Queensland Literary Awards program under review after fellowship revoked from First Nations writer
The decision was made by the state's arts minister John-Paul Langbroek, who wrote to the library's board on Monday May 19.
The library said it was legally bound to follow the minister's order.
"To comply with the direction, the fellowship was not awarded to K A Ren Wyld," the library said in a statement.
"State Library values freedom of expression within the limits of the law."
Quoting its Intellectual Freedom Policy the library's statement said:
"Libraries [sic] support the free flow of information and ideas, [and] have a responsibility to oppose the infringement of intellectual freedom."
Speaking to state parliament last Tuesday, Mr Langbroek said concerns had been raised about a social media post by Ms Wyld following the death of Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar in October last year, which was deleted shortly after it was posted.
"The author, via comments on social media, has praised the mastermind of the 7 October Hamas-led terror attacks as a 'martyr' and a 'hero'," Mr Langbroek said.
"Words matter, and that is why we have taken the decision that this award should not be presented at the State Library."
Multiple panel judges for the Queensland Literary Awards resigned following the decision.
In a statement on social media, Ms Wyld said they flew to Brisbane to attend the announcement, which was scheduled for last Tuesday.
On arrival, they said they were given the news by State Library CEO Vicki McDonald that the fellowship had been rescinded .
"Clarifying what's happened is not Vicki's fault, or the Black&Write team and partner organisations," they wrote.
"She was not able to give me much information.
"I will not receive the $15,000 award money, and my manuscript will not be edited as part of the Black&Write program."
Ms Wyld said they had been contacted prior to the Tuesday meeting by a News Corp journalist who informed them Queensland arts minister John-Paul Langbroek had written to the library directing them to void the fellowship.
The State Library confirmed there will be an independent review of its awards and fellowships programs.
"It will have specific focus on how we balance our strong commitment to freedom of expression and our role as a Queensland government funded cultural institution," a statement said.
Academic and fiction prize judge Dr Jeanine Leane and writer and critic Nigel Featherstone made up half the four-person fiction prize panel — which wasn't judging Ms Wyld's manuscript — before they both resigned on Friday.
Dr Leane said she resigned from judging the awards due to what she called an "intervention" into the arts scene.
"This kind of interference into the art scene becoming a frequent occurrence in Australia, where projects and artists and writers are being shut down because of their political views and the opinions that they express," she said.
She said such interventions shift the focus away from the work to serve political narratives.
"That makes it not about art or writing, or creativity, or diversity, or the possibility of considering the multiplicities of truths and stories that may exist out there.
"Shutting down a truth of someone expressing their concern for a genocide in Palestine, and shutting down the truth of the cultural genocide here that happened through the Stolen Generations — which is what [Ms Wyld's] manuscript was about."
Mr Featherstone said it was not solely about Gaza but the "core principle" of freedom of speech in the arts.
"For me, it actually doesn't matter what those political views are, whether they're highly conservative or highly progressive, I think they should be able to express those views and not lose work opportunities or awards, grants, or fellowships," he said.
Author of Muddy People and non-fiction panellist Sara el Sayed said she found it "impossible" to continue to work with the library following the decision.
"It's completely against what the values of the State Library and these awards should stand for, and honestly I think it completely undermines the whole process and this whole project that we're involved in," she said.
"What is the point in judging a literary award if a politician can swoop in at the last second and, for whatever reason he decides, say 'this person cannot receive this award because I say so'?"
Ms el Sayed said a review of the library's suite of awards wasn't necessary.
"What I'm concerned about is, what's it going to find out, what's it going to uncover? Is it going to introduce more power for these ministers?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
39 minutes ago
- ABC News
As the 2026 state election nears, who will run for the SA Liberal Party?
