logo
Emergency departments are bursting. Why don't we use the workforce who can prevent this?

Emergency departments are bursting. Why don't we use the workforce who can prevent this?

The Advertiser4 days ago
We cannot continue to delude ourselves: the health and health care of our population is less than it could and should be.
There are alarming rates of obesity and diabetes; faltering immunisation rates; great difficulty in the regions accessing a doctor's appointment, even for urgent matters; nurses and doctors labouring under increasing emergency department presentations; and bed-block for want of community placement for the elderly and those with disabilities.
The highly visible issues of long waiting times and staff shortages in the hospital system are linked to less visible failures at the prevention and primary care end of the healthcare system.
The current model of healthcare is not working for Australians, and despite governments at federal and state level giving strong public commitments to prioritising primary healthcare, there is yet to be a harnessing of the skill and expertise of our nursing profession - a profession making up 54 per cent of the health workforce.
While pharmacists have successfully lobbied for greater access to service provision, nurses are still perceived to be an adjunct to doctors, rather than a collegial health provider in their own right.
Is it that the public have a long-outdated understanding of nursing and the capability of the modern nurse? Is it that medicine/doctors have so successfully captured the centre ground? Or both?
I recently directed a project for renewing the global definitions of a nurse and nursing for the International Council of Nurses (ICN). While the old definitions tended to focus narrowly on hospital care and jobs, the renewed definitions have a greater emphasis on the nurse as having a much broader role in healthy communities and illness prevention.
They emphasise the scientific knowledge, ethical standards, therapeutic relationships and compassion that underpins all nursing, but go further to explain the role nurses play in shaping policy, and in healthcare innovation, in disaster response, and in population health.
The issue is that patients are unable to reap the benefits of the advanced skills and knowledge of nurse because of funding roadblocks and antiquated regulations that mean the structure of the primary health care system is stuck in the past.
So, what needs to be done? We need to provide better access and payment systems for nurses to deliver the holistic care of patients for which they are educated - to manage chronic disease; to ensure immunisations are current; to provide health checks and to provide aged care that maximises capability.
We need to reduce our reliance on fee-for-service medicine - Medicare Benefits Schedule rebates - and fund primary healthcare differently to enable patients to access nurses.
Nurses must be better supported to help people to manage their conditions, such as diabetes, or chronic wounds, working with GPs and specialists both directly and via the increasingly digital patient management options available.
We need to look at regulations that hinder nurses from delivering safe and quality care in their communities.
This very year, we have seen the government insist that nurse practitioners providing telehealth care to remote and marginalised communities be subject to the same rules as general practitioners, many of whom would be working in more stable urban communities.
Nurse practitioner-led practice is further marginalised by the rule that "MyMedicare" funding can only be accessed if the program is led by a GP.
The $8.5-billion injection to Medicare that preceded this year's election campaign was a massive injection into primary health care, to be sure.
But increasing bulk billing rates is not going to address the issues of poorly managed chronic disease in our community, which in turn leads to acute exacerbations of illnesses that themselves lead to unplanned visits to hospital emergency departments.
We may well need targeted investment in hospitals, but if we prioritise that over the complex but necessary, innovation that is needed to improve our primary healthcare system, we are effectively giving up on the support our communities need to live their lives as healthily and as well as possible.
This is not professional posturing, as even Professor Fiona Stanley recently said, "the last thing we need is more doctors and more hospitals. We need to invest in social supports, early intervention, community-led programs."
These are areas for which nurses are educated and eager to enhance.
Far from replacing general practice, this is about working across multidisciplinary teams to enhance and complement existing primary healthcare services.
Nor is it about fragmentation of care. It is not possible to fragment care that doesn't exist. It is about strengthening nursing's presence within primary healthcare practices and having multidisciplinary caring arrangements, including with nurse-led clinics in primary health networks.
It is about giving access to care where little to no care exists and delivering care where the people live.
We nurses have known and written and argued for many years about who ought to be at the centre of healthcare. It should not be a health professional or any one profession: it must be about people-centred care, which is a cornerstone of the new nursing definitions.
