Tulsi Gabbard explains why fight against ‘deep state' is slow
Gabbard's remarks came after the Trump administration's controversial decision not to release the 'Epstein list'. Officials have denied the existence of any document naming alleged high-profile associates of the late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The decision has drawn criticism from some commentators, who see it as evidence of the deep state's enduring influence.
'They exist within every single agency of the federal government and the national security state and the propaganda media,' Gabbard said at a student conference on Sunday, hosted by the conservative nonprofit Turning Point USA in Tampa, Florida.
'I feel the same frustration that I see many of you expressing [online],' she added. 'Why aren't things going faster? Why aren't we getting results more quickly? The deep state is fighting us every step of the way.'
Gabbard's comments followed a speech by former Trump campaign strategist Steve Bannon, who called on the audience in Tampa to wait for the eventual 'full release' of documents related to the Epstein case. Bannon argued that a special counsel would be appointed to probe efforts to undermine Trump and his MAGA movement, and could bring the materials to light.
'Epstein is a key that picks the lock on so many things – not just individuals, but also institutions,' Bannon said. 'Intelligence institutions, foreign governments, and who was working with him on our intelligence apparatus and in our government.'
Epstein died by apparent suicide in 2019 while in federal custody, awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. The administration's recent refusal to release additional records related to his case has drawn criticism from some Trump allies, including Bannon.
Trump defended Attorney General Pam Bondi's handling of the matter, saying the idea of the Epstein files had been exaggerated or fabricated by his political adversaries.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
20 minutes ago
- Russia Today
Fyodor Lukyanov: Here's the fundamental difference between Russian and US strategy towards Ukraine
Donald Trump's recent comments on Ukraine were highly anticipated, especially given his habit of surprising even those who consider themselves seasoned observers. His remarks on 14 July, delivered alongside NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, were characteristically loud but ultimately underwhelming. That in itself should not be surprising. Over the past six months, Trump's style on major international issues has followed a familiar pattern. Ukraine is no exception. At the heart of Trump's approach lies a calculated strategy of noise. He generates maximum bluster to create the impression of strength and decisiveness. What follows is not action, but an endless repetition of simple slogans. Clarification is deliberately avoided, the aim being to appear both consistent and unpredictable. Behind this theater lies a reluctance to become truly entangled in any foreign conflict. Trump wants short, manageable involvement with low costs and quick exit ramps. Above all, he is not willing to challenge the mainstream consensus in Washington as deeply as he claims. For all the bluster, Trump remains tethered to the very 'Deep State' he rails against. The Israel-Iran confrontation earlier this year offers a textbook example. One dramatic strike on Iranian nuclear sites gave the impression of a bold move. It satisfied different parts of Trump's base, pleased Israel, and sent a message to Tehran – without triggering a regional war. Trump got to claim a geopolitical 'win' and was once again floated as a Nobel Peace Prize candidate. But for all the headlines, little actually changed. Iran's nuclear program continues, and the political dynamics of the region remain largely intact. Still, Trump presented it as a major American contribution to world peace. The problem is, Ukraine is not the Middle East. It is far more complex, and Trump appears to know it. His instinct is to avoid the problem altogether. But he can't. The conflict is now a central issue in US-European relations, and Trump's own supporters are split between isolationists and hawks. He knows he cannot ignore Ukraine outright. Nor can he allow Biden's war to become his. This explains the repeated emphasis in his 'It's Not My War' speech. He said it three times. So, what did Trump actually propose? Not much. He suggested that America's European allies should send Ukraine their old weapons systems – especially Patriot batteries – and then buy new ones from the United States, paying '100 percent.' That, for Trump, is the core of the plan: turn war into business. The logic is simple and familiar. Europe gets rid of its aging stock, Ukraine gets support, and America gets orders. But the practicalities remain vague: what systems, what timeline, what delivery mechanisms? These were left unclear. Then there's the question of exerting economic pressure on Russia. Trump approved a plan to impose 100 percent tariffs on Russian exports to third countries. This is a more moderate version of Senator Lindsey Graham's 500 percent threat. The idea is to squeeze Russia economically without enforcing a full embargo. But here, too, the scheme is light on details. The White House will issue the duties and can cancel them at will. Implementation will be delayed by 50 days – standard Trump trade deal tactics. Nothing is final. Everything is leverage. The real message is that Trump is still negotiating. He can't reach a deal with Putin, but he wants to pressure Moscow without entering into an open confrontation. He still refuses to personally attack Putin, saying only that he is 'very dissatisfied' and 'disappointed.' That signals he is keeping his options open. He wants credit for any peace that might emerge but is unwilling to own the risks of deeper engagement. Trump also repeated his claim to being the world's premier peacemaker, listing off a string