logo
‘Inheriting £10m was a curse': why young heirs are giving away their fortune

‘Inheriting £10m was a curse': why young heirs are giving away their fortune

Telegraph12-03-2025
When Paolo Fresia inherited tens of millions of pounds following his mother's death, it was 'a blessing and a curse'.
At first, he simply acted as though it wasn't happening. Then, at age 22, 'my focus was to run away and pretend that it didn't exist', he says.
'Unfortunately for some other of my relatives who received money,' – hundreds of millions from the family vermouth company fortune were split between them – the windfall 'ended up corrupting their lifestyle and also their mental health, so it wasn't good for them, and that money was wasted.'
The young and very, very wealthy, it transpired, 'are not the people probably best suited to steward it'.
It is for this reason that 36-year-old Fresia, who lives in London, has joined Patriotic Millionaires UK – a group designed to help the rich give away their money.
With millennials set to inherit huge fortunes – and current millionaires giving away less than ever – younger adults are seeking new ways to part with their cash.
'You don't want to come out as wealthy to your friends'
Finding out you're set to inherit a windfall isn't the magical Hallmark moment many might expect, Fresia says.
As well as dealing with the trauma of the death that has inevitably accompanied it, often the young 'don't want to come out as wealthy to their friends'.
And so he ignored his fortune, working for Medicins Sans Frontieres in sustainability, before realising some of the company's investments didn't align with his beliefs. Things came to a head when Fresia reached his mid-20s.
'I really said, 'Okay, I can't run away from it any more. I've got to do something about it'.'
Fresia began looking into ways his money might make a difference. He had been working for a family firm in Hong Kong when he began enquiring about where his money might be put to good use.
He was pointed in the direction of networks like Patriotic Millionaires, which guide people who would otherwise have no idea how to spend their large sums.
'Life became a lot easier because there are incredible advisers that you can pay to give you advice. But in the end, the buck stops with you,' he adds.
'If you don't do the personal work of really acknowledging your privilege, understanding your responsibility to redistribute away resources and your power – and so sometimes acknowledging the fact that you're not the best person to make those investment or philanthropic decisions – then, of course, the whole thing doesn't work.'
Antonia Mitchell, director of Aurelia Philanthropy, says that around 40pc of her clients are aged under 40, typically seeking her help to spend away family money, rather than their own.
Some $90 trillion (£70 trillion) will be transferred to American millennials, with 94pc of the wealthiest fifth of households in the UK set to leave a bequest, according to figures from the Resolution Foundation.
Yet, unlike their parents, younger generations are most keen to spend on what Mitchell calls 'destitution issues', such as refugees, gender or race matters, those affecting the LGBTQ+ community, 'and medical research in which, interestingly, they include mental health – which is in stark contrast to their parents who tend to avoid it', Mitchell adds.
'A lot of these issues tend to be tricky to navigate between their generation and the older generation who have radically different views,' she explains. 'There's no doubt that the increase in discussion around issues like gender politics have shaped why they see it through that lens.'
Fresia says that among his age group and below, some wealthy people 'do feel really guilty, especially when the history of their wealth is in industries that are a little bit more controversial, like weapons or oil and gas – and it's understandable, of course.
'But it's about switching that to being more action-oriented, and saying, 'The money was earned in this way. How can you have a clear reparations plan to make good all the negative impacts that money might have made while being made, and then moving on to redistributing it?' I operate under that mindset'.
'It's the same inheritance issues everyone faces – but on steroids'
In typical millennial style, discussions over how to give away large sums often happen via dedicated retreats where attendees, clad in 'Tax the rich' T-shirts, visit workshops to confront their 'wealth shadows' – the physical embodiment of the anguish their fortune has wrought.
Online networks also play a big part, as does social media. Many groups have formed too (namely in America), including Donor Revolt and Resource Generation – all dedicated to helping the young syphon off inherited cash.
The methods people choose can be somewhat unorthodox.
Last year, Marlene Engelhorn, a 32-year-old from Vienna, announced that she would be distributing the £21.5m she had received from her grandmother's pharmaceutical empire to 50 recipients, who would be selected based on the suggestions from the 10,000 letters she posted out to fellow Austrians, which asked who they thought would be most deserving.
Mitchell says that 'giving is easy, giving well is hard, and as they start realising that giving well is difficult, that's when they call me'. Her client with the smallest fortune is giving away £60,000 – the largest, £1.5m.
'I do see a lot of tension,' she adds of the family dynamics that ensue – either because parents see their child's giving intentions as the rejection of a gift, relatives disagree over where money should go ('I was dealing with somebody who was actually really disappointed in their child… they cared about homelessness, but the father was uninterested'), or there are arguments over what they're entitled to in the first place.
'I always say it's the same challenges everybody else faces, but on steroids.'
Mitchell has one client who grew up on the edges of poverty, 'did really well for himself, and his children have grown up in private education… How does he then teach his children the values that have been central to his success?' she says.
Financial and social responsibility can be difficult things for rich kids to learn: 'Philanthropy is all about your moral compass.'
How, or perhaps what, to tell children is a perennial conundrum among many wealthy families.
Mitchell's past clients have included the offspring of an entrepreneur who 'hadn't realised how wealthy the family was, and then it all came out in the media. And for them that was quite traumatic and quite stressful… they'd read so many articles about rich people doing bad things, and they didn't want to be part of that.'
With some of the youngest inheritors now having children of their own, these quandaries are becoming more acute.
The question is 'really on my mind these days, actually', Fresia says of his four and six-year-old. 'I really hope that they will be angry at me when they're teenagers for not having given enough money away, as opposed to not having given enough money to them. But I'll see if I succeed in making them angry in that direction.'
He admits, however, that, 'I'm not a super frugal saint.'
His children go to private school, the family goes on nice holidays, and while he is a 'huge admirer' of people like Engelhorn, he says he is 'not as brave as them'. His risk tolerance has fallen since his brood expanded (currently 80pc of his wealth is invested in good causes).
He feels that his own generation, and the one they have borne, will have a very different experience of inheriting wealth.
'A lot of what was happening in previous generations is that because of this paradigm of accumulating and preserving, the younger generation was shielded from knowing how much they were going to inherit and what the money was for,' he explains.
'Whereas we are going to be very clear with our young children about the fact that this wealth, especially because it was inherited, is not for the purpose of living an overly luxurious life,' he says.
Rather, Fresia wants his children to learn that the money should be viewed 'for the purposes of being a good steward of it and redistributing it.'
Beyond the money, 'clarity, I think, is the biggest gift that I can give them, because I did not have that. I really didn't'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Moment 'air scooter' bids to fly across English Channel
Moment 'air scooter' bids to fly across English Channel