At the moment, it is not happening, and individuals, communities and our hospitals are paying the price. It's time for change, and nurses must be considered an important part of the effort.
We cannot continue to delude ourselves: the health and health care of our population is less than it could and should be.
There are alarming rates of obesity and diabetes; faltering immunisation rates; great difficulty in the regions accessing a doctor's appointment, even for urgent matters; nurses and doctors labouring under increasing emergency department presentations; and bed-block for want of community placement for the elderly and those with disabilities.
The highly visible issues of long waiting times and staff shortages in the hospital system are linked to less visible failures at the prevention and primary care end of the healthcare system.
The current model of healthcare is not working for Australians, and despite governments at federal and state level giving strong public commitments to prioritising primary healthcare, there is yet to be a harnessing of the skill and expertise of our nursing profession - a profession making up 54 per cent of the health workforce.
While pharmacists have successfully lobbied for greater access to service provision, nurses are still perceived to be an adjunct to doctors, rather than a collegial health provider in their own right.
Is it that the public have a long-outdated understanding of nursing and the capability of the modern nurse? Is it that medicine/doctors have so successfully captured the centre ground? Or both?
I recently directed a project for renewing the global definitions of a nurse and nursing for the International Council of Nurses (ICN). While the old definitions tended to focus narrowly on hospital care and jobs, the renewed definitions have a greater emphasis on the nurse as having a much broader role in healthy communities and illness prevention.
They emphasise the scientific knowledge, ethical standards, therapeutic relationships and compassion that underpins all nursing, but go further to explain the role nurses play in shaping policy, and in healthcare innovation, in disaster response, and in population health.
The issue is that patients are unable to reap the benefits of the advanced skills and knowledge of nurse because of funding roadblocks and antiquated regulations that mean the structure of the primary health care system is stuck in the past.
So, what needs to be done? We need to provide better access and payment systems for nurses to deliver the holistic care of patients for which they are educated - to manage chronic disease; to ensure immunisations are current; to provide health checks and to provide aged care that maximises capability.
We need to reduce our reliance on fee-for-service medicine - Medicare Benefits Schedule rebates - and fund primary healthcare differently to enable patients to access nurses.
Nurses must be better supported to help people to manage their conditions, such as diabetes, or chronic wounds, working with GPs and specialists both directly and via the increasingly digital patient management options available.
We need to look at regulations that hinder nurses from delivering safe and quality care in their communities.
This very year, we have seen the government insist that nurse practitioners providing telehealth care to remote and marginalised communities be subject to the same rules as general practitioners, many of whom would be working in more stable urban communities.
Nurse practitioner-led practice is further marginalised by the rule that "MyMedicare" funding can only be accessed if the program is led by a GP.
The $8.5-billion injection to Medicare that preceded this year's election campaign was a massive injection into primary health care, to be sure.
But increasing bulk billing rates is not going to address the issues of poorly managed chronic disease in our community, which in turn leads to acute exacerbations of illnesses that themselves lead to unplanned visits to hospital emergency departments.
We may well need targeted investment in hospitals, but if we prioritise that over the complex but necessary, innovation that is needed to improve our primary healthcare system, we are effectively giving up on the support our communities need to live their lives as healthily and as well as possible.
This is not professional posturing, as even Professor Fiona Stanley recently said, "the last thing we need is more doctors and more hospitals. We need to invest in social supports, early intervention, community-led programs."
These are areas for which nurses are educated and eager to enhance.
Far from replacing general practice, this is about working across multidisciplinary teams to enhance and complement existing primary healthcare services.
Nor is it about fragmentation of care. It is not possible to fragment care that doesn't exist. It is about strengthening nursing's presence within primary healthcare practices and having multidisciplinary caring arrangements, including with nurse-led clinics in primary health networks.
It is about giving access to care where little to no care exists and delivering care where the people live.
We nurses have known and written and argued for many years about who ought to be at the centre of healthcare. It should not be a health professional or any one profession: it must be about people-centred care, which is a cornerstone of the new nursing definitions.
At the moment, it is not happening, and individuals, communities and our hospitals are paying the price. It's time for change, and nurses must be considered an important part of the effort.
