Pinkins leaving MS Democratic Party, running as independent. What to know
Pinkins told the Clarion Ledger on Monday his decision stemmed from disagreements with campaign finance raising between the Democratic Party and himself.
"I refuse to operate in a system that prioritizes money over people," Pinkins said. "I was asked more about fundraising than about any values or anything about my vision as United States senator coming from Mississippi than anything else. It was all about money. I don't think that's leadership, it's gatekeeping, and that's why I'm running as an independent now, to stay accountable to the people and not the party."
Pinkins also made note of being pushed to drop out of the race for another candidate, which he refused to do.
"When I first entered this race, party officials didn't ask me about healthcare, veterans or education," he said. "They asked how much money I had. And when I refused to step aside for their handpicked, millionaire-backed candidate, they tried to buy me off — and then they threatened me."
Mississippi Democratic Party Chairman Cheikh Taylor did not respond to requests for comment by press time. Pinkins said he did not give the Democratic Party a prior warning to the announcement.
In May, the Clarion Ledger reported Lowndes County District Attorney Scott Colom would likely run for U.S. Senate against incumbent Republican Cindy Hyde Smith. U.S. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, according to previous Clarion Ledger reporting, thinks Colom is the right man for the job.
If Colom follows through, Pinkins would now avoid a primary with a well-respected candidate in the Democratic Party.
Pinkins said that fact was not part of his decision to run as an independent in the Senate race.
"I think that there's a problem with money in our politics, and I think both parties are compromised with the amount of money that's in politics, and the only way that we can get out of it is for independent candidates to step forward and tell them, 'I don't accept big corporate PAC money,'" Pinkins said. "'I don't accept money for billionaires,' so that voters can see that they have a candidate that's not lost in the big money machine."
The 2026 senate race will be Pinkins' third campaign in under three years. In 2023, Pinkins had begun his first Senate campaign against incumbent Republican U.S. Sen. Roger Wicker, but at the Democratic Party's request, he changed gears and ran for Mississippi Secretary of State. He lost to incumbent and current office holder Michael Watson.
In 2024, Pinkins picked back up the Senate campaign against Wicker but was unsuccessful in the November election.
Because Pinkins is now an independent candidate, he will need 1,000 Mississippians' signatures to qualify for the race and also $1,000. Both will be needed to put his name on the state's ballot in 2026.
Pinkins is also now the second high-ranking Democrat to leave the Mississippi Democratic Party. Shuwaski Young, a politician and former candidate for secretary of state from Philadelphia (Mississippi) left the party in October 2024.
Pinkins would at this time be the only independent running for Mississippi's U.S. Senate seat in 2026, which also would leave Colom without a Democratic opponent in the 2026 primary.
Hyde-Smith, who was first appointed to the U.S. Senate by former Gov. Phil Bryant, does at this time have one challenger in her party, Sarah Adlakha, a resident of Ocean Springs.
Grant McLaughlin covers the Legislature and state government for the Clarion Ledger. He can be reached at gmclaughlin@gannett.com or 972-571-2335.
