DHL ordered to pay redundancy over transfer requiring five-hour work commute
The
Workplace Relations Commission (WRC)
has upheld a complaint under the Redundancy Payments Act 1967 against DHL Supply Chain Limited by stock picker Oscar Solano Fernandez, who lost his job of 15 years after bosses decided to shut down and sell off a warehouse in Clondalkin.
A senior HR manager in DHL had denied keeping workers 'nominally in employment' when the warehouse closed in a bid to 'avoid' paying staff their statutory redundancies.
Mr Solano told a hearing the alternative job offered by the company at a Tesco distribution centre near Donabate in north county Dublin was a two-bus journey which could take between 90 minutes and 2.5 hours each way from his home in the Coombe.
READ MORE
He had previously been able to get to his former workplace at Oak Road in Clondalkin by bus in 15 to 20 minutes, he told the WRC, adding the new commute required of him would interfere with his family life.
'I don't have nothing against DHL; they gave me a chance to work with them but I didn't want to be spending two, three hours per day going to and back from work,' Mr Solano said.
Mr Solano, originally from Madrid, said he came to Ireland in 2005 with a former girlfriend.
Peter Spencer, a DHL human resources manager, said in evidence that when client Argos announced it was pulling out of Ireland shortly after DHL announced the sale of the Clondalkin site
, it became 'unviable to look for a property in south Dublin'.
DHL moved to make 37 out of 40 warehouse staff 'wholly or mainly associated' with the Argos contract redundant, he said.
Following negotiations with trade union Siptu, others, including Mr Solano, were offered transfers to locations within 50km of the Clondalkin site and a relocation package consisting of a bonus payment of €1,000 and €5,000 worth of Perx vouchers spread over three years, he said.
Barrister Paul Maier, for Mr Solano put it to Mr Spencer that 'part of the motivation for keeping people nominally in employment was to avoid paying redundancy'.
'We'd absolutely dispute that point,' Mr Spencer said.
Niamh Ní Cheallaigh of Ibec, for DHL, argued that the company did not breach Mr Solano's contract of employment.
'No redundancy situation arose and there was suitable alternative work; that's demonstrated by the fact that 112 people did relocate. Everyone was treated the same – of those who transferred, 52 had children,' she said.
Adjudication officer Brian Dalton found the relocation proposed for Mr Solano was 'not reasonable' and ruled his complaint under the Redundancy Payments Act 1967 to be 'well founded'.
Mr Solano was 'entitled to a redundancy payment' based on his weekly wages of €580 and more than 15 years' service. Mr Maier had told the tribunal the statutory redundancy package due to his client was worth over €18,000.
Two other complaints were dismissed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
7 minutes ago
- Irish Times
For once, Ryanair needs to say sorry
Ryanair has a problem in its stance on the oversized cabin bags row – and not with the fact that it offers staff commission for any oversized luggage they detect. The problem is trust. Under Michael O'Leary , the airline has built its reputation on straight speaking. It offers a no-frills service and you get what you pay for. It will tell you quite bluntly what you can expect and what you cannot and it is not overly concerned if it ruffles some feathers in the process, whether that is among its passengers or among consumer advocates. READ MORE And that's fine. Really, it is. Everyone knows where they stand if they fly with Ryanair. The airline will almost always get you where you want to go when you expect to be there. On the rare occasions it doesn't, that's generally just the passengers' bad luck. Part of the deal is you pay for every accommodation – baggage, being first on the plane, sitting in more-favoured seats, getting your boarding card printed at the airport, food, water, whatever. So it would have come as no surprise to anyone that in its relentless pursuit to streamline operations, the airline would incentivise its staff to identify cabin baggage that, however marginally, exceeded the permitted dimensions. [ Ryanair looking to boost staff commission to tackle 'scourge' of oversized bags Opens in new window ] Nor that it should be deaf to any clamour alleging it had shrunk its bag sizers. The problem is that one of Mr O'Leary's senior lieutenants went on air and said expressly: 'We don't pay our staff commission for bags.' That, as we now know, is not true. Ryanair is very quick out of the traps – generally within hours – to address any perceived inaccuracy in reports on how it conducts its business. It is not credible that it and the people it pays to monitor media coverage would not have been aware for three months that, in commenting on what was at the time a high-profile issue, a senior executive had made a statement entirely at odds with the truth, misleading passengers and the wider public. Being straight speaking is one of Ryanair's unique selling and branding points. If passengers cannot take Ryanair at its word, however blunt, it risks breaking its unspoken contract with its target market. This time, Ryanair needs to show that it knows how to say 'sorry'.