It's only 37 weeks until South Australians head to the polls. While plenty of voters are not paying attention at this stage, the major parties are preparing for political combat – preselecting candidates, devising campaign strategies and doorknocking in key seats. But cooking up an election winning campaign is a much easier task for the Labor Party right now. The Malinauskas Government's stock continues to rise despite major questions over whether it has met its key election promises. And two by-election victories last year have given Labor a commanding 28 Lower House seats compared to the Liberal Party's 13. The government is already looking for more, with Premier Peter Malinauskas last month announcing candidates for four Liberal-held seats – Morphett, Colton, Heysen and Unley – on top of existing targets Morialta and Ngadjuri (formerly Frome). Meanwhile, the state Liberals have just watched their federal counterparts get voted out of metropolitan Adelaide, leaving them with just two MPs in Canberra. Compounding matters was a YouGov poll published last week showing the SA Liberals could suffer a similar fate. The shocking, but not surprising, survey had the Malinauskas government on a 67 to 33 per cent two-party-preferred lead. If replicated on election day, that would leave the Liberals with just two seats in state parliament. With that sort of doom and gloom on the horizon, who would want to run for the Liberal Party right now? Frank Pangallo, apparently. Channel 7 reported on Monday that Mr Pangallo – a former Today Tonight journalist who was elected to the upper house in 2018 under Nick Xenophon's SA-Best ticket – was poised to join the Liberal Party for a tilt at the Adelaide Hills seat of Waite. Mr Pangallo told the ABC on Tuesday that he was yet to decide his next move and still has 'several options' in front of him, while Liberal Party state director Alex Hyde said the party is 'open to those who share our centre-right values'. With his term in the upper house expiring in 2026, it's unsurprising that Mr Pangallo would be seeking a political lifeboat – SA-Best garnered just one per cent of the statewide vote in 2022, below even the Animal Justice and Legalise Cannabis parties. Mr Pangallo left SA-Best in 2023 to stand as an independent, citing differences with party colleague Connie Bonaros. "I have so much more I want to achieve and get done," he said on Tuesday. "As such, I am considering a range of options that will give me the best opportunity to continue to serve all South Australians." But it is questionable whether Waite is where Mr Pangallo will find a political safe haven. First-term Labor MP Catherine Hutchesson holds the seat on a margin of around four per cent – not easy to overturn even when the political wind is behind you. One person who knows a lot about Waite – and switching parties – is Martin Hamilton-Smith. The one-time Liberal leader represented the seat from 1997 to 2018 and shocked the South Australian political world with his defection to the Weatherill government in 2014. Asked about Mr Pangallo's mooted switch to the lower house, Mr Hamilton-Smith said the electorate would be after a 'strong local community member' who would 'bring new life into the party'. 'So, it'll be interesting if the Liberal Party choose to run an existing politician in a seat like Waite,' he said. 'And also, transfers from the upper house to the lower house are notoriously difficult. Mr Hamilton-Smith is also no stranger to the challenge of preselecting candidates. He said ahead of the 2010 election, he interviewed 10 people to run for the Liberal Party – all of whom turned him down. Speaking about Opposition leader Vincent Tarzia, Mr Hamilton-Smith said: 'I don't envy his job." 'It'd be very tough at the moment trying to find candidates that are fresh, new, talented, capable, strong community advocates,' he said. 'You're asking people to give up their jobs and dedicate three to six months to campaigning, put themselves out there in the Liberal guernsey [and] do a lot of hard work with little prospect of winning.' Liberal insiders can, however, point to a number of candidates it has locked in for marginal seats next year. The party has preselected candidates for several seats it has lost to Labor over the last three years, including Dunstan, Gibson, King, Davenport, Newland, Adelaide and Elder. It's also selected replacements for David Pisoni in Unley and John Gardner in Morialta – two seats that are now high on Labor's target list given the absence of an incumbent. But the Liberals were hit with a curveball last month when frontbencher Matt Cowdrey announced he would not be running for re-election in 2026. That has thrown open a Liberal preselection contest for his coastal seat of Colton, potentially making it more vulnerable to Labor. The Liberal Party is also yet to preselect a candidate for former leader David Speirs's seat of Black after last year's disastrous by-election loss. While attention turned to Waite this week, another seat will loom large over the coming months. Labor insiders say their next preselection cab off the rank is the Opposition leader's seat of Hartley. Mr Tarzia holds the north-eastern suburbs electorate on a margin of around 3.6 per cent and is considered by both sides of parliament to be a strong local member. Ironically, he held onto the seat in 2018 in the face of a challenge from Mr Pangallo's former leader, Nick Xenophon. While defeating the Opposition leader will be no easy feat, one Labor source said there would be 'tactical value' in keeping the leader occupied with his own electorate rather than the Liberal Party's campaign. The political chess match has 37 weeks left to run.
