The #1 Vegetable to Eat More Of to Reduce Visceral Fat, According to Dietitians
Eating carotenoid- and fiber-rich vegetables may help protect against this harmful fat.
Spinach is packed with these compounds, making it a top choice for reducing visceral fat.Visceral fat is the type of fat that lies deep in the abdomen and around the middle of the body. It's linked to a long list of chronic health conditions like type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome and cancer. Lifestyle habits like exercise, sleep and stress management can play a key role in the amount of visceral fat your body accumulates. So can the foods you eat, especially vegetables. While many vegetables can help protect against this stubborn belly fat, dietitians say the best one of all is spinach.
Read on to find out what makes this leafy green so powerful, plus other simple tips to reduce troublesome visceral fat.
Spinach is rich in powerful plant compounds called carotenoids, especially lutein and zeaxanthin. 'Carotenoid-rich vegetables like spinach can potentially reduce visceral fat by increasing fat oxidation and reducing inflammation,' says Molly Synder, RDN, LDN. For instance, one study found that people with the highest serum concentrations of carotenoids in their blood, including lutein and zeaxanthin, had less visceral fat than people with the lowest levels.
'Carotenoid-rich vegetables [like spinach] are high in fiber and water, which promote fullness, reduce calorie intake and improve cholesterol levels often linked to visceral fat,' says Diane Han, M.P.H., RDN. In fact, research has found that people who eat a fiber-rich diet carry less visceral fat than those who consume little fiber. And spinach is a tasty way to get it. One cup of cooked spinach provides 4 grams of fiber or 14% of the 28-gram Daily Value.
People with obesity tend to have lower levels of carotenoids in their blood. However, research shows that higher carotenoid levels could help reduce their visceral and total body fat. For instance, one study found that when people's blood carotenoids rose, their body fat and waist circumference declined. While the exact reason isn't known for sure, carotenoids from foods like spinach may prevent the buildup of fat, including visceral fat. More research is needed to understand the exact mechanisms behind this process. But tossing some spinach into your salad or an omelet could be a tasty way to trim deep belly fat.
'Of course, carotenoids alone won't cause fat loss, but regularly including carotenoid-rich vegetables like spinach in meals, along with protein, fiber and healthy fats, supports a metabolic environment that can help reduce visceral fat over time,' says Anar Allidina, M.P.H., RDN. For even more visceral fat-reducing power, try these dietitian-approved strategies:
Get Moving. Both resistance training and aerobic exercise may be beneficial for reducing visceral fat. Fortunately, you don't have to spend hours in the gym to reap their benefits. 'Even short daily walks after meals reduce belly fat and blood sugar spikes,' says Allidina. The most important thing is consistency to prevent muscle loss over time.
Eat Enough Protein. 'Protein helps preserve lean muscle, supports metabolism and keeps you full,' says Allidina. The typical adult requires 0.36 grams of protein daily for each pound they weigh. For the biggest nutritional bang, eat a variety of protein-rich whole foods rather than supplements. And don't forget fiber-rich plant proteins like beans, tofu, edamame and lentils, which can benefit gut health and promote satiety.
Manage Stress. Living a high-stress lifestyle without the tools to manage it can take a toll on your health and contribute to excess visceral fat. That's because stress increases cortisol, a hormone that promotes fat accumulation around the abdomen. Stress-management techniques that include mindfulness and relaxation may help keep cortisol in check. 'Try deep breathing, yoga, journaling, time in nature or anything else that helps you feel calm and present,' says Allidina.
Limit Added Sugars. It's easy to eat too many added sugars, especially if you typically eat lots of highly processed foods or drink sugar-sweetened beverages. Trouble is, people who consume lots of added sugars tend to have more visceral fat than those who eat few added sugars. If you're wondering how much is too much, stick with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommendations of no more than 10% of total calories from added sugars. That's 50 grams of added sugars per day for someone who eats 2,000 calories daily.
