logo
In Pennsylvania, a meteorite landed in a carton of ice cream. Brown University helped ID the out-of-this-world topping.

In Pennsylvania, a meteorite landed in a carton of ice cream. Brown University helped ID the out-of-this-world topping.

Boston Globe12-03-2025
Once authorities released the rock, the vehicle's owner believed it could be a
Get Rhode Map
A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Before long, a team of geologists and meteorite experts formed to take a look and verify what exactly they were looking at – including professor Dan Ibarra and graduate student Riley Havel, from Brown University.
Advertisement
'At Brown University's Ibarra Lab, Ibarra, Havel, and visiting student Jiquan Chen prepared the sample for advanced isotopic analysis,' university officials said in a statement. 'Their primary focus was measuring the rock's triple oxygen isotope composition— an essential method for distinguishing meteorites from terrestrial rocks.'
Meteorites are distinct from Earth rocks as they contain 'oxygen isotope ratios that reflect their formation in space, often dating back to the early solar system,' according to the university.
The measurements allowed the team to confirm the rock was a meteorite, informally referred to as the 'Ice Cream Drop,' school officials said.
'This work paves the way for official classification in the Meteoritical Bulletin, ensuring that the sample becomes part of the global scientific record,' the university said.
Havel said there is a particular importance in identifying meteorites from 'meteor-wrongs.'
'Meteorites have unique scientific value and can be used to answer questions about our solar system in ways that many terrestrial rocks cannot,' Havel said in a statement.
The research was recently detailed in Pennsylvania Geology Magazine, which is published by the state's Department of Conservation and Natural Resources.
Advertisement
'We tried to maintain an open mind when the owner of the main mass brought it to us for examination after being rebuffed by others,' Robert C. Smith II and John H. Barnes, retired from the Pennsylvania Geological Survey, and James T. Herbstritt, of the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission, wrote in the magazine. 'We do not control custody of the main mass of this specimen, but we hope that our efforts on the material that was made available to us will lead to additional research of this worthy specimen by others.
'To be sure, observed meteorite falls are rare, but meteorites can and do land in Pennsylvania!,' they added.
Christopher Gavin can be reached at
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A Mars rock was expected to sell at auction for $4 million. The final bid was for more
A Mars rock was expected to sell at auction for $4 million. The final bid was for more

USA Today

time17-07-2025

  • USA Today

A Mars rock was expected to sell at auction for $4 million. The final bid was for more

The final price tag, which came after various fees and costs were added, is the most any meteorite of any origin has ever sold for at auction, Sotheby's said. The largest piece of Mars to ever make its way to Earth is now also the most valuable meteorite in the world. A chunk of the Martian surface that at some point crashed into Earth following an unlikely cosmic journey sold Wednesday, July 16 to an anonymous bidder for a record $5.3 million at a Sotheby's New York auction. The final price tag, which came after various fees and costs were added, is the most any meteorite of any origin has ever sold for at auction, Sotheby's said in a post on social media site X. The sale also surpasses the $2-4 million the Mars rock was expected to fetch. What is the Mars rock? The large space rock, which has the scientific name of NWA 16788, had its Martian origins validated by the Meteoritical Society, which included it in its Meteoritical Bulletin, the global journal of record for meteor-related science. The meteorite was previously on exhibit at the Italian Space Agency in Rome and at a private gallery in Arezzo, Italy, in Tuscany, before it landed in Sotheby's auction. Mars rock sells for $5.3 million: Who bought it? Marketed by Sotheby's as "the largest Martian meteorite ever found on Earth," the cosmic object was expected to sell for up to $4 million. The final bid was $4.3 million. The official final sale price was then about $5.3 million after various fees and costs were added, multiple outlets reported, including the Associated Press and ABC News. Sotheby's, a British-founded auctioneer of art and collectibles based in New York City, auctioned off the meteorite, along with more than 100 other items, Wednesday, July 16. Sotheby's has not publicly identified the buyer. What are meteorites? Rocks in space are known as meteoroids. If those space rocks enter Earth's atmosphere, they become meteors that streak across the sky in events colloquially referred to as "shooting stars." Meteors – or fragments of them – that survive their atmospheric trip and land on the surface without burning up become meteorites, according to NASA. Martian meteorite is largest on Earth: How big is it? The Martian meteorite is 54 pounds, or about the weight of a standard bag of cement. Measuring nearly 15 inches by 11 inches by 6 inches, the space rock is approximately 70% larger than the next largest piece of Mars found on Earth. In fact, it is so large that it represents approximately 6.5% of all Martian material ever found on Earth. How did Martian space rock get to Earth? NWA 16788 was discovered Nov. 16, 2023, by a meteorite hunter in Niger's remote Agadez region in the Sahara Desert. Featuring an unmistakable reddish Martian hue, NWA 16788's internal composition suggests it was blasted from the surface of Mars by a powerful asteroid strike. Intense enough to turn some of the meteorite's minerals into glass, the asteroid strike sent the rock hurtling through space, where it miraculously made it through Earth's atmosphere without burning up, Sotheby's said in an auction house video. Because the meteorite shows signs of minimal Earthly weathering, and its chemical makeup has not significantly changed, experts believe it reached our planet in recent years. On a planet mostly covered in water, discovering meteorites on land is incredibly rare. And Mars meteorites are even more elusive on Earth. Of the more than 77,000 officially recognized meteorites, only 400 are Martian meteorites, according to Sotheby's. Eric Lagatta is the Space Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach him at elagatta@