ABC News
39 minutes ago
- ABC News
Russia-backed fund Pravfond that bankrolled 'Aussie Cossack' sanctioned by Australia over anti-Ukraine propaganda
A Russian-backed organisation that has bankrolled the legal defence of alleged spies and criminals has been sanctioned by the federal government just weeks after an investigation detailed its support for Australia's most prominent pro-Putin propagandist. The joint investigation between the ABC and the Organised Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) revealed the organisation, Pravfond, had paid the legal bills of Simeon Boikov, also known as "Aussie Cossack", and successfully lobbied for him to be granted Russian citizenship. The sanctioning of Pravfond means Australian individuals and entities will no longer be able to make assets available to or for the benefit of Pravfond, and any assets held on behalf of or controlled by Pravfond must be frozen. Australian financial authorities must also closely scrutinise its transactions. Formally known as "Foundation to Support and Defend the Rights of Compatriots Living Abroad", Pravfond was founded in 2012 with the stated goal of defending the rights of expat Russians, primarily by offering assistance if they get into legal trouble. Previous reporting has indicated that it has helped pay for the legal defence of notorious Russian arms dealer Viktor Bout and hit man Vadim Krasikov, who murdered a Chechen militant in Berlin in 2019. Several top Pravfond figures, including its deputy director, Vladimir Pozdorovkin, have been identified as former Russian intelligence officers. The joint investigation drew on a cache of 50,000 internal emails to reveal Pravfond's support for Boikov, who had been hiding from authorities in the Russian consulate in Sydney since December 2022 after he assaulted a pro-Ukraine protester. The emails detail how Boikov's Sydney-based wife applied for at least three rounds of legal aid from Pravfond and the organisation helped him at least once, paying thousands of dollars in legal fees to his Sydney solicitors. They also showed Pravfond successfully pushed for Boikov's Russian citizenship — publicly confirmed in a 2023 decree from President Vladimir Putin. Asked why, given Pravfond's alleged intelligence ties and prior support of the likes of Viktor Bout and Vadim Krasikov, he thought it was appropriate to apply for funding, Boikov said he was unaware of these facts. "I didn't know about this fund … but even if I knew, even if I knew [them], I had no problems, because I think they're all heroes. They're my compatriots. "I think Viktor Bout's a great guy … he's fantastic. He's a patriot. I'm a patriot." From inside the consulate, Boikov regularly broadcasts pro-Russian propaganda, including support for Russia's war in Ukraine, via the Telegram app, where he has tens of thousands of subscribers. Last week, the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) announced Pravfond had been added to its list of sanctioned individuals and entities. A spokesperson for the department told the ABC that Pravfond "has been identified as supporting individuals and entities attempting to influence public opinion abroad, including in relation to Russia's illegal and immoral invasion of Ukraine". "Australia has now imposed more than 1,500 sanctions in response to Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine," the spokesperson said. "We will continue to maintain pressure on Russia for its malign actions. "Australia has been clear that those enabling Russia's illegal invasion will face consequences." A spokesperson for the Russian embassy in Australia referred the ABC to comments by the spokeswoman for the Russian foreign ministry, Maria Zakharova, after the investigation into Pravfond was published in May. Based on the cache of internal emails, the OCCRP published stories about Pravfond with 28 media partners, including the ABC. Ms Zakharova said at the time that the reports were "fake stories" and that Pravfond was "a purely human rights structure" that had gotten "in the hair of hateful Russophobes". "This organisation, that really helps Russians protect their legal rights abroad, is currently the target of a deluge of slander and outright disinformation," she said. A Pravfond spokesperson said it "categorically reject[ed] the allegations and designations imposed by the Australian authorities". "The Foundation's mission is solely humanitarian — to protect the rights of Russian compatriots abroad in accordance with international law," it said in a statement. The spokesperson said support for Boikov was provided "at the request of his family and exclusively on a humanitarian basis", and the fund "has no organisational or financial ties to any state or intelligence agencies". No system is 100 per cent secure, but ProtonMail can be used to protect your identity by using end-to-end encryption. Please read the terms and conditions to work out the best method of communication for you.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Macquarie Point AFL stadium issue a vote changer, YouSay polling reveals ahead of Tasmanian state election
