Legislative decision on prison construction will come later than planned
South Dakota lawmakers will not convene to make the call on a new prison site on July 22, according to Gov. Larry Rhoden's office.
Lt. Gov. Tony Venhuizen wrote a letter to Rhoden this week asking that the special session the governor had hoped to call on that date be pushed back. Lawmakers would be asked to back plans for a new prison at that session.
Venhuizen leads the Project Prison Reset group, called into being in February via a Rhoden executive order and charged with deciding if the state needs new prison facilities, how large and where those facilities should be.
Members voted during a Springfield meeting in late April to build a replacement for the South Dakota State Penitentiary, which is located in Sioux Falls.
Pierre played host to the group's most recent meeting last week, where the group narrowed down locations to Mitchell or Worthing and existing prison campuses in Springfield and Sioux Falls, and voted to cap the cost of such a prison at $600 million. Elected officials in Mitchell including the mayor and sheriff have since come out against locating the prison near their community.
Prison task force rejects original Lincoln County site, tightens budget for new facility
This week, Venhuizen wrote that the group had made 'excellent progress,' but that the two weeks between the next Project Prison Reset meeting and the intended special session aren't enough.
'Even if the task force is able to adopt a specific proposal on July 8, we do not feel that two weeks provides adequate time for a final proposal to be completed with adequate detail, and for state legislators to learn about that proposal prior to the special session,' Venhuizen wrote.
Rhoden, through spokeswoman Josie Harms, said the governor will 'accept the task force's request' and 'consult with leadership on a rescheduled date.'
'I'm eager to see what the task force can accomplish in their next meeting,' Rhoden wrote.
The cost of the Rhoden administration's preferred solution to correctional overcrowding – a 1,500-bed, $825 million facility south of Harrisburg in Lincoln County – was among the primary concerns for the lawmakers who rejected the idea in February.
A consultant hired on behalf of the task force to reevaluate the state's needs concluded that the state needs more beds than that, 1,700, immediately, to ease current crowding.
A 1,700-bed prison wouldn't solve the state's problems long-term, however, according to the consultants. By the mid-2030s, the state would need yet another 1,500-bed prison.
The task force ultimately rejected those conclusions, betting that $600 million would be enough to bulk up the system and replace the oldest parts of the Sioux Falls penitentiary complex.
Lawmakers had put back more than $600 million for prison construction before the 2025 legislative session, and the fund had swelled larger than that with interest by winter.
Ongoing construction bills at the site of a new women's prison in Rapid City – an $87 million project that earned legislative approval – have since come out of that fund, DOC spokesman Michael Winder told Searchlight on Thursday.
The state's also paid some of the bills associated with site prep at the now-rejected Lincoln County site out of that fund. Lawmakers had approved the spending of up to $60 million in prison design and site prep for a men's prison in 2024, and the state spent or obligated $52 million of that money for the Lincoln County plan before it came to a halt.
Subtracting the money spent since the last legislative session's end and adding the $23 million earned in interest this year that will be deposited in August, Winder said, the fund's available balance will sit at approximately $538 million by the end of summer.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
House passes Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' as opponents flip
The House of Representatives sent Donald Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill" to the president for his signature Thursday after a record-setting and emotional debate over a piece of legislation that will be felt across the economy for years to come. The final vote was 218-214, with just two Republicans voting no in the end. House Speaker Mike Johnson whittled down a list of over two dozen GOP holdouts who were objecting to the bill as recently as Wednesday to just Reps. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt quickly announced after the vote ended that Trump would sign the bill on Friday at 5 p.m. ET at a White House ceremony, adding "this bill is going to create an economic boom for the United States of America." The approval came after a pressure campaign from the White House and yet another all-night session on Capitol Hill that satisfied Republican holdouts concerned about the multitrillion-dollar price tag and healthcare cuts. The vote also came after Democratic Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries held the floor — for what C-SPAN confirmed was a new length record — to lambast the bill for more than eight hours. He said that he spoke so that the final vote would happen 'in the light of day' and at another point calling the legislation a "crime scene." But Johnson and his colleagues celebrated final passage soon after Jeffries yielded, with the House speaker saying just before the vote commenced that "this day is a hugely important one" and describing it as part of a long list of recent Trump wins. He and his colleagues soaked in a victory many were skeptical could ever happen — the weaving together of a wide array of Republican priorities into a single bill and sending it to Trump before his self-imposed July 4 deadline. What in the end appears to have allowed Johnson to move many of these recalcitrant lawmakers into the yes column were not any changes to the bill itself — today's vote approved the 870-page bill that passed the Senate earlier this week with zero changes — but with promises from Trump of things like executive actions to address their concerns. Read