
SC wants Chandrachud to vacate CJI bungalow
A July 1 communication from the Supreme Court, seen by HT, to the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (MoHUA) has demanded that Bungalow No. 5 on Krishna Menon Marg in Lutyens' Delhi -- the designated residence for India's sitting CJI, be vacated immediately.
'I am to request you to take the possession of Bungalow No. 5, Krishna Menon Marg, from Hon'ble Dr. Justice DY Chandrachud without any further delay as not only the permission that was granted for retention... has expired on 31st May, 2025, but also the period of six months provided in Rule 3B of the 2022 Rules has expired on 10th May, 2025,' read the letter from a Supreme Court official to the MoHUA secretary. HT has seen this letter.
Justice Chandrachud, who served as the 50th CJI between November 2022 and November 2024, currently occupies the Type VIII bungalow nearly eight months after demitting office. Two successive CJIs — Justices Sanjiv Khanna and the incumbent Bhushan R Gavai — chose not to move into the premises, opting instead to continue living in their previously allotted bungalows.
When contacted, Justice Chandrachud attributed the delay to compelling personal circumstances of which the Supreme Court administration was fully informed. He clarified that he had already been allotted alternative accommodation by the government on rent for a limited period, and was only waiting for it to be made livable after years of disuse.
As per the July 1 communication, on December 18, 2024 -- just over a month after he retired, Justice Chandrachud wrote to then CJI Khanna, seeking permission to continue residing at 5 Krishna Menon Marg until April 30, 2025.
In his letter, Justice Chandrachud said that although he had been allotted Bungalow No. 14 on Tughlak Road in accordance with Rule 3B of the Supreme Court Judges (Amendment) Rules, 2022, renovation work at the new residence had been stalled due to pollution-related construction restrictions under GRAP-IV.
'It would be more convenient if I am permitted to retain the existing accommodation at 5 Krishna Menon Marg till 30 April 2025,' wrote Justice Chandrachud, while offering to forgo the Tughlak Road bungalow so it could be allotted to another judge.
Rule 3B of the 2022 Rules permits a retired Chief Justice to retain Type VII accommodation, which is a notch below the Krishna Menon Marg bungalow (Type VIII), for a maximum of six months post-retirement.
In the wake of the then CJI's nod, MoHUA approved the retention of the Type VIII bungalow at Krishna Menon Marg by Justice Chandrachud from December 11, 2024, to April 30, 2025 on payment of licence fees of ₹5,430 per month. This was conveyed by MoHUA to the Supreme Court via a letter dated February 13, 2025.
The July 1 letter added that Justice Chandrachud subsequently made an oral request to the CJI to continue residing at the same premises until May 31, 2025, which was granted with a caveat -- no further extension would be allowed as other judges, elevated in the interim, were living in guest houses or waiting for a bungalow allotment.
The July 1 letter further underscores the breach of both the permission timeline and the statutory framework. It notes that Rule 3B entitles a retired Chief Justice to only a Type VII residence for six months, a period that ended for Justice Chandrachud on May 10, 2025.
The communication also clarified that while the Krishna Menon Marg residence was permitted due to 'special circumstances,' the understanding was that it would be vacated after the agreed-upon extension till May-end. With that deadline having lapsed, the administration has now pressed the ministry to 'take possession without any further delay' and confirm to the Supreme Court.
The letter marks a rare instance of formal intervention by the apex court to reclaim its highest official residence from a former occupant, and that too a former CJI. While informal extensions and grace periods post-retirement are not uncommon in the judiciary or bureaucracy, a letter seeking urgent action is unheard of at this level.
Justice Chandrachud said: 'I have already been allotted an accommodation by the government on rent and that house is currently under renovation because it was shut for the last at least two years. I informed the Supreme Court about this allotment, making it clear I will shift the very next day that the house is ready,' he added.
Justice Chandrachud also shared that the delay was, in part, due to the needs of his family, particularly his two daughters, both of whom require special care. 'I have two daughters with special needs, which is why it has taken me some time to look for a house appropriate for their needs,' he said.
'My daughters have severe comorbidities and genetic problems – particularly nemaline myopathy, for which they are being treated by specialists at AIIMS. I totally understand it is my personal issue. But I should also make it clear why it has taken me so long to look for a house, and this is something I have already discussed with the judges and the officers in the Supreme Court.'
The former CJI maintained that the issue would soon be resolved and that he remained fully aware of the obligations that came with his past office.
'It is a matter of just a few days and I will shift… I have occupied the highest judicial office and I am completely cognisant of my responsibilities. To be sure, former CJIs in the past have been allowed extended time to retain government accommodation post-retirement, often to facilitate transition or address personal exigencies,' Justice Chandrachud emphasised.
