Protesters clash outside asylum hotel in North London as police issue arrest warnings
Conditions have been imposed on the two groups, Thistle Barbican needs to go - locals say no, and counter protest group Stand up to Racism. However, members of the Stand up to Racism group have formed up outside of their specified area, in Lever Street, crossing into Central Square.
Police have warned people to move back, even threatening arrests for those who don't do so. A spokesperson for the force posted to X: 'A group of counter protesters formed up outside the conditioned area and marched to Central Street.
READ MORE: Brave rape survivor tells of sex attack by North London man who 'groomed and controlled' her
READ MORE: Police impose conditions on asylum hotel protest in North London
'Officers prevented opposing groups coming together but those in the junction remain in breach of the conditions. Warnings are being given. Those who don't move will be arrested.'
The protest against the hotel being used to house asylum seekers has attracted people from outside the local community which means there is likely to be a large number of people attending. It has been restricted to the King Charles Square area, with both protests required to end by 4pm.
People believed to be migrants watched from open windows inside the hotel as protesters chanted and banged drums in the street below on this afternoon.
A student counter-protester outside the Thistle City Barbican Hotel said he wants migrants to 'feel safe' in the UK. Pat Prendergast, 21, said: 'I want people to feel safe. I think the (rival protesters) over there are making people feel unsafe.
'I want to stand up in solidarity and say that, you know, we want people here. We want migrants. We want asylum seekers.'
The protesters opposing the use of the hotel is noticeably smaller than the counter protest group. One man chanted in the direction of the hotel: 'Get these scum off our streets.'
A large group of masked protesters dressed in black chanting 'we are anti-fascist' appeared from a side street and marched towards the rival group outside the hotel. There were brief clashes before police rushed in to separate the two groups.
Chief Superintendent Clair Haynes, in charge of the policing operation, said: 'We have been in discussions with the organisers of both protests in recent days, building on the ongoing engagement between local officers, community groups and partners.
'We understand that there are strongly held views on all sides. Our officers will police without fear or favour, ensuring those exercising their right to protest can do so safely, but intervening at the first sign of actions that cross the line into criminality.
'We have used our powers under the Public Order Act to put conditions in place to prevent serious disorder and to minimise serious disruption to the lives of people and businesses in the local community.
'Those conditions identify two distinct protest areas where the protests must take place, meaning the groups will be separated but still within sight and sound of each other.'
Why are people protesting at hotels housing asylum seekers?
The protest at the Thistle City Barbican Hotel is the latest in a series outside of hotels housing asylum seekers. Rival groups have clashed outside The Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex during several demonstrations since July 13.
One of the migrants had been chased by protesters while out for a walk, according to Steve Smith, the chief executive of refugee charity Care4Calais, reports the BBC. Missiles were thrown and constables hurt as tensions rose at the hotel on July 17.
The protests were sparked after a man living there was charged with sexual assault, harassment and inciting a girl to engage in sexual activity. Hadush Kebatu, 41, has denied the offences and remains on remand in custody.
There have been similar protests outside the Britannia Hotel, in Canary Wharf, which saw protesters gather there following rumours that asylum seekers from The Bell had been moved there.
The Home Office denied there were asylum seekers in the hotel and confirmed they would not be moving any of those being housed at The Bell to The Britannia, although reports from today suggest some asylum seekers may have been moved to the hotel.
Got a story? Please get in touch at katherine.gray@reachplc.com
Looking for more from MyLondon? Subscribe to our daily newsletters here for the latest and greatest updates from across London.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
2 minutes ago
- CBS News
Can Texas Gov. Greg Abbott remove Democratic lawmakers who left the state over redistricting?