Daily Mirror

time8 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Moment 'air scooter' bids to fly across English Channel

Franky Zapata, 46, attempted to cross the English Channel in his AirScooter as part of a bid to impress investors in the US and market it to a whole new audience across the Atlantic This is the moment an "air scooter" crashed into the water during a failed bid to cross the English Channel. ‌ A French start-up tried to make history on Friday by crossing the Channel using vertical take-off and landing craft. Franky Zapata, 46, hopped in his AirScooter in Sangatte, near Calais, in a bid to complete the 21-mile journey across the Channel toward Kent. ‌ He zoomed across the water but decided to turn back after 17 minutes. Just nine minutes later, the craft slowly nosedived into the sea as observers watched on from a nearby boat. ‌ The AirScooter team said an "electric parachute" had slowed the descent and prevented a freefall. Team members are now looking to recover the air scooter. Before the flight, Zapata said he was not "100 per cent sure" the craft would reach Dover, in Kent. He added: "We've been rehearsing the flight for months and months. ‌ "It's relatively good but it's still new. Sometimes everything goes well and sometimes not so well." Zapata had hoped a Channel crossing would be a massive opportunity to market the craft to American investors. The US currently has fewer regulations on ultralight aircraft compared to counterparts in Europe, including France and the UK. ‌ But the crash now indicates Zapata will need to examine the product to iron out any possible flaws with its design. The Times reported Zapata wants wealthy out-of-town homeowners "who want to fly to the neighbours' for a barbecue on a Sunday." He latter conceded, "they won't be able to use them over towns." The craft weighs about 115kg (253lbs) and was said to be able to fly about two hours and reach a speed of 62mph. The aircraft is estimated to cost about £149,000 and Zapata has announced he intends to open a flight centre in Las Vegas in 2028, that will give people the opportunity to try it out. Zapata crossed the Channel on a hoverboard n 2019, which cemented his reputation. He went on to be asked to fly over the Champ Elysées avenue in Paris for the Bastille Day parade about a year later.

