Colbert is latest casualty of late-night TV's fade-out
The announced end of one of the most popular broadcast late-night shows, days after host Stephen Colbert accused the network owner of bribing President Donald Trump to approve a merger, drew cries of political foul play from liberal politicians, artists and entertainers.
"Stephen Colbert, an extraordinary talent and the most popular late-night host, slams the deal. Days later, he's fired. Do I think this is a coincidence? NO," Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, an independent, wrote on X.
CBS executives said dropping the show was "purely a financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night. It is not related in any way to the show's performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount".
The late-night format has been struggling for years as viewers increasingly migrate to streaming. Younger viewers, in particular, are more apt to find amusement on YouTube or TikTok, leaving smaller, aging TV audiences and declining ad revenues.
Americans used to religiously turn on Johnny Carson or Jay Leno before bed, but nowadays many fans prefer to watch quick clips on social media.
Advertising revenue for Colbert's show has dropped 40 per cent since 2018 - the financial reality that CBS said prompted the decision to end The Late Show in May 2026.
One former TV network executive said the program was a casualty of the fading economics of broadcast television.
Colbert's late-night show rivals Jimmy Fallon and Seth Myers both expressed shock over the cancellation.
"I'm just as shocked as everyone," Fallon wrote on Instagram.
"For as great a comedian and host he is, Stephen Colbert is an even better person," Meyers wrote on Instagram.
Fifteen years ago, a popular late-night show like The Tonight Show could earn $US100 million ($A153 million) a year, the executive said. Recently, though, The Late Show has been losing $US40 million ($A61 million) a year, said a person briefed on the matter.
The show's ad revenue plummeted to $US70 million ($A107 million) last year from $US121million ($A185 million) in 2018, according to ad tracking firm Guideline. Ratings for Colbert's show peaked at 3.1 million viewers on average during the 2017-18 season, according to Nielsen data.
For the season that ended in May, the show's audience averaged 1.9 million.
Comedians like Colbert followed their younger audiences online, with the network releasing clips to YouTube or TikTok. But digital advertising did not make up for the lost TV ad revenue, the source with knowledge of the matter said.
But the end came at a politically sensitive time.
Paramount Global, the parent company of CBS, is seeking approval from the Federal Communications Commission for an $US8.4 billion ($A12.8 billion) merger with Skydance Media.
This month Paramount agreed to settle a lawsuit filed by Trump over a 60 Minutes interview with his 2024 Democratic challenger, Kamala Harris.
Colbert called the payment "a big fat bribe" two days before he was told his show was cancelled.
Late-night television had been fighting for its survival even before The Late Show with Stephen Colbert was cancelled last week.
The announced end of one of the most popular broadcast late-night shows, days after host Stephen Colbert accused the network owner of bribing President Donald Trump to approve a merger, drew cries of political foul play from liberal politicians, artists and entertainers.
"Stephen Colbert, an extraordinary talent and the most popular late-night host, slams the deal. Days later, he's fired. Do I think this is a coincidence? NO," Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, an independent, wrote on X.
CBS executives said dropping the show was "purely a financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night. It is not related in any way to the show's performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount".
The late-night format has been struggling for years as viewers increasingly migrate to streaming. Younger viewers, in particular, are more apt to find amusement on YouTube or TikTok, leaving smaller, aging TV audiences and declining ad revenues.
Americans used to religiously turn on Johnny Carson or Jay Leno before bed, but nowadays many fans prefer to watch quick clips on social media.
Advertising revenue for Colbert's show has dropped 40 per cent since 2018 - the financial reality that CBS said prompted the decision to end The Late Show in May 2026.
One former TV network executive said the program was a casualty of the fading economics of broadcast television.
Colbert's late-night show rivals Jimmy Fallon and Seth Myers both expressed shock over the cancellation.
"I'm just as shocked as everyone," Fallon wrote on Instagram.
"For as great a comedian and host he is, Stephen Colbert is an even better person," Meyers wrote on Instagram.