We cannot continue to delude ourselves: the health and health care of our population is less than it could and should be.
There are alarming rates of obesity and diabetes; faltering immunisation rates; great difficulty in the regions accessing a doctor's appointment, even for urgent matters; nurses and doctors labouring under increasing emergency department presentations; and bed-block for want of community placement for the elderly and those with disabilities.
The highly visible issues of long waiting times and staff shortages in the hospital system are linked to less visible failures at the prevention and primary care end of the healthcare system.
The current model of healthcare is not working for Australians, and despite governments at federal and state level giving strong public commitments to prioritising primary healthcare, there is yet to be a harnessing of the skill and expertise of our nursing profession - a profession making up 54 per cent of the health workforce.
While pharmacists have successfully lobbied for greater access to service provision, nurses are still perceived to be an adjunct to doctors, rather than a collegial health provider in their own right.
Is it that the public have a long-outdated understanding of nursing and the capability of the modern nurse? Is it that medicine/doctors have so successfully captured the centre ground? Or both?
I recently directed a project for renewing the global definitions of a nurse and nursing for the International Council of Nurses (ICN). While the old definitions tended to focus narrowly on hospital care and jobs, the renewed definitions have a greater emphasis on the nurse as having a much broader role in healthy communities and illness prevention.
They emphasise the scientific knowledge, ethical standards, therapeutic relationships and compassion that underpins all nursing, but go further to explain the role nurses play in shaping policy, and in healthcare innovation, in disaster response, and in population health.
The issue is that patients are unable to reap the benefits of the advanced skills and knowledge of nurse because of funding roadblocks and antiquated regulations that mean the structure of the primary health care system is stuck in the past.
So, what needs to be done? We need to provide better access and payment systems for nurses to deliver the holistic care of patients for which they are educated - to manage chronic disease; to ensure immunisations are current; to provide health checks and to provide aged care that maximises capability.
We need to reduce our reliance on fee-for-service medicine - Medicare Benefits Schedule rebates - and fund primary healthcare differently to enable patients to access nurses.
Nurses must be better supported to help people to manage their conditions, such as diabetes, or chronic wounds, working with GPs and specialists both directly and via the increasingly digital patient management options available.
We need to look at regulations that hinder nurses from delivering safe and quality care in their communities.
This very year, we have seen the government insist that nurse practitioners providing telehealth care to remote and marginalised communities be subject to the same rules as general practitioners, many of whom would be working in more stable urban communities.
Nurse practitioner-led practice is further marginalised by the rule that "MyMedicare" funding can only be accessed if the program is led by a GP.
The $8.5-billion injection to Medicare that preceded this year's election campaign was a massive injection into primary health care, to be sure.
But increasing bulk billing rates is not going to address the issues of poorly managed chronic disease in our community, which in turn leads to acute exacerbations of illnesses that themselves lead to unplanned visits to hospital emergency departments.
We may well need targeted investment in hospitals, but if we prioritise that over the complex but necessary, innovation that is needed to improve our primary healthcare system, we are effectively giving up on the support our communities need to live their lives as healthily and as well as possible.
This is not professional posturing, as even Professor Fiona Stanley recently said, "the last thing we need is more doctors and more hospitals. We need to invest in social supports, early intervention, community-led programs."
These are areas for which nurses are educated and eager to enhance.
Far from replacing general practice, this is about working across multidisciplinary teams to enhance and complement existing primary healthcare services.
Nor is it about fragmentation of care. It is not possible to fragment care that doesn't exist. It is about strengthening nursing's presence within primary healthcare practices and having multidisciplinary caring arrangements, including with nurse-led clinics in primary health networks.
It is about giving access to care where little to no care exists and delivering care where the people live.
We nurses have known and written and argued for many years about who ought to be at the centre of healthcare. It should not be a health professional or any one profession: it must be about people-centred care, which is a cornerstone of the new nursing definitions.
At the moment, it is not happening, and individuals, communities and our hospitals are paying the price. It's time for change, and nurses must be considered an important part of the effort.
We cannot continue to delude ourselves: the health and health care of our population is less than it could and should be.