Irish Times
7 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Renewable fuel source faces curbs on back of fraud fears
Suppliers argue that Minister for Transport Darragh O'Brien risks overstepping the mark if he curbs imports of some green transport fuel on the back of fears over fraud. Mr O'Brien recently ended an extra incentive for the use of processed palm oil mill effluent (pome) as biofuel after the National Oil Reserves Agency conceded that production in some Far Eastern countries was high enough to spark concerns about fraud. Biofuel producers here and in Europe have been warning that exporters in the Far East are labelling actual palm oil, which the European Union does not classify as a renewable fuel, as pome. This allows them sell huge quantities of fraudulently labelled palm oil cheaply, undercutting European producers who play by the rules. Pome is the waste produced from manufacturing palm oil. The EU allows its use as biofuel, which means it benefits from incentives to encourage green road transport fuel in member states. READ MORE The Republic obliges suppliers to ensure that up to 25 per cent of the petrol and diesel they sell is renewable. However, up to this month, this obligation fell by a third if they used pome, making it a cheaper option for oil companies. Mr O'Brien ended this incentive at the beginning of the month and has not ruled out imposing a limit on pome imports. That is a step that industry body, Fuels for Ireland, says would go too far. Kevin McPartland, the organisation's chief executive, argues that the problem lies not with pome, but with enforcement at both European Union and national level. The Government should wait for a new EU biofuel database, due shortly, that will allow greater scrutiny of companies producing pome and other green fuels manufactured from waste, he argues. However, while European producers say the database is a step in the right direction, they maintain that the risk of fraud is now so high that curbs may ultimately be the only way of tackling the problem. Whether or not Mr O'Brien curbs imports, it looks like he will face a row with one or other element of the State's fuel industry.
Irish Times
7 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Can I pay into Irish State pension from the UK?
I was born in Ireland and moved to London in 2002 ( aged 22) after graduating from university . I have been working in London since then (and will qualify for a full UK state pension upon retirement) and have no immediate plans to come home to live in Ireland. I did summer jobs in Ireland before leaving and so have paid some tax from 1997 until 2001. My query is to whether I can qualify for a full Irish State pension and what is the most straightforward way to set this up while living in London. Can I make voluntary contributions for an Irish State pension in the same way that it is possible to do for a UK pension? READ MORE Can I set up an Irish limited company and pay myself a nominal salary in order to make the required pension contributions? Is there any other way for which I can set myself up for an Irish State pension in a relatively straightforward manner? I really appreciate any help or guidance you can give me in this matter. Mr JK The principle of State contributory pensions – and other welfare benefits that are not means tested – is that you qualify on the basis of your social insurance contributions over a period of time. All countries that I am aware of have a minimum threshold before you can qualify for these benefits. In Ireland, that number is 520 – 10 years of PRSI (Pay Related Social Insurance) contributions . In your case, despite working here for a few years before heading for the UK, you are well shy of that threshold. So, as of now, you would not qualify for any Irish State pension. [ How can I find what my likely State pension will be? Opens in new window ] And, given that the 520-contribution figure is also a requirement to make voluntary PRSI contributions, you will not be eligible for that either. Even if you had those contributions, you would have fallen outside the qualification window – 60 months since your most recent paid PRSI stamp. You refer to the UK system of voluntary national insurance but it, too, has rules and a limit on how far back you can go. So there is no, as you put it, 'relatively straightforward' way you can set myself up for an Irish State pension. Could you set up a limited company here as a vehicle to allow you to pay contributions? To be honest, I'm not across company law sufficiently to answer one way or the other, but one thought comes to mind – why bother? There are costs involved in setting up and running a limited company even if it were possible. More pertinently, your life now is in the UK. You have spent your entire adult working life since graduation in the UK, it is your home and, by your own admission, you have no real intention to return to Ireland. [ Am I too late to apply to boost my UK pension? Opens in new window ] If you were eligible for a State contributory pension, it could be paid to you in the UK but it seems to me that you would be far better to invest in a private pension in the UK, availing of the tax relief available and with more control over its investment priorities. You are currently 45 with the possibility/ likelihood of 20+ years left in your working life. As I understand it, you can get tax relief at 20 per cent on any money you invest over there in a private pension and a 25-year investment window is more than enough to deliver a strong return. I am conscious there was a lot of talk recently about Irish residents who had worked in the UK for a time beefing up their UK national insurance record to qualify for or increase a future UK state pensions but that was different for two reasons. First, the qualifying criteria were lower under a special amnesty arrangement and second the cost of purchasing that extra entitlement was attractive for many people. Please send your queries to Dominic Coyle, Q&A, The Irish Times, 24-28 Tara Street, Dublin 2, or by email to , with a contact phone number. This column is a reader service and is not intended to replace professional advice
