
BJD corporator arrested in rape case
As Jena was not available at his house and possible locations in the city and remained incommunicado, the police formed a special squad and launched a manhunt for the BJD leader. 'Finally, he was located at a village under Berhampur police station limit in Nilgiri area in Balasore and apprehended by the special squad,' a police officer said. Jena was staying in a village in Nilgiri area, which is close to the forest, with the aim of escaping to the jungle if there was any police raid to apprehend him. However, he could not escape because the operation was carried out secretly, the officer said.
Immediately after his arrest, the BJD issued an office order stating that: 'Amaresh Jena, Corporator, Bhubaneswar Municipal Corporation, is hereby suspended from Biju Janata Dal with immediate effect.'
The BJD Bhubaneswar president, Ashok Panda, told reporters on Sunday that Jena's suspension will not affect the party. 'No one is indispensable for BJD. It is party first. I reiterate that law will take its own course.' He said the BJD has acted immediately as soon as Jena was arrested by police. 'The BJD stands by its pro-women ideology. Jena's arrest will in no way damage BJD.
It is a huge party with thousands of workers and leaders. He is an accused and will go through the legal process,' Panda said.
On Saturday night, the police had arrested five aides of Jena on charges of harbouring him. The police said the five persons provided conveyance and assisted Amaresh Jena in evading arrest. The five arrested individuals hail from various parts of Khurda and Jagatsinghpur districts. They were forwarded to judicial custody after their bail pleas were rejected.
A 19-year-old woman, in a written complaint at Laxmisagar police station, accused the BJD corporator of rape, foeticide, cheating and criminal intimidation. Jena, while absconding, told a section of the media that he was 'innocent' and 'framed' by the ruling BJP.
In her complaint, the survivor alleged that the corporator sexually exploited her with the promise of marriage when she was 17 years old. She claims that Jena took her to Puri, engaged in physical relations, and in February 2024, when she was still a minor, forced her to abort a two-month pregnancy by administering pills. The survivor also alleged that she was threatened and directed not to reveal the matter to anyone.
Police have recorded the statement of the survivor, and she also underwent a medical test. Bhubaneswar police had this week arrested the State president of NSUI, Udit Pradhan, for allegedly raping an engineering student. He has also been suspended from the party.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Supreme Court Upholds Bombay HC Ruling: 18 Unauthorized Flats in Tardeo Must Vacate
MUMBAI: The Supreme Court upheld a Bombay High Court order and declined to intervene against the well-reasoned ruling, which directed "selfish" residents of the top 18 floors of a 34-storey tower in Tardeo, south Mumbai, that lack an Occupancy Certificate, to vacate their premises in two weeks. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The High Court clarified that such members would be entitled to occupy the flats only after the Occupancy Certificate is granted. On July 15, Justices Girish Kulkarni and Arif Doctor of the High Court also observed the lack of a Fire NOC for the entire high-rise but stayed any civic demolition action and adjourned the issue of the first 16 floors for hearing by two weeks. Aggrieved residents rushed to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and R Mahadevan on Friday dismissed a special leave petition filed by Willingdon View Cooperative Housing Society seeking to challenge the High Court judgment. The Supreme Court judges said, "We are of the view that we should not interfere with a very well-considered, bold, and lucid judgment delivered by the High Court." "We appreciate the concern expressed by the High Court," Justices Pardiwala and Mahadevan said, adding, "We also appreciate the courage and conviction exhibited by the High Court in taking stern steps against such unauthorised constructions. Sympathy towards the occupiers of such flats on the ground of hardship and difficulties at the end of the Court would be thoroughly misplaced. At the end of the day, the rule of law must prevail. " However, the Supreme Court provided some relief to the residents, saying if they wanted time to vacate, they may approach the High Court with such a request. The Supreme Court also directed that the High Court shall "ensure that all its directions are scrupulously complied with. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Necessary legal action shall also be taken against the wrongdoers and erring officials if any." Before the High Court, there was a batch of petitions. There were more than two categories of petitions, the High Court said. There were petitions filed by purchasers/members of the Willingdon View Cooperative Housing Society Limited, who intended to defend the illegal constructions under the garb of regularisation. There was also a writ petition filed by Sunil B. Jhaveri H.U.F., who assailed several illegalities, including the lack of an Occupancy Certificate for floors 17 to 34 and the lack of a Fire NOC, rendering the building illegal. The High Court expressed its reservations about people occupying even floors 1 to 16 but had stayed BMC's hands in resorting to any demolition under its notices for illegal constructions and posted the issue of the first 16 floors for further hearing on July 29. The High Court order noted that BMC had for years been attempting to take legal actions against these illegalities. "There being no fire NOC, no Occupancy Certificate for floors 17 to 34, itself is glaring. It appears that the persons who are occupying the 34-storey building are least bothered about their own lives. If this be so, how can they be bothered about anybody else, in the event of any untoward incident of any nature taking place? Such an approach, which is wholly contrary to law, cannot be countenanced. In fact, it would set an example to perpetuate illegalities. It needs to be deprecated." What the High Court said: All the occupants or society members who are illegally occupying floors 17 to 34 are required to vacate their respective premises, and in the event they fail to vacate, the Municipal Corporation needs to take appropriate steps in accordance with the law to get the tenements vacated. We would be justified to say that in the present facts, the flat purchasers who have taken the law into their own hands in occupying construction which has no Occupancy Certificate are a selfish lot, who not only with open eyes are acting contrary to the building regulations but also have means to defeat legal actions being taken by the Municipal Corporation by indulging in several statutory violations, which can never be permitted. — Bombay High Court Justices Girish Kulkarni and Arif Doctor


Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Chhattisgarh court grants bail to two Kerala nuns in human trafficking-conversion case
NEW DELHI: A special court in Bilaspur on Saturday granted bail to two Catholic nuns from Kerala who were arrested last week at Durg Railway Station on charges of human trafficking and forced religious conversion. Principal District and Sessions Judge (NIA court) Sirajuddin Qureshi had reserved the order on their bail pleas after a hearing on Friday. The court has granted conditional bail to the trio, defence lawyer Amrito Das said. Preethi Merry and Vandana Francis were taken into custody by Government Railway Police (GRP) on 25 July, following a complaint. The complaint alleged that the nuns were attempting to traffic and convert three tribal women from Chhattisgarh's Narayanpur district under the guise of offering them employment. Sessions court refused to hear plea Earlier this week, a sessions court in Durg dismissed their bail petitions, stating it had no jurisdiction under Section 143 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which pertains to human trafficking. The court directed the accused to approach the designated NIA court in Bilaspur instead. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !


New Indian Express
4 hours ago
- New Indian Express
BJD seeks SME Minister Nityananda Gond's resignation over OTET question paper leak
BHUBANESWAR: BJD on Friday launched a scathing attack on the state BJP government over Odisha Teacher Eligibility Test (OTET) question paper leak demanding the resignation of Minister for School and Mass Education Nityananda Gond. Addressing mediapersons here, BJD spokesperson Lenin Mohanty said the recent arrests in connection with the OTET leak has once again exposed the irregularities plaguing the state's examination system. 'The protectors have become predators. The government is merely targeting low-level employees like data entry operators and subordinate staff, while shielding those in key positions. The Board of Secondary Education (BSE) authorities and the minister must be held accountable,' he said. Mohanty alleged that the BJP government has failed to conduct even a single examination properly since coming to power and there have been administrative failures and question paper leaks in at least 13 examinations in last 13 months. 'From OPSC to OSSC and OSSSC, all recruitment bodies have been marred by controversy. Examinations such as RI, amin, ICDS supervisor, excise and police sub-inspector, Odisha Civil Services, SDIPRO and now OTET have witnessed administrative lapses, paper leaks or flawed evaluation processes,' he said. Referring to the Odisha Judicial Service Exam controversy in February this year, the BJD leader reminded that the Orissa High Court had directed the OPSC to pay Rs 1 lakh compensation to each affected candidate due to faulty grading. 'Even that order is yet to be implemented, proving the government's apathy towards students,' he said. Mohanty also alleged that there were allegations of involvement of a BJP leader in the RI and Amin examination fiasco, but no action has been initiated.