Fifteen years ago, a popular late-night show like The Tonight Show could earn $US100 million ($A153 million) a year, the executive said. Recently, though, The Late Show has been losing $US40 million ($A61 million) a year, said a person briefed on the matter.
The show's ad revenue plummeted to $US70 million ($A107 million) last year from $US121million ($A185 million) in 2018, according to ad tracking firm Guideline. Ratings for Colbert's show peaked at 3.1 million viewers on average during the 2017-18 season, according to Nielsen data.
For the season that ended in May, the show's audience averaged 1.9 million.
Comedians like Colbert followed their younger audiences online, with the network releasing clips to YouTube or TikTok. But digital advertising did not make up for the lost TV ad revenue, the source with knowledge of the matter said.
But the end came at a politically sensitive time.
Paramount Global, the parent company of CBS, is seeking approval from the Federal Communications Commission for an $US8.4 billion ($A12.8 billion) merger with Skydance Media.
This month Paramount agreed to settle a lawsuit filed by Trump over a 60 Minutes interview with his 2024 Democratic challenger, Kamala Harris.
Colbert called the payment "a big fat bribe" two days before he was told his show was cancelled.
Late-night television had been fighting for its survival even before The Late Show with Stephen Colbert was cancelled last week.
The announced end of one of the most popular broadcast late-night shows, days after host Stephen Colbert accused the network owner of bribing President Donald Trump to approve a merger, drew cries of political foul play from liberal politicians, artists and entertainers.
"Stephen Colbert, an extraordinary talent and the most popular late-night host, slams the deal. Days later, he's fired. Do I think this is a coincidence? NO," Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, an independent, wrote on X.
CBS executives said dropping the show was "purely a financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night. It is not related in any way to the show's performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount".
The late-night format has been struggling for years as viewers increasingly migrate to streaming. Younger viewers, in particular, are more apt to find amusement on YouTube or TikTok, leaving smaller, aging TV audiences and declining ad revenues.
Americans used to religiously turn on Johnny Carson or Jay Leno before bed, but nowadays many fans prefer to watch quick clips on social media.
Advertising revenue for Colbert's show has dropped 40 per cent since 2018 - the financial reality that CBS said prompted the decision to end The Late Show in May 2026.
One former TV network executive said the program was a casualty of the fading economics of broadcast television.
Colbert's late-night show rivals Jimmy Fallon and Seth Myers both expressed shock over the cancellation.
"I'm just as shocked as everyone," Fallon wrote on Instagram.
"For as great a comedian and host he is, Stephen Colbert is an even better person," Meyers wrote on Instagram.
Fifteen years ago, a popular late-night show like The Tonight Show could earn $US100 million ($A153 million) a year, the executive said. Recently, though, The Late Show has been losing $US40 million ($A61 million) a year, said a person briefed on the matter.
The show's ad revenue plummeted to $US70 million ($A107 million) last year from $US121million ($A185 million) in 2018, according to ad tracking firm Guideline. Ratings for Colbert's show peaked at 3.1 million viewers on average during the 2017-18 season, according to Nielsen data.
For the season that ended in May, the show's audience averaged 1.9 million.
Comedians like Colbert followed their younger audiences online, with the network releasing clips to YouTube or TikTok. But digital advertising did not make up for the lost TV ad revenue, the source with knowledge of the matter said.
But the end came at a politically sensitive time.
Paramount Global, the parent company of CBS, is seeking approval from the Federal Communications Commission for an $US8.4 billion ($A12.8 billion) merger with Skydance Media.
This month Paramount agreed to settle a lawsuit filed by Trump over a 60 Minutes interview with his 2024 Democratic challenger, Kamala Harris.
Colbert called the payment "a big fat bribe" two days before he was told his show was cancelled.
Late-night television had been fighting for its survival even before The Late Show with Stephen Colbert was cancelled last week.
The announced end of one of the most popular broadcast late-night shows, days after host Stephen Colbert accused the network owner of bribing President Donald Trump to approve a merger, drew cries of political foul play from liberal politicians, artists and entertainers.
