Tens of thousands of pro-Palestine protesters march on Downing Street for Nakba anniversary
Tens of thousands of pro-Palestine demonstrators have marched through London to mark the anniversary of Nakba.
The demonstration, organised by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, began at Embankment before heading down to Big Ben, across the river to Waterloo, then over the bridge and down to the doors outside Downing Street.
The PSC said the march was intended to 'mark the 77th anniversary of the 1948 Nakba and demand our government take action to end the ongoing ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from their land'.
The Nakba, which means 'catastrophe' in Arabic, is the name Palestinians give to the violent displacement of an estimated 750,000 Palestinians from their homes and villages during the fighting surrounding the creation of the modern state of Israel in 1948, which resulted in the permanent displacement of more than half the Palestinian population, according to the UN.
The anniversary coincided with reports that the Donald Trump administration was in talks with Libya about the northern African country taking up to a million Palestinians from Gaza in exchange for billions of dollars. Previous talk from Mr Trump about relocating the Palestinians from the enclave drew the ire of the international community, who referred back to the Nakba.
A spokesperson for the PSC said they expected around 100,000 people to attend the London march, making it larger than previous demonstrations in recent months.
The Metropolitan Police, which set out Public Order Act conditions in place for the protest, highlighting areas on a London map where attendees must remain, suggested about 20,000 demonstrators showed up.
Protesters were bused in from around the country, as far as Wales and northern England.
A counter-demonstration organised by 'Stop The Hate' gathered on the Strand at the north end of Waterloo Bridge. The group was told to remain in a specific area of the Strand by the Met. Dozens of Israeli flags were seen being waved by counter-protesters on the sidelines of the march.
The pro-Palestine demonstrations hit their peak under the previous Conservative government, in the immediate months after Hamas launched its cross-border attacks on Israel on 7 October, 2023, and Israel responded by conducting widespread attacks on Gaza. Around 300,000 protesters attended the Armistice Day protest in 2023, according to the Met, which remains the most widely-attended demonstration since the outbreak of the war in the Middle East.
Hamas killed around 1,200 people during the 7 October attacks, and took more than 250 hostage in Gaza. Israel's retaliatory air and ground offensives have killed more than 53,000 people, according to the local health ministry. Nearly the entire 2.3 million population has been displaced, many more than once, as the enclave has been razed to the ground by relentless Israeli airstrikes, which, they say, are intended to root out Hamas operatives.
Efforts to negotiate an end to the conflict have been frustrated by both Hamas and Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who recently approved fresh plans to launch more deadly attacks in Gaza.
Humanitarian agencies and the international community have urged Israel to allow vital aid into the enclave.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
27 minutes ago
- BBC News
MPs to vote on welfare bill as unrest rumbles on
MPs will vote on the government's planned reforms to welfare later - with dozens of Labour MPs still planning to vote against them, despite concessions from ministers. The Conservatives have said they will oppose the plans as they are not "serious reforms".The rebellion's scale has ebbed and flowed. Last week, more than 120 Labour MPs signed an amendment that would have killed the proposals outright, an extraordinary threat of defeat for a government with a landslide majority. Now a replacement amendment, supported by disability charities, has attracted around 35 Labour MPs. It suggests that last-minute concessions may have reduced the potential for a government loss - but not comfortably. A number of MPs have expressed concerns about a promised review of personal independence payment (Pip) assessments, after Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall announced on Monday that it would only report back around the same time that the proposed changes were introduced. Labour Chief Whip Sir Alan Campbell reportedly told a regular meeting of the parliamentary party last night that they should "act as a team" and government efforts at persuasion are expected to continue up until the vote itself, which is due this the current government concessions people who currently receive Pip or the health element of universal credit will continue to do so. But future claimants will still be affected by the reforms. Chris Mason: Labour still has a big persuasion job aheadWelfare cuts: What are the Pip and universal credit changes?'Disability welfare reforms could leave us worse off' The Conservative leader, Kemi Badenoch, told the BBC her party would vote against the measures"The benefits bill is too high," she said."It was 40bn just before Covid. It is now projected to be a 100bn by 2030. And what Labour is doing is not making any savings at all. It's just reducing the rate of increase. That's why we are not supporting it."Other criticism of the government proposals has been diverse, with some saying the reforms will not be as effective as the government hopes. "I strongly believe that these kind of punitive measures of cutting welfare are not going to have the outcomes that we've been told they will," said Olivia Blake, Labour MP for Sheffield Hallam, who is disabled and opposes the reforms."I think it will just be about saving money but will actually move spending into areas such as housing services, the NHS and social care," she told BBC added that some MPs were still considering their vote, saying the rebellion would be "more significant than maybe people realise".Kendall defended the bill in the House of Commons on Monday, saying it aligned with MPs' shared values around providing support to those that could work while protecting those that published by Department for Work and Pensions suggested around 150,000 people might be pushed into poverty by 2030 because of the welfare cuts - lower than the original 250,000 figure estimated before the government made the Stephen Timms is slated to conduct the report that was among the concessions. He told BBC Newsnight that the net effect of the government's policies would reduce poverty - including the measures to help people into work. He also stressed the need to make Pip sustainable in the Conservatives have criticised the cost of the bill while the Liberal Democrats have called for proposals to be suspended so they can be further looked government had hoped to save £5bn a year by 2030 before the concessions. These are now likely to cost around £3bn, according to the Resolution Foundation think tank.
