20250801-why-these-new-tourist-taxes-may-be-a-good-thing (GIF Image, 1 × 1 pixels)
A series of new climate-focused tourism fees could be the key to preserving some of the world's most beloved – and vulnerable – destinations.
Your next holiday may be slightly more expensive than you expect – and it's not just because of inflation. Around the world, a growing number of destinations are introducing new climate-focused fees on hotel stays, ferry tickets and admission to national parks and other protected areas.
But even though paying more for a trip may feel frustrating, these new fees could help ensure some of your favourite destinations survive in a world of rising seas, record heat and natural disasters.
Getty Images The 2023 Maui wildfires were one of the deadliest climate-related natural disasters in US history (Credit: Getty Images)
This May, Hawaii took an unprecedented step by enacting the US's first tourist tax explicitly tied to the climate crisis. Known as the Green Fee, the bill adds an additional 0.75% on top of existing accommodation taxes. The fee is expected to raise $100m annually for wildfire recovery, reef restoration and climate adaptation starting in 2026.
In a press statement, Hawaii's Governor Josh Green said the new law addresses the growing impact that hosting 10 million tourists has on the islands and reflects a broader strategy to respond to the increasing frequency of natural disasters.
"This isn't just a surcharge," Susan Fazekas, a Maui-based hiking guide and owner of Awapuhi Adventures told the BBC. "Visitors come here for the natural beauty – the waterfalls, reefs and rainforest trails – but those very resources are under strain. Asking them to contribute to the care of these places is not a burden; it's a chance to be part of their preservation. It's also a way to honour the kuleana (shared responsibility) we all share in protecting Hawaii's future."
As climate-related disasters intensify, other destinations around the world are also rethinking how tourism revenue is collected and where it goes.
Getty Images Greece implemented a Climate Crisis Resilience Fee in 2024 (Credit: Getty Images)
In January 2024, Greece replaced its overnight stay tax with a Climate Crisis Resilience Fee. Travellers now pay €0.50 to €10 a night, depending on hotel class and season, with surcharges of up to €20 per person on popular islands like Mykonos and Santorini during peak periods. The government expects to raise €400m annually, which will be directed towards water infrastructure, disaster prevention and ecosystem restoration.
Elsewhere, Bali introduced a 150,000 rupiah (£6.88) fee for international travellers in 2024 earmarked for environmental protection. The Maldives has imposed a nightly "Green Tax" since 2015, but doubled it in January 2025, with most hotels and resorts now charging $12 (€9) per person, per night. Revenues are channelled into a government-run fund for waste management and coastal resilience. In New Zealand, an International Visitor Levy – which was first introduced in 2019 but has nearly tripled to around NZD $100 (£45) in 2024 – supports conservation efforts and sustainable tourism infrastructure across the country.
Compared to the overall cost of travel, these fees are often modest. But if they're managed well, their impact can be transformative.
According to Dr Rachel Dodds, professor of tourism management at Toronto Metropolitan University in Canada, what ultimately makes these fees meaningful is how clearly they are communicated to residents and visitors. "Tourism taxes can be an easy source of additional income to support sustainability or climate initiatives," she says. "But transparency is essential to ensure the money actually goes to those initiatives."
Getty Images The Maldives publishes reports showing how its taxes are allocated to help coastal protection (Credit: Getty Images)
At some destinations, that clarity already exists. The Maldives publishes monthly Green Fund reports detailing exactly how its revenue tax is allocated to coastal protection, waste treatment and water access. New Zealand's visitor levy is accompanied by annual performance reports showing which projects are selected, funded and completed, such as the redevelopment of Cathedral Cove's storm-damaged trails and major investments in the New Zealand Cycle Trails, including upgrades, maintenance and climate-resilient improvements.
Hawaii is also working to improve clarity around how its new tourist taxes will be used. After the Lahaina fires, the state established a Climate Advisory Team (CAT), which published a 60-page report outlining potential resilience efforts and funding sources to ensure transparency and build public trust. "The comprehensive data that we were able to present, including surveys of residents statewide, actuarial analysis of the potential impacts of climate events and extensive engagement with experts across the climate resilience spectrum, resulted in a favourable public opinion of a climate fee," says CAT chair Chris Benjamin.