"Stephen Colbert, an extraordinary talent and the most popular late-night host, slams the deal. Days later, he's fired. Do I think this is a coincidence? NO," Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, an independent, wrote on X.
CBS executives said dropping the show was "purely a financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night. It is not related in any way to the show's performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount".
The late-night format has been struggling for years as viewers increasingly migrate to streaming. Younger viewers, in particular, are more apt to find amusement on YouTube or TikTok, leaving smaller, aging TV audiences and declining ad revenues.
Americans used to religiously turn on Johnny Carson or Jay Leno before bed, but nowadays many fans prefer to watch quick clips on social media.
Advertising revenue for Colbert's show has dropped 40 per cent since 2018 - the financial reality that CBS said prompted the decision to end The Late Show in May 2026.
One former TV network executive said the program was a casualty of the fading economics of broadcast television.
Colbert's late-night show rivals Jimmy Fallon and Seth Myers both expressed shock over the cancellation.
"I'm just as shocked as everyone," Fallon wrote on Instagram.
"For as great a comedian and host he is, Stephen Colbert is an even better person," Meyers wrote on Instagram.
Fifteen years ago, a popular late-night show like The Tonight Show could earn $US100 million ($A153 million) a year, the executive said. Recently, though, The Late Show has been losing $US40 million ($A61 million) a year, said a person briefed on the matter.
The show's ad revenue plummeted to $US70 million ($A107 million) last year from $US121million ($A185 million) in 2018, according to ad tracking firm Guideline. Ratings for Colbert's show peaked at 3.1 million viewers on average during the 2017-18 season, according to Nielsen data.
For the season that ended in May, the show's audience averaged 1.9 million.
Comedians like Colbert followed their younger audiences online, with the network releasing clips to YouTube or TikTok. But digital advertising did not make up for the lost TV ad revenue, the source with knowledge of the matter said.
But the end came at a politically sensitive time.
Paramount Global, the parent company of CBS, is seeking approval from the Federal Communications Commission for an $US8.4 billion ($A12.8 billion) merger with Skydance Media.
This month Paramount agreed to settle a lawsuit filed by Trump over a 60 Minutes interview with his 2024 Democratic challenger, Kamala Harris.
Colbert called the payment "a big fat bribe" two days before he was told his show was cancelled.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
13 minutes ago
- The Age
America's shame is that Trump can remain shameless
A few days earlier a separate Journal story reported on a sexually suggestive letter it said Trump had sent the financier for the occasion of Epstein's 50th birthday. The letter refers to secrets and has a sketch of a naked woman on it. Trump denies he wrote it and is suing the Journal for defamation. Loading On Wednesday, The New York Times published a piece titled 'I Covered the Epstein Case for Decades. These are 9 Questions We Actually Need Answered.' Among the unanswered questions journalist Barry Levine lists are queries about how Epstein made so much money (his estate was worth $600 million), whether he might have been an intelligence asset (which was claimed as an unverified excuse for the leniency of a 2008 plea deal that ended a federal investigation into Epstein), questions over the nature of Epstein's relationship with former US president Bill Clinton (who also appears in the Epstein private jet flight logs), and queries over why the autopsy on Epstein was never made public (many people doubt the report's finding that he died by suicide while in prison). The MAGA heartland has long held as an article of faith that Trump would release the Epstein files when he was in a position to do so. Trump has responded with a frenzy of social media posting, apparently to distract from pressing Epstein-related matters, and has reacted angrily when asked questions about Epstein by reporters. In an apparent concession, Deputy Attorney-General Todd Blanche interviewed Epstein's convicted accomplice and former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell. But Blanche was previously Trump's private attorney for his hush-money trial and two federal criminal cases. Suspicions inevitably arise that he might be predisposed to protect the interests of the president. Loading It is a scenario worthy of a political thriller – The Da Vinci Code set in the post-#MeToo era. Trump's history of sexual misconduct is well known, spans decades and has been successfully tested in court. Comedian Stephen Colbert calls it the president's 'long public history of pervitude'. Paramount cancelled The Late Show with Stephen Colbert last week, with many commentators concluding it was at least partly due to the host's mockery of Trump. Undeterred, Colbert – who will continue to present the show until May – played a tape of Trump talking to US radio shock jock Howard Stern in 2006. After boasting he could easily bed a 24-year-old, the then-60-year-old Trump was asked if he had an 'age limit' when it came to women. 