There are alarming rates of obesity and diabetes; faltering immunisation rates; great difficulty in the regions accessing a doctor's appointment, even for urgent matters; nurses and doctors labouring under increasing emergency department presentations; and bed-block for want of community placement for the elderly and those with disabilities.
The highly visible issues of long waiting times and staff shortages in the hospital system are linked to less visible failures at the prevention and primary care end of the healthcare system.
The current model of healthcare is not working for Australians, and despite governments at federal and state level giving strong public commitments to prioritising primary healthcare, there is yet to be a harnessing of the skill and expertise of our nursing profession - a profession making up 54 per cent of the health workforce.
While pharmacists have successfully lobbied for greater access to service provision, nurses are still perceived to be an adjunct to doctors, rather than a collegial health provider in their own right.
Is it that the public have a long-outdated understanding of nursing and the capability of the modern nurse? Is it that medicine/doctors have so successfully captured the centre ground? Or both?
I recently directed a project for renewing the global definitions of a nurse and nursing for the International Council of Nurses (ICN). While the old definitions tended to focus narrowly on hospital care and jobs, the renewed definitions have a greater emphasis on the nurse as having a much broader role in healthy communities and illness prevention.
They emphasise the scientific knowledge, ethical standards, therapeutic relationships and compassion that underpins all nursing, but go further to explain the role nurses play in shaping policy, and in healthcare innovation, in disaster response, and in population health.
The issue is that patients are unable to reap the benefits of the advanced skills and knowledge of nurse because of funding roadblocks and antiquated regulations that mean the structure of the primary health care system is stuck in the past.
So, what needs to be done? We need to provide better access and payment systems for nurses to deliver the holistic care of patients for which they are educated - to manage chronic disease; to ensure immunisations are current; to provide health checks and to provide aged care that maximises capability.
We need to reduce our reliance on fee-for-service medicine - Medicare Benefits Schedule rebates - and fund primary healthcare differently to enable patients to access nurses.
Nurses must be better supported to help people to manage their conditions, such as diabetes, or chronic wounds, working with GPs and specialists both directly and via the increasingly digital patient management options available.
We need to look at regulations that hinder nurses from delivering safe and quality care in their communities.
This very year, we have seen the government insist that nurse practitioners providing telehealth care to remote and marginalised communities be subject to the same rules as general practitioners, many of whom would be working in more stable urban communities.
Nurse practitioner-led practice is further marginalised by the rule that "MyMedicare" funding can only be accessed if the program is led by a GP.
The $8.5-billion injection to Medicare that preceded this year's election campaign was a massive injection into primary health care, to be sure.
But increasing bulk billing rates is not going to address the issues of poorly managed chronic disease in our community, which in turn leads to acute exacerbations of illnesses that themselves lead to unplanned visits to hospital emergency departments.
We may well need targeted investment in hospitals, but if we prioritise that over the complex but necessary, innovation that is needed to improve our primary healthcare system, we are effectively giving up on the support our communities need to live their lives as healthily and as well as possible.
This is not professional posturing, as even Professor Fiona Stanley recently said, "the last thing we need is more doctors and more hospitals. We need to invest in social supports, early intervention, community-led programs."
These are areas for which nurses are educated and eager to enhance.
Far from replacing general practice, this is about working across multidisciplinary teams to enhance and complement existing primary healthcare services.
Nor is it about fragmentation of care. It is not possible to fragment care that doesn't exist. It is about strengthening nursing's presence within primary healthcare practices and having multidisciplinary caring arrangements, including with nurse-led clinics in primary health networks.
It is about giving access to care where little to no care exists and delivering care where the people live.
We nurses have known and written and argued for many years about who ought to be at the centre of healthcare. It should not be a health professional or any one profession: it must be about people-centred care, which is a cornerstone of the new nursing definitions.
At the moment, it is not happening, and individuals, communities and our hospitals are paying the price. It's time for change, and nurses must be considered an important part of the effort.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Couldn't roll out of bed': The story Greg Inglis shares in a bid to save lives
‘Couldn't roll out of bed': The story Greg Inglis shares in a bid to save lives

