500-home housing project that was culled by minister had seen costs 'effectively double'
|
43 mins ago
COSTS FOR A multi-partner project containing almost 500 social homes that was suddenly halted last month had 'effectively doubled', according to internal warnings from housing officials weeks ahead of the cancellation.
In correspondence seen by
The Journal
, they warned that 'development costs and interest rates' had combined to see the price rise for the multimillion euro project, which was to deliver 486 homes across six sites in Dublin, Kildare, Wicklow and Sligo.
It was also revealed today that judicial review proceedings have been initiated by a construction company over the cancellation against the Department of Housing, following Minister James Browne's cost-related decision
to stop the project from going ahead last month
.
All 486 homes were due to be delivered under a public private partnership (PPP) scheme.
This model is essentially a long-term contract sometimes used to deliver infrastructure, where the private partner provides funding and operational management of the project as part of its delivery.
The model for the delivery of such largescale social housing projects has been thrown into doubt as a result of this cancellation.
New details at Oireachtas committee
Today's Oireachtas Housing Committee heard Browne say that judicial review proceedings had been initiated by one of the parties involved in the PPPP in recent days against the department because of the cancellation.
Court records show builder JJ Rhatigan has lodged papers against the minister and Dublin City Council.
Social Democrats housing spokesperson Rory Hearne said the situation was now an 'utter mess', telling the minister that the legal proceedings will likely further delay the delivery of the homes through alternative means.
Browne told the committee he could not discuss the cancelled PPP as it was now the subject of legal proceedings, but, speaking generally, he said the model of housing needs to be 'completely overhauled' to make it better for the taxpayer.
Four upcoming PPPs – set to contain several thousand homes – have been stalled with a review now being carried out into each project.
The Wexford Fianna Fáil TD also said he was not happy about the 'length of time' it took for the project to 'land on my desk for a final decision'.
Advertisement
It's likely to raise further questions about management of the scheme, as the PPP had twice passed government financial appraisals – including last October.
Emails between officials
The Journal
can also now report that housing officials raised significant concerns around the costs involved in the project in late March, just weeks before cancelling the project.
The claim was made in emails – seen by
The Journal
– between the Department of Housing to their counterparts in the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform. The latter department has responsibility for the purse strings on projects backed by the State.
They repeatedly sought a meeting on the project, with housing officials later requesting discussions 'asap' as they were due to have a decision made on the future of the homes by May.
In one email, housing officials sought an urgent meeting with the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform about the project.
The project is known as Bundle 3 as it is the third of the social housing projects delivered under the model.
'The costs have risen significantly since the last bundle closed in 2019/2020 (effectively doubled),' the officials said in an email from 27 March.
'These costs include the whole lifecycle including development, funding, operations for 25 years etc.'
Housing officials added that they were working with the State-backed financial institution National Development Finance Agency (NDFA) and said it had reviewed different aspects of Bundle 3.
The official said that Bundle 3 had 'passed' its value for money tests – which were conducted last year – but raised concerns over the costs now presented.
'The cost of delivery of Bundle 3 has doubled when compared to Bundles 1 and 2, reflecting current development costs and interest rates,' the official told the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform.
The Housing official continued in the email, outlining that the NDFA have provided a report 'detailing the costs and the reasons for the increases over previous bundles'.
The NDFA's cost report was not released by the department due to commercial information contained within the report.
The homes were due to be
delivered by the Torc Consortium
, a partnership for all six sites between Galway-based developer JJ Rhatigan, London-based financier Equitix, Japanese developer Kajima and housing body Túath Housing Association.
Although no final contract had been awarded, it is understood that the second Value for Money check last October resulted in developers proceeding to work on the site,
leading the consortium's partners to spend upwards of €8 million on the six sites to get them shovel-ready
.
A total of 1,400 workers had been assigned to work on the homes for the next 18 months before the plug was pulled.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Post
an hour ago
- Business Post
JJ Rhatigan and Spanish firm launch legal battle against Department of Housing
Galway developer JJ Rhatigan and Spanish construction firm Obrascon Huarte Lain (OHLA ) have launched legal proceedings against housing minister James Browne and Dublin City ...


Dublin Live
an hour ago
- Dublin Live
Anti-immigration protest 'demands' access to Leinster House
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info A large anti-immigration protest has gathered outside Leinster House and are demanding to be allowed to address the chamber. The protest, organised by failed Kerry election candidate Michelle Keane, marched from the GPO. The front gates to Leinster House have been closed, with protesters gathering right up to where the vehicular entrance is. Workers in Leinster House were encouraged to remove their access badges when leaving the building and advised not to exit via the Kildare Street entrance. Ms Keane wrote to all TDs and Senators on Monday evening advising them of the protest and demanding that it be allowed into Leinster House. The letter called for 100 people to be let into Leinster House to address politicians. The letter read: "On Tuesday, July 8 2025, over 100 Irish citizens will march peacefully from the GPO to Leinster House under the banner 'The People's Right to Dissolve the Dail'. "We are writing to formally demand that you facilitate our entry into Dáil Éireann to allow representatives of the Irish people to speak directly before parliament. This is not a symbolic gesture - it is a democratic action grounded in the principle that: The Irish Government was established by the Irish people, and it can only be "disestablished or reformed by the Irish people. "As elected members of the Oireachtas, you have the power and duty to request access through the Superintendent of the Houses of the Oireachtas, and to stand with the people you were elected to serve. We ask that you do so without delay. "If the Dail is truly the house of the people, it must not be locked against them in their hour of national concern A refusal to allow a peaceful, constitutional address by citizens would be a direct violation of the spirit of the Republic, and an abdication of democratic responsibility. "Let history record where each member of the Oireachtas stood on this day. We respectfully demand your immediate action to ensure we may enter Leinster House and speak peacefully as citizens of Ireland - united across 32 counties, regardless of background or tradition, in one common goal: national renewal." On a livestream of the protest, Ms Keane told the crowd that they wanted "to do this peacefully". She added: "We are Irish citizens and we are not going to let ourselves down here today." She also suggested that a Garda had gone into Leinster House to ask the Superintendent to come out and speak to the crowd. A man could be heard on the video saying, "There are people ready to go through these gates." Barriers are usually set up around Leinster House when protests take place to push groups back onto Molesworth Street. However, no barriers were constructed on this occasion. Join our Dublin Live breaking news service on WhatsApp. Click this link to receive your daily dose of Dublin Live content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. For all the latest news from Dublin and surrounding areas visit our homepage.


Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Irish Examiner view: Cutting back on flats and standards
The ongoing housing and accommodation crisis continues to seep into all areas of life, and we seem no closer to finding a resolution. The crisis is of such proportions that it appears almost impossible to find an approach that may make a difference, with the latest idea from the Government a proposal to reduce apartment sizes. James Browne, the housing minister, is to suggest changes to the laws governing the building of apartments, but cutting the size of studio apartments is bound to catch the eye — the aim is to reduce the minimum size of a studio apartment from 37 sq m to 32 sq m. On paper, this has the potential to increase the supply of apartments considerably. The opposition has raised concerns, saying this move will reduce living standards, but Sinn Féin's housing spokesman Eoin Ó Broin may have made a more salient point when suggesting the initiative is likely to raise the value of land and developers' costs. The minister's suggestion that his changes will cut building costs by between €50,000 and €100,000 per apartment may be correct, but are there any grounds for optimism that such savings will be passed on to prospective buyers? A more serious caveat surrounds the fire, accessibility, and environmental standards of these new apartments. The rush to build during the Celtic Tiger years left a poisoned legacy with which we are still contending, from the crisis with defective building blocks which plagued the north-west of the country in particular to the widespread issues with fire safety in apartment buildings. As far back as 2002, a Garda superintendent recommended prosecution against a developer after two people died in an apartment fire but nothing came of it, while an expert report has estimated that between 62,500 and 100,000 apartments or duplexes built between 1991 and 2013 may have defects that require remediation. This is worth bearing in mind when we consider sweeping changes to our apartment-building legislation. Lessons must be learned. Keeping it in the community Yesterday was Amazon Prime Day, though 'day' is a little misleading for a festival of spending which lasts some 96 hours, with analysts in America expecting buyers to spend up to $23.8bn (€27.6bn)across the four-day event this week. Given Amazon recently opened a dedicated Irish shopping website, it is reasonable to expect a surge in spending here also. It is entirely reasonable to expect people to be on the lookout for bargains, given the rise in prices across the board and the general increase in the cost of living, everyone is looking for value for money. Though children are off school at present, for instance, wary parents will be conscious of the need to stock up on various essentials for the return to the classrooms in a few weeks. However, it should be pointed out that traditional Irish businesses are also in need of support. As recently as May, the Government established a small business unit aimed at giving SMEs in the country more focus and support. The unit is under the direction of Peter Burke, the enterprise, trade, and employment minister. He recently pointed out: 'Small businesses employ two-thirds of our population and keep our local communities and economies vibrant and strong. Government must recognise this, and ensure we are providing the support that SMEs need to run their businesses successfully and continue to provide vital employment and economic benefit across the country.' The contribution of small businesses to communities all over Ireland, big and small, is a telling point. It may be a cliche to hear such businesses stress that the money they generate remain within those communities, but it is also a fact. The money spent on Amazon purchases goes, ultimately, on events such as the company owner Jeff Bezos's recent wedding. The contrast could hardly be starker. Hardline Tory The death was announced yesterday of former British politician Norman Tebbit at the age of 94. Tebbit served as a minister under Margaret Thatcher and came to embody hardline Tory attitudes. After the Brixton riots in 1981, he said his father had been unemployed in the 1930s but instead of rioting he 'got on his bike and looked for work.' Later he became synonymous with the 'cricket test', when he suggested the teams British Asians supported in international cricket games showed whether they were loyal to Britain. Described by his own party colleagues as abrasive, Tebbit is probably best remembered in Ireland for surviving the Brighton bombing in 1984. The IRA planted a large bomb in the Grand Hotel in Brighton while the Tory party conference was ongoing, killing five people, including one Tory MP. Thatcher was unhurt by the bomb but the ceiling and floor of Tebbit's room — directly beneath Thatcher's — collapsed, burying him and his wife, also Margaret. When they were rescued, she had suffered a broken neck and was paralysed for life; Tebbit had severe injuries to his ribs, shoulder, and pelvis. He did not stand in the 1992 election in order to care for his wife. Strongly right-wing in his view, Tebbit maintained his involvement in Tory politics well into the 21st century but for many, he will always be a reminder of the grimmest part of the 1980s.