The former CJI further cited an April 28 letter that he wrote to the then CJI, Justice Khanna, informing him that he was in the process of shortlisting accommodation, given the special needs that his daughters had, seeking extension till June 30.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
38 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
CAQM ban on selling fuel to old vehicles from Nov 1 in Delhi, 5 NCR districts
NEW DELHI: The Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) in NCR and adjoining areas on Tuesday amended its order to deny fuel to end-of-life vehicles (ELVs) in Delhi at fuelling stations, stating the restrictions will now come into force in Delhi and five other high vehicle density (HVD) districts in the National Capital Region (NCR) from from November 1, people familiar with the matter said. Delhi transport department official keeping a vigil on vehicles as fuel ban for end-of-life vehicles was launched in Delhi from July 1. The decision was later put on hold by the city government. (HT File Photo/Sanchit Khanna) These five districts are Gurugram, Faridabad, Ghaziabad, Gautam Budh Nagar and Sonipat. The decision was taken in a general meeting held by CAQM on Tuesday afternoon, which included representatives of all NCR states. The status of the direction was also taken up for a review, following Delhi environment minister Manjinder Singh Sirsa's request to CAQM on Friday to put implementation of this direction on hold due to technical and infrastructural challenges. 'A decision has been taken to now enforce this direction in Delhi from November 1, alongside five other NCR districts. The decision was taken as the government had mentioned technical challenges. This will give them time to prepare,' a CAQM official said. Also Read: 48 hours, 87 cars later, ELV seizure drive ends The Delhi government had earlier said it would approach the Supreme Court to review the ban on ELVs – 10-year-old diesel vehicles and 15-year-old petrol vehicles in the national capital, arguing that real-world emissions and not age of vehicle should be the criteria to scrap old vehicles. Delhi chief minister Rekha Gupta on Sunday reiterated the government's stand to approach the Supreme Court to seek relief on the ban on refuelling end-of-life vehicles (ELVs) in Delhi, citing enforcement difficulties. The government has reasoned that Delhi should have same parameters and regulations on ELVs as are enforced all over the country. To be sure, 10-year-old diesel vehicles and 15-year-old petrol vehicles will still be considered ELVs and illegal on Delhi roads, based on a 2018 Supreme Court judgement and a 2014 National Green Tribunal order that prohibit the parking of ELVs in public spaces. 'It would have been a different situation if the order was enforced all over Delhi-NCR. If we don't give petrol in Delhi and NCR keeps providing them fuel, it is not possible. The government will echo the sentiments of the people before the Supreme Court,' Gupta said on Sunday.


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
CJI Gavai says three arms of democracy fulfilled responsibilities as desired by Ambedkar
The three arms of democracy — the executive, legislature and judiciary — have been able to fulfil their responsibilities at the completion of 75 years of the Constitution as desired by BR Ambedkar, Chief Justice of India BR Gavai said Tuesday. Speaking on Indian Constitution at the Central Hall of the Maharashtra Legislature after he was felicitated for becoming the 52nd Chief Justice of India, Justice Gavai said: 'When the country is heading for the centenary of the Constitution, the three arms have also been successful in ensuring social and economic justice and equality. It also ensured social-economic and social-political democracy.' 'I feel lucky to be the Chief Justice when the Indian Constitution has completed 75 years in April this year and heading for its centenary. I will be able to contribute my share in this journey… During my career I have always tried to strike a balance between the Directive Principles and Fundamental Rights described in the Indian Constitution,' he said. Remembering his father the late RS Gavai, who was the chairperson of legislative council and former governor of Bihar, Kerala and Tripura, the CJI said that he treats the felicitation by the Maharashtra Legislature as blessings of 12.87 crore people of the state. Gavai said that the Constitution is a weapon for bloodless revolution in the country and it has been witnessed during the several judgements given by the Supreme Court while upholding or dismissing the various enactments made by the states. Adding that Ambedkar opposed the federal and state Constitution on the lines of United States of America (USA) and made a strong pitch for one Constitution, which has helped the country remain united, the CJI said: 'Babasaheb Ambedkar was criticised by some for the Constitution being too centralised and by some it provides too much of federalism. Babasaheb had replied to that criticism by saying the Constitution is not centric nor federal. We are giving the country a Constitution suitable for all challenges, and I can assure you that it will keep the country united in times of war and peace.' Referring to Babasaheb Ambedkar's argument that the Constitution cannot be static but should be organic and evolving to suit the needs of future generations, Gavai said that even for an amendment, it requires two-third majority and approval from 50 per cent of the state legislatures. 'Due to the Constitution, in India two women became President of India, members of the Scheduled Caste assumed the post of President of India and the Vice-President of India. In several states, women are assuming the posts of the chief secretary and the director general of police,' he said.


New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Pure electoral rolls inevitable for strengthening democracy: CEC Gyanesh Kumar on Bihar SIR
NEW DELHI: Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar asserted that the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of Bihar electoral rolls is an 'inclusive' exercise and that it is "inevitable for strengthening democracy", while responding to the opposition. "Pure electoral rolls are inevitable for strengthening democracy," Kumar said. However, opposition parties have firmly stated that the exercise would deprive crores of voters their right to vote. Notably, the Supreme Court had on Monday agreed to hear on July 10 a batch of petitions challenging the ongoing SIR of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar. Several fresh pleas including a joint petition by opposition leaders of Congress, NCP (Sharad Pawar), Shiv Sena (UBT), Samajwadi Party, JMM, CPI and CPI (ML) were filed in the apex court against the poll panel's decision to conduct the special intensive revision before Bihar go to polls later this year.