Surveys suggest visitors are ready to contribute – if they know their money will be used well. According to Booking.com's 2024 Sustainable Travel Report, 75% of global travellers said they wanted to travel more sustainably in the year ahead, and 71% said they hoped to leave the places they visit better than how they found them. A separate 2023 study by Euromonitor found that nearly 80% of visitors were willing to pay at least 10% more for sustainable travel options.
Maho Tanaka, a Japanese advertising professional based in Tokyo who hopes to visit Hawaii in the next year, says she supports the state's new climate fee. "It depends on how much it is," she says. "If it were too expensive, especially with the weak yen, it might discourage me. But if it's just 0.75%, like an extra $3 on a $400 stay, then that seems fine." While Tanaka doesn't actively track how such fees are used, she says their overall purpose matters. "If it's going toward protecting Hawaii's beaches and forests, then that's a good thing… It feels [like] a contribution to something important. Hawaii is like one big national park. It makes sense to support it."
Alamy Surveys suggest most travellers are willing to pay climate-related visitor taxes if their uses are clearly communicated (Credit: Alamy)
Zixuan Liu, a Chinese national, recently spent three weeks travelling around Greece after the nation implemented its new Climate Crisis Resilience Fee and echoes the survey's findings: "I did notice the charge and thought it was a bit expensive, but I wasn't sure how it was being used. If that were made clearer, I'd actually be happy to pay more – as long as the money is going to the right place."
Still, experts warn that sustainability shouldn't be treated as an add-on.
"We need to bake sustainability into our operations, services and offerings so that travellers choose it by default," says Christopher Imbsen, Vice President of Research and Sustainability at the World Travel & Tourism Council. "It shouldn't be a premium or an added layer of complexity. If sustainability is embedded from the start, people won't need to consciously choose it – it will simply be the obvious choice."
At its core, the rise of climate-linked tourist taxes isn't just about funding; it's about rewriting the social contract of travel. For decades, tourism has largely operated as an extractive economy: visitors arrive, consume and leave. But in a climate-compromised world, that model is no longer sustainable.
These modest fees reflect something bigger: a transition from tourism as consumption to tourism as collaboration. We're moving towards a future that invites travellers to go beyond merely visiting and encourages them to take part in the shared responsibility of preservation.
Getty Images Travellers are now being encouraged to participate in preservation efforts like never before (Credit: Getty Images)
Fazekas says responsible tourism in Hawaii means "slowing down" – fewer crowds, more meaningful experiences and deeper respect for the local culture and environment. To her, it's also about educating visitors, reducing impact and creating opportunities to give back, "not just take a photo and leave".
So yes, your next trip may be a little more expensive. But that extra $10 or €20 may just help preserve these destinations for the generations that follow.
For more Travel stories from the BBC, follow us on Facebook and Instagram.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Expert: Things you should never touch in an airport
Published: | Updated: Summer travel is in full swing, and airports across America are busier than ever with nearly 3 million passengers flying every day. Travel, especially in crowded environments like airports and airplanes, increases the potential for exposure to viruses, particularly those that spread through respiratory droplets and contact with contaminated surfaces. Common viruses people are most at risk of encountering during air travel include respiratory viruses (influenza, Covid-19 and r hinoviruses, which cause the common cold) and norovirus, which causes vomiting and diarrhea. However, more serious illnesses, including measles, are increasingly becoming a threat as international travelers and unvaccinated Americans move through airports. In a bid to keep travelers as healthy as possible, one expert is warning of the spots in the airport and on the airplane that should be approached with care. Dr Darin Detwiler, who previously served as a public health expert for the FDA , told the Daily Mail that air travel is a risky endeavor with 'people unknowingly entering an invisible battlefield of infectious threats'. However, Dr Detwiler said 'there is some good news,' adding certain habits can protect against getting sick and ruining a vacation. 'By taking strategic precautions at every stage of your journey - from your ride to the airport to the moment you retrieve your luggage - you can dramatically reduce your risk of infection.' Be Uber alert Your exposure to germs begins before you step into the terminal, Dr Detwiler said. 