'No, I don't have an age limit,' Trump told Stern, before correcting himself – slightly. 'You know, I don't want to be, like … with 12-year-olds.' It is a truism that Trump has redefined the terms of shamelessness in public life with his sexual exploits, brags about sexual assault, and the judicial findings against him of sexual assault. None of it has made any difference to his popularity among his base. If anything, the moral outrage over Trump's doings only galvanises his fervent supporters in his defence. Loading Whatever is in the Epstein files regarding Trump may indeed be shameful for the president by any objective measure, but that measure no longer exists in American public life. Few observers of American politics believe Trump could be damaged substantially by further revelations of sexual misconduct. Those in his base who are pressuring Trump to release the files are not suspicious about the president's potential sexual wrongdoing. They are piqued by a betrayal of faith – they believed Trump was the guy who would work to unmask the deep-state Democrat paedophiles on their behalf. On Friday, The Australian Financial Review published a long interview with former White House intern Monica Lewinsky. Lewinsky has become a latter-day feminist heroine, whose public shaming following her affair with then-president Bill Clinton was epic and unprecedented. Her notoriety was such that, for a decade or so after the event, Lewinsky struggled to get a date or a job interview. The affair was consensual but the exploitative power dynamics at play – she was a 22-year-old intern, he was the world's most powerful man – are undeniable in the contemporary context. Clinton lied about the affair and it almost ended his presidency. But I do not think you could say any substantial moral shame adheres to him, all these decades later, from the affair. Meanwhile, Lewinsky has spent the rest of her life – she is now 52 – trying to expunge her shame and to make amends for it in the court of public opinion. It seems likely that the public has not been told the whole story about the people and institutions that enabled Epstein to offend against vulnerable girls, at such scale, over decades. But you don't have to be a conspiracy theorist to believe that whatever comes out, the shame of it all will defy gravity and bounce off some, while sticking to others.
Sydney Morning Herald
13 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
America's shame is that Trump can remain shameless
A few days earlier a separate Journal story reported on a sexually suggestive letter it said Trump had sent the financier for the occasion of Epstein's 50th birthday. The letter refers to secrets and has a sketch of a naked woman on it. Trump denies he wrote it and is suing the Journal for defamation. Loading On Wednesday, The New York Times published a piece titled 'I Covered the Epstein Case for Decades. These are 9 Questions We Actually Need Answered.' Among the unanswered questions journalist Barry Levine lists are queries about how Epstein made so much money (his estate was worth $600 million), whether he might have been an intelligence asset (which was claimed as an unverified excuse for the leniency of a 2008 plea deal that ended a federal investigation into Epstein), questions over the nature of Epstein's relationship with former US president Bill Clinton (who also appears in the Epstein private jet flight logs), and queries over why the autopsy on Epstein was never made public (many people doubt the report's finding that he died by suicide while in prison). The MAGA heartland has long held as an article of faith that Trump would release the Epstein files when he was in a position to do so. Trump has responded with a frenzy of social media posting, apparently to distract from pressing Epstein-related matters, and has reacted angrily when asked questions about Epstein by reporters. In an apparent concession, Deputy Attorney-General Todd Blanche interviewed Epstein's convicted accomplice and former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell. But Blanche was previously Trump's private attorney for his hush-money trial and two federal criminal cases. Suspicions inevitably arise that he might be predisposed to protect the interests of the president. Loading It is a scenario worthy of a political thriller – The Da Vinci Code set in the post-#MeToo era. Trump's history of sexual misconduct is well known, spans decades and has been successfully tested in court. Comedian Stephen Colbert calls it the president's 'long public history of pervitude'. Paramount cancelled The Late Show with Stephen Colbert last week, with many commentators concluding it was at least partly due to the host's mockery of Trump. Undeterred, Colbert – who will continue to present the show until May – played a tape of Trump talking to US radio shock jock Howard Stern in 2006. After boasting he could easily bed a 24-year-old, the then-60-year-old Trump was asked if he had an 'age limit' when it came to women. 