Visceral fat can spell trouble for your health in all sorts of ways. Fortunately, certain foods can help reduce visceral fat or prevent it from creeping up in the first place. And spinach is a great place to start. In fact, spinach is dietitians' favorite vegetable for reducing visceral fat. This nutritious leafy green is filled with carotenoids that may inhibit fat storage and fight visceral fat-promoting inflammation. It also provides fiber, which has been linked to lower visceral fat levels and helps keep you full and satisfied. Plus, spinach is super-versatile. Whether you like it blended into a smoothie, piled high in a leafy green salad, tucked into a sandwich or stirred into soup, pasta or eggs, there are countless ways to enjoy this good-for-you leafy green. So, toss a bunch in your shopping cart today!
Read the original article on EATINGWELL
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
18 minutes ago
- Associated Press
US judge says HHS layoffs were likely unlawful and must be halted
PROVIDENCE, R.I. (AP) — A federal judge has ruled that the recent mass layoffs at the U.S. Health and Human Services were likely unlawful and ordered the Trump administration to halt plans to downsize and reorganize the nation's health workforce. U.S. District Judge Melissa DuBose in Rhode Island granted the preliminary injunction sought by a coalition of attorneys general from 19 states and the District of Columbia in a lawsuit filed in early May. DuBose said the states had shown 'irreparable harm,' from the cuts and were likely to prevail in their claims that the 'HHS's action was both arbitrary and capricious as well as contrary to law.' 'The executive branch does not have the authority to order, organize, or implement wholesale changes to the structure and function of the agencies created by Congress,' DuBose wrote in a 58-page order handed down in U.S. district court of Rhode Island. Her order blocks the Trump administration from finalizing layoffs announced in March or issuing any further firings. HHS is directed to file a status report by July 11. The ruling applies to terminated employees in four different divisions of HHS — the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; the Center for Tobacco Products within the Food and Drug Administration; the Office of Head Start within the Administration for Children and Families and employees of regional offices who work on Head Start matters; and the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. eliminated more than 10,000 employees in late March and consolidated 28 agencies to just 15. Combined with previous layoffs by President Donald Trump's administration, about a quarter of the agency's workforce has been slashed, according to the lawsuit. The attorneys general argued that the massive restructuring was arbitrary and outside of the scope of the agency's authority. The lawsuit also says the action decimated essential programs and pushed burdensome costs onto states. 'The intended effect … was the wholesale elimination of many HHS programs that are critical to public health and safety,' the lawsuit argued. The cuts are part of a federal 'Make America Healthy Again' directive to streamline costly agencies and reduce redundancies. Kennedy told senators at a May 14 hearing that there is 'so much chaos and disorganization' at HHS. But the restructuring has eliminated key teams that regulate food safety and drugs, as well as support a wide range of programs for tobacco, HIV prevention and maternal and infant health. Kennedy has since said that because of mistakes, 20% of people fired might be reinstated. The states who joined the lawsuit have Democratic governors, and many of the same states — plus a few others — also sued the Trump administration over $11 billion in cuts to public health funding. A preliminary injunction was granted in that case in mid-May. ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Science and Educational Media Group and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
CNN
28 minutes ago
- CNN
These women dedicated almost 50 years to science. Their efforts may soon be trashed
For decades, researchers have been collecting samples from hundreds of thousands of women and tracking their health. The work has deepened our basic understanding of human health, but now the entire project is in danger. When nurses Patricia Chubb, 70, and her mother, Charlotte Mae Rohrbaugh, 98, joined the fledgling Harvard University-led Nurses' Health Study in 1976, they had no idea it would last for nearly 50 years. 'It's probably the longest, if not one of the longest, prospective health care studies for women that's ever been done,' said Chubb, who lives in Pennsylvania. 'They picked nurses to do the study because they know how to answer health questions correctly and can draw their own blood and the like — it's very cost-effective.' Study data gathered through the years from some 280,000 nurses in the United States has contributed enormously to improving how we live. The work has informed dietary recommendations, including national dietary guidelines; led to hormonal therapies for breast cancer prevention and treatment; and contributed to research about how nutrients, inflammatory markers and heavy metals influence disease development. Yet all of that priceless data may soon be discarded due to President Donald Trump's ongoing feud with Harvard over what Trump claims is a failure to protect Jewish students during campus protests. On Monday, an investigation by the Trump administration claimed that Harvard was in 'violent violation' of the Civil Rights Act by being 'deliberately indifferent' or a 'willful participant in anti-Semitic harassment of Jewish students, faculty, and staff.' Harvard strongly disagreed with the administration's claims. Interestingly, Trump had posted on Truth Social