more: Taxes, energy, and healthcare: 3 ways Senate's Trump megabill impacts the business world The back-and-forth Thursday was just the latest twist in days of negotiations over a reconciliation package that is set to reshape large swathes of the US economy, especially in areas of taxes, energy, and healthcare. The package also includes a $5 trillion debt ceiling increase and is projected to unleash new borrowing that will lead the US national debt to surpass $40 trillion in the coming years. Economists have likewise noted the final price tag, which could lead to $4 trillion in new debt over the coming decade, and critiqued an accounting gimmick Republicans employed to hide much of that red ink. It's a bill also set to be felt in American pocketbooks with provisions like no taxes on some tips, cuts to student loans and the Pell Grant program, an increase in state tax deductions, and a range of other provisions, even so-called MAGA accounts for young children. The process proved exceptionally contentious in recent days, largely over the healthcare portion of the bill, which appears set to extract hundreds of billions in government savings but cause millions to lose their coverage. Clean energy was another key last-minute flash point, with Tesla (TSLA) CEO Elon Musk perhaps the loudest voice in opposition. That portion of the bill saw provisions added and subtracted in rapid succession during the Senate debate, sending solar stocks gyrating. It ended with a final product that didn't include at least one of the harshest ideas, but is nevertheless set to have the US government move away from any significant role in renewable energy in the years ahead. A first step will be felt quickly with a plan to eliminate electric vehicle credits on Sept. 30 of this year. Democrats, for their part, promised to make the bill a political albatross for Republicans and have signaled plans to talk nonstop about the package between now and next year's midterm election. "Don't ever lecture us about fiscal responsibility: Not now, not ever," Jeffries said at one point in his Thursday morning speech. Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts said in her own reaction after the vote: "We will never let the Republican Party forget." A particular political focus is expected to be on the healthcare provisions that, according to an accounting from the Congressional Budget Office that came in over the weekend, could cause 11.8 million additional Americans to become uninsured by 2034. A series of polls has also shown declines in the overall public support for the bill as the focus on healthcare has intensified. Even a recent Fox News national poll found a 21-point gap between those who say they are opposed (59%) and those who say they are in favor (38%). Read more: What is a healthcare FSA? The Democratic opposition also comes as Republicans clearly have mixed feelings about the bill with some of the healthcare cuts. Some Republicans continue to slam that portion of the bill as too politically painful. Meanwhile, some of their colleagues look at the exact same provisions and say the cuts are not deep enough to improve the fiscal situation. In just one example of Republican tensions, GOP Rep. Keith Self of Texas posted Wednesday just hours before voting began that the bill was "morally and fiscally bankrupt," before then voting yes on Thursday and saying "issues have now been addressed" even as he acknowledged "the bill is not perfect." This story has been updated with additional developments. Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) Could Benefit From Shifting Power Sources, Says Jim Cramer
We recently published . GE Vernova Inc. (NYSE:GEV) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. GE Vernova Inc. (NYSE:GEV) is a former General Electric business that has prospered on the stock market in today's AI wave. This is because of the firm's exposure to nuclear energy as it manufactures turbines and other equipment. GE Vernova Inc. (NYSE:GEV) is one of Cramer's top nuclear power stocks. The CNBC host is typically dismissive of nuclear energy stocks as he believes that the returns from nuclear power projects typically take years to materialize. In his recent remarks, Cramer discussed by GE Vernova Inc. (NYSE:GEV)'s shares recently soared: 'And then GE Vernova. Which you know yesterday there was an article in the Times about how windmills are going to get hurt in the Republican bill. GE Vernova was up nine again. A lot of it has to do parts where they're made and they're fabled for making American stuff. I would think that if you banned Chinese parts or you make them pay, that people would be willing to, that they might shift from one kind of power to another. But wind power is very very cheap.' Later, Cramer discussed how GE Vernova Inc. (NYSE:GEV) can benefit from President Trump's trade discussions: 'Second, as Vernova CEO, Scott Strazik told us when he came on the show in late April, his company could see some real benefits from trade tensions. Just like Boeing's planes, GE Vernova's turbines are big-ticket items. They cost tens of millions of dollars each. People say they're about $50 million on average. The Trump administration wants a lot of countries to reduce their trade surpluses with the United States, and buying a bunch of natural gas turbines is an easy way to make that happen. I've liked GE Vernova since before it was spun out of GE, and I see no reason to turn bearish now. Sure, the stock's expensive, trading at roughly 72 times this year's earnings estimates, which is why a couple of analysts have downgraded it, from Buy to Hold in recent weeks. But the scale of the opportunities is enormous, and the story seems almost tailor-made for this moment. Look, over time, I bet GE Vernova can continue to grind higher. Count me as a buyer for the trust.' While we acknowledge the potential of GEV as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stocks To Buy Now and 30 Best Stocks to Buy Now According to Billionaires. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.