For Tasmanians, the proposed Macquarie Point stadium is likely to play at least some role in who they vote for at the upcoming state election. According to ABC YourSay data, the stadium remains the hot-button issue. And of more than 1,000 respondents across the first two weeks of the campaign, the vast majority referenced the stadium as a key issue — or at least something they are thinking about ahead of polling day. So, what are Tasmanians telling the ABC when it comes to the stadium? And could the stadium act as a vote changer for Tasmanians? First-time state Greens candidate Vanessa Bleyer, who is running in the north-west seat of Braddon, believes so. "Nine out of ten people in Braddon are raising the stadium to me very quickly as a core issue to them in their state election," she said. "At least half of the people I've spoken to who are opposed to funding a billion-dollar stadium in Hobart are changing their vote to oppose that funding." Ms Bleyer's experience has been reflected in a number of YourSay responses. Leanne in Devonport said she could flip her vote. Beatrice in Shearwater voted Labor at the May federal election, but could also swing to the Greens because of the stadium. "I would like to vote Labor as I'm pleased with federal Labor, but I can't if they're going ahead with the stadium. So, it's the Greens for me this time," she said. Ms Bleyer said she'd spoken to both Labor and Liberal voters who planned on changing their vote to oppose the stadium. Independent candidate Craig Garland, who is seeking re-election in Braddon, said he was being delivered a clear message by his constituents. "The amount of people emailing and stopping me in the street and telling me 'if you support the stadium, you haven't got my vote', it's quite clear it's the number one issue for them," he said. Among those in attendance at north-west football grounds, opinions were split. "I don't think it should be a cut-throat deal, no stadium no team," Melissa Bishop said, referring to the AFL's stipulation that without the roofed stadium at Macquarie Point, Tasmania does not get to enter a team into the national competition. But she said it wouldn't influence her vote. "It's definitely not at the top of my priorities," she said. "It'd be better off in Launceston. It'd be fairer for the rest of the state," Doug Rowlings from Devonport told the ABC. "People in Smithton aren't going to travel all the way to Hobart for a game of football, then travel home," he said. While not eligible to vote, Circular Head junior footballer Harvey Vanderlaan, aged 13, said he would like to see the stadium. Liberal candidate for Bass Rob Fairs, whose electorate takes in the northern city of Launceston, said the Devils AFL team was coming up regularly while he was doorknocking. "While people are taking the opportunity to hear about the benefits a stadium will bring them in the north, they know what's at stake and they are telling me they'll vote to save the dream," he said. Hamish in West Launceston told YourSay it was "critical" that a Jeremy Rockliff-led Liberal government was re-elected so that the stadium could be built. While David in Whitemark on Flinders Island said his vote would change. "At the next election, I will be voting for the Liberal party for the first time ever," he told YourSay. Lesley in Newstead, also in Bass, said they would be voting informally because of the stadium. "I cannot place a valid vote. Independent candidate for the southern seat of Franklin, David O'Byrne, who is also the president of the Southern Football League, believed the stadium would be a vote changer, but mostly for people who supported the proposal. "The people who are against the stadium are predominantly staying where they are, in my view," he said. He also said he believed it would mobilise the southern football community, given the timing of the election. "The election is in the middle of football season, and the biggest issue for a lot of sporting communities is the Devils and the stadium and what that brings. It's clear that without the stadium, you can't deliver a team and football clubs know that," he said. A number of Franklin voters said the stadium issue would force their vote to change. "I have voted Labor for almost 50 years but will not be voting for the Labor party this election," Chris in Howrah told YourSay. While Bernard, also of Howrah, could also swing towards the pro-stadium Liberals. "It's vitally important that the stadium goes ahead to the extent that I'm considering voting Liberal for the first time in my life," he said. A swing away from the Labor party, based on their pro-stadium stance, was a theme amongst YourSay respondents. Labor candidate for Clark Luke Martin, who has been doorknocking Hobart's northern suburbs, said the stadium was not a prominent issue among his potential constituents. "While a few people have raised the stadium, with a range of views, it's clear that most are focused on issues that affect their day-to-day lives, like health, housing, the cost of living and growing concerns about crime in Glenorchy." Older Tasmanians have so far been far more likely to respond to the survey, with about three-quarters of respondents between the ages of 60 and 69 years old. The stadium was a strong theme amongst this cohort, with 66 per cent of them specifically referencing the stadium as a key election issue. Of the 22 respondents who gave their age as being between 15 and 29, the stadium rated as only a lukewarm topic. Lachlan of Moonah wanted less focus on the stadium and more focus on "the Liberal government's lack of financial responsibility". James of New Norfolk said the state election wasn't a "stadium referendum" and health and housing should be the main focus for voters. Art student Dan did not want to see the stadium built, while other young people were more concerned about the closure of Ashley detention centre, public transport and a greater focus on LGBTIQ+ issues.