The Texas Legislature attempted to meet Monday to consider a redistricting plan that would favor Republicans, but Democratic members who left the state over the weekend did not return, denying the quorum needed to convene the session. Gov. Greg Abbott insisted he will take steps to remove those lawmakers from their seats, and Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows said he had signed civil arrest warrants for the absent Democrats. Republicans "can make idle threats, but as long as they are out of state, there's really nothing that they can do," said Mark Jones, a Rice University political science professor. More than 50 Texas House Democrats left the state on Sunday, leaving the chamber short of the two-thirds quorum needed to bring a vote to the floor. Democrats are protesting the President Trump-led effort by Republicans to redraw the state's U.S. House congressional map, which could net the GOP up to five more seats. "We are not fighting for the Democratic Party, we are fighting for the democratic process," Democratic state Rep. James Talarico tweeted about their action. "This House will not sit quietly while you obstruct the work of the people," Burrows said Monday. To assist Burrows, Abbot said Monday that he had ordered the Texas Department of Public Safety to "locate, arrest, and return to the House chamber any member who has abandoned their duty to Texans." However, the Texas DPS does not have jurisdiction to arrest them out of state. Rep. Ann Johnson, a Houston Democrat, told CBS News' Ed O'Keefe in an interview Monday that "a quorum break is written into the Texas Constitution" and "the threat of arrest is something that should be an alarm for a lot of folks." Abbott claimed on Fox News on Monday that the Democrats could face bribery charges if their costs while out of state are being covered by others. "I think based upon comments made by legislators themselves, they face a possibility of facing bribery charges, which is a second-degree felony in the state of Texas, there's one way to cure that, and that is if they get back to the state of Texas and make quorum today at a hearing that we have at 3 o'clock, they can cure themselves of any quid pro quo that would subject them to potential bribery charges," Abbott said. But Jones noted that "Texas, compared to other states, has very loose ethics laws." "The governor is certainly welcome to make that argument, and theoretically it has a limited level of potential to move forward, but at the end of the day, if you look at Texas ethics law and look at all of the things that are allowed under Texas ethics law … we would rank receiving money to pay a fine at the lower end at the potential for an ethics violation, let alone things that are illegal," Jones said. Abbott said Sunday that if members didn't return by a deadline of 3 p.m. Central Time on Monday, he would "invoke Texas Attorney General Opinion No. KP-0382 to remove the missing Democrats from membership in the Texas House." Abbott is citing a 2021 opinion from Texas' Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton, which was written after a previous walkout when Democratic lawmakers left the state to protest a change in the voting laws. The opinion, which is nonbinding, says a "district court may determine that a legislator has forfeited his or her office due to abandonment and can remove the legislator from office, thereby creating a vacancy." But Jones noted that the only legal ways to remove a Texas lawmaker is either for the person to be expelled by a vote of two-thirds of the Legislature — as was done to expel Republican Rep. Byron Slaton over misconduct in 2023 — or the ballot box. Republican state Rep. Briscoe Cain posted on social media Monday that he would be filing a bill that would declare a seat vacant if a legislator missed seven consecutive days of a session. But since there is no quorum, the bill can't go anywhere — at least for now. Abbott called a special session last month to take up the redistricting effort along with 17 other topics, which included relief for Texas flood victims, a review of the flood warning system and emergency preparedness, and a THC ban. Congressional redistricting, however, was considered first. Texas has a part-time legislature which meets for 140 days every other year. The governor has the right to call a 30-day special session to address certain topics. The current special session started on July 21. Abbott can call as many special sessions as he wants, which means that if Democrats run out the clock on this special session, he could call another one as soon as it ends.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Government asks body to consult on axing ‘discriminatory' minimum wage age bands