The £200bn reason why Swinney must not make a mess of Trump visit
The £200bn reason why Swinney must not make a mess of Trump visit

Scotsman

time9 hours ago

  • Scotsman

The £200bn reason why Swinney must not make a mess of Trump visit

Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... There is a surplus of advice to John Swinney about issues he should raise with President Donald Trump, most of it misguided. This is not an opportunity to be wasted on grandstanding or moral indignation. The policy area on which Mr Swinney might have some possibility of influence is around trade and tariffs. So far, Keir Starmer has done pretty well on that front so, at this point, the obligation is to consolidate that advantage, not to threaten it. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad There should be the closest possible co-operation between Downing Street and Edinburgh to ensure that Mr Swinney is singing from exactly the same hymn sheet as the Prime Minister, including appreciation of the trade deal to which Mr Trump has apparently signed up. It is advisable to include the word 'apparently' in every such statement since it is well established that when dealing with Mr Trump, the Lord giveth and the Lord taketh away, particularly if provoked. A lot of livelihoods are dependent on not screwing it up. It also helps to understand and, to some extent, empathise with where Mr Trump is coming from on the whole question of tariffs and protectionism, which runs deep in the American psyche. It was only in 1947 that the USA converted to the principles of free trade, and even then a lot of its people and communities were never really convinced. We should be able to understand that. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Keir Starmer has worked hard to mitigate the damage to the UK economy caused by Donald Trump's tariffs (Picture: Stefan Rousseau/pool) | Getty Images 'Liberation Day' stock market plunge It is received wisdom and probably true that nobody ever wins from trade wars. However, that seems a bit glib in the vast swathes of America which have seen the disappearance of proud manufacturing industry. Mr Trump has not found it difficult to convince his base that the old medicine of tariffs is required to save what's left, or even turn the lights back on in derelict factories and mills. He soon found out after being re-elected that rhetoric on this subject is easier than implementation. His great 'Liberation Day' tariffs announcement led to stock markets plummeting and they were hastily put on hold. Since then, there has been more bluster than clarity but as things stand, the UK will 'benefit' from a ten per cent tariff, significantly lower than the EU. Our exporting industries can live with that. The Scotch Whisky Association has welcomed the UK Government's 'measured and pragmatic approach'. So let's just keep the ship steady until the storm passes. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Cashmere tariff panic My own learning curve about the direct relevance of tariffs to that most basic human commodity – jobs – came shortly after I became UK trade minister and received a call at home one Saturday morning from the panic-stricken managing director of a Borders cashmere company which exported 90 per cent of its production to the United States. Did I know what was going on with the World Trade Organisation authorising US tariffs on cashmere knitwear as part of a long-running dispute about the EU giving preferential treatment to Caribbean bananas, as opposed to those imported from American-owned companies in Latin America? If this went ahead, many hundreds of jobs were at stake. It was the kind of call one does not forget. To the uninitiated, it would require a book to explain how cashmere knitwear had become intertwined with bananas in a trade war, but take my word for it. We did pretty well on that one, by underwriting the impact of tariffs until that particular storm had passed, which it duly did. But it taught me two lessons – first, the ruthlessness with which the US acts on trade issues and, second, the direct and immediate impact this has on jobs. That's why it is so important to proceed with care, particularly in the current, capricious environment. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Harris Tweed also has a colourful history of avoiding punitive US tariffs which once involved a Free Church minister going to Washington to plead the industry's special case, having first rallied support for exemption among fellow fundamentalists in the textile-producing areas of the southern States. At that time, vast quantities of the fabric were exported to the US to be turned into jackets. The change that has taken place epitomises the issue. To all intents and purposes, there is no American garment-making industry any more. Much of the fabric goes to other countries with lower labour costs and it is the finished products which enter America and will be subject to tariffs at whatever rate is eventually set. Fortunately, the American market is much less dominant than it used to be, for there would now be no space for even a Free Church minister, never mind a trade one, to exercise benign influence! Value of exports to US is huge For similar reasons, Ireland is waiting with trepidation for the terms of the US-EU deal. By relying so heavily on American tech companies for low-taxed inward investment, the threat of tariffs on the finished products which are exported back to the US is a serious threat to its economic base. Trump's message to Apple and the likes that they should be manufacturing in America is intended to be powerful. Last time round, Trump's tariffs cost the Scotch Whisky industry around £600 million. Understandably, along with Scottish salmon, it tends to catch the headlines while representing a modest proportion of the overall picture. The United States market is worth almost £200 billion to the UK in goods and services, by far our biggest trading partner. The difference between ten per cent and even 15 per cent matters a lot, which is why Mr Starmer's trade deal is so important. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad

Donald Trump says he 'loves standing on the soil of Scotland'
Donald Trump says he 'loves standing on the soil of Scotland'

The National

time10 hours ago

  • The National

Donald Trump says he 'loves standing on the soil of Scotland'

Ian Murray told the PA news agency what the US President's first words were after disembarking from Air Force One in Prestwick. The UK Government minister was the first person to greet the president in Scotland as he begins his four day visit to the country. Speaking after meeting the American leader, Murray told PA: 'The president came off the flight, and I said, 'Mr president, welcome to Scotland – the home country of your dear mother', and he said, 'It's great to be here, I always love standing on the soil of Scotland'. READ MORE: LIVE: Updates as protesters rally against Donald Trump in Scotland 'I said, 'I hope you're looking forward to a bit of downtime with some golf this weekend', and he said, 'Yes'. And I said, 'Well, we've whipped up a bit of a wind for you to make it a bit more competitive', and he went, 'I'm looking forward to it'.' Murray said Trump was given a 'warm reception' as he got off his presidential plane. Hundreds gathered on the Mound overlooking Prestwick Airport for the president's arrival. A Trump flag was flown while a few spectators wore 'Make America Great Again' hats, although many of those attending were locals and aviation enthusiasts, including some who had travelled from England. Murray said: 'Spotters hills, as it's called, where all the plane spotters come to Prestwick, was absolutely full. 'You could see that from the tarmac and as Air Force One came in, people were snapping away on their photographs. 'To see all that happening is quite a spectacle in itself. 'It's really good to have that kind of focus on Scotland.' Trump will meet Prime Minister Keir Starmer during his trip to discuss the UK-US trade deal as Britain hopes to be spared from the president's tariff regime. The Scottish Secretary said: 'Really, the purpose of this weekend, the purpose of greeting the president off the plane, the purpose of the Prime Minister's relationship with the president is to build that close relationship, to make sure that that old alliance is nurtured, and to do that for the benefit of the national interest, which is about jobs and growth here in the UK, and particularly Scotland.' Trump will meet Scottish First Minister John Swinney during his trip as he opens a new golf course in Aberdeenshire. (Image: PA) Before flying to Prestwick, Trump said in Washington that he was 'looking forward' to meeting Swinney, describing him as a 'good man' – the same phrase he used for the Prime Minister after landing in Scotland. Asked about the president's relationship with the UK, Murray said: 'The Prime Minister has taken a very pragmatic approach to the relationship with the president of the United States, because it's in our national interest to do so, whether it be on defence, security, trade, cultural, historic ties. 'It's a historic alliance, and that alliance has to be nurtured and continue through to the future, because it's quite clear that our relationship with United States is good for jobs and growth here in Scotland and across the UK. 'The Prime Minister knows that, and knows that working very closely with the US is in our national interest.' Asked about protests, which are expected across the country, Murray said people had a right to demonstrate, adding: 'Freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and freedom to protest is a key cornerstone of both countries, America and the UK, and the right to be able to protest if they so wish to so.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store