'No, I don't have an age limit,' Trump told Stern, before correcting himself – slightly. 'You know, I don't want to be, like … with 12-year-olds.' It is a truism that Trump has redefined the terms of shamelessness in public life with his sexual exploits, brags about sexual assault, and the judicial findings against him of sexual assault. None of it has made any difference to his popularity among his base. If anything, the moral outrage over Trump's doings only galvanises his fervent supporters in his defence. Loading Whatever is in the Epstein files regarding Trump may indeed be shameful for the president by any objective measure, but that measure no longer exists in American public life. Few observers of American politics believe Trump could be damaged substantially by further revelations of sexual misconduct. Those in his base who are pressuring Trump to release the files are not suspicious about the president's potential sexual wrongdoing. They are piqued by a betrayal of faith – they believed Trump was the guy who would work to unmask the deep-state Democrat paedophiles on their behalf. On Friday, The Australian Financial Review published a long interview with former White House intern Monica Lewinsky. Lewinsky has become a latter-day feminist heroine, whose public shaming following her affair with then-president Bill Clinton was epic and unprecedented. Her notoriety was such that, for a decade or so after the event, Lewinsky struggled to get a date or a job interview. The affair was consensual but the exploitative power dynamics at play – she was a 22-year-old intern, he was the world's most powerful man – are undeniable in the contemporary context. Clinton lied about the affair and it almost ended his presidency. But I do not think you could say any substantial moral shame adheres to him, all these decades later, from the affair. Meanwhile, Lewinsky has spent the rest of her life – she is now 52 – trying to expunge her shame and to make amends for it in the court of public opinion. It seems likely that the public has not been told the whole story about the people and institutions that enabled Epstein to offend against vulnerable girls, at such scale, over decades. But you don't have to be a conspiracy theorist to believe that whatever comes out, the shame of it all will defy gravity and bounce off some, while sticking to others.
Perth Now
4 hours ago
- Perth Now
Travis Kelce wants to show how serious he is about Taylor Swift
Travis Kelce decided to post pictures of him and Taylor Swift on Instagram because he wanted to show 'how serious things have become'. Earlier this week, the Kansas City Chiefs tight end shared a carousel of photos from his off-season to the social media platform and for the first time ever, he included pictures of his superstar singer girlfriend Taylor. A source told PEOPLE: 'It wasn't random. It was intentional. They've been private in their own way, but this was his way of showing how serious things have become." "They're in a really solid place and more in sync than ever.' Travis shared 13 images of himself posing with loved ones and seven of those pictures included Taylor. He captioned the set: 'Had some adventures this offseason, kept it 100.' Flavor Flav commented: 'The whole world happy for y'all,,, may God continue to bless you and your families with happiness and pure joy,' while Erin Andrews wrote: 'FAVS'. And, a comment from the official Kansas City Chiefs account said: 'things we love to see: travis happy.' Last year, Taylor, 35, shared pictures of Travis, 35, to her grid for the first time, when she posted a selfie that also featured the athlete, Prince William, Prince George and Princess Charlotte at her first London Eras Tour show at Wembley Stadium. Meanwhile, Taylor took to her own Instagram account to share her support for her boyfriend's new movie Happy Gilmore 2. Travis appears alongside Adam Sandler in the sequel and Taylor shared the film's poster and wrote: 'Happy Gilmore 2 had me cackling and cheering the whole movie. An absolute must watch. 13/10, go watch it on @netflix as soon as humanly possible.' Travis also posted a picture of himself with Sandler and wrote: 'Man this life is crazy!! Still so surreal I got this opportunity. @adamsandler SANDMAN!! Thank you brotha, for the opportunity and for giving us all Happy Gilmore 2! Everybody go check it out right now! On @netflix #happygilmore2.'
