
Controversial plan to build new homes on greenbelt land near Airdrie kicked out by councillors
A controversial plan to build hundreds of new homes on greenbelt land near Airdrie has been kicked out by North Lanarkshre councillors.
The massive Orchard Brae development, which proposed to build almost 1000 new homes on the Europark site, adjacent to Eurocentral, went before councillors on Thursday.
North Lanarkshire Council planners advised the 244 hectare plan should be rejected, with councillors voting to knock back the application with 42 against and 18 supporters backing it.
Nine councillors withdrew after declaring a possible conflict of interest.
The council report stated: 'It is acknowledged that the proposal has some benefits, but the need for additional housing land and the justification provided for the employment land are not accepted, and it is considered that the employment and economic benefits are likely to be substantially less than the applicant estimates.
'The benefits of the proposal are therefore not considered to be sufficient to justify such a significant departure from the development plan, and for this reason it is recommended that planning permission in principle should be refused.
'The proposal is contrary to National Planning Framework and to North Lanarkshire Local Development Plan Policies as the development would result in detrimental impacts upon a valuable area of the Glasgow and Clyde Valley Green Network.
'The development as a whole is inconsistent with the wider policies of the development plan and therefore its adverse impacts on the Glasgow and Clyde Valley Green Network cannot be justified.
'It is not considered that any adequate justification, special circumstances or material considerations have been demonstrated which would justify a departure from these policies.'
Opponents - including the Woodhall, Faskine and Palacecraig Conservation Group - believed the plans would destroy a historic area of greenbelt, damage wildlife and deprive residents of valuable outdoor space.
At the meeting, objector Dr Ann Glen called on councillors to reject the plans.
She said: 'Nature's condition reflects our values. Our mission should to be to foster a world where communities can flourish in harmony with nature. Not by destroying it, as the destruction of this greenbelt would imply.
'Nor should we be allowing it to be destroyed for speculative gain. That is completely unacceptable.'
Politicians from all sides of the political spectrum spoke of their delight at the news.
Central Scotland Labour MSP Richard Leonard said: 'When I first stood for Parliament in 2016 this was a rising issue. Almost a decade of campaigning led by local people has paid off.
'It has been a long hard 10 years but this is a victory for democracy and the people. We remain vigilant and ready to keep the campaign going for as long as it takes.'
Airdrie South Progressive Change councillor Paul DiMascio said: 'Local democracy won through and the strength of feeling against building on the green belt had been made clear. Crucially, approval would have been a clear breach of national and local guidelines.
'Should Orchard Brae appeal to the Scottish Reporter it is imperative that they both know the strength of feeling which was apparent against this proposal and take full account of North Lanarkshire's position which was made clear and ensure that this development does not get the nod down the line on appeal, via the back door.
Conservative MSP Graham Simpson added: 'It's fantastic news that the massive Woodhall and Faskine development has been rejected.
'It's been my pleasure and honour to work alongside everyone in opposing these plans.'
Scott Gillespie, director for Orchard Brae, said the group were disappointed by the decision made by North Lanarkshire Council.
He continued: "When officers published their report recommending refusal, despite a decade of discussions and the changes they asked us to implement in 2024 being made, it was clear that we faced an uphill task.
'I want to thank the 18 elected members who supported our proposals alongside our local partners who joined us at the hearing. Their support is very much appreciated.
'We remain fully committed to our vision for this landmark mixed-use development, which we firmly believe would deliver significant benefits to the local community and beyond including more than 2000 jobs.
'It is apparent at the hearing that these benefits cannot be readily delivered elsewhere in North Lanarkshire, so there is a threat that they may now be lost.
'We have taken on board feedback from the council and local stakeholders and shaped our plans accordingly, including a vibrant economic hub, much-needed housing, a medical centre, a state-of-the-art football facility, a new primary school, additional investment in surrounding secondary schools, and, notably, a nationally-recognised country park covering 64 per cent of the site.
'This proposal was never a choice between development and greenspace. It offered the best of both, delivering jobs, training opportunities, and high-quality, sustainable homes within an enhanced natural environment.
'Many within the local community have shown strong support for this balanced and forward-thinking approach. It is unfortunate that this was not reflected in today's decision.
'We will now carefully consider our next steps and how best to move forward with our proposals and long-term vision for the area.'