Dust devils on Mars leave 'fingerprints' that can guide future Red Planet missions
Dust devils on Mars leave 'fingerprints' that can guide future Red Planet missions

Yahoo

time17-07-2025

  • Yahoo

Dust devils on Mars leave 'fingerprints' that can guide future Red Planet missions

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Martian dust devils are fleeting, but the footprints they leave behind can endure for months. Now, researchers have used those tracks to learn about the whirlwinds and potentially guide future mission planning. As wind swirls across the landscape on both Mars and Earth, it sweeps up ground particles that reveal the dry columns. The whirlwinds dance across the landscape, leaving a path revealed by excavated particles. On the active surface of Earth, such paths are hard to spot. But on the nearly inactive surface of Mars, they can remain for months, long after the devils' minutes-long lifetimes. "Dust devils themselves are difficult to capture in images because they are so short-lived," Ingrid Daubar, a planetary scientist at Brown University and lead author of the study, told by email. "The tracks they leave behind last longer, so we are able to observe them more thoroughly." Dusting off the fingerprints On warm, windy days in Earth's deserts, vortices of sand and debris can form suddenly and move unpredictably. (This author distinctly recalls being "chased" by one such devil in the Mojave Desert as a child in 1990.) Similar conditions on Mars can also produce dust devils. But the whirls on the Red Planet tend to be both wider and taller than their counterparts on Earth, and scientists aren't sure why. Questions like these led Dauber and her colleagues to study images from the High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE) on NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter — the highest-resolution photos of the planet snapped from space. HiRISE can capture features as small as 3 feet (1 meter). But its detailed perspective comes at a price: Its images cover only a small percentage of the Martian surface and are taken by request, though most latitudes and longitudes are well sampled. Dauber's team studied 21,475 HiRISE images taken between January 2014 and April 2018 — roughly a quarter of the snapshots captured by the instrument as of autumn 2024. Tracks appear in only 798 of those, or just under 4%. Dust devil tracks (DDTs) suggest dust devils are more common at high northern and southern latitudes and are especially active in each hemisphere's summer, peaking in the southern hemisphere's summer. According to the researchers, Mars' significant orbital eccentricity, or deviation from a perfect circle, causes the atmosphere in the southern summer to circulate more energetically, creating conditions ideal for vortex formation. That, combined with less dust accumulation in the North, makes the southern hemisphere summer an almost perfect storm for dust devils. The observations reflect peak DDT preservation more than dust devil formation, the researchers cautioned, but the culmination coincides with the peak observed by NASA's Spirit rover at Gusev crater, along with global observations of the sand spouts. The researchers also realized that DDTs most commonly form and are preserved in regions of mixed sand, rocks and bedrock, with little bright dust, the most common surface type identified on Mars. Bright dust scooped up from the surface leaves behind trails that are dark from the underlying landscape. "The material on the ground is critical to the formation of the DDTs," Dauber said. Dusty missions The first Martian dust devil tracks appeared in images sent back from NASA's Mariner 9 mission in 1972 (although they weren't discovered until the images were analyzed in 2014). But it wasn't until 1998, when higher-resolution images were captured by Mars Global Surveyor, that the tracks could be seriously analyzed. RELATED STORIES —Dust devils on Mars may spark lightning — possibly threatening NASA's Perseverance rover —NASA's Perseverance rover watches as 2 Mars dust devils merge into 1 (video) —Perseverance Mars rover figures out how devils and winds fill the Red Planet's skies with dust Dust has hindered past ground missions. Mars rovers take their energy from the sun via solar panels. Over time, dust builds up on the panels, limiting their efficacy. The blockage has shuttered missions like NASA's Opportunity rover, which explored the surface for 14.5 years. NASA's InSight lander also succumbed to a dust-related death after four years. The high winds that birth dust devils can also revitalize robots, however. Opportunity's twin, Spirit, got a second lease on life after a Martian whirlwind cleaned its solar arrays back in 2005. Understanding where dust devils are most active can help in the selection of landing sites for future missions. High-latitude bands where DDTs and their progenitors occur more frequently could help to scour solar panels and thus enable a more enduring exploration. "It depends on the mission — every mission is unique," Daubar said. There are many requirements for landing sites and exploration, including regions that will allow for a safe touchdown, alongside complex scientific goals. "It could be that there are only a few places where the specific science goals can be achieved, and then perhaps this could be a deciding factor between those sites," she said. A new study of dust devils on Mars was published in May 2025 in the journal Geophysical Research Letters. Solve the daily Crossword

