
Congressional vote to overturn California clean car rules could kill New Mexico mandates
The U.S. Senate voted mostly along party lines Thursday to pass the resolutions blocking the coastal state's efforts to push the sale of electric vehicles. The House passed the resolutions a few weeks ago, with a handful of Democrats, including New Mexico's Gabe Vasquez, breaking with the caucus to support the rollback.
In 2022, California adopted its "Advanced Clean Cars II" regulation, which mandates that by 2035 all new passenger cars, trucks and SUVs sold in the state produce zero emissions. A handful of other Democratic-controlled states, including New Mexico, have followed suit, adopting similar regulations to phase in more zero-emission vehicles in an effort to combat climate change.
Thursday's votes overturned three waivers provided to California by the Biden administration that allowed the state to set more rigorous standards than those on the federal level. Other states cannot set their own standards but they are allowed to follow California's, NPR reported a few weeks ago.
President Donald Trump is expected to sign off on the measures. Assuming the action is held up in court — Democrats are arguing Congress didn't have the authority to overturn the regulations — the reversals will have an impact on New Mexico's own clean vehicle standards adopted in 2022 and 2023, Environment Department spokesperson Jorge Armando Estrada wrote in an email. For New Mexico, starting next year, 43% of passenger cars and light-duty trucks and 15% of commercial heavy-duty trucks shipped to local dealerships were supposed to produce zero emissions.
"This is the same authority that underpins New Mexico's rules," Estrada wrote.
The department did not respond Friday evening to follow-up questions about how it plans to proceed.
In a news release Thursday, Western Resource Advocates said the votes "undermine nearly 50 years of precedent under the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency."
"Prior to [the] vote, other states could either rely on the weaker federal standard or adopt these more ambitious emissions standards, so these three rules were the nation's most robust path to decarbonize the transportation sector and protect people from dangerous air pollution," the organization's release said.
The vote comes after the Environment Department announced a proposed clean transportation fuels rule earlier this week, which would create a carbon intensity standard for fuel used in transportation and a credit system for companies making or importing fuels. Stay below the standard, you earn credits; exceed it, and be required to buy credits.
Hybrid market
In the third quarter of 2024, full electric vehicle, hybrid and plug-in hybrid sales hit an all-time high nationally, making up around 21% of the market, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.
But adoption isn't even across states.
In 2023, less than 1% of vehicle registrations in New Mexico were for full electric vehicles, according to data reported by the Department of Energy. And at least two states delayed implementation of their own clean vehicle rules in recent weeks — voluntarily.
In a late April executive order, Vermont Gov. Philip Scott, a Republican, said charging infrastructure and technology hasn't kept up with the regulatory schedule.
Some manufacturers are requiring that car dealers sell zero-emission vehicles before internal combustion engine vehicles, reducing the overall supply, Scott wrote. Tariffs are also increasing costs and disrupting the supply chain for the industry, he added.
'I continue to believe we should be incentivizing Vermonters to transition to cleaner energy options like electric vehicles," Scott said in a news release. "However, we have to be realistic about a pace that's achievable. It's clear we don't have anywhere near enough charging infrastructure and insufficient technological advances in heavy-duty vehicles to meet current goals."
A memo sent by Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Director Leah Feldon last week, meanwhile, stated some manufacturers are limiting the sales of internal combustion engine trucks to remain in compliance with the clean trucks requirements, reducing overall vehicle availability for drivers in the state.
'While manufacturers were involved in developing the [Advanced Clean Trucks] framework, they now indicate that ACT requirements are too difficult to meet,' Feldon wrote.
In the memo, Feldon indicated that the department wouldn't be enforcing the regulations or fining manufacturers right away, so long as they kept selling internal combustion engine vehicles to Oregonians without limitations, took 'good faith' efforts to reduce emissions, and continued to follow reporting requirements. Although the stick is gone, the carrot remains: a credit program for zero-emission vehicles sent to the state remains in effect.
'The current federal administration has created significant uncertainty around [zero-emission vehicle] incentives, electric vehicle charging investments, manufacturing and tariffs, each of which threaten a smooth transition to medium- and heavy-duty ZEVs,' Feldon wrote.