on June 20 that Harvard had 'acted extremely appropriately' during negotiations and that he was close to a 'Deal' with the university that would 'be 'mindbogglingly' HISTORIC, and very good for our Country.' But then, in the letter sent to Harvard on Monday, Trump officials made it clear Harvard would continue to lose 'all federal financial resources,' including millions for research, if the university did not comply with the administration's wishes. Funding for the Nurses' Health Study and its companion study for men, the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, had already been abruptly withdrawn in mid-May, said Harvard nutritionist Dr. Walter Willett, who has led the studies since 1980. Willett and his team were left scrambling to find the funds needed to protect freezers stocked with stool, urine and DNA specimens gathered from thousand of nurses for nearly five decades. Just the liquid nitrogen needed to keep the specimens frozen costs thousands of dollars a month. 'Of course, we would all love to have an agreement that lets us get on with research, education, and working to improve the health and well-being of everyone.' said Willett, a professor of epidemiology and nutrition at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health in Boston, who has published over 2,000 papers on nutrition. 'But this can't happen if we turn over admissions, faculty hiring and curriculum to governmental control.' Twenty-one-year-old Jackie Desmond joined the Harvard-based study when she graduated from nursing school in 1978. She considered the research so valuable that she later enrolled her 9-year-old son Kyle in a spin-off study investigating family nutrition. At 41, he still participates. 'They send us questionnaires once or twice a year about lifestyle and nutrition, what medications you're on, your lifestyle habits, when you sleep, when you eat, everything,' Desmond said. 'I've sent them samples of blood, urine, feces, whatever they need.' The study even has solicited toenails, which carry markers of heavy metals. One reason the study was so special is it was only focused on women, said Desmond, who is now 68 and lives in Connecticut. 'Before that, most studies were done only on men. So, it was about time to focus on studying women and they came up with some amazing information that's been very helpful to many of us,' Desmond said. 'You know for that reason alone, these samples are irreplaceable — losing them might put women's health research back many years,' she added. For Desmond and Chubb, the cuts in research funding make no sense. 'There's no connection in my mind between antisemitism and medical research. Why are you getting rid of decades of research? It's infuriating,' Desmond said. 'And it's very personal — I guess they'll just toss my DNA into the dump.' The threats to cuts also arrive as the Trump administration pushes its 'Make American Healthy Again' initiative, which Chubb finds ironic. 'You know what? There's lots of research going on to get us healthier and keep us healthier, and those are cuts that should not be made,' Chubb said. 'It's so shortsighted to shoot first and aim later.' Data from the Nurses' Health Study has vastly improved how all Americans live and eat while also impacting the health of people around the world, Willett said. 'From the efforts of these dedicated nurses we learned trans fats were terrible for health, and now those are basically gone from our food supply,' he said. 'We also found one of the earliest links between cigarette smoking and heart disease.' Data from the nurses' studies found red meat and alcohol can lead to breast cancer in women. Other key findings also proved lifestyle choices can improve health — the research identified diets that may reduce risk of cognitive decline. A list of scientific advances produced from the Nurses' Health Study data appears on its website. Dorothy Dodds, who died at 83, joined the original study in 1976. When her daughter Martha became a nurse in 1982, she joined the second wave of research, called the Nurses' Health Study II. A third generation of the study is still enrolling participants — the Nurses' Health Study 3. For Martha Dodds, now 68, her family's years of dedication to the study is priceless. 'You know, nurses don't get paid a lot,' Dodds said. 'We do our work because we want to help others. We took the study seriously and were careful and honest with our answers. 'My one little part may have helped women cut down on alcohol consumption, or maybe it'll help both men and women exercise more and cut back on trans fats,' Dodds added. All of the nurses CNN spoke with consider their years of dedication to the Nurses' Health Study a lifetime accomplishment. 'I'm so proud to be a participant, I'll put it in my obituary,' Chubb said. 'And my 98-year-old mom — who's still got all her faculties, and some of other people's, too — has chosen the Nurses' Health Study for donations in lieu of flowers in her funeral plans.' Chubb and her mother are in good company. Families of nurses across the country have proudly listed their Nurses' Health Study participation in their obituaries: Karen Ann Mudgett from Michigan, Donna Palmer from Georgia, Jeanette Thomas from Pennsylvania, Mary Ellen Natale from New Jersey, Patricia Anne Cobb from California, Marion Jones from Florida, Irene Rees from Virginia and many more. 'And now these hundreds of thousands of hours of work by nearly 300,000 nurses will just be discarded?' Dodds said. 'We're going to take 50 years of research and all this biodata and just destroy it, make it useless? 'It's like burning the Library of Congress — you just can't get that back.' Get inspired by a weekly roundup on living well, made simple. Sign up for CNN's Life, But Better newsletter for information and tools designed to improve your well-being.
