"Big, beautiful bill" pushes millions of people away from social safety net
Why it matters: Experts say the cuts could unleash a tidal wave of pain — overcrowded emergency rooms, an increase in chronic health care issues, more medical debt, and more folks going hungry.
If the $4 trillion bill passes into law, it would be the biggest cut to the social safety net in decades, as the Washington Post noted.
State of play: It's hard to know exactly where the bill will land, but it's on track to cut 20% of spending on food stamps, or SNAP, with more than 2 million losing benefits, per an estimate from the Congressional Budget Office provided to Senate Democrats.
Cuts to Medicaid could lead to nearly 12 million people losing health insurance, per the CBO.
Changes to the Affordable Care Act could lead to losses for millions more; others would face higher healthcare costs.
There's massive overlap here — nearly 30 million of the 38.3 million people receiving SNAP in 2022 were also enrolled in Medicaid, notes KFF.
It's a double-whammy: these folks would need more for healthcare, while being further stretched on groceries.
By the numbers: The bottom 20% of earners would see a nearly 3% decline in income, about $700, under the Senate version of the bill. That's per a new analysis from the Yale Budget Lab, which takes into the social safety net changes into account.
The top 1 percent would see a nearly 2% increase, or $30,000.
The intrigue: Many of the losses in Medicaid and SNAP coverage are the result of new work requirements that opponents say are actually red tape thickets that typically lead people to lose benefits — even those who are working.
Proponents argue that work requirements for able-bodied adults help "reduce unnecessary enrollments in welfare," as this Heritage Foundation report explains.
The other side: The White House and Congressional Republicans say work requirements are just a common-sense way to reduce waste, fraud and abuse.
"By slashing waste, fraud, and abuse in these programs and implementing commonsense work requirements, The One, Big, Beautiful Bill will preserve these vital lifelines for generations of Americans to come," White House spokesman Kush Desai said in a statement.
"The bill's pro-growth provisions and working class tax cuts will turbocharge America's economic resurgence."
The White House also argues that the Congressional Budget Office's assumptions about Obamacare changes are overblown.
💭 Emily's thought bubble: Beginning in 2020, when Trump was in office, the federal government unleashed a torrent of money in social safety net spending that continued into the Biden era. It drastically reduced poverty rates in the U.S.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
22 minutes ago
- Newsweek
'Free America' Anti-Trump Protests Expand Across Nation For 4th of July
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Hundreds of "Free America" demonstrations against President Donald Trump and his administration are planned nationwide on July 4. The protests are being organized by the same group behind the Women's March, with the stated goal being to "Free America from the grip of hate and the politics of fear." They are taking the form of various community gatherings, including block parties, banner drops, barbecues, and dance events. Nichole Geibel, a 'Free America' protest organizer in Ohio, and Co-Chair of the North Ridgeville Democrats, told Newsweek: "The motivation behind this event is the growing frustration so many Americans have with the policies at the federal and state levels that infringe on our fundamental rights and take choice away from all of us and our communities. We believe that freedom of speech, personal autonomy and accountability in government are always important and always need to be fought for." Newsweek has reached out to the White House for comment via email. A protester waves an upside down American flag in front of the Capitol, Tuesday, March 4, 2025, in Washington. A protester waves an upside down American flag in front of the Capitol, Tuesday, March 4, 2025, in Washington. Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP Photo Why It Matters These protests come only a few weeks after the "No Kings" nationwide demonstrations, which were the largest anti-Trump gathering since his inauguration in January. The demonstrations also come just one day after Trump's sprawling tax and spending bill, known as the "Big Beautiful Bill", was passed by the House of Representatives What To Know The "Free America" organizers are calling attention to several aspects of the Trump administration, including the growing wealth disparity in America and mass layoffs enacted across the federal government. Geibel told Newsweek: "We want our elected officials to see that we're paying attention. We want them to know that their constituents understand that freedom and individual rights are being stripped away from all of us, and we expect them to represent us and our rights. Our hope is they'll listen more, restrict less, remember who they work for and remember that America is not a fascist nation." There are currently 264 "Free America" protests planned across Republican and Democratic states, including Florida, Texas, Ohio, Tennessee, New Hampshire, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and