religious difference on an interpersonal level, it's about who you invest in (or divest from), what you choose to speak out on, how you balance profit with purpose. To stay silent in the face of mass violence sends a clear message: some lives don't matter. What gives me hope is the people-powered movements within companies. Staff are holding their leaders to account. Be that employees at the Boston Consulting Group who shared a letter to the company's top management demanding an end to its involvement in the development of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, staff at the Berlin-based retail company Zalando protesting against the dismissal of an Arab employee who criticised its support of Israel, or the more than 100 BBC staff who spoke out against censorship in its reporting of Israel/Palestine. These ordinary workers are taking up the mantle where DEI is failing. We need to move away from this current sanitised, apolitical version of DEI towards one with meaning. Core values of dignity, humanity and fairness need to be integral to business decisions, not just corporate buzzwords. If you stand for nothing, you will fall for anything. And that's not a DEI I want to be part of. Jinan Younis is the founder of diversity, equity and inclusion agency WeCalibrate and former assistant politics editor at gal-dem magazine

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store