
Trump asks 17 non-Indian drug majors to cut prices in US; Nifty pharma dips
The letter urged that these businesses cut US drug pricing to match prices in other developed markets.
Though no Indian pharmaceutical companies received Trump's letters, the Nifty Pharma index reacted sharply, falling 2.45 per cent during the intra-day trade on Friday.
The index fell for the third day in a row. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd fell 3.98 per cent. Aurobindo Pharma lost 3.42 per cent and Granules India lost 3.2 per cent. Gland Pharma, Cipla, and Lupin fell 2 to 3 per cent.
The US President wrote to 17 of the world's major pharmaceutical corporations, pressing them to lower drug prices immediately and give assurance that future drugs will be priced in line with other countries.
The letters were sent to Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and others, seeking 'Most Favoured Nation' (MFN) pricing for US within 60 days.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said recent data showed that Americans paid more than three times more for brand-name drugs than other developed nations.
Trump had earlier made a similar announcement on May 12, asking pharma companies to cut prices in US. Industry sources in India had then said Trump's proposal might hurt Indian exporters of branded generics to the US, given generic drugs are already sold at low prices. If prices are cut further, it will make shipping unviable, they said. A third of Indian pharmaceutical exports of $30 billion annually, reach the US market.
Trump gave drug companies 60 days to voluntarily comply with the new pricing diktat in the letter, failing which, he said, the US would use 'every tool in our arsenal' to protect Americans from 'continued abusive drug pricing' practices.
Trump's letter required companies to sell certain drugs directly to patients at prices at which they are offered to third-party insurers.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
28 minutes ago
- Hans India
TGCHE Chairman inaugurates national workshop to elevate standards in B-Schools
Hyderabad: In a significant move toward enhancing academic excellence in business education, Professor V. Balakista Reddy, Chairman of the Telangana Council of Higher Education (TGCHE), inaugurated a two-day National Workshop titled 'Building Excellence in B-Schools: Academic Leaders' Strategies for Institutional Development.' The workshop was organised by the Association of Indian Management Schools (AIMS) at their newly established Secretariat in Hyderabad. Speaking to an audience of over 50 Deans and Directors from top B-Schools across India, Professor Reddy emphasised the vital importance of human resource development in preparing the youth of India for emerging technologies and the demands of the global industry. He pointed out that in addition to academic leadership, clarity in policies related to tariffs and regulations is essential for sustained growth in both business and educational institutions. The workshop included interactive sessions led by distinguished resource persons from academia and industry, focusing on modern strategies for institutional development, innovation, and technology integration. Participants shared best practices aimed at enhancing the quality of teaching, research, administration, and leadership within Indian business schools. The event will continue on August 2 with panel discussions and collaborative planning sessions designed to foster long-term academic and industry connections across the country.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
28 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Trump fires data chief after disappointing jobs report shakes markets
President Donald Trump got some bad economic news Friday, and responded by shooting the messenger. Trump fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, hours after it sent markets tumbling with a report that showed a dramatic slowdown in US hiring. It's an escalation of his campaign against economic institutions long held to be above partisan politics — one that until now has principally targeted the Federal Reserve. And Trump got an unexpected opportunity that same afternoon to exert more influence at the central bank too, when Governor Adriana Kugler announced her imminent resignation, just as investors were still digesting the jobs numbers and the BLS news. He'll now get to name a replacement, likely one who's inclined to support his drive for lower interest rates. There's already widespread concern about Trump's relentless pressure on the Fed and its chief Jerome Powell to cut rates, since the consensus is that central banks do a better job of taming inflation when politicians leave them alone. His move against US data agencies now risks damaging the integrity of the world's most important statistics – numbers that can move global markets by trillions of dollars at a time. Trump's targeting of the BLS will 'spark general anxiety in the market that politics may bleed over into future economic considerations,' said Yung-Yu Ma, chief investment strategist at PNC Asset Management Group. 'The bigger concern now for investors is what is the next step? Will Trump threaten to fire Fed Chair Powell again after this?' And these questions arise with the US already facing a 'nasty cycle,' Ma said, where growth slows and inflation starts to rise. Trump used Friday's hiring numbers to renew his attack on Powell, who'd cited a solid jobs market as one reason for holding interest rates steady earlier this week. There was a silver lining for the president: Markets immediately started pricing in a September cut when the data came in. Two-year Treasury bonds – which are tightly linked to short-term Fed rates – soared the most since 2023, sending yields down almost 30 basis points. The announcement of Kugler's departure, and the prospect of a Trump pick joining the Fed in her place, amplified rate-cut bets for later in the year. Meanwhile the S&P 500 index was slumping, the president was directing barbs at McEntarfer, and economists linked to both political parties were jumping to her defense. The BLS on Friday slashed its payroll estimates for the previous couple of months, as well as posting a below-forecast number for July. It's the latest in a series of unusually large revisions, which have drawn Trump's ire before – including in the runup to last year's election. 'Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes,' Trump posted Friday on social media. He later added that the figures 'were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad.' But US data agencies enjoy a global reputation for 'gold standard' statistics – one Trump may now be putting in danger — and economists of all stripes dismissed the idea of politically motivated manipulation. 'There's just absolutely no evidence' that McEntarfer had any desire to fake the numbers, said Michael Strain of the conservative-leaning American Enterprise Institute. William Beach, who was appointed to head the BLS during Trump's first term, called her firing 'totally groundless' and said it sets a 'dangerous precedent.' McEntarfer will be replaced at the BLS on an acting basis by William Wiatrowski, currently the deputy chief, the administration said. As for Kugler, whose term was due to end in January, it's not clear who'll be appointed to fill her seat – and it could be a decision with major consequences. Even before her early departure, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent had suggested the administration might nominate a replacement for Kugler who'd then be elevated into the post of Fed chair. At the start of Friday, before all the drama that followed – the shock job numbers, BLS firing and Fed departure – Trump had issued a call to arms on social media, urging members of the central bank's board to defy their chair and vote for lower interest rates. 'ASSUME CONTROL, AND DO WHAT EVERYONE KNOWS HAS TO BE DONE!' he wrote. Later on, departing the White House, the president told reporters he was 'very happy' that he now has an open spot on the board — and posted that Powell should follow Kugler's example and resign.