North Carolina. The protests have grown since June 30, when 170 demonstrations were listed on the organization's site. The number of protests is still a great deal smaller than the roughly 1,800 "No Kings" protests that took place on June 14. Organizers say the language of "freedom" reflects the symbolism of the July 4 holiday, which commemorates the signing of the Declaration of Independence. Speaking to how protests have grown in size throughout the first months of the Trump administration, Geibel said: "We have been protesting weekly [in Lorain County, Ohio] since March. Our protest group has grown exponentially since March and our local democratic community meetings have seen an increase in attendance this year also. The people in Lorain County Ohio are not giving up on the fight for democracy." Protesters demonstrate against the policies of President Donald Trump during a No Kings rally, Saturday, June 14, 2025, in Orlando, Florida. Protesters demonstrate against the policies of President Donald Trump during a No Kings rally, Saturday, June 14, 2025, in Orlando, Florida. Phelan M. Ebenhack/AP Photo What People Are Saying Nichole Geibel, a 'Free America' protest organizer in Ohio told Newsweek: "We hope people feel less alone and more connected with others who want to take peaceful, meaningful action. It's about showing up, using our voices, and reminding ourselves that democracy only works when everyday people participate and stand up for what they believe in. As Rep. John Lewis once said 'Never be afraid to make some noise and get into good trouble, necessary trouble.' We want people to leave feeling empowered and not be afraid to speak up for themselves and for this country." Stephen Miller, White House Deputy Chief of Staff, posted on X in response to Trump's Big Beautiful Bill passing the House before July 4: "The most incredible opening 6 months to an American presidency in history." What Happens Next The demonstrations are planned nationwide for July 4.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Food pantry leaders plead with Lawler to save SNAP, other programs to fight hunger
CONGERS - Rockland leaders on the frontlines of tackling food insecurity said their already-strapped feeding programs face even greater threats from the One Big Beautiful Bill now wending its way through Congress. Several leaders raised the alarm during a press conference at the offices of the nonprofit TOUCH, a member of the Rockland Community Against Hunger coalition, on Tuesday, July 1, calling on their congressional representative, Rep. Mike Lawler, to protect the programs. "We run out of food consistently," said Nathan Mungin III, executive director of the Martin Luther King Jr. Multi-Purpose Center. Anita Dreichler, coordinator of Rockland Community Against Hunger, warned that the impact of current and future cuts "is going to be immense." The Senate passed the One Big Beautiful Bill Tuesday. It will now head back to the House for another vote. Here's the double whammy Rockland agency leaders warned about: The Trump administration has already cut funds to The Emergency Food Assistance Program, known as TEFAP, which benefits farmers by purchasing food from them and sending it to states to distribute to food banks and feeding programs. Current versions of the bill now in congressional negotiations embed years-long changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, known as SNAP. Cuts to TEFAP force the Regional Food Bank of Northeastern New York to buy more food at higher costs to meet its partners' needs, COO Nick Pisani said. The Regional Food Bank supplies 23 New York counties from Rockland to the Canadian border. Those costs hit local feeding programs in the amount provided and in quality too. Pisani noted that direct-from-farm purchases are high quality and nutritious. Medicaid cuts from federal bill? House budget bill: Nearly 1.5M in NY could lose health coverage under House GOP cuts Julian Palmer, who leads TOUCH, noted that the spending bill passed the House by 215-214, with Lawler voting yes; he could be among those who could flip the script by changing his vote or demanding a better bill. Ciro Riccardi, a spokesman for Lawler, said on July 1 that Lawler 'has been fighting for TEFAP and SNAP in the One Big Beautiful Bill, as the legislation is geared to encouraging states to correct bureaucratic inefficiencies." "The Senate's bill extended the deadline for states to get their error rates under 6% and avoid incurring a percentage of the cost share," Riccardi notes, adding that New York has one of the highest error rates in the country and that overpayments nationwide are wasting $10 billion a year. "Rep. Lawler actively addressed concerns to the Agriculture committee, successfully advocating for the removal of the quality control zero-tolerance section from the Senate bill," Riccardi said. "The office has also sent a letter to the USDA highlighting issues with potential TEFAP cuts to ensure these vital programs remain protected for Hudson Valley families.' Nyack Center executive director Kim Cross said Lawler can cut deals, like what was done in the Senate, to protect programs that help the children served by the community center. Nyack Center offers weekend food packages through a program with