Health Line
28 minutes ago
- Health Line
A Guide to Medicare Advantage HMO-POS Plans
Medicare Advantage offers various plan types to choose from. One such option is the Health Maintenance Organization Point-of-Service (HMO-POS) plan. This type of plan is similar to an HMO plan but offers different costs and benefits. Medicare Advantage plans are an alternative to Original Medicare (parts A and B). While each Medicare Advantage plan is required to offer the same coverage as Original Medicare, they may also offer other benefits. These additional benefits may include vision, dental, and hearing, among others. There are six options for Medicare Advantage plans: Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) Health Maintenance Organization Point-of-Service (HMO-POS) Preferred Provider Organization (PPO) Medicare medical savings account (MSA) Private Fee-For-Service (PFFS) Special Needs Plan (SNP) Glossary of common Medicare terms Out-of-pocket cost: This is the amount you pay for care when Medicare doesn't pay the full cost or offer coverage. It includes premiums, deductibles, coinsurance, and copayments. Premium: This is the monthly amount you pay for Medicare coverage. Deductible: This is the annual amount you must spend out of pocket before Medicare begins to cover services and treatments. Coinsurance: This is the percentage of treatment costs you're responsible for paying out of pocket. With Medicare Part B, you typically pay 20%. Copayment: This is a fixed dollar amount you pay when receiving certain treatments or services. With Medicare, this often applies to prescription medications. What does HMO-POS mean? An HMO-POS plan is an HMO plan that offers point-of-service payments in certain circumstances. This means that HMO-POS plans work in basically the same way that HMO plans do. For example, you still have to choose a primary care physician (PCP) and use in-network providers most of the time. But in certain situations, you can go outside of the network for care and pay a higher copayment or coinsurance. This is similar to a PPO plan but may cost less. »Learn more: Medicare Advantage HMO plans How do HMO-POS plans work? Generally, HMO-POS plans work the same way regular HMO plans do: You typically must choose a PCP. You typically have to use healthcare providers within your plan's network. You typically must have a referral to see a specialist. HMO-POS plans tend to offer a bit more flexibility. They allow you to get some services using out-of-network providers for a higher cost. This allows you similar flexibility to PPO plans at a lower cost. Vs. PPO plans PPO plans offer more flexibility than HMO-POS plans. With PPO plans: You have a list of in-network providers. But you can also see out-of-network providers at a higher cost. You do not have to choose a PCP. You do not need a referral to see a specialist. Summary HMO-POS plans generally work the same way HMO plans do. But they offer some of the flexibility of PPO plans as well. This means, in some circumstances, you can see out-of-network providers. You'll have to pay more for these services. But you have the option to use them if you need them without changing plans. The information on this website may assist you in making personal decisions about insurance, but it is not intended to provide advice regarding the purchase or use of any insurance or insurance products. Healthline Media does not transact the business of insurance in any manner and is not licensed as an insurance company or producer in any U.S. jurisdiction. Healthline Media does not recommend or endorse any third parties that may transact the business of insurance.