Hindustan Times
28 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump rattles markets again with new levies
US President Donald Trump formally imposed a 25% tariff on Indian exports late on Thursday in a sweeping executive order that hit dozens of trading partners with new levies, escalating his global trade war as the Friday deadline approached. US President Donald Trump (REUTERS) The Republican pressed ahead with a trade policy that initially sparked market sell-offs when announced in April. On Friday, global shares stumbled, with Europe's STOXX 600 down 1.8% and Wall Street opening sharply lower. Indian equity benchmark indices Sensex and Nifty fell 0.72% and 0.82% respectively. Goods from India face the 25% levy plus an unspecified penalty for Russian oil purchases after talks bogged down over access to India's agriculture and other sensitive sectors, with New Delhi refusing to open its labour-intensive farms to unfettered American imports. Trump's executive order also set punitive rates for 69 trading partners, including 35% duties on Canada, 50% for Brazil, 20% for Taiwan and 39% for Switzerland, as a previously announced 12.01am EDT August 1 deadline approached. Goods from unlisted countries face a 10% baseline tax. The new levies come into effect on August 7. India now faces higher tariff rates than regional competitors, with Thailand, Indonesia and Malaysia set for 19% duties while Bangladesh, Vietnam and Taiwan face 20% rates—potentially weakening India's position as a preferred sourcing destination for US companies. India exports $86.5 billion worth of goods to the US, with a surplus of $41 billion. However, industry experts estimate that a significant chunk of Indian goods may avoid the higher duties for now since the Trump administration has exempted electronics, pharmaceuticals, energy products and critical minerals from additional tariffs citing national interest. Nonetheless, analysts expect a significant impact for India's exports. Ratings agency ICRA has lowered its growth forecast for India's GDP from 6.2% to 6.0%, with further reductions possible if additional penalties are imposed. The Global Trade Research Institute estimates India's goods exports could decline by 30% to $60.6 billion in FY26. 'The tariff announced for India is higher than other Asian countries such as Vietnam (20%), Indonesia (19%), and Japan (15%), which can potentially weaken India's position as a preferred sourcing destination, particularly in sectors like textiles, cut and polished diamonds, tyres, metals, and auto components,' ICRA said in a report. Questions loom over India's purchases of discounted Russian energy, which have prompted threats of additional penalties as Washington seeks to restrict Moscow's export revenues to push President Putin into Ukraine peace talks. 'Several options exist for India to diversify its crude purchases as Russian crude accounted for less than 2% of Indian crude imports prior to FY2023. However, the potential impact of cutting off Russian oil from the international market would be a significant increase in international oil prices as Russian oil exports account for 7% of global liquids consumption,' said Prashant Vashisht, senior vice president at ICRA. 'A significant spike in crude prices could lead to higher crude import bill and under recoveries on sale of liquified petroleum gas, petrol and diesel for the oil marketing companies. A $10/barrel increase in crude oil prices would increase the oil import bill by about $13-14 billion,' Vashisht added. He warned that disrupting Russian energy exports could also make domestic gas and LNG imports more expensive for India. India's tariff rate could be reduced if New Delhi and Washington finalise a trade deal, which both countries have been negotiating since February. However, disagreements over market access—particularly in agriculture—as well as tariff reciprocity and ongoing WTO disputes have held up progress. 'A trade agreement will have a meaningful impact in accelerating our already-robust economic relationship. But an agreement would be more significant to further improve our larger strategic relationship. Not long ago, any type of trade agreement was seen as nearly-impossible, yet we are now on the verge,' said Rick Rossow, who holds the India chair at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington DC-based think tank. Basant Sanghera, managing principal at the Asia Group and former US diplomat, warned of missed opportunities. 'It would be a missed opportunity if the trade deal doesn't go through. The interim trade package on the table is substantial, especially by the standards of the US-India economic relationship, and it provides a foundation for future engagement.' Sanghera argued there was a risk of problems worsening unless the leadership on both sides take on a more active role. The tariff announcement also drew criticism from Capitol Hill, with Indian-American Congressman Ami Bera telling HT: 'As negotiations between the United States and India continue, it is vital that we pursue outcomes that reflect the strength of our bilateral relationship and advance our shared strategic interests. India is a close friend and strategic partner. President Trump's misguided and erratic statements do not reflect the bipartisan commitment to strengthening ties between our two nations.'