Where Did Bird Flu Go?
Where Did Bird Flu Go?

Scientific American

time15-07-2025

  • Scientific American

Where Did Bird Flu Go?

For months, bird flu was seemingly everywhere in the U.S.: news headlines reported the highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza virus was rapidly sweeping through hundreds of herds of dairy cattle and leading to massive culls of poultry flocks, concerning infections in humans and grocery store aisles where nary an egg could be found. But nearly as quickly as bird flu took hold in daily conversations, it disappeared from them and most people's thoughts—making it easy for the public to think avian influenza's threat had waned. Far from it, experts say. 'The flu is still there, and we just don't know enough about it,' says Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at the University of Saskatchewan. What made the virus apparently fade away—and what does that mean for the future of bird flu? On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. One scenario experts have definitively ruled out is that the currently circulating bird flu virus—a member of a subtype of influenza called H5N1 for the proteins on its surface—is simply vanishing on its own, says Jennifer Nuzzo, an epidemiologist at Brown University. 'There has been this wishful thinking that it's just going to wipe through and be gone, and we've just not seen that, and that's just not how flu viruses work,' Nuzzo says. 'This isn't going away.' Experts are still monitoring for H5N1 avian influenza in a variety of animals: wild birds, commercial poultry animals, wild mammals, dairy cattle and humans—and finding it, albeit at lower rates. But the virus is tricky, behaving somewhat differently in each host. Here's what we know about the current state of the virus. The most reliable data on bird flu prevalence come from poultry operations. That's because the virus is so devastating in chickens and turkeys that farmers must cull flocks as soon as they detect an infection to reduce spread. They are also able to report outbreaks to the federal government to receive partial compensation. There's no way to ignore a sick flock or any incentive to hide one. And right now poultry tolls to avian influenza are relatively low. Farmers reported just three million poultry birds killed by the virus or culled to stop it in March and April combined compared with 23 million and 12 million in January and February, respectively. May saw more than five million birds dead after the virus infiltrated several massive egg-laying facilities in Maricopa County, Arizona. But June rates fell far below one million birds, and July cases to date remain very low, with just one commercial facility affected so far. These lower rates of bird flu aren't particularly surprising, given the virus's past behavior in poultry to date, says Mike Persia, a poultry specialist at Virginia Tech. 'We generally see a reduction in infections over the summer,' he says. Since the current outbreak began in early 2022, U.S. Department of Agriculture data show that, each year, the monthly count of affected poultry birds has tended to dip to under five million in June, July and August. Two factors seem to contribute to the apparent seasonal trend, Persia says. The virus appears to falter in higher ambient temperatures, and the migratory wild birds that typically introduce the virus into poultry flocks aren't traveling as widely now that breeding season is in full swing. But the outbreak's history tells a cautionary tale: each autumn, the number of affected poultry birds rises again—so it would be premature to assume H5N1 is done with us. 'I'm optimistic that maybe this was the last of it, and it goes away forever. I wouldn't take the lull as proof of that, though,' says Jada Thompson, an agricultural economist at the University of Arkansas. 