The Government has said it is pushing forward with plans to look at removing 'discriminatory' age bands for the national minimum wage as it extended the remit of the Low Pay Commission (LPC). It said the advisory body will consult with employers, trade unions and workers on narrowing the gap between the minimum wage rate for 18 to 20-year-olds, and the so-called national living wage – the UK minimum wage for workers 21 years and older. The LPC will also be required to put forward 'recommendations on achieving a single adult rate in the years ahead'. Chancellor Rachel Reeves said: 'To ensure the right balance is struck between the needs of workers, business affordability and the wider economy, the LPC is being asked to consult on several issues before recommending the new rates.' Last year, Labour committed to removing these age bands to create a 'genuine' national living wage, as part of efforts to bolster employment rights. Currently, the national living wage for workers aged 21 and older is £12.21. Meanwhile, the minimum wage for workers aged between 18 and 20 is £10. There is also a minimum wage for those aged under 18, and apprentices, of £7.55. The Government said the change to the LPC remit will also ensure it actively considers the cost of living in its recommendations for changes to the minimum wage which are next applied from April 2026. The LPC, which was founded in 1997, provides recommendations to the Government each October regarding how it believes the minimum wage should be changed. The Government ultimately sets minimum wage rates for the following April after this advice. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said: 'Low pay drags down living standards for our workers and in turn hurts our high streets and local businesses. 'This Government's plan for change will put money back in people's pockets, with this new remit marking the next step in considering how we ensure a fair deal for our lowest-paid workers while maintaining a competitive economy that boosts businesses and their employees alike.' Baroness Philippa Stroud, chairwoman of the LPC, said: 'We are pleased to receive our remit from the Government. 'Already, since the beginning of the year, we have spent significant time speaking with workers and employers to understand the pressures in the economy and the effects of the most recent increases in the minimum wage. 'We have held a successful call for evidence and received detailed submissions from all sides.'
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tougher gun laws introduced after Keyham and Woodmancote shootings
People with a record of violence or domestic abuse will be prevented from owning firearms under new rules following a series of killings in recent years. The new guidance, issued on Tuesday, comes in response to concerns raised by coroners and campaigners after shootings in Woodmancote, Sussex, and Keyham, near Plymouth. Police officers will be instructed to interview partners or other household members of people applying for a firearms licence to identify signs of domestic abuse or other factors that could make someone unsuitable to own a weapon. They must carry out additional checks to ensure people with a record of violence are not permitted to hold a firearms licence. The move comes two years after an inquest found that 'catastrophic failures' in the licensing system had meant Keyham gunman Jake Davison had been allowed to own a shotgun despite his history of violence. Davison, then 22, killed his mother and four others including a three-year-old girl in an eight-minute shooting spree before taking his own life in August 2021. Evidence of dishonesty will also count against an application, including withholding relevant medical history. Robert Needham, who killed his partner Kelly Fitzgibbons and their daughters Ava and Lexi with a legally owned shotgun at their home in Woodmancote in 2020, was given a licence despite admitting that he had failed to disclose a history of depression and work-related stress. Emma Ambler, Ms Fitzgibbons' sister, welcomed the changes but said there was 'still some way to go'. She said: 'I still believe that holding a gun licence is a privilege and not a right. 'The priority has to be the safety of society and it's so important to stop these extremely dangerous weapons falling into the wrong hands, which these changes will go some way to doing.' Tuesday's changes will also mean applicants for shotgun licences now require two referees rather than one, bringing the process into line with the rules for other firearms. Policing minister Dame Diana Johnson said: 'Only those who meet the highest standards of safety and responsibility should be permitted to use shotguns or firearms, and it is crucial that police have full information about the suitability of all applicants for these lethal weapons. 'The events in Woodmancote in 2020, Plymouth in 2021 and other cases provide a tragic reminder of what can happen when these weapons are in the hands of the wrong people, and we must do everything we can to protect the public.' Controls on shotgun ownership could be further toughened after another consultation, due to be launched later this year, that will also seek views on improving the rules on private firearms sales. The new consultation follows the case of Nicholas Prosper, who killed his mother, Juliana Falcon, and siblings Giselle and Kyle Prosper in Luton in 2024. Prosper, 19, had been able to purchase a shotgun and 100 cartridges from a legitimate firearms dealer after forging a licence. He was jailed for life with a minimum term of 49 years after pleading guilty to the murders earlier this year.
