Middle East Airlines announces schedule changes for some flights due to operational reasons
To view the updated schedule, click here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LBCI
2 hours ago
- LBCI
Turkey wants 'new and vibrant' phase for Iraq-Turkey oil pipeline, official says
The under utilization of an oil pipeline between Iraq and Turkey is regrettable and Ankara wants a "new and vibrant phase" in the matter to benefit both parties and the region, a senior Turkish official told Reuters on Monday. In a presidential decision published in the Official Gazette on Monday, Ankara stated that the Turkey-Iraq Crude Oil Pipeline Agreement, which was agreed upon by Turkey's government in 1973 and came into effect in 1975, and all subsequent protocols will be halted as of July 27, 2026. The official stated that the pipeline had the potential to become a "highly active and strategic pipeline for the region," and added that Turkey had invested heavily in its maintenance, while repeatedly emphasizing its importance for regional projects, such as the Development Road—a planned trade route involving Turkey and Iraq. "A new and vibrant phase for the Iraq-Turkey Pipeline will benefit both countries and the region as a whole," the person said.
LBCI
2 hours ago
- LBCI
MEA announces schedule changes for select international flights July 26–30
Middle East Airlines announced, due to operational reasons, the schedules of several flights to and from Paris, Nice, Istanbul, Cairo, Doha, Larnaca, Jeddah, and Accra–Abidjan will be modified between Saturday, July 26, 2025, and Wednesday, July 30, 2025. The changes involve either advancing or delaying some flight times. To view the updated flight schedules, click here.
LBCI
18 hours ago
- LBCI
From Gaza to Ukraine: Are global trade corridors fueling deeper rivalries?
Report by Toni Mrad, English adaptation by Karine Keuchkerian Do you know what's behind the war in Gaza? Or the reason for the conflict between Ukraine and Russia? Some observers trace these wars back to a global rivalry between two competing trade initiatives: one led by China—the 'Silk Road'—and the other backed by the United States—the 'India–Middle East–Europe Economic Corridor.' At first glance, this analysis may seem unconventional. But some argue that many of the wars and conflicts unfolding around the world today are tied to a deeper struggle over trade routes and economic influence among major powers. To break it down: there are two key global trade projects. The first is China's Silk Road, formally launched in 2013 as the Belt and Road Initiative. It's a vast economic and strategic plan aimed at linking China to Europe via Asia and the Middle East. The second is the India–Middle East–Europe Economic Corridor, which was formally introduced during the 2023 G20 summit. This initiative seeks to establish a trade corridor connecting India to the Gulf and Europe through the Middle East. But is it accurate to say that many of today's wars are connected to the rivalry between these two trade routes? Take Gaza, for example. The war didn't erupt directly because of this rivalry, but the conflict became an indirect factor in Israel's military campaign. Put another way, the war in Gaza effectively froze progress on the India–Middle East–Europe Economic Corridor. It became nearly impossible for Saudi Arabia to move forward with normalization or economic cooperation with Israel under current conditions. More broadly, the rivalry between the Chinese and Indian trade corridors helps explain why some countries have backed different sides in the conflict. India supported Israel, a position interpreted as an effort to protect its trade project from derailment. In contrast, China expressed support for the Palestinians—seen by some as an attempt to undermine the Indian corridor in favor of its own Belt and Road Initiative. Another example is the war in Ukraine, which has also disrupted China's Silk Road. The conflict weakened the initiative and forced China to alter its routes. Prior to the war, some Chinese goods passed through Ukraine en route to Europe. That route has been completely halted due to military operations and instability. This disruption created new space for competing projects, including the Indian corridor, to gain ground. Ultimately, when a war breaks out, the geopolitical dimensions—especially those tied to global trade routes—should not be overlooked.
