US wants migrants to know that crossing the border illegally could mean jail time
Federal immigration authorities in Arizona are warning people to think twice about crossing into the United States without using the proper channels to immigrate.
Unauthorized immigrants could face prosecution if caught, which could result in imprisonment.
'If you try to enter the U.S. by crossing the border illegally, you will be found, detained, and deported,' Jesus Vasavilbaso, U.S. Border Patrol agent and spokesperson for the agency's Tucson Sector, said on May 8. 'If you have committed a crime, more than once, you will be processed for a federal crime, which could result in a prison sentence.'
Vasavilbaso spoke to media outlets in Spanish on Thursday morning at Mariposa Canyon, a desert grassland where gravel service roads run along the border west of the Mariposa Port of Entry in Nogales, Arizona.
In previous years, that area had seen hundreds of people entering daily through gaps in the 30-foot steel bollard wall to turn themselves in daily to the Border Patrol. The flow of people stopped when the gaps in the wall were completed last year, Vasavilbaso said.
He announced the end of "catch and release," a policy that allows the release of migrants into the community rather than detaining them while they wait for their court hearings. He also underlined the Trump administration's intention to prosecute 100% of all unauthorized crossings.
Vasavilbaso warned that Mexicans caught crossing illegally could face charges and be deported to the interior of Mexico, and as far south as the Mexico-Guatemala border, miles away from where they entered the U.S.
"If you try again, the consequences will be worse," he warned. "Trying to enter the country illegally is not a process of trial and error."
He noted that if someone is caught crossing illegally and has previous criminal charges, they could face many years in prison.
Despite the current low numbers of unauthorized crossings into Arizona from Mexico, Vasavilbaso said he wants people to heed the warning.
Being charged with a federal crime could impact a person's ability to come to the U.S. 'de por vida,' he said. 'For life."
The warning comes as the southern border is seeing a decrease in border patrol apprehensions. While the number of unauthorized border crossings was already decreasing under the Biden administration, the number has dropped even more under President Donald Trump, according to the Migration Policy Institute, an independent, nonpartisan think tank.
The think tank attributed the drop in numbers, in part, to Trump ending the CBP One app, which allowed migrants to schedule appointments at a border port of entry. Trump renamed the app CBP Home and repurposed it for reporting self-deportations, the think tank said. As of April 24, at least 5,000 immigrants reportedly used CBP Home to report they were leaving the country, the Migration Policy Institute said.
Vasavilbaso noted that the Tucson Sector alone has seen a 90% decrease in people crossing over, compared with last year.
Despite the current administration's focus on arrests, the pace of deportations suggests the administration will fail to reach its goal of 1 million deportations annually, the Migration Policy Institute said.
The Trump administration 'appears on track to deport roughly half a million people this year,' said the group in an April 24 publication. The article notes that the number of people deported this year is fewer than the 685,000 deportations recorded in 2024 under former President Joe Biden.
At Thursday's news conference, The Arizona Republic asked Vasavilbaso if there would be a legal process for people to enter the United States.
There already are legal pathways into the United States with various types of visas, Vasavilbaso said, but that is something Congress decides, not border enforcement officials.
The Migration Policy Institute maintains that the Trump administration has 'effectively ended access to asylum at the Southwest border,' which had already been decreasing during Biden's last year in office.
Firsthand look: Arizona border, once the busiest in the nation for illegal immigration, goes quiet
Arizona Republic reporter Raphael Romero Ruiz contributed to this article.
Reach the reporter at sarah.lapidus@gannett.com.
The Republic's coverage of southern Arizona is funded, in part, with a grant from Report for America. Support Arizona news coverage with a tax-deductible donation at supportjournalism.azcentral.com.
This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: US officials warn migrants not to cross border illegally
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Trump Urges Israel-Gaza Ceasefire: 'Make the Deal'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump has pressed for Israel and Hamas to clinch a ceasefire and secure the release of the remaining captives held in Gaza. Trump fired off an all-caps demand fire in a Truth Social post at 1:19 a.m. ET Sunday: "MAKE THE DEAL IN GAZA. GET THE HOSTAGES BACK!!! DJT" It follows comments the president made on Friday in the Oval Office, when he told reporters that he believed a ceasefire could come "within the next week." "I think it's close. I just spoke with some of the people involved. It's a terrible situation," Trump said. This is a breaking news situation and will be updated
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Trump threatens to support a primary challenger against GOP senator for opposing 'big, beautiful bill'
President Donald Trump on Saturday said he is looking for a GOP candidate to mount a primary challenge against Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., after the lawmaker announced he would not support the president's "big, beautiful bill." "Numerous people have come forward wanting to run in the Primary against 'Senator Thom' Tillis," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "I will be meeting with them over the coming weeks, looking for someone who will properly represent the Great People of North Carolina and, so importantly, the United States of America," he continued. "Thank you for your attention to this matter!" Tillis, who is up for re-election in 2026, came out against Trump's spending bill earlier on Saturday over concerns about deep cuts to Medicaid. The senator vowed not to support the measure through a procedural hurdle needed to kick off a marathon of debate and amendment voting that would eventually lead to a vote on the measure's final passage. As he was leaving the Senate GOP's closed-door lunch on Saturday, the North Carolina lawmaker said he has a "great relationship" with his colleagues, but that he could not support the colossal bill. "We just have a disagreement," he said. "And, you know, my colleagues have done the analysis, and they're comfortable with the impact on their states. I respect their choice. It's not a good impact in my state, so I'm not going to vote on the motion to proceed." The Senate cleared the hurdle late Saturday to start debate on the bill by a 51-49 vote. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., was another Republican who joined Tillis in voting no. "Did Rand Paul Vote 'NO' again tonight? What's wrong with this guy???" Trump wrote on Truth Social. Senate Republicans hold a slim 53-47 majority and can only afford to lose three votes. Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, said earlier that she would help advance the bill through the first step, but was leaning against voting to pass the bill's final passage unless the legislation was "further changed." Collins and other initial GOP holdouts, Sens. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., and Ron Johnson, R-Wis., voted to at least advance the legislation through the first key procedural hurdle. The latest version of the bill pushed back the provider rate crackdown by one year and also added another $25 billion for a rural hospital stabilization fund over the next five years. During a closed-door lunch earlier this week, Tillis reportedly warned that North Carolina could lose as much as $40 billion in Medicaid funding if the changes were codified. He is also planning to unveil further analysis on the impact of Medicaid cuts on his state that he said no one in the "administration or in this building" has been able to refute. "The president and I have talked, and I just told him that, 'Look, if this works for the country, that's great. And if my other colleagues have done extensive research and concluded it's different in their states, I respect that,'" he said. "We just have a disagreement based on the implementation in our respective states."