'Rideshares, taxis and airport shuttles can be incubators for illness, often lacking proper sanitation and ventilation between passengers,' he explained. To maximize safety, he recommends disinfecting high touch surfaces, such as seatbelt buckles, door handles and touchscreen TVs, with hand sanitizer or cleansing wipes. Opening the window can also 'improve airflow and reduce airborne virus concentration.' Meanwhile, Dr Detwiler recommends keeping your hands away from your face as your eyes, nose and mouth are direct entry points for pathogens. Security bins are dirtier than toilets Security checkpoints are some of the dirtiest areas in an airport, Dr Detwiler warns. A 2018 study found that the plastic trays used at airport security checkpoints harbored more germs than the airport toilets. Researchers took eight samples from the trays used at the Helsinki airport over the course of three weeks. When the results came back, they found that half of the samples carried some kind of respiratory disease, including influenza A, rhinovirus, adenovirus and coronavirus. In comparison, viruses were not detected in most of the samples collected from toilets. The scientists said this may be due to people paying particular attention to hand hygiene when in the bathroom. 'Much like old days when public pay phones were the most handled (and contaminated) surfaces, today those plastic security bins harbor more respiratory viruses than public toilets,' Dr Detwiler told the Daily Mail in response to the findings. To prevent the spread of germs in the security area, he recommends using hand sanitizer immediately after touching security bins, conveyor belts or fingerprint scanners. With millions of travelers from all over the world passing through airports each day, Dr Detwiler said terminals are high-risk areas for airborne illnesses like measles, flu and RSV. Airport terminals, as large, enclosed spaces with high traffic, can experience poor air quality due to various factors like emissions from vehicles and aircraft. And with millions of people breathing out potentially infectious droplets, there is a high chance of pathogens spreading. For this reason, the health expert said wearing a face mask is a good way to protect yourself. He recommends KN95 and N95 masks, as both are designed to filter out at least 95 percent of particles. If you don't feel comfortable wearing a mask all the time, focus on wearing one in crowded areas to maximize safety, 'particularly at security, near gate seating and in restrooms,' Dr Detwiler said. Other tips include maintaining your distance from anyone visibly ill (especially in boarding lines), using your phone instead of self-check-in kiosks and shared touch-screens, and staying hydrated. 'Dry air suppresses your immune system, making you more susceptible to infection,' he explains. 'So it's best to keep a drink with you at all times.' However, be wary of public drinking fountains as the dispenser buttons were one of the dirtiest surfaces in airport terminals, with 1,240 colony-forming units (CFU) of bacteria. Bathroom stall locks, in comparison, had 70 CFU. If you want to your take safety protocols up a notch, Dr Detwiler adds, 'you could consider wearing disposable gloves around the terminal, but remember to remove them safely and sanitize afterward.' Beware of the buffets in airport lounges The expert said premium airport lounges may offer a quieter atmosphere, but they're not immune from contamination, 'especially when it comes to shared food stations and high-touch surfaces.' He advises avoiding self-serve buffets and opting for packaged or made-to-order meals instead. He also recommends disinfecting tables and seating areas before eating. The bathrooms and shower facilities in airport lounges are also riddled with germs, so he always uses a napkin or paper towel to open bathroom doors and touch water faucets. Boarding the plane and flying Once on the plane, you're packed into a small space and exposed to an exponential amount of droplets and pathogens. While Dr Detwiler said an aircraft's High-Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filters remove 99.9 percent of airborne particles, including bacteria and viruses, the biggest risk is proximity to other passengers, especially those coughing or sneezing. The former FDA employee, who is also an ardent traveler, said he always picks a window seat to reduce encounters with passers-by. He also always keeps his air vent open and pointed slightly downward to 'create an airflow barrier.' Before taking his seat, he uses sanitizing wipes to clean high-touch areas, including the tray table, armrests, seatbelt buckle and touchscreens. One 2015 study found that tray tables were the dirtiest spots on a plane. Results showed they had 2,155 CFU per square inch, far more than the bathroom flush button (265 CFU), overhead air vent (285 CFU) and seatbelt buckle (230 CFU). One of Dr Detwiler's biggest no-nos while flying is using the seatback pockets because, he says, they are rarely disinfected and may harbor bacteria. Arrival and post-flight precautions Think you're safe once you've landed? Think again. The doctor revealed the baggage claim area, customs and ground transportation all present new risks. Baggage claim belts come into contact with thousands of suitcases and hands, making them potential areas for bacteria to gather. Studies have also shown that suitcases - particularly their wheels and bases - can carry significant amounts of bacteria, sometimes exceeding levels found on surfaces like public toilet seats. Plus, 'exhaustion can make you more vulnerable as you are less alert and it is easy to let your guard down'. To keep your guard up, he recommends sanitizing your hands after collecting luggage, as your 'bag has been tossed around and handled by multiple people, moving along on conveyor belts, trolleys and cargo holds.' He also suggests keeping your mask on in customs and baggage claim as these areas are still crowded with travelers. After returning home or arriving at a hotel, shower and change into clean clothes as soon as possible, especially after long-haul flights.
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Venice's anti-tourism protesters should stop whining
If there was an annual award for anti-tourism then surely this year's prize would have to go to Venice. Yes, the usual suspects in Barcelona and the Canary Islands may have been busy with their water pistols again but it's their counterparts in the Floating City who have truly upstaged them this time around. Maybe organising a weekend of street protests against Jeff Bezos's wedding was always going to seize the news agenda, given the hordes of reporters already heading to Venice to cover it. But the protests also deserve some credit for just how effectively they revealed the true face of anti-tourism protests as another iteration of the same old politics of envy. Venice as a billionaire's playground for the weekend? What on earth would the great old Doge have made of it all? While the ancient Venetian rulers might have other concerns (like why their name has been pinched by a US government department), does anyone believe they wouldn't be delighted to see that the city they built is still able to court the ultra-wealthy? In truth, the Venice naysayers show the hypocrisy of the anti-tourism movement. In Barcelona, protesters point to the deluge of Airbnbs across the city contributing to the housing affordability crisis as well as dumping drunken party-goers into residential neighbourhoods. But the idea that this applies to the ultra-rich who visit Venice is frankly ludicrous. Everyone knows the super rich love Venice, which is exactly why so many of them flock there every year for the Venice Film Festival or the Biennale. And when they get there they stay in dreamy hotels that were built for their custom – quite literally in some cases. Did you know the Four Seasons spent more than $30 million to restore the glorious Hotel Danieli as a five-star hotel. What would have happened to that building if it weren't for the roaring demand from high-net-worth travellers? In some ways, it's a tale as old as Venice itself. Like its modern-day equivalent in Dubai, much of the city was built to cater to the super rich of the 13th and 14th centuries. And you can bet those glorious palazzos were pretty controversial in their heyday too. Just look at the famous Ca' d'Oro (House of Gold). Built by one of Venice's founding families, the Contarini, it was practically the antidote to old-fashioned Christian modesty. Still, that's what Venice does: it attracts the rich and famous, and those who want to walk in their footsteps. Remember the iconic images of Princess Diana in her gondola? How many trips to Venice do you think they inspired in the decade that followed? Within a year, she'd probably put most of those gondoliers' future children through university with the extra business. And don't listen to anyone tell you that 'overtourism' is ruining Venice either. In fact, the truth remains that the city is actually much less crowded than it was 500 years ago – even when you factor in those cruise ships. These days, the city has just 20,000 residents, and attracts around 15,000 tourist per day, on average. But this compares to 180,000 residents back in the Renaissance days. That means it isn't difficult to find a quiet bistro or bar, provided you're happy to wander ten minutes away from St Mark's Square. Even the most visited parts of Venice still have a seductive charm. Perhaps it's the constraints that come with being a canal city, but I'm always struck by how well modern Venice seems to have managed to maintain not just its character, but also the kind of characters who frequent it – particularly after the sun goes down and the cruise ship day-trippers disappear. Last time I was there, I dined at the Club del Doge in the famous Gritti Palace. As I was perusing the menu, a hushed silence fell over the room. When I looked up, I saw a rather famous designer followed by what appeared to be their two romantic partners (an arrangement that the TikTok generation calls a 'polycule') in tow. Witnessing the rich and famous with their guard down is always interesting. But in Venice it is something else entirely. In those scandalous seconds, I felt the same thrill that well-heeled Venetian traders must have experienced when catching a glimpse of the most powerful nobles peeking from behind their carnival masks. It's that sort of magic that makes Venice such an intoxicating place. And while certain locals might pull their hair about the city's all-year-round popularity, the truth is that none of the kind of gimmicks we've seen in recent years – like the tourism tax on day-trippers or the ban on groups of over 25 people – will put a dent in its appeal to the rest of us, and certainly not to the super rich. Still, at least Venice makes for a stunning backdrop for those who do still want to protest. Let's just hope they leave the water pistols behind for now.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Delta flight endured over six hours on Georgia tarmac