'We need to maintain vigilance.' Evaluating the outbreak in U.S. dairy cattle has been more difficult. Cows that are sick with bird flu eat less and produce thick and discolored milk. But the infection isn't nearly as fatal in cattle as it is in poultry, making the virus harder to see in the former. And there's no recompense for lost milk to encourage farmers to report being hit. In addition, the virus's jump into dairy cattle in late 2023 was wildly unexpected and not publicly confirmed until March 2024, giving dairy farmers and virologists little time to understand bird flu's tendencies in the species. Last year cases continued throughout the summer, particularly in the hard-hit state of Colorado. Spread proved to be difficult to contain, in part because of the movement of animals required by the dairy industry. And although the virus can be monitored through milk, officials only began mandating such testing last December, after a full year of viral circulation. This year reported infections have trailed off, with only two herds confirmed to have the virus in all of June. But it's unclear how to interpret the trend—dairy farmers, too, are left poised between caution and optimism. Throughout the outbreak, bird flu risk to humans has been low, although dairy and poultry workers with exposure to infected animals have been more vulnerable. The first detected human infection in 2024 came shortly after confirmation that dairy cattle had become sick with H5N1. Additional human cases came in flurries throughout the intervening months, totaling 70 confirmed infections, including one death, by mid-February. Since then, infection tallies at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have stalled. Experts doubt that's a good thing. 'I can't rule out that part of why we're not finding infections is: we're just simply not looking for them,' Nuzzo says. Throughout the outbreak, the CDC has kept a running tally of the testing it is conducting, and those numbers paint a clear picture. As of July 1, the CDC noted that more than 880 people had been subject to targeted testing after exposure to infected animals. On March 1 that number had been more than 840; in contrast, the February 1 number was more than 660. The CDC tested more than four times as many people in February as in March, April, May and June combined. Another way experts have kept tabs on bird flu has been through existing national flu surveillance—but because normal flu infections are in a seasonal lull, so are tests through that network. The result is a lot of question marks. 'We are in sort of a perfect storm of no testing,' Rasmussen says. Even wastewater monitoring, which has proven helpful in understanding levels of the virus that causes COVID as testing rates have fallen, is of limited help. The approach looks for the presence of viruses in community water processing plants, but H5N1 is spread so broadly across species that it is nearly impossible to use these detections to definitively trace sources. 'You don't know how it got there,' Nuzzo says of the virus in wastewater. 'You don't know if people are infected; you don't know if [the virus is present] because birds were hanging out in the wastewater.' In some cases, spikes in wastewater levels of H5N1 have even been linked to farmers dumping milk from their infected cows. Nuzzo suspects that there have certainly been more human cases of avian influenza than the 70 confirmed to date but that the virus is not spreading widely. 'I don't think there's some huge iceberg of infections that we're missing,' Nuzzo says. Nuzzo and Rasmussen find that cold comfort, however. Instead they emphasize how vital it is to have as much intel as possible about what H5N1 is doing. Choosing not to seek out evidence of the virus's behavior means passing up on the opportunity to catch any early signs of a pandemic in the making. 'No news in my world is not good news,' Rasmussen says. 'We're just not collecting any data, and those are two very, very different things.' The U.S.'s current approach is simply further shrouding a situation that is already difficult to parse—given the complexity of a multispecies outbreak and the unpredictable nature of rapidly changing influenza viruses. 'This is the kind of thing that could become a pandemic tomorrow, [or] it could never become a pandemic. And I don't know which one is going to happen,' Rasmussen says. 'This is a huge risk, but it's also a risk that may never come to pass,' she says. 'But we won't know if we just stop looking for it.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store