The Age

time6 hours ago

  • The Age

‘Couldn't roll out of bed': The story Greg Inglis shares in a bid to save lives

'Before I knew it, I was lost for five days. It really hit home for me. Friends and family were ringing around hospitals, ringing around police stations trying to figure out where I was. 'I got to some days and some nights where I couldn't wake up and put pants on. I just couldn't roll out of bed. 'After those five days, I went back home, detoxed for two weeks before I made my way back down to Sydney, and then checked myself into a rehab facility for three weeks.' While Inglis' mental health issues bubbled to the surface after hanging up his boots, he was not immune from it during his playing days. Not long after being appointed Kangaroos captain, Inglis was stripped of the honour after being involved in a drink-driving/speeding incident. 'I take full responsibility for that, I take accountability for that,' Inglis said. 'It was no one's mistake but mine. It was a massive honour and they made the right decision. 'I got to some days and some nights where I couldn't wake up and put pants on. I just couldn't roll out of bed.' Greg Inglis on his mental health struggles 'If they were to go back and say I'm still the captain, I would have stepped aside and said it's not right because it's not setting a good example for our next generations coming through. 'It happened to be around that time in my life [that I was struggling]. It wasn't the sole reason behind my struggles; it's before that. 'When I was in rehab, it went back to my early childhood, but I just learned how to deal with it, learned how to put a mask on. 'My way out of it was training and playing. I sort of suppressed my feelings.' Inglis now acknowledges it is a mistake to do that. The former Storm, Rabbitohs, Maroons and Kangaroos star wants people to seek help given that suicide is the leading cause of death for Australians between 15 and 44, with the rate spiking in Indigneous and remote communities. 'I want to reduce the suicide rate within Australia because it's four times the rate of the road tolls,' Inglis said. 'I want to reduce the suicide rate in Australia, but also want to increase the numbers of people going to seek mental health clinicians. ''Stick With It' is about the resilience of people, using a sporting tape to showcase that. Loading 'It's come about through my own mental health struggles. The reason why we're using this is because if you go to a doctor and you go see something fixed, they put a bandage on it or they put something around it so people can talk about it. 'Why not showcase [the cause by] using athletes to spread the word of mental health by using strapping tape?' Inglis has almost 260,000 Instagram followers, but has dispensed with social media. Instead, he asks his business managers to curate his content. 'I don't need that in my life right now. I don't think I will in the future,' he said. 'Yes, it is a big part of society at the moment, but what I also say to people who are out there is be careful of what you put out there. 'Once it's out there - if you do carry a voice or an image or are an influencer - make sure you're sharing the right messaging around whatever you're promoting.'

‘Couldn't roll out of bed': The story Greg Inglis shares in a bid to save lives
‘Couldn't roll out of bed': The story Greg Inglis shares in a bid to save lives

Sydney Morning Herald

time6 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

‘Couldn't roll out of bed': The story Greg Inglis shares in a bid to save lives

'Before I knew it, I was lost for five days. It really hit home for me. Friends and family were ringing around hospitals, ringing around police stations trying to figure out where I was. 'I got to some days and some nights where I couldn't wake up and put pants on. I just couldn't roll out of bed. 'After those five days, I went back home, detoxed for two weeks before I made my way back down to Sydney, and then checked myself into a rehab facility for three weeks.' While Inglis' mental health issues bubbled to the surface after hanging up his boots, he was not immune from it during his playing days. Not long after being appointed Kangaroos captain, Inglis was stripped of the honour after being involved in a drink-driving/speeding incident. 'I take full responsibility for that, I take accountability for that,' Inglis said. 'It was no one's mistake but mine. It was a massive honour and they made the right decision. 'I got to some days and some nights where I couldn't wake up and put pants on. I just couldn't roll out of bed.' Greg Inglis on his mental health struggles 'If they were to go back and say I'm still the captain, I would have stepped aside and said it's not right because it's not setting a good example for our next generations coming through. 'It happened to be around that time in my life [that I was struggling]. It wasn't the sole reason behind my struggles; it's before that. 'When I was in rehab, it went back to my early childhood, but I just learned how to deal with it, learned how to put a mask on. 'My way out of it was training and playing. I sort of suppressed my feelings.' Inglis now acknowledges it is a mistake to do that. The former Storm, Rabbitohs, Maroons and Kangaroos star wants people to seek help given that suicide is the leading cause of death for Australians between 15 and 44, with the rate spiking in Indigneous and remote communities. 'I want to reduce the suicide rate within Australia because it's four times the rate of the road tolls,' Inglis said. 'I want to reduce the suicide rate in Australia, but also want to increase the numbers of people going to seek mental health clinicians. ''Stick With It' is about the resilience of people, using a sporting tape to showcase that. Loading 'It's come about through my own mental health struggles. The reason why we're using this is because if you go to a doctor and you go see something fixed, they put a bandage on it or they put something around it so people can talk about it. 'Why not showcase [the cause by] using athletes to spread the word of mental health by using strapping tape?' Inglis has almost 260,000 Instagram followers, but has dispensed with social media. Instead, he asks his business managers to curate his content. 'I don't need that in my life right now. I don't think I will in the future,' he said. 'Yes, it is a big part of society at the moment, but what I also say to people who are out there is be careful of what you put out there. 'Once it's out there - if you do carry a voice or an image or are an influencer - make sure you're sharing the right messaging around whatever you're promoting.'

