Puerto Rico's government sues private power company as chronic outages damage appliances
The civil lawsuit by the consumer affairs department says the Luma company, which oversees power transmission and distribution in Puerto Rico, was 'negligent' and is responsible for damages caused to consumer appliances by outages and power fluctuations.
It said the department has the authority to take cases to court to protect those affected by the company's 'inefficiency and lack of adequate service.'
The action was filed against the company as a whole since the law exempts Luma's employees and contractors from claims filed by customers under an immunity granted in 2021 by Puerto Rico's Energy Bureau.
The suit cited a recent Luma statement at a public hearing that the company has rejected 1,828 claims. 'It's time for Luma to be fully accountable to Puerto Rican consumers,' it said.
Luma said in a brief statement that it would treat the lawsuit with the seriousness and responsibility it deserves.
'Our commitment is to continue working for the benefit of our customers, despite the significant challenges we face in operating a fragile and deteriorating electrical system, which for years has lacked the necessary maintenance and investment,' it said.
The outages have damaged thousands of appliances ranging from air conditioners to refrigerators on the island of 3.2 million people with a 40% poverty rate.
The lawsuit comes months after Puerto Rico's governor promised to cancel Luma's contract, warning it would be a long and complex process.
Anger against Luma has been growing ever since it signed a contract with Puerto Rico's government in 2020.
Outages remain common after Hurricane Maria razed Puerto Rico's electric grid when it hit the island as a powerful Category 4 storm in September 2017. But the grid was already frail following a lack of investment and maintenance for decades by Puerto Rico's Electric Power Authority, which is struggling to restructure $9 billion in debt.
Two island-wide blackouts hit the island in recent months, including on New Year's Eve and during Easter Week.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
3 hours ago
- Associated Press
INVESTOR ALERT: Class Action Lawsuit Filed on Behalf of Replimune Group (REPL) Investors – Holzer & Holzer, LLC Encourages Investors With Significant Losses to Contact the Firm
ATLANTA, Aug. 04, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- A shareholder class action lawsuit has been filed against Replimune Group, Inc. ('Replimune' or the 'Company') (NASDAQ: REPL). The lawsuit alleges that Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose material adverse information, including allegations that: (1) Defendants recklessly overstated the IGNYTE trial's prospects, given material issues that defendants knew or should have known of, which resulted in the FDA deeming the IGNYTE trial inadequate and not well-controlled; and (2) as a result, defendants' statements about Replimune's business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all times. If you purchased shares of Replimune between November 22, 2024 and July 21, 2025, and experienced a significant loss on that investment, you are encouraged to discuss your legal rights by contacting Corey D. Holzer, Esq. at [email protected], by toll-free telephone at (888) 508-6832, or by visiting the firm's website at for more information. The deadline to ask the court to be appointed lead plaintiff in the case is September 22, 2025. Holzer & Holzer, LLC, an ISS top rated securities litigation law firm for 2021, 2022, and 2023, dedicates its practice to vigorous representation of shareholders and investors in litigation nationwide, including shareholder class action and derivative litigation. Since its founding in 2000, Holzer & Holzer attorneys have played critical roles in recovering hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders victimized by fraud and other corporate misconduct. More information about the firm is available through its website, and upon request from the firm. Holzer & Holzer, LLC has paid for the dissemination of this promotional communication, and Corey Holzer is the attorney responsible for its content. CONTACT: Corey Holzer, Esq. (888) 508-6832 (toll-free) [email protected]
Associated Press
4 hours ago
- Associated Press
Johnson Fistel Commences Investigation of Fluor Corporation