The Hill
28 minutes ago
- The Hill
Musk's primary threats pose danger for Republicans
Elon Musk is threatening to primary Republicans who voted for President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' posing a challenge for the president and his allies as they look to defy midterm headwinds. Musk vowed earlier this week that Republicans who supported Trump's megabill 'will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth' as the Tesla CEO has reignited his feud with Trump in recent days. Republicans see the comments as unhelpful, with some saying if the threats come to fruition, it could risk diverting resources away in an election environment that historically hasn't been kind to the president's party in power. 'One of the most destructive behaviors that we've had in cycles where we've been unsuccessful in Senate races … are those in which we have expended massive resources in intraparty warfare,' said one Republican consultant who's worked on Senate races. Ever since Musk ended his stint at the White House, the billionaire has been a vocal critic of Trump's major policy bill, taking particular issue with the projected trillions of dollars multiple analyses say will add to the deficit. The House narrowly passed the final version of the bill on Thursday, and Trump signed it Friday evening at a White House Fourth of July event. But Musk's frustrations reached a new point on Monday when he said he would back challengers to Republicans who supported Trump's agenda-setting legislation, while saying he would also look to protect Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), a prominent opponent of the bill who has drawn Trump's ire. The Tesla CEO also suggested it was time for a new political party. 'It is obvious with the insane spending of this bill, which increases the debt ceiling by a record FIVE TRILLION DOLLARS that we live in a one-party country — the PORKY PIG PARTY!! Time for a new political party that actually cares about the people,' he said on the social platform X, which he owns. Some lawmakers have sought to brush off Musk's threat. 'I'll take President Trump's endorsement over Elon's any day of the week, back home,' Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) said in an interview with Just the News's Nicholas Ballasy regarding the potential primary challenge. Marshall said his Republican colleagues were 'ignoring' Musk. Trump, meanwhile, left the door open this week to deporting Musk, who was born in South Africa and became a naturalized U.S. citizen. He also suggested Musk's advisory Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) could be turned against the billionaire and his companies. 'I think what's going to happen is DOGE is going to look at Musk. And if DOGE looks at Musk, we're going to save a fortune,' Trump said while in Florida on Tuesday. 'I don't think he should be playing that game with me.' The White House and a representative for Musk did not respond to requests for comment for this story. Some Republicans expressed skepticism that Musk would actually follow through in launching primary challenges against GOP incumbents, while others didn't view the billionaire's remarks as an immediate threat. 'I think the president is much more popular with the base right now than Elon Musk, and I think our elected representatives are also more popular,' said Mark Jefferson, a former executive director for the Wisconsin GOP. 'I don't take the threat all that seriously, because how do you primary hundreds of people?' asked Georgia-based Republican consultant Brian Robinson. Unlike Musk, Trump has a history of trying to oust Republicans with whom he's been at odds, with varying degrees of success. And Trump's allies have already signaled this cycle they're not afraid to go after holdouts and members of the party they see as stymieing the president and his agenda. A pro-Trump super PAC has already been created with the goal of 'firing' Massie. 'Unless and until Musk can start lining up some A-team candidates or credible people or people in the same wing of the party, he's going nowhere,' said top GOP donor Eric Levine, who described Massie as 'fringe.' Other Republicans suggest it may not be long before Trump and Musk are back on good terms again. While it's too soon to say how serious Musk might be about his primary threats, the moves would be an unnecessary obstacle for the party. 'I hope that he doesn't, obviously, because I think that primary fights normally don't do anything but strengthen the opposition,' said longtime GOP donor Bill Bean. Bean acknowledged that Musk 'has a point' about the GOP legislation raising the deficit, but he also voiced concern that Musk's primary challenges against members of Congress could force Republicans to divert resources from areas where the party might not otherwise have been concerned. 'I think that his money would be much better spent instead of primarying conservative Republicans who maybe aren't 100 percent as conservative or 100 percent agree with him to go out and win elections in swing districts,' Bean said. 'I guarantee you, if we had a 30-seat majority in the House and a 12-seat majority in the Senate, the bill right now going through would be a lot closer to what he would like to see,' he added. Musk's remarks represent a noteworthy shift from just months ago, when he was considered one of Trump's biggest allies. His America PAC spent tens of millions of dollars alone supporting the president during the 2024 election, and he was a critical donor for Wisconsin Republicans earlier this year as they looked to narrow the spending gap against Democrats in the high-stakes state Supreme Court race. Even while Musk has opened up old wounds with Trump over Republicans' major policy bill, it hasn't stopped him from offering some praise for the president. He lauded the president last week over his handling of foreign affairs, writing Wednesday in a post on X: 'Credit where credit is due. @realDonaldTrump has successfully resolved several serious conflicts around the world.' Meanwhile, some Republicans have a warning for Musk, should he follow through on his threats. 'Musk is deeply hated among Democrats. For now, he maintains good standing among Republicans, but if he follows through, he will lose them as well and be a man without a country,' said Michigan-based GOP strategist Jason Cabel Roe in an email to The Hill. 'That will sabotage any political or business initiatives he's involved in.'