Passengers aboard a cross-country Delta flight endured over six grueling hours trapped on a Georgia tarmac with no functioning toilets onboard. A flight bound for Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport was suddenly diverted to Augusta Regional Airport on Friday due to the heavy rain and severe thunderstorms that swept across the state the day before, WSB-TV 2 News reported . But instead of their journey ending upon landing, travelers found themselves stranded on the runway for hours, unable to leave. 'A disheveled mess to say the least,' Pat McCormack , a passenger on the flight, told the outlet. 'There was no water on the plane,' he added. 'The toilets weren't working.' After nearly seven hours sitting motionless on the ground, passengers were finally allowed to disembark. However, with no plan in place, they were unprepared for the unexpected landing at Augusta - and only one person was available to answer their questions about what to do next. To request reimbursement, travelers must complete a form using the information the airline emailed to them. But even after submitting the form, McCormack said he received only a $200 SkyMiles credit - a settlement he considers inadequate for the chaotic ordeal. Delta has made headlines in recent months for a series of unusual travel mishaps - including a recent incident where an employee filmed a sexual video of himself on a child's Peppa Pig iPad he found left on a plane in New York City. The unidentified man was seen [expletive] in a video that was uploaded to the iCloud account attached to one of Brooke and Tony Brewer's children's iPads, a complaint viewed by Daily Mail revealed. The man was seen fondling his [expletive] while wearing a lanyard that contained a red Delta ribbon and making facial expressions at the camera, screenshots of the video in the complaint showed. He also allegedly attempted to access the iPad's iTunes account and reportedly hacked into the family's Amazon account, creating a profile named '[expletive].' On July 30, passengers on a Delta flight from Salt Lake City to Amsterdam feared for their lives as the plane suddenly dropped more than 1,500 feet before making an emergency landing . At least 25 people were injured as Delta flight 56 was diverted to Minneapolis/St. Paul International airport just two hours into its eight-hour journey. Delta confirmed in a statement that severe turbulence rocked the aircraft, with witnesses describing how its impact threw people into the air as beverage carts crashed around inside the cabin. Data from flight tracking site FlightAware showed that the plane plummeted over 1,600 feet in an 85 second span, with passengers saying that there 'was a moment where we thought we were going down.' The flight then continued for over an hour after the terrifying drop before landing safely. Last month, Delta sparked an internet uproar after allegedly cancelling a flight from Florida due to 'ice on the runway' as temperatures neared 100 degrees Fahrenheit outside. The bizarre situation emerged when a woman headed from Orlando International Airport (MCO) to New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK) was alerted her flight had been pushed back an entire day. She then reached out to the airline to ask about getting a reimbursement for her hotel room that night. Her request was denied because the cancelation was 'weather related,' according to a Reddit post shared by the flier's cousin after the fact. A Delta agent told the customer the flight was called off 'due to a deicing situation, which means the runway was too slippery' for takeoff, as shown in a message exchange. This 'deicing situation' was pertaining to the runway in Orlando - where the heat was scorching. In response to the claim, the customer said: 'It is 95 degrees in Orlando and 84 degrees in New York City.' According to AirAdvisor , airlines in the US do not have to financially help their passengers when a flight gets cancelled because of the weather. They are only required to either rebook the flight or provide a full ticket refund. Delta has since emailed affected passengers with details on compensation and reimbursement.