Governors push back
A group of governors, including New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham, Oregon's Tina Kotek and Colorado's Jared Polis, reaffirmed their support for the programs. The U.S. Climate Alliance, of which the 11 governors are members, announced the launch of the Affordable Clean Cars Coalition on Friday.
"The federal government and Congress are putting polluters over people and creating needless chaos for consumers and the market," read a statement from the governors. "But our commitment to safeguarding Americans' fundamental right to clean air is resolute. We will continue collaborating as states and leveraging our longstanding authority under the Clean Air Act, including through state programs..."
They added, "As we consider next steps for our clean vehicle programs, our states will engage stakeholders and industry to provide the regulatory certainty needed while redoubling our efforts to build a cleaner and healthier future."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Those who invested in Castings (LON:CGS) five years ago are up 9.0%
Ideally, your overall portfolio should beat the market average. But every investor is virtually certain to have both over-performing and under-performing stocks. So we wouldn't blame long term Castings P.L.C. (LON:CGS) shareholders for doubting their decision to hold, with the stock down 23% over a half decade. On top of that, the share price is down 5.9% in the last week. However, this move may have been influenced by the broader market, which fell 2.6% in that time. Since shareholders are down over the longer term, lets look at the underlying fundamentals over the that time and see if they've been consistent with returns. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. While markets are a powerful pricing mechanism, share prices reflect investor sentiment, not just underlying business performance. One imperfect but simple way to consider how the market perception of a company has shifted is to compare the change in the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price movement. During the five years over which the share price declined, Castings' earnings per share (EPS) dropped by 16% each year. The share price decline of 5% per year isn't as bad as the EPS decline. So investors might expect EPS to bounce back -- or they may have previously foreseen the EPS decline. The image below shows how EPS has tracked over time (if you click on the image you can see greater detail). Before buying or selling a stock, we always recommend a close examination of historic growth trends, available here. What About Dividends? As well as measuring the share price return, investors should also consider the total shareholder return (TSR). Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. Arguably, the TSR gives a more comprehensive picture of the return generated by a stock. In the case of Castings, it has a TSR of 9.0% for the last 5 years. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. This is largely a result of its dividend payments! A Different Perspective Investors in Castings had a tough year, with a total loss of 16% (including dividends), against a market gain of about 22%. However, keep in mind that even the best stocks will sometimes underperform the market over a twelve month period. Longer term investors wouldn't be so upset, since they would have made 1.7%, each year, over five years. It could be that the recent sell-off is an opportunity, so it may be worth checking the fundamental data for signs of a long term growth trend. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. Even so, be aware that Castings is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those is potentially serious... We will like Castings better if we see some big insider buys. While we wait, check out this free list of undervalued stocks (mostly small caps) with considerable, recent, insider buying. Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on British exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio

Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Corporate profits are slowing
Shares in American Eagle Outfitters rose nearly 24 per cent yesterday after President Donald Trump called the company's controversial Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Axios
13 minutes ago
- Axios
Trump, Murdoch agree to pause WSJ case deposition until after dismissal ruling
President Trump and Rupert Murdoch reached a deal Monday to postpone the media mogul's deposition in a libel lawsuit related to the Wall Street Journal publishing a report on an Epstein birthday book, per court filings. Why it matters: Trump's lawyers had raised concerns about Murdoch's age and health when they asked a federal court in Florida last week to expedite the 94-year-old's deposition, but the deal postpones this until after the outlet's upcoming motion to dismiss the case. Now, neither Murdoch nor the 79-year-old Trump are likely to be deposed for months, per Politico's Josh Gerstein, who first reported on Monday's filing in Miami. Zoom in: "Until Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Complaint is adjudicated, the Parties agree not to engage in discovery," according to the filing. If the WSJ's motion to dismiss Trump's lawsuit is denied, Murdoch would appear in person for a deposition within 30 days of such a ruling. Murdoch must provide a sworn declaration about his current health condition within three days of a court order approving the agreement and the Australian-born mogul has agreed to provide regular updates on his health, per the filing. Driving the news: Trump is suing Murdoch, the WSJ, its owner Dow Jones, its parent company News Corp. and others over the Journal report last month about a " bawdy" birthday letter" that the outlet said bore the president's name.