Survey confirms vicious cycle of epilepsy and anxiety
Survey confirms vicious cycle of epilepsy and anxiety

Perth Now

time12 hours ago

  • Perth Now

Survey confirms vicious cycle of epilepsy and anxiety

After years of anxiety living with epilepsy Rosie Connell-Moller got her life back on track thanks to a game-changing implant that sends signals to her brain to calm it down. The 40-year-old is now a full-time nurse in Brisbane and proud of regaining her driver's licence exactly 20 years after her first seizure at age 19. "I had the 'grand mal' seizure which is everything happening at once, the falling, the shaking, the biting of the tongue," she tells AAP. "It's the one that freaks you out if you're to see it on a movie, even more in person." Now known as a tonic-clonic seizure, she had a second a week later and was diagnosed with epilepsy. It sparked years of different medications and treatments while going through a tough time in her life. Her marriage was breaking up, she had two young children to care for, her hopes of a career looked bleak and she lost touch with friends, which depressed her. "Because of everything going on with that, my seizures were heightened," she says. Like many others with epilepsy Ms Connell-Moller was subject to a vicious cycle: her anxiety prompting seizures and the "scary" seizures prompting more anxiety. A survey of 7800 Australians with epilepsy has found some 20 per cent live with depression, almost twice as many as within the general population. About 15 per cent also live with an anxiety disorder. A majority of respondents nominated stress (62 per cent) and sleep deprivation and exhaustion (55 per cent) as top seizure triggers while just over half reported low-to-average quality of life. The impact of the condition is felt more by those with drug-resistant epilepsy where anti-seizure medication alone can't bring adequate seizure control. It affects up to 30 per cent of people living with epilepsy. Ms Connell-Moller, who has drug-resistant epilepsy, is still on five medications but was fortunate to get onto VNS therapy in 2020. This is where a Vagus Nerve Stimulation device is implanted under the skin in the chest to send electrical impulses to the vagus nerve in the neck, which then sends signals to the brain to reduce the frequency and severity of seizures in drug-resistant cases. The therapy has been a game-changer for Ms Connell-Moller who says it's like a pacemaker that "helps to calm my brain down". The therapy allowed her to begin nursing studies and she now works full-time shifts and has bought her own home. Pushing to get her driver's licence back took a bit more effort, with further tests in hospital to show seizures were still happening but only for seconds at a time, not causing any loss of awareness. Ms Connell-Moller's first seizure fell on May 25 and exactly 20 years later she got her licence back. Her advice to others with epilepsy is to educate themselves about the condition and bug their GPs and specialists about trying different treatments, which led her to VNS therapy. She also advises having a support system of other people with epilepsy. Epileptic seizures create fear, anxiety and depression, and affect quality of life, according to Epilepsy Action Australia chief executive Carol Ireland. "A person is quite worried about what's going to happen and how they might be perceived," she says. Her first message to those with the condition is to make sure they are seen at a comprehensive epilepsy centre in a major hospital, with people often not knowing other treatment options are available. Secondly, ensuring that they know about the condition and understand different self-management techniques to recognise triggers for their seizures and take steps to avoid them. Associate Professor Lata Vadlamudi, a neurologist specialising in epilepsy at Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, says seizures are just the visible part of a much larger issue. "Beneath the surface lie critical and often overlooked challenges - mental health struggles, stigma, reduced productivity and employment, diminished quality of life and most tragically, an increased risk of death," she says. "To break the 'vicious life loop' so many people with epilepsy experience, we need to provide holistic care and support across multiple areas. "That's what the survey findings make clear." National Epilepsy Line 1300 374537. Lifeline 13 11 14 beyondblue 1300 22 4636

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store