Sky News
44 minutes ago
- Sky News
Elon Musk steps up attacks on Trump once again - and calls for new political party
Elon Musk has stepped up his attacks on Donald Trump's sweeping tax and spending bill - weeks after a spectacular fallout between the world's richest man and the US president. Following weeks of relative silence after clashing with Mr Trump over his "big beautiful bill", the billionaire vowed to unseat politicians who support it. In a post on X, Musk said those who had campaigned on cutting spending but then backed the bill "should hang their heads in shame". He added: "And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth." Musk also threatened to put their faces on a poster which said "liar" and "voted to increase America's debt" by $5trn (£3.6trn). As the Senate discussed the package, Musk called it "utterly insane and destructive". The Tesla and SpaceX CEO said the bill's massive spending indicated "we live in a one-party country - the PORKY PIG PARTY!!" "Time for a new political party that actually cares about the people," he wrote. 0:46 Musk spent at least $250m (£182m) supporting Mr Trump in his presidential campaign and then led the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which sacked about 120,000 federal employees. He has argued the legislation would greatly increase the US national debt and wipe out the savings he claimed he achieved through DOGE. Musk previously said some of his social media posts during his dramatic fallout with Mr Trump "went too far". He had shared a series of posts on X, including one that described Mr Trump's tax and spending bill as a "disgusting abomination". He also claimed, in a since-deleted post, that the president .
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Trump administration sues Los Angeles over immigration policies
Donald Trump's administration has sued the city of Los Angeles over its immigration policies, claiming that city law discriminates against federal law enforcement and is obstructing the enforcement of immigration laws with sanctuary policies that bar local police from sharing information on people without legal status. Filed in the central district of California, the lawsuit says Donald Trump 'campaigned and won the presidential election on a platform of deporting the millions of illegal immigrants the previous administration permitted, through its open borders policy, to enter the country unlawfully'. It is the latest in a string of lawsuits against so-called sanctuary jurisdictions – including New York,New Jersey and Colorado – that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities. Los Angeles's sanctuary city ordinance bars city resources from being used for immigration enforcement. The court filing calls the city ordinance 'illegal' and asks that it be blocked from being enforced as the White House cracks down on what it calls a 'crisis of illegal immigration'. Attorney general Pam Bondi said in a statement: 'Sanctuary policies were the driving cause of the violence, chaos, and attacks on law enforcement that Americans recently witnessed in Los Angeles. Jurisdictions like Los Angeles that flout federal law by prioritizing illegal aliens over American citizens are undermining law enforcement at every level – it ends under President Trump.' It comes weeks after protests over the administration's highly aggressive and hostile deportation agenda exploded in Los Angeles. The protesters – along with city mayor Karen Bass and state governor Gavin Newsom – have subsequently become key targets for Trump and his allies. Over the past three weeks, immigration agents have swarmed southern California, arresting hundreds of people and prompting the protests. Tens of thousands of people participated in rallies over immigration raids and the subsequent deployment of the national guard and marines. Los Angeles police have arrested over 100 people on various charges from throwing rocks at federal officers to setting fire to Waymo cars equipped with self-driving technology. 'The practical upshot of Los Angeles's refusal to cooperate with federal immigration authorities has, since 6 June 2025, been lawlessness, rioting, looting, and vandalism,' the court filing says. On 18 June, the mayor lifted a curfew she had imposed a week earlier to prevent vandalism and break-ins during nighttime protests. The demonstrations had been largely concentrated in a few downtown blocks that are home to several federal and local government buildings. Chad Mizelle, Bondi's chief of staff, said in announcing the latest lawsuit that the administration will not tolerate any interference with the federal government's crackdown. 'We will keep enforcing federal immigration law in Los Angeles, whether or not the city's government or residents agree with it,' Mizelle said in a social media post.