SAN DIEGO, Aug. 04, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Johnson Fistel, PLLP, a shareholder rights law firm, announces that it is investigating potential claims on behalf of investors of Fluor Corporation (NYSE: FLR) regarding possible violations of federal securities laws. What if I purchased Fluor securities? If you incurred significant losses and want to determine if you are eligible to participate in the potential class action or to seek a recovery of your losses, follow the link provided: For more information, contact James Baker at (619) 814-4471, [email protected] or [email protected]. On August 1, 2025, Fluor Corporation reported its financial results for the second quarter and lowered its full-year guidance. Management attributed the disappointing performance to escalating costs across several infrastructure projects, citing subcontractor design errors, increased material prices, and scheduling delays. Fluor also pointed to a decline in capital spending among customers. These issues had not been previously disclosed, despite earlier affirmations of its full-year outlook. Following this announcement, Fluor shares closed down 27.04% on August 1, 2025. About Johnson Fistel, PLLP | Top Law Firm, Securities Fraud, Investors Rights: Johnson Fistel, PLLP is a nationally recognized shareholder rights law firm with offices in California, New York, Georgia, Idaho, and Colorado. The firm represents individual and institutional investors in shareholder derivative and securities class action lawsuits. We also extend our services to foreign investors who have purchased on US exchanges. Stay updated with news on stock drops and learn how Johnson Fistel, PLLP can help you recover your losses. For more information about the firm and its attorneys, please visit Achievements: In 2024, Johnson Fistel was honored to be ranked in the Top 10 Plaintiff Law Firms by the ISS Securities Class Action Services. This recognition underscores our effectiveness in advocating for investors, having recovered approximately $90,725,000 for aggrieved clients in cases where we served as lead or co-lead counsel. This notable accomplishment marks the eighth occasion our firm has been recognized as a top plaintiffs' securities law firm in the United States, as determined by the total dollar value of final recoveries. Attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Services may be performed by attorneys in any of our offices. Johnson Fistel, PLLP has paid for the dissemination of this promotional communication, and Frank J. Johnson is the attorney responsible for its content. Contact: Johnson Fistel, PLLP 501 W. Broadway, Suite 800, San Diego, CA 92101 James Baker, Investor Relations or Frank J. Johnson, Esq., (619) 814-4471 [email protected] or [email protected]
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Dutch foundation launches class action lawsuit against FIFA over transfer rules after Diarra ruling
A Dutch group seeking compensation on behalf of soccer players who might have lost income due to transfer regulations has filed a class action lawsuit against the sport's governing body FIFA and five other football associations. The Justice for Players foundation said in a statement Monday that men and women across the world who have played for a club in the European Union or the United Kingdom since 2002 are eligible to join the legal procedure. The legal move follows a landmark ruling from top EU court last year stating that some parts of FIFA's transfer regulations did not comply with the bloc's laws on competition and freedom of movement for labor. The foundation says it is fighting for the right of players 'whose earnings were compromised as a result of FIFA's restrictive rules on termination of contracts and transfers." In addition to FIFA, Justice For Players is also taking legal action against the national football associations of the Netherlands, France, Germany, Belgium and Denmark. 'Preliminary estimates indicate that the number of affected footballers may comprise approximately 100,000 players,' it said. By ruling in the Lassana Diarra case that some FIFA regulations on player transfers are contrary to EU legislation relating to competition and freedom of movement, the European Court of Justice has paved the way for deep changes in the sport's economy. Diarra, a former Real Madrid, Arsenal and Chelsea player, signed a four-year contract with Lokomotiv Moscow in 2013. The deal was terminated a year later after he was unhappy with alleged pay cuts. FIFA and then the Court of Arbitration for Sport found the Russian club terminated the contract 'with just cause' and ordered the player to pay 10.5 million euros ($11.2 million). Diarra argued his search for a new club was affected by FIFA rules, making his next employer jointly responsible for paying compensation to Lokomotiv. Some analysts have compared the ruling to the 1995 decision on Belgian Jean-Marc Bosman. That ruling removed restrictions placed on foreign EU footballers within national leagues and allowed players in the bloc to move to another club for free when their contracts ended. But for now, the decision on Diarra has not changed how the global soccer transfer market, worth more than $10 billion each season, functions. Justice for Players said that economists at Compass Lexecon consulting firm estimate that FIFA regulations caused the affected players to earn about 8% less over their careers. 'All professional football players have lost a significant amount of earnings due to the unlawful FIFA regulations,' said the foundation chair, Lucia Melcherts. 'The past and even current system unduly favours FIFA who has far too much unilateral power. In any other profession, people are allowed to change jobs voluntarily.' For further information please visit:
