New Zealand parliament suspends three Maori Party politicians over haka protest
Three days had been the longest ban for a politician from New Zealand's parliament before.
The lawmakers from Te Pati Maori, the Maori Party, performed the haka, a chanting dance of challenge, in November to oppose a widely unpopular bill, now defeated, that they said would reverse Indigenous rights.
Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke, Debbie Ngarewa-Packer, and Rawiri Waititi (Charlotte Graham-McLay/AP)
The protest drew global headlines and provoked months of fraught debate about what the consequences for the politicians' actions should be and the place of Maori culture in Parliament.
A committee in April recommended the lengthy bans. It said they were not being punished for the haka, but for striding across the floor of the debating chamber toward their opponents while doing it.
Judith Collins, the committee chair, said the behaviour was egregious, disruptive and potentially intimidating.
Ms Maipi-Clarke, 22, rejected that description, citing other instances when legislators have left their seats and approached opponents without sanction.
The suspended legislators said they are being treated more harshly than others because they are Maori.
'I came into this house to give a voice to the voiceless. Is that the real issue here?' Ms Maipi-Clarke asked parliament.
'Is that the real intimidation here? Are our voices too loud for this house?'
Inside and outside parliament, the haka has increasingly been welcomed as an important part of New Zealand life. The sacred chant can be a challenge to the viewer but is not violent.
As Maori language and culture have become part of mainstream New Zealand in recent years, haka appear in a range of cultural, sombre and celebratory settings. They also have rung out in parliament to welcome the passage of high-profile laws.
Some who decried the protest haka in Parliament cited its timing, with Ms Maipi-Clarke beginning the chant as votes were being tallied and causing a brief suspension of proceedings. She has privately apologised for the disruption to Parliament's Speaker, she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Petition to repeal Online Safety Act reaches 340K signatures
The changes from the act apply across the UK and include age checks on pornography websites, as well as other platforms like Reddit, X and Bluesky. The Act was passed into law on October 26, 2023, and was implemented on July 25, 2025, with platforms now requiring users to prove their age by ID verification. Well done to everyone who campaigned to ensure age verification for pornography was in the Online Safety Act! Today it comes into force and while no doubt there will be some who get around it, it means young kids in particular won't be stumbling on violent and harmful porn. — Jess Asato MP (@Jess4Lowestoft) July 25, 2025 The measures, as part of the Online Safety Act and set to be enforced by regulator Ofcom, require online platforms to have age checks – using facial age estimation or credit card checks. Since the act was implemented, a petition has been launched and has surpassed more than 340,000 signatures. Calls for the Online Safety Act to be repealed in viral petition Sharing why the petition was made, the creator behind it Alex Baynham, wrote: "We believe that the scope of the Online Safety act is far broader and restrictive than is necessary in a free society. "For instance, the definitions in Part 2 covers online hobby forums, which we think do not have the resource to comply with the act and so are shutting down instead. "We think that Parliament should repeal the act and work towards producing proportionate legislation rather than risking clamping down on civil society talking about trains, football, video games or even hamsters because it can't deal with individual bad faith actors." At the time of writing, the petition had surpassed the needed 100,000 signatures for Parliament to consider debating the petition. On TikTok, the Act has received a large amount of debate. Recommended Reading Content creator Thomas Pearson branded the act "pointless", sharing that he believes the act "is a fundamental betrayal of one of the core principles of British democracy; governing and policing by consent." Previously discussing the Act, Technology Secretary Peter Kyle told Sky News: "I have very high expectations of the change that children will experience. "And let me just say this to parents and children, you will experience a different internet really, for the first time in from today, moving forward than you've had in the past. And that is a big step forward."
North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Disability Pride Month: Why MPs need to do more to support
I once believed that being disabled was something to be ashamed of, often hiding the fact that I had disabilities. When I did disclose I was disabled, I would often face misunderstanding from others and looking back now, bullying over it. Even when I got to a point when I had to face that I had a disability and use a power chair to get around, I still felt ashamed. But looking back, I had no reason. This is me, this is who I am, like it or not. I am proud of myself, disability and all, and I think it has come from being in a community that accepts itself, which has helped me accept myself too. So this Disability Pride month, I ask you to join us in celebrating our achievements, inclusivity and help to promote equality for all. (Newsquest) (Image: Newsquest) July is Disability Pride month. It is a whole month for people with disabilities to celebrate diversity and their achievements. It's a month to celebrate inclusivity and promote equality for the disabled community. However, whilst we celebrate, we do this in the face of adversity. We do this whilst we are up against people who just do not understand. But the problem is, some of the people who do not understand are the people who have our lives in their hands. Is that right? The recent 'Welfare Reform Bill' showed us just how little understanding there is amongst lawmakers in this country. I watched Parliament session after session, as it was implied multiple times that Personal Independence Payment (PIP) was an out-of-work benefit. Whether these MPs intended to suggest this, I cannot comment. However, the fact that it was said, for those who did not know, will now assume that it is. Therefore, they may end up voting on something that is factually untrue. Whilst there have been amendments to the bill and consultations are happening with disabled people and charities, it got me thinking. Is it right that the lawmakers of this land make these rules, having no idea of the facts or the implications that surround them? Yes, consultations are supposed to happen, but often they don't. A committee meeting just days ago, in which Liz Kendell and Steve Darling discussed the fact that the reform for PIP was consulted on, in Parliament only. Had it not been for the 120 rebels, a consultation with disabled people would not be happening. Disability Pride should be a month of celebration, and I, for one, won't let anyone stop me from celebrating my achievements or how far I have come. But when our own government makes us feel like we are not good enough or worthy, how long before people start to break? I would love to sit down with all MPs to find out exactly how much they understood about the bill and what they were voting for. Did they understand the impact, or did they just go by the figures? The impact report, the amount of savings, or just the information being fed by their leaders. I hope that people out there, before they judge, get behind and find out the facts. Look into the true findings, and yes, there are reports out there that are factually untrue. Which is why it needs to come from the source. The people who know about it first-hand. The disabled community, their carers, and charities. Why are we not standing up in Parliament and answering the questions these MPs have? I, for one, would be willing and open to any MP or any member of the public who wants to know more to simply ask. So this Disability Pride month, I ask you to join us in celebrating our achievements, inclusivity and help to promote equality for all.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Disability Pride Month: Why MPs need to do more to support
I once believed that being disabled was something to be ashamed of, often hiding the fact that I had disabilities. When I did disclose I was disabled, I would often face misunderstanding from others and looking back now, bullying over it. Even when I got to a point when I had to face that I had a disability and use a power chair to get around, I still felt ashamed. But looking back, I had no reason. This is me, this is who I am, like it or not. I am proud of myself, disability and all, and I think it has come from being in a community that accepts itself, which has helped me accept myself too. So this Disability Pride month, I ask you to join us in celebrating our achievements, inclusivity and help to promote equality for all. (Newsquest) (Image: Newsquest) What is Disability Pride Month? July is Disability Pride month. It is a whole month for people with disabilities to celebrate diversity and their achievements. It's a month to celebrate inclusivity and promote equality for the disabled community. However, whilst we celebrate, we do this in the face of adversity. We do this whilst we are up against people who just do not understand. But the problem is, some of the people who do not understand are the people who have our lives in their hands. Is that right? Welfare Reform Bill exposed the 'little understanding' of disability benefits The recent 'Welfare Reform Bill' showed us just how little understanding there is amongst lawmakers in this country. I watched Parliament session after session, as it was implied multiple times that Personal Independence Payment (PIP) was an out-of-work benefit. Whether these MPs intended to suggest this, I cannot comment. However, the fact that it was said, for those who did not know, will now assume that it is. Therefore, they may end up voting on something that is factually untrue. Whilst there have been amendments to the bill and consultations are happening with disabled people and charities, it got me thinking. Is it right that the lawmakers of this land make these rules, having no idea of the facts or the implications that surround them? Yes, consultations are supposed to happen, but often they don't. A committee meeting just days ago, in which Liz Kendell and Steve Darling discussed the fact that the reform for PIP was consulted on, in Parliament only. Had it not been for the 120 rebels, a consultation with disabled people would not be happening. MPs need to understand the Disability bills they vote on Disability Pride should be a month of celebration, and I, for one, won't let anyone stop me from celebrating my achievements or how far I have come. But when our own government makes us feel like we are not good enough or worthy, how long before people start to break? I would love to sit down with all MPs to find out exactly how much they understood about the bill and what they were voting for. Did they understand the impact, or did they just go by the figures? The impact report, the amount of savings, or just the information being fed by their leaders. I hope that people out there, before they judge, get behind and find out the facts. Look into the true findings, and yes, there are reports out there that are factually untrue. Which is why it needs to come from the source. The people who know about it first-hand. The disabled community, their carers, and charities. Why are we not standing up in Parliament and answering the questions these MPs have? I, for one, would be willing and open to any MP or any member of the public who wants to know more to simply ask. So this Disability Pride month, I ask you to join us in celebrating our achievements, inclusivity and help to promote equality for all.