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Senate bill's Medicaid cuts draw some GOP angst
The Senate's deep cuts to Medicaid in the tax and spending megabill are setting off alarm bells among some Republicans, complicating leadership's effort to get the legislation passed by July 4. It seeks to clamp down on two tactics states use to boost Medicaid funding to hospitals: state-directed payments and Medicaid provider taxes. The restrictions are a major concern for rural hospitals, a key constituency for senators. Republicans have set an ambitious July 4 deadline to pass the bill and send it to President Trump to be signed into law. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), who has been warning his colleagues about making cuts to Medicaid for weeks, said the changes took him by surprise. 'I had no idea that they were going to completely scrap the House framework with this. I mean, this totally caught me by surprise. And I've talked to other senators, and that's what I've heard consistently from everybody I've talked to, that no one was expecting this entirely new framework,' Hawley told reporters Tuesday. States impose taxes on providers to boost their federal Medicaid contributions, which they then direct back to hospitals in the form of higher reimbursements. Critics argue it's a scheme for states to get more federal funding without spending any of their own money. But provider taxes have become ingrained into states' Medicaid financing systems. States and provider groups say the taxes provide a steady source of financing for hospitals that operate on thin margins and would otherwise face closure. 'The draconian Medicaid cuts contained in the Senate bill would devastate health care access for millions of Americans and hollow out the vital role essential hospitals play in their communities,' said Bruce Siegel, president and CEO of America's Essential Hospitals, an organization that represents hospitals that serve low-income patients. The legislation would effectively cap provider taxes at 3.5 percent by 2031, down from the current 6 percent, but only for the states that expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act. The cap would be phased in by lowering it 0.5 percent annually, starting in 2027. Nonexpansion states would be prohibited from imposing new taxes, but as was true in the House-passed version, their rates would be frozen at current levels. The lower cap would not apply to nursing homes or intermediate care facilities. All states except for Alaska finance part of their share of Medicaid funding through health care provider taxes, and 38 states have at least one provider tax that exceeds 5.5 percent. When asked if his concerns were enough to make him vote against the bill if it were brought to the floor as written, Hawley hedged. 'It needs a lot of work, so I would say maybe we could, I guess, try to fix it on the floor, but it'd be better to do it beforehand,' he told reporters. Republicans can afford to lose only three votes in the Senate and still pass their bill if Democrats remain united in opposition. Sen. Jim Justice ( said he was also surprised by the Senate's change. If provider tax changes are on the table, he said he wants leadership to keep the House version. Justice wouldn't say how he would vote if the provision was left unchanged but expressed some unease about the July 4 deadline. 'I promise you, I won't rubber-stamp anything,' Justice said. 'I want this thing to come out and come out quickly, but when it really boils right down to it, you may have to hold your nose on some things that you just absolutely don't like because we can't like everything.' Similarly, Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) indicated he would also prefer the House-passed freeze on provider taxes but was still analyzing the impact on his state. Louisiana expanded Medicaid in 2016. Senate Republican leaders huddled with members Tuesday during a closed-door caucus lunch to talk through the details of the bill. Speaking to reporters afterward, Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) said leadership was listening to members' concerns, especially about provider taxes. 'We think [the changes] rebalance the program in a way that provides the right incentives to cover the people who are supposed to be covered,' Thune said. 'We continue to hear from members specifically on components or pieces of the bill they want to see modified or changed, and we are working through that.' Members were also briefed by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Mehmet Oz, who downplayed the impact of a lower provider tax cap. 'We do not believe that addressing the provider tax effort is going to influence the ability of hospitals to stay viable,' Oz told reporters. Without weighing in on the exact details, Oz said some changes to provider taxes and state-directed payments should be included. 'The framework of addressing the legalized money laundering with state-directed payments and provider taxes must be in this bill, it should be in this bill,' Oz said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