People to People called "In the Bag." Soup Angels, a food kitchen, also helps Nyack Center families all year round. "There are opportunities to mitigate the choices that can be made," Cross said. SNAP: How many in NY, Hudson Valley could lose food stamps under GOP bill? Revised rules for SNAP eligibility could throw 300,000 New York households off monthly food payments, groups warn. About 53,000 Rockland residents currently rely on SNAP. Mungin said the MLK Center's food distributions are slated for the early evening because many of the 300 families who turn out are working during the day. "It's notable people aren't looking for a handout," he said. "They're looking for a way to make their budgets." Tracie Pucci volunteers at People to People, the county's largest food pantry. She also is provided supplemental food from the pantry, she said, but only when she needs it. For People to People, the loss of TEFAP means the loss of 250 tons of USDA goods that get to the Nanuet-based feeding program via the Regional Food Bank, board chairman emeritus Joe Allen said. The cost to replace that fresh food: around $1 million. Cuts to SNAP will send more people to the pantry, Allen said, as the Great Recession, Hurricane Sandy, COVID and government cuts have in the past. Pucci agreed that many, including those like her who receive SNAP, still need help from People to People and other feeding programs. The income cutoff for such support is annual gross earnings of $40,560 for a family of four or under — double for people who are disabled. Pucci asked Lawler to put his family in her shoes. "I'd like to ask Mr. Lawler, what is my family to do?" she asked." I'm begging you go vote no." This article originally appeared on Rockland/Westchester Journal News: Mike Lawler called to act as food pantries condemn Big Beautiful Bill
Newsweek
36 minutes ago
- Newsweek
How Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Will Affect US Housing Market
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which House Republicans narrowly passed on Thursday, is likely to help high-end buyers in the U.S. housing market while doing little for lower-income renters and potential first-time buyers, experts have said. The House passed the sweeping bill, which extends tax cuts and slashes the U.S.'s social security net programs, with a 218-214 vote—with all Democrats voting against it and all but two Republicans supporting it. The bill has been strongly contested over the past few weeks, exposing rifts within the GOP. Its approval marks a significant win for the president, who told reporters on Thursday that the legislation would "make this country into a rocket ship." "This is going to be a great bill for the country," Trump said. The president is expected to sign the bill into law on July 4. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson celebrating with fellow House Republicans during an enrollment ceremony of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on July 3. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson celebrating with fellow House Republicans during an enrollment ceremony of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on July experts have expressed skepticism that the bill will bring positive changes for everyday Americans. Many economists have denounced the bill, saying it is likely to benefit the wealthiest individuals in the country while stripping poorer families of crucial benefits. "There has never been a single law in U.S. history that has hurt low-income households more, from both the largest Medicaid cuts and the largest SNAP cuts in history," Bobby Kogan, a former top numbers cruncher for the Senate Budget Committee, said in a statement shared with Newsweek. He added: "And what's particularly egregious is this bill hurts low-income households while simultaneously bestowing huge tax cuts on the richest Americans. Quite literally, this bill makes the poor poorer while making the rich richer." The bill is also likely to affect the struggling U.S. housing market, which is in the midst of a slowdown as inventory surges while buyers are kept to the sidelines by elevated mortgage rates, sky-high prices, rising costs and growing economic uncertainty. "There are several parts of the bill that could affect real estate and housing markets, but its impact won't be uniform," senior economist Jake Krimmel told Newsweek. "Its overall impact is likely to vary significantly across regions and income groups, depending on local tax burdens, home prices, and how tight supply is," he said. "That's because the bill includes provisions that affect both housing demand and housing supply, and they operate differently in different parts of the country—especially given today's large regional divides in local economic conditions." High-End Buyers, Investors and Professionals to Benefit the Most The tax package passed by Congress includes a provision raising the cap on the state and local tax (SALT) deduction to $40,000—effectively quadrupling the previous $10,000 limit. For homeowners in certain states and metros, this could mean saving thousands of dollars in annual taxes. Ed Fernandez, the president and CEO of exchange investment company 1031 Crowdfunding, told Newsweek that the measure "would be incredibly productive" and "create a real estate boom again." This change, however, "disproportionately benefits higher-income buyers in high-tax states like New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, and Illinois—regions where housing markets remain tight and prices elevated," Krimmel said. The states with the highest share of properties taxed over $10,000, according to data, are New Jersey (39.9 percent), New York (25.9 percent), Connecticut (19.4 percent), California (19.3 percent), Massachusetts (18.4 percent), New Hampshire (16.3 percent), Illinois (13.7 percent), Texas (12.4 percent) and Rhode Island (9.3 percent). The District of Columbia (15.6 percent) is also included in the top 10. The top 10 metros are San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, California (47.9 percent); New York-Newark-Jersey City, New York-New Jersey (47.8 percent); San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, California (40.9 percent); Bridgeport-Stamford-Danbury, Connecticut (39.3 percent); Kiryas Joel-Poughkeepsie-Newburgh, New York (37.5 percent); Trenton-Princeton, New Jersey (35.8 percent); Nantucket, Massachusetts (35.5 percent); Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, Texas (32.0 percent); Jackson, Wyoming-Idaho (28.7 percent); and Santa Cruz-Watsonville, California (28.1 percent). An additional $30,000 in deductions could amount to about $10,500 in annual tax savings for homeowners in these states and metros, assuming a 35 percent federal marginal tax rate, calculated. The higher SALT deduction cap "may supercharge demand in places where affordability has already been declining and inventory remains below pre-pandemic norms, potentially adding upward pressure to already strained markets," Krimmel said. That means that your average buyer in these already-expensive states and metros might face even higher prices as a result of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. "In the near term, the bill offers meaningful support to higher-income buyers and real estate investors but does less comparatively for lower-income renters and potential first-time buyers, who are still facing the steepest affordability challenges in today's housing market," Krimmel said. A permanent qualified business income deduction that the bill introduces is also likely to give an advantage to real estate investors and professionals, potentially fueling more investment in both residential and commercial property, Krimmel said. While everyday Americans may not benefit from the changes introduced by the new legislation, professionals are thrilled. Abe Schlisselfeld, the senior managing director and national real estate industry leader at CBIZ—a company that provides financial, insurance and advisory services in the U.S. and abroad—told Newsweek that the bill was "a big win for the real estate industry." One of the most attractive provisions for real estate investors in the bill is the return of 100 percent bonus depreciation, he said. "This would allow you to fully deduct the cost of qualifying renovations, property improvements, and certain building components immediately, instead of spreading the deductions out over several years," Schlisselfeld said. "This could be a game changer for your 2025 renovation or development plans," stimulating a significant amount of activity. A special depreciation allowance for qualified production property contained in the bill might also "create an additional tax advantage for investors in logistics, warehousing, or production-related facilities," Schlisselfeld said. Lower-Income Buyers Unlikely to Catch a Break 'Anytime Soon' The bill is also likely to affect the U.S. housing market on the supply side by expanding the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit and making tweaks to opportunity zone incentives, Krimmel said. These are tools that support affordable housing, community redevelopment and increasing housing supply "where it's so desperately needed," he said. While these measures could help address the national housing shortage—including in rural areas and in lower-income urban neighborhoods—"large-scale supply-side impacts will take time and aren't likely to relieve pressure in high-cost cities anytime soon," Krimmel said. Several sections of the bill also terminate the Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit, the Residential Clean Energy Credit, New Energy Efficient Home Credit and the deduction for energy efficient commercial buildings. An analysis by the think tank and progressive advocacy group Groundwork Collaborative found that abolishing the New Energy Efficient Home Credit, which incentivized the construction of energy efficient homes and was estimated to spur the construction of 3 million homes in the next few years, would increase the price of new homes. "Now, builders that were expecting the credit will likely pass the cost on to consumers or cancel the construction of new homes altogether, further disrupting the housing supply and increasing costs," the group said. Construction of new homes in the U.S. has already significantly slowed down since the Trump administration's introduction of sweeping tariffs that brought up the cost of crucial material. A surge of for-sale listings in the U.S. market is also discouraging builders from hiking up production.