This article originally appeared on Mississippi Clarion Ledger: Ty Pinkins leaving Mississippi Democratic Party
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
9 minutes ago
- CNN
Newsom blasts Trump during South Carolina tour as California governor stokes 2028 speculation
California Gov. Gavin Newsom embarked Tuesday on a two-day swing through rural South Carolina as the high-profile Democrat seeks to position himself as a leader for a party in rebuilding mode while simultaneously stoking fresh speculation about a potential 2028 presidential bid. Newsom alternated between defiance toward President Donald Trump and familiarity with voters in the early primary state during his roughly 15-minute address at a stop in Bennettsville, sharply criticizing the administration and referring to the opening of Trump's second term as 'an alarming six months.' 'It's not what happens to us, it's how we respond to it. And our opportunity presents itself anew. In 18 months, you have the power to end Donald Trump's presidency,' Newsom said, to loud applause from the full room. 'We'll have to deal with the tweets, we'll have to deal with the attacks and the bullying. But the legislative agenda is effectively over,' Newsom continued. 'You have that power in these midterms.' Throughout his remarks, Newsom touted his own efforts to stand up to the Trump administration and help rebuild the Democratic Party. He made repeated references to his efforts to support the Democratic presidential ticket in 2024 and promoted California as 'the most un-Trump state,' while also slipping in the occasional 'y'all' in a nod to the South. He commented on several recent news developments, including the Trump administration's latest immigration crackdown in his state and the tragic flooding last week in Texas, taking both opportunities to lambaste the president's leadership. 'Donald Trump,' Newsom said of the immigration raids in Los Angeles, 'decided to send hundreds and hundreds of military troops into the park, into the playground, in the middle of the day, where kids this old were at summer camp.' Newsom went on, 'Not one arrest was made. But what he was doing – he wanted to make a point. Cruelty is the point. Cruelty is the point.' And commenting on Texas, Newsom continued criticizing Trump's leadership. 'Do you remember his response to the disaster in California? He blamed every single person – not a peep of blame in Texas,' Newsom remarked, referencing his clashes with the administration during severe wildfires that devastated Los Angeles earlier this year. Speaking at the White House on Tuesday, Trump didn't mention Newsom by name but called him 'one of the worst governors in our country, who I used to get along with, actually.' Trump also defended the federal response to the wildfires. 'If we didn't step in, Los Angeles would have been burned to the ground,' he said. At one point, while invoking his support for former President Joe Biden, Newsom noted that included the 'not so easy' role of being a surrogate on the night of the first presidential debate hosted by CNN in June 2024. 'I say this with love in my heart – with love in my heart – but love for my party and love for my country.' Newsom also touted his recent defamation lawsuit against Fox News, drawing applause from the audience. 'Lies. Myths. And misrepresentations. You think I'm lying? Take a look at what I did last week – I sued Fox News,' he remarked. The California governor's visit to the key presidential primary state is the latest in a series of moves laying the groundwork for a potential 2028 campaign, with several high-profile contenders already making visits to longtime early primary states. Attendees at Newsom's midday event in Marlboro County underscored the anticipation. 'I came to see the next president of the United States, who should really be the current president, if we are being honest,' said Samantha Sherman, who drove from her home near the state line with her 10-year-old son Patrick to see Newsom. Ken Stroman, a Bennettsville native, told CNN he didn't know much about Newsom coming into Tuesday's visit. 'I knew people described him as a potential front-runner. Now I see why,' said Stroman. 'I don't know if he will be the nominee, but if he is, I could support him.' 'The way Trump has treated California, we get that. Poor Black people in the South, that is how we are treated. He sees that.' Trump improved his performance in Marlboro County in each of his three campaigns. In 2016, he lost it to Democrat Hillary Clinton by about 16 points. Four years later he cut his deficit to less than 11 points against Biden. Last November, he lost it by less than 3 points against former Vice President Kamala Harris. South Carolina Republicans responded to Newsom's trip on social media by mocking him and the state of California. 'Gavin Newsom in South Carolina today is like a kale salad at a Waffle House — confused, unwelcome, and about to get sent back,' said Republican Rep. Russell Fry on X.
Politico
9 minutes ago
- Politico
Senate GOP preps vote on the first judge of the second Trump era
House Budget Chair Jodey Arrington says Republicans shouldn't give up on advancing certain priorities that were cut out of their 'big, beautiful bill' for not complying with Senate rules, telling reporters Tuesday that lawmakers will try again in follow-up budget reconciliation packages. 'There may be a longer list of things that were kicked out by the Senate parliamentarian as non-compliant with the Byrd rule — I think we should make another run at that and look for ways to structure the provisions so that it's more fundamentally budgetary in impact and policy,' the Texas Republican said during the press call Tuesday afternoon. 'I suspect that's why they were kicked out.' The so-called Byrd rule limits what provisions can be included in a bill moving through Congress through the reconciliation process, which allows lawmakers to skirt the 60-vote filibuster threshold in the Senate. Arrington specifically pointed to one provision stripped in the Senate from the House-passed megabill that would have prohibited Medicaid coverage for gender affirming surgeries, and another that would have banned noncitizens from tapping into Medicaid resources. 'I think those — we need to spend more time' crafting the provisions to pass muster with the parliamentarian, Arrington said. 'I don't think we spent enough time to look for a pathway to success on them, and that's sort of the landscape, as I see it, of the opportunities in another reconciliation bill.' Echoing Speaker Mike Johnson 's recent comments, Arrington said he suspects GOP leaders will attempt to do two more party-line packages in the 119th Congress, with the next one slated for the fall. Arrington added members would likely demand that those additional measures be drafted under circumstances where both chambers adhere to the same budget framework, avoiding a repeat of the most recent scenario where House and Senate Republicans each gave their committees different deficit reduction targets. He lamented the fact that the Senate did not comply with the House's aggressive instructions for writing iits version of the megabill, but credited fiscal hawks for helping secure $1.5 trillion in savings in a final product, and noted that it was not 'feasible' to expect the full magnitude of cost savings would be acheived in a single reconciliation bill — 'politically, at least.' As it currently stands, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which President Donald Trump signed into law over the weekend, is 'front loaded with costs and back-end loaded with savings,' which Arrington said should compel Republicans to make sure the administration follows through in 'mak[ing] sure the savings actually happen.' 'That was a concern among conservative budget hawks,' Arrington said. 'When I think about the Budget Committee's role going forward, one of the things that we need to do … is keep the pressure on the Senate, on the House and the administration to be diligent in implementation and enforcement.'
The Hill
15 minutes ago
- The Hill
Graham: Senate will move ‘soon' on Russia, China sanctions
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said Tuesday that the Senate will move 'soon' on a 'tough' Russia sanctions bill that will also penalize the Kremlin's top energy recipients, China and India. 'President @realDonaldTrump is spot on about the games Putin is playing,' Graham said in a Tuesday post on X. 'The Senate will move soon on a tough sanctions bill – not only against Russia – but also against countries like China and India that buy Russian energy products that finance Putin's war machine. The Senate bill has a presidential waiver to give President Trump maximum leverage.' 'When it comes to Putin and those who support his war machine, it is time to change the game,' added the South Carolina Republican, a prominent supporter of Ukraine in the Senate. Graham renewed his push for the sanctions bill, a measure that has more than 80 co-sponsors in the Senate, as President Trump has continued to express his frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin. 'That is a war that it should have never happened. A lot of people are dying and it should end. We get a lot of bull**** thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth. He's very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless,' Trump told reporters at the Cabinet meeting on Tuesday. Trump confirmed, when asked by a reporter on Tuesday, that he is 'looking at' Graham's sanctions bill. The measure would impose a 500 percent tariff on imports from any nation that purchases Russian uranium, gas and oil. Graham has been in constant contact with Trump about the bill and lawmakers in the upper chamber are waiting for the president's approval to bring it to the floor. Graham is proposing a carveout to his bill to spare countries who still import Russian gas, but have supported Ukraine in their three-year war with the Kremlin's military. 'A lot of countries still buy Russian oil and gas but less. Some European countries still have relationships with Russia, but they've been very helpful to Ukraine. So I want to carve them out,' Graham told reporters last month. 'There's some of our allies who've really helped Ukraine but would be affected by the bill, they've earned their way to get a carveout,' the senator added. 'Those who have helped Ukraine, meaningfully, will get a carveout. In other words you'll incentivize people to help Ukraine.' Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) told reporters on Tuesday that 'we'll have more to say about that later this week' when talking about Graham's measure and added that there is a 'lot of interest' in moving the bill forward. The Pentagon is expected to resume sending some defensive weapons to Ukraine, marking a reversal after the shipments were halted last week amid concerns of U.S. stockpiles running low. Trump said on Monday that the U.S. needs to supply Ukraine with weapons so that the war-torn country can defend itself from the Russian military's attacks. 'Defensive weapons, primarily, but they're getting hit very, very hard. So many people are dying in that mess. We're going to send some more weapons,' the president told reporters. The Defense Department confirmed the move Monday night, adding that the review of U.S. munitions will continue. Trump expressed disappointment with Putin after speaking with the Russian leader on Thursday, saying that the Kremlin head is not 'looking to stop' and that he made 'no progress' in forging a potential ceasefire agreement between Moscow and Kyiv. Trump spoke with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Friday. Ukraine's leader said the two presidents had a 'very important and fruitful' conversation. The two leaders spoke about the Russian attacks and agreed that 'we will work together to strengthen protection of our skies.'