*Don't miss the latest headlines from around Lanarkshire. Sign up to our newsletters here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
5 days ago
- Daily Mail
HOLYROOD SKETCH STEPHEN DAISLEY: It's two months off for the Class of '25... I'd give them all 12
The Holyrood Class of '25 marked their final day of term yesterday, not with the traditional cider down the park and ritual burning of school ties, but with one of the grimmer sessions of FMQs I've sat through. Every other question was on Scotland's woeful record on cancer. Russell Findlay set the tone by noting that one in three cancer patients do not start treatment within the target time. A dismaying statistic in itself, but one made all the bleaker given the target time is 62 days. Findlay rhymed off the health boards where patients were still waiting to start life-saving care. John Swinney noted North Lanarkshire wasn't listed, as it is meeting the target. Bully for them, but hardly reassuring for those in the rest of the country. Findlay had an idea. Those seldom end well in politics, but the Tory leader made a reasonable suggestion: ring-fence the SNP government's half-billion underspend for an emergency cancer fund. The First Minister objected that his latest budget had hiked up NHS cancer cash. Then he did something he really needs to knock on the head. He argued that, if you look at median waiting times, things are going better. They are for the median patient, but what about those waiting longer? In cancer treatment, time is as precious as any medicine or therapy. Mark Twain was right about the three types of falsehoods: lies, damned lies, and statistics. But trying to hoodwink cancer patients with statistics is the most damnable of all. The Health Secretary was notably absent, though he's seldom notable when he's present. Findlay queried Neil Gray's whereabouts. My guess would be in a ministerial limo bound for Pittodrie or the pub. But, no, he was in Osaka at a health technology conference. It's his second official visit lately. I'm sure we're all impressed Mr Gray is big in Japan, but if he wants to be a hit at home he might want to spend more time in Scotland doing his job. Findlay sniped that the NHS was in crisis but the Health Secretary was 'out of the country talking tech'. It's got to be an improvement on what he talks here. Chanting a litany of SNP failures, Anas Sarwar asked if 'the guy who promised to steady the ship has now become the captain of the Titanic'. It's worse than that: Swinney is the captain and the iceberg. Since becoming an MSP in 2024, Tim Eagle has brought a much-needed quality to the debating chamber: snark. He succeeded Donald Cameron after his elevation to the Lords, and while his predecessor was a patrician Highland gent, Eagle is a squawking, talons-bared bird of prey. 'There is no political disaster like an SNP disaster,' he spat, describing how the visitor levy was causing a 'crisis' for rural businesses, including 750 firms in his neck of the woods. The recipients of his philippic mumbled their displeasure. 'You can mutter away, but it's true,' he told them. Gas, meet peep. Holyrood has now entered its summer recess and MSPs are off for two months. The length of break upsets voters, who reckon politicians should spend less time on their hols and more in parliament. Have you seen what happens when they're in parliament? The GRR Bill, the DRS scheme, ferries that can't sail. At least when they're on a beach they're not creating new thought crimes to charge us with. Two months off? I'd give them all 12.


Daily Record
25-06-2025
- Daily Record
North Lanarkshire Council confirms £1m-plus repair costs for Airdrie's John Smith Pool but is 'confident' facility will reopen
Details will be given to the communities committee on August 18, with repair work to be undertaken thereafter, if realignment of funds is approved. North Lanarkshire Council has confirmed it will cost more than £1m to repair Airdrie's John Smith Pool - but is "confident" in the facility's "timely reopening". Last week, Lanarkshire Live reported on how the popular town centre leisure venue was set to be shut for a further two months, after its doors were closed in late December for what was initially described as "technical issues" before being identified as "flooding to the pool plant room". Councillors and officers have been exploring ways to reopen the "critical community asset" since and the local authority's Labour administration will put forward recommendations to committee in August that will ask councillors to approve a "realignment of funds" to ensure the pool returns for use. It is expected that it will cost £1.057 million to reopen the facility. Council leader Jim Logue said: "Despite scaremongering attempts from local politicians, the closure of John Smith Pool was never on the table. "The pool suffered serious damage over the Christmas period, and it has taken time to assess the damage, calculate the associated costs and determine a plan to reopen the pool and avoid further similar issues in the coming years. "As such, I instructed officers to detail the costs for repair and enhancement and this will total £1.057 million, with the details being brought to the meeting of the communities committee on August 18. "It remains my expectation that following committee approval, repair work will be undertaken thereafter and the people who use this pool will have access to it once again. "I wish to thank residents for their continued patience and pay tribute to those councillors who have worked diligently to find a solution, while others have indulged in posturing and political opportunism. "This Labour administration will always put our communities first." Airdrie MSP Neil Gray says his constituents "have been given mixed messages for months as to what is happening with the pool". He added: "The John Smith Pool must be reopened as quickly as possible. "It is well used and popular, not just with leisure swimmers, but local clubs and community groups. "My constituents have been given mixed messages for months as to what is happening with the pool and have been left to travel across North Lanarkshire for swimming lessons, club swimming and leisure activities. "Local clubs, social groups and additional support needs groups have been let down and kept in the dark, continuing to be charged despite being considerably inconvenienced or not being able to access a pool at all."


Daily Record
24-06-2025
- Daily Record
Council in secret pothole repair company payout over £31m court challenge
The local authority has refused to reveal how much it has paid to settle a legal challenge. One of Scotland's biggest local authorities has settled a £31million court battle after being forced to make a massive payout to a pothole repair company. North Lanarkshire Council chiefs are refusing to say how much they paid to construction firm Amey after it took legal action over a botched contract. The settlement could run up to tens of millions at a time when the council is facing a budget deficit of £13.4million this year. Councillors have demanded the local authority reveal how much public cash has been lost as a result of the scandal. Gerry Brennan, Progressive Change North Lanarkshire councillor for Motherwell North, said: 'The people of North Lanarkshire need to know how much has been paid as a result of incompetence in managing this contract. 'The council has a budget deficit over the next three years of £62million. We estimate the settlement figure for this case to be around £31million given what the firm wanted in compensation in the original court case. 'As a local authority we simply do not have that kind of money to spend. It should be spent on improving local services, making the roads better and improving our schools. It should not be lining the pockets of corporations merely because a contract was mishandled by this administration and council officials.' Amey lodged a £45million claim against the council in the Court of Session after it awarded a 12-year road maintenance contract to a German firm last summer. Court documents show the amount was later revised to £31million. Amey argued the offer put forward by Hochtief PPP Solutions was 'abnormally low' and should have been excluded from the contest. Lawyers also accused the council of 'failing to act transparently' by not listening to Amey's concerns about how the contract was awarded. The case has now settled out of court. Brennan said: 'We will not stop pushing for transparency and demand the council make the figures public.' A spokeswoman for North Lanarkshire Council said: 'The case has formally concluded and a settlement agreed.'