of supposed triumphs – India-Pakistan, Israel-Iran, Serbia-Kosovo, Gaza ('well, almost'), the DRC and Rwanda, Armenia and Azerbaijan, and Egypt and a 'neighboring country' (apparently forgetting the name of Ethiopia). These boasts reflect the core Trump method: declare success, repeat it often, and rely on public attention spans being short. Despite the showmanship, the risk of American entanglement in Ukraine remains high. The measures Trump has announced will not meaningfully shift the military-political balance, but they may prolong the war, at increased cost. Meanwhile, the channel of negotiation opened by Trump's call to Putin in February appears to be closing. Trump is reportedly irritated with Moscow, but Russia has not moved an inch. Nor does it plan to. Putin sees no reason to adapt his position simply to accommodate Trump's political timetable. There are rumors that Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov delivered some new proposals to Senator Marco Rubio in Malaysia. But based on past experience, these are almost certainly familiar Russian talking points in new packaging. Moscow's approach to resolving the Ukrainian crisis has remained unchanged for over three years. Trump's rhetoric won't alter that. From the Kremlin's perspective, Washington no longer has the capacity to engage at the same level as it did in 2023–2024. The political will, financial resources, and strategic bandwidth simply aren't there. Half-measures from the US won't deliver results, though they may prolong the conflict. That is unfortunate, but not sufficient cause for Moscow to adjust its course. Trump, for his part, doesn't want to stay on the Ukraine file. He wants to move on – and fast. Many in the Pentagon share that view. But the war will not end just because Washington wants to focus elsewhere. Neither side has a clear long-term strategy. What remains is inertia – and inertia, for now, is stronger than article was first published by the magazine Profile and was translated and edited by the RT team.
Russia Today
4 hours ago
- Russia Today
Trump believes Russia will win
US President Donald Trump believes that Russian victory in the Ukraine conflict is inevitable, Politico reported, citing a senior White House official. On Monday, Trump threatened to impose secondary US tariffs of up to 100% on Russia's trading partners unless progress toward a peace agreement is made within 50 days. He also authorized new weapons deliveries to Ukraine, which are to be paid for by European NATO members. Moscow has warned that Trump's declaration could be seen by Kiev as a signal to continue the war. According to Politico, Trump decided to up the pressure on Moscow out of frustration with continued Russian strikes on Ukraine. The source noted that the US president believes that Moscow can secure military victory against Kiev thanks to its 'bigger economy' and 'bigger military.' 'The president's view is Russia is going to win; it's a matter of how long it takes,' the White House official told the outlet, noting Moscow's progress on the battlefield. In recent months, Russian forces have continued to gain ground, fully liberating the Lugansk People's Republic, as well as the Kursk Region, which was invaded by Ukrainian forces last year. Russia has rejected Trump's latest ultimatum, while condemning attempts to pressure it. Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov asserted that this approach is 'unacceptable' and demanded that Washington and NATO respect Russia's interests and concerns. Moscow has repeatedly stressed that it is open to conducting negotiations based on mutual respect with the aim of settling the Ukraine conflict diplomatically. However, Russian officials have also said they see no genuine effort on the part of Kiev or the West to pursue peace and repeatedly slammed calls by Western officials to inflict 'strategic defeat' on Russia. Russia has emphasized that it remains determined to achieve the goals of its military operation in Ukraine and, while it would prefer to do so through diplomacy, it is prepared to use military means if necessary.
Russia Today
7 hours ago
- Russia Today
EU welcomes Trump's ultimatum to Russia
EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas has welcomed US President Donald Trump's threat to impose tariffs on Russia's trading partners unless a deal with Ukraine is reached within 50 days, calling it a 'positive' step. Moscow, however, has warned that Trump's declaration could be seen by Kiev as a signal to continue the war. Trump said on Monday that he was 'very, very unhappy' with the protracted negotiation process, warning Moscow of 'severe' secondary tariffs of up to 100% unless the sides move towards a settlement. 'It is very positive that President Trump is taking a strong stance on Russia,' Kallas, known for her hawkish stance on Moscow, said at a press briefing. She suggested, however, that Trump's deadline may not be enough to 'pressure' Russia. '50 days is a very long time... It is clear that we all need to put more pressure on Russia so that they would also want peace,' she stated, calling for Washington to continue supporting Kiev militarily. Russia has repeatedly denounced Western arms supplies to Ukraine, saying they prolong the conflict without changing its course. Moscow has also condemned sanctions as illegal under international law. Russia and Ukraine have held two rounds of direct talks in Istanbul over the past two months. Both sides agreed to major prisoner swaps and exchanged proposals on potential ways towards a settlement. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Tuesday that Moscow remains open to negotiations but has not received a response on the timing of the next round from Kiev. Peskov described Trump's ultimatum as 'quite serious,' but noted that Russia needs time to analyze it. He also warned that the shift in Washington's tone could be seen in Kiev 'not as a signal toward